Amendments to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court
Amendments to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court must be proposed, adopted, and ratified in accordance with articles 121 and 122 of the Statute. Any state party to the Statute can propose an amendment. The proposed amendment can be adopted by a two-thirds majority vote in either a meeting of the Assembly of States Parties or a review conference called by the Assembly. An amendment comes into force for all states parties one year after it is ratified by seven-eighths of the states parties.[1] However, any amendment to articles 5, 6, 7, or 8 of the Statute only enters into force for states parties that have ratified the amendment. A state party which ratifies an amendment to articles 5, 6, 7, or 8 is subject to that amendment one year after ratifying it, regardless of how many other states parties have also ratified it.[2] For an article 5, 6, 7, or 8 amendment, the Statute itself is amended after the amendment comes into force for the first state party to ratify it. Amendments of a purely institutional nature enter into force six months after they are approved by a two-thirds majority vote in either a meeting of the Assembly of States Parties or a review conference.[3]
Summary of adopted amendments to the Rome Statute
In June 2010, two amendments to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court were adopted by the Review Conference in Kampala, Uganda. The first amendment criminalizes the use of certain kinds of weapons in non-international conflicts whose use was already forbidden in international conflicts.[4] The second amendment defines the crime of aggression.[5] Per the language of that amendment, the Court will only have jurisdiction over the crime of aggression after two additional conditions are met: (1) the amendment has entered into force for 30 states parties and (2) on a date after 1 January 2017, the Assembly of States Parties has voted in favour of allowing the Court to exercise jurisdiction.[5] In November 2015, an additional amendment to remove article 124 from the Statute was adopted during the 14th meeting of the Assembly of States Parties in The Hague.[6]
Name | Adopted on | Ratified by | In force on | In force in[A] | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Amendment to article 8 | 10 June 2010 | 30 | 26 September 2012 | 24 | [7] |
Amendments on the crime of aggression | 11 June 2010 | 28 | 8 May 2013 | 23 | [8] |
Amendment to article 124 | 26 November 2015 | 0 | — | 0 | [9] |
Amendment to article 8 (2010)
Summary
An amendment to article 8 was adopted on 10 June 2010 at the Review Conference of the Rome Statute in Kampala, Uganda.[4] The amendment had originally been proposed by Belgium and it was forwarded to the Review Conference by the eighth session of the Assembly of States Parties.[10]
The amendment adds to article 8(2)(e) three clauses which make it a war crime to employ poison, "asphyxiating, poisonous or other gases, and all analogous liquids, materials or devices," or expanding bullets in an armed conflict not of an international character.[4] The Rome Statute already makes the use of such means of warfare a war crime in international armed conflicts.
States parties to the amendment
Because the amendment is to article 8, it will come into force only for those states parties which have ratified it, one year after doing so. Thus far, 30 states parties have ratified the document.[7] However, the Rome Statute itself was amended on 26 September 2012 after the amendment came into force for the first state party to ratify it. Since 26 September 2012, the amendment has been part of the Statute and any state that becomes a party to the Statute can choose to also be a party to the amendment.
State[7] | Ratified | Entry into force |
---|---|---|
Andorra | 26 September 2013 | 26 September 2014 |
Austria | 17 July 2014 | 17 July 2015 |
Belgium | 26 November 2013 | 26 November 2014 |
Botswana | 4 June 2013 | 4 June 2014 |
Costa Rica | 5 February 2015 | 5 February 2016 |
Croatia | 20 December 2013 | 20 December 2014 |
Cyprus | 25 September 2013 | 25 September 2014 |
Czech Republic | 12 March 2015 | 12 March 2016 |
El Salvador | 3 March 2016 | 3 March 2017 |
Estonia | 27 March 2013 | 27 March 2014 |
Finland | 30 December 2015 | 30 December 2016 |
Georgia | 3 November 2015 | 3 November 2016 |
Germany | 3 June 2013 | 3 June 2014 |
Latvia | 25 September 2014 | 25 September 2015 |
Liechtenstein | 8 May 2012 | 8 May 2013 |
Lithuania | 7 December 2015 | 7 December 2016 |
