Arab–Byzantine prisoner exchanges

During the course of the Arab–Byzantine wars, exchanges of prisoners of war became a regular feature of the relations between the two powers, beginning in the late 8th century and continuing until the mid-10th century.

Background

Centuries of war between the Byzantine Empire and the Arab Caliphate had led to degree of a mutual understanding, respect, and a regular pattern of diplomatic and cultural exchanges between the two powers.[1] This is evidenced for instance in the protocols for the imperial receptions at the Byzantine court, where the "Eastern Muslims" are accorded the first place immediately after any ecclesiastical officials, enjoying precedence over the Bulgarians or the Franks,[2] but also by the humane treatment of prisoners of war by both sides. On the Byzantine side, Arab prisoners were usually paraded in triumphal processions but otherwise generally well treated. Senior figures were state prisoners and honoured guests for the duration of their captivity, being regularly invited to attend races at the Hippodrome or imperial banquets at the Great Palace and given gifts as part of imperial ceremonies.[3] The rank and file on the other hand were usually sold off as slaves or kept in prison until they were ransomed or exchanged. Most were employed as labour force, and although some might be induced to convert to Christianity, in which case they were given lands to settle, otherwise they enjoyed the freedom to worship at mosques of their own. Al-Muqaddasi noted that although the Arab captives were made to work as slaves, they could earn money, and that the Byzantines "do not force any of them to eat pork, and they do not slit their noses or their tongues".[4][5]

Both sides also engaged in regular exchanges of prisoners (ἀλλάγια, allagia, in Greek; fidāʾ, pl. afdiya, in Arabic), which took place on the river Lamos (mod. Limonlu Çayı) in Cilicia, on the border between Byzantium and the Caliphate.[6][7] A truce was arranged beforehand, and both sides met on the river. The exchange was made man for man, as illustrated by al-Tabari in his report of the 845 exchange: Two bridges were built over the river, one for the prisoners of each side. Each side released one prisoner, who walked across the bridge towards his co-religionists, simultaneously with his counterpart. After the exchange was complete, the surplus prisoners were either ransomed for money or exchanged for slaves.[6][8]

Prisoner exchanges

Year Details
769 Mentioned only by Theophanes the Confessor.[9]
797 Mentioned only by al-Mas'udi.[9]
805 Mentioned by al-Mas'udi and al-Tabari. It was the first to take place on the Lamos, and was supervised by the Arab eunuch Abu Sulayman. It lasted 12 days, and 3,700 prisoners were exchanged.[7][9][10]
808 Mentioned by al-Mas'udi and al-Tabari as the "fidāʾ Thābit b. Naṣr", after the man who supervised it on the Arab side. It lasted 7 days, and 2,500 prisoners were exchanged.[7][9][11]
810 Mentioned only by al-Mas'udi.[9]
816 Mentioned only by al-Mas'udi.[9]
Sep. 845 Mentioned by several Muslim sources ("fidāʾ Khāḳān"), according to which the Byzantines had many more prisoners than the Muslims, forcing Caliph al-Wathiq to cover the balance by purchasing slaves from the markets of Baghdad and ar-Raqqah, and even by liberating slave women from his own household. The Muslim prisoners were questioned by an emissary of the chief qadi on their opinion on Quranic createdness, allowing only those who supported it to be exchanged. The exchange lasted 10 days. Al-Tabari records that the Muslims recovered 4,600 prisoners, of whom 600 women and 500 dhimmis, while Ibn al-Athir gives the respective numbers as 4,460, 800 and 100.[7][12]
Feb./Mar. 856 The "fidāʾ Shunayf" of the Muslim sources, it lasted 7 days. Al-Tabari reports that in total, the Byzantines held 20,000 Muslim prisoners, of whom the Muslims recovered 789 men and 125 women. Al-Mas'udi on the other hand gives the figure as 2,200 men or 2,000 men and 100 women.[7][12]
Apr./May 860 The "fidāʾ Naṣr b. al-Azhar waʿAlī b. Yaḥyā". According to al-Mas'udi, 2,367 Muslim prisoners, both men and women, were exchanged in 7 days.[7][12]
861/2 Mentioned only by al-Mas'udi.[12]
867 Mentioned only by al-Mas'udi.[12]
872 Mentioned only by al-Mas'udi.[12]
Sep./Oct. 896 The "fidāʾ Ibn Ṭughān". According to al-Tabari and Sibt ibn al-Jawzi, the Muslims recovered 2,504 prisoners, men, women and children, over 10 days, while Mas'udi variously gives a total of 2,495 prisoners or 3,000 men.[7][12]
Sep. 905 Supervised by Rustam ibn Baradu, the exchange was interrupted after 1,154 or 1,155 Muslim prisoners had been exchanged, according to al-Mas'udi, because the Byzantines reneged on the agreed terms. Hence known as the "ransom of treachery" (fidāʾ al-ghadr) in the Arab sources.[7][12]
July 908 After a two-year diplomatic mission by the Byzantine envoy Leo Choirosphaktes, the exchange resumed in 908, hence it was named "ransom of completion" (fidāʾ al-tamām). Again under the supervision of Rustam ibn Baradu, the Muslims recovered 2,842 further prisoners according to al-Mas'udi (al-Tabari gives "about 3,000").[7][13]
Sep./Oct. 917 The exchange ("fidāʾ Muʾnis") was preceded by a Byzantine embassy under John Rhadenos to Baghdad. 5,500 prisoners were exchanged according to Ibn al-Jawzi, 3,336 over 8 days according to al-Mas'udi.[7][14]
Sep./Oct. 925 The "fidāʾ Mufliḥ". According to al-Mas'udi, 3,983 Muslims were exchanged over 19 days, while al-Maqrizi gives 3,933.[7][14]
Oct. 938 The "fidāʾ Ibn Warḳāʾ". The negotiations on the Muslim side were handled by the autonomous ruler of Egypt, al-Ikhshid. More than 6,300 people were exchanged over 16 days, but the Byzantines still held 800 more prisoners than the Muslims, and the truce was extended for six months to allow the remaining captives to be ransomed for money in smaller batches.[7][14]
Oct. 946 The last exchange to take place at the Lamos. 2,482 prisoners, men and women, were exchanged, with the remaining 230 Muslim prisoners held by the Byzantines ransomed with 80,000 gold dinars, paid partly by the Hamdanid Emir of Aleppo, Sayf al-Dawla, and partly by the Ikhshidids. The exchange was supervised by Nasr al-Thamali on behalf of Sayf al-Dawla, whence the exchange is also known as "fidāʾ Ibn Ḥamdān".[7][15]
953 Small exchange which took place in Alexandria, involving 60 Muslim prisoners.[16]
954 The Byzantines sent an embassy to Sayf al-Dawla to negotiate a prisoner exchange.[16]
966 The exchange took place on 23 June between Sayf al-Dawla and Emperor Nikephoros II Phokas at Samosata, following the conquest of Cilicia under Phokas in the previous years. The Byzantines held more than 3,000 prisoners, which Sayf al-Dawla promised to ransom at 270 dinars each. However, he ran out of money after 240,000 dinars had been paid, and was forced to ransom the rest by handing over a valuable cuirass and a hostage from