Luxembourg | 15 January 2013 | 15 January 2014 |
Macedonia, Republic of | 1 March 2016 | 1 March 2017 |
Malta | 30 January 2015 | 30 January 2016 |
Mauritius | 5 September 2013 | 5 September 2014 |
Norway | 10 June 2013 | 10 June 2014 |
Poland | 25 September 2014 | 25 September 2015 |
Samoa | 25 September 2012 | 25 September 2013 |
San Marino | 26 September 2011 | 26 September 2012 |
Slovakia | 28 April 2014 | 28 April 2015 |
Slovenia | 25 September 2013 | 25 September 2014 |
Spain | 25 September 2014 | 25 September 2015 |
Switzerland | 10 September 2015 | 10 September 2016 |
Trinidad and Tobago | 13 November 2012 | 13 November 2013 |
Uruguay | 26 September 2013 | 26 September 2014 |
Amendments on the crime of aggression (2010)
Summary
Amendments on the crime of aggression were adopted on 11 June 2010 at the Review Conference of the Rome Statute in Kampala, Uganda.[5] The amendments were proposed by Liechtenstein, which chaired the Special Working Group on the Crime of Aggression, the committee directed by the Assembly of States Parties to form a definition for the crime of aggression, which was originally absent from the Statute.[11]
The amendments define the crime of aggression in accordance with United Nations General Assembly Resolution 3314. Acts of aggression are: invading another state; bombing another state; blockading the ports or coastlines of another state; attacking the land, sea, or air forces, or marine or sea fleets of another state; violating a status of forces agreement; using armed bands, groups, irregulars or mercenaries against another state; allowing territory to be used by another state to perpetrate an act of aggression against a third state.[5]
While the amendments will come into force one year after being ratified, the amended text says that only crimes of aggression committed one year or more after the thirtieth ratification are within the jurisdiction of the Court. Furthermore, a decision is to be taken by the Assembly of States Parties with a two-thirds majority vote after 1 January 2017 to actually exercise jurisdiction.[5]
While upon a United Nations Security Council referral the Prosecutor can open an investigation against the national of any state, this is not the case with state referral and proprio motu investigations by the Prosecutor. A state party can opt out of these amendments, and nationals of non-states parties are not subject to the Court's jurisdiction. Additionally, the Prosecutor must wait for a determination of the Security Council regarding an act of aggression. If the Security Council determines an act of aggression has taken place, the Prosecutor may proceed. If the Security Council does not act within six months, the Prosecutor can proceed provided that a Pre-Trial Chamber approves that move. The Security Council keeps its right to defer investigations for a period of one year.[5]
States parties to the amendments
Thus far, 28 states parties have ratified the amendment.[8] Per the amendments, the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court may begin one year after the 30th ratification of the amendment but not before the Assembly of States Parties has approved the commencement of jurisdiction after 1 January 2017.
State[8] | Ratified | Entry into force |
---|---|---|
Andorra | 26 September 2013 | 26 September 2014 |
Austria | 17 July 2014 | 17 July 2015 |
Belgium | 26 November 2013 | 26 November 2014 |
Botswana | 4 June 2013 | 4 June 2014 |
Costa Rica | 5 February 2015 | 5 February 2016 |
Croatia | 20 December 2013 | 20 December 2014 |
Cyprus | 25 September 2013 | 25 September 2014 |
Czech Republic | 12 March 2015 | 12 March 2016 |
El Salvador | 3 March 2016 | 3 March 2017 |
Estonia | 27 March 2013 | 27 March 2014 |
Finland | 30 December 2015 | 30 December 2016 |
Georgia | 5 December 2014 | 5 December 2015 |
Germany | 3 June 2013 | 3 June 2014 |
Latvia | 25 September 2014 | 25 September 2015 |
Liechtenstein | 8 May 2012 | 8 May 2013 |
Lithuania | 7 December 2015 | 7 December 2016 |
Luxembourg | 15 January 2013 | 15 January 2014 |
Macedonia, Republic of | 1 March 2016 | 1 March 2017 |
Malta | 30 January 2015 | 30 January 2016 |
Poland | 25 September 2014 | 25 September 2015 |
Samoa | 25 September 2012 | 25 September 2013 |
San Marino | 14 November 2014 | 14 November 2015 |
Slovakia | 28 April 2014 | 28 April 2015 |
Slovenia | 25 September 2013 | 25 September 2014 |
Spain | 25 September 2014 | 25 September 2015 |
Switzerland | 10 September 2015 | 10 September 2016 |
Trinidad and Tobago | 13 November 2012 | 13 November 2013 |
Uruguay | 26 September 2013 | 26 September 2014 |
Amendment to article 124 (2015)
On 26 November 2015 during their 14th meeting, the Assembly of States Parties adopted the amendment to article 124 in The Hague in the Netherlands.[6] The amendment deletes article 124 from the Rome Statute.[6] Article 124 is a transitional provision, which allows a state, upon becoming party to the Statute, to declare that it does not accept the jurisdiction of the Court over war crimes committed in its territory or by its nationals for a period of seven years.[12] To date, no states have ratified the amendment.[9]
Proposed amendments
A number of amendments have been proposed by states parties, but have either not been considered or adopted by the Assembly:
- African Union states parties have proposed allowing a state party that has jurisdiction over a situation before the Court to ask the United Nations Security Council to defer the matter, or alternatively, if the Security Council fails to make a decision the state party can ask the United Nations General Assembly to defer the matter.[13]
- Belgium, along with Argentina, Bolivia, Burundi, Cambodia, Cyprus, Ireland, Latvia, Luxembourg, Mauritius, Mexico, Romania, Samoa, and Slovenia have proposed two amendments making it a war crime to use weapons prohibited by the Biological Weapons Convention, Chemical Weapons Convention, Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Convention, and the various protocols to the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons.[14][15]
- Kenya proposed several amendments, including making sitting heads of state immune from prosecution, subjecting ICC authorities to prosecution for crimes against the administration of justice, and granting the Independent Oversight Mechanism more authority.[16]
- Mexico has proposed making the use or threat of use of nuclear weapons a war crime.[13]
- The Netherlands has proposed adding terrorism as a prosecutable crime.[13]
- Norway has proposed establishing a mechanism for allowing international or regional organizations to play a role in the enforcement of sentences.[14]
- Trinidad and Tobago and Belize have proposed adding international drug trafficking as a prosecutable crime.[13]
Notes
- A An amendment to articles 5, 6, 7, or 8 of the Statute only enters into force for states parties that have ratified the amendment.
References
- ↑ Articles 121(3), (4), and (6) of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.
- ↑ Article 121(5) of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.
- ↑ Article 122(2) of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.
- 1 2 3 "Resolution RC/Res.5: Amendments to article 8 of the Rome Statute" (PDF). International Criminal Court. 2010-06-10. Retrieved 2011-03-13.
- 1 2 3 4 5 6 "Resolution RC/Res.6: The crime of aggression" (PDF). International Criminal Court. 2010-06-10. Retrieved 2011-03-13.
- 1 2 3 "Resolution ICC-ASP/14/Res.2: Amendment to article 124 of the Rome Statute" (PDF). International Criminal Court. 2015-11-26. Retrieved 2015-12-08.
- 1 2 3 "Chapter XVIII, Penal Matters 10.a: Amendment to article 8 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court". United Nations Treaty Collections. 2015-12-08. Retrieved 2015-12-08.
- 1 2 3 "Chapter XVIII, Penal Matters 10.b: Amendments on the crime of aggression to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court". United Nations Treaty Collection. 2015-12-08. Retrieved 2015-12-08.
- 1 2 "Chapter XVIII, Penal Matters 10.c: Amendment to article 124 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court". United Nations Treaty Collection. 2016-01-22. Retrieved 2016-01-22.
- ↑ "Annex VIII: Elements of crimes corresponding to the proposed amendment contained in annex III to resolution ICC-ASP/8/Res.6" (PDF). International Criminal Court. Retrieved 2011-03-13.
- ↑ "ICC-ASP/8/20: Annex II – Liechtenstein: Proposals for a provision on aggression" (PDF). International Criminal Court. Retrieved 2011-03-13.
- ↑ Article 124 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.
- 1 2 3 4 "ICC-ASP-NL-03/10-En: ASP Special Edition Newsletter #3" (PDF). International Criminal Court. 2010-01-19. Retrieved 2011-03-16.
- 1 2 "ICC-ASP-NL-02.b/09-En: ASP Special Edition Newsletter #2" (PDF). International Criminal Court. 2000-12-17. Retrieved 2011-03-16.
- ↑ "ICC-ASP/10/32: Report on the Working Group on Amendments" (PDF). International Criminal Court. 2011-12-09. Retrieved 2011-12-15.
- ↑ Masau, Nzau and Gideon Keter (2013-11-18). "9 AU countries threaten bid to amend ICC regulations". The Star (Nairobi). Retrieved 2013-11-29.
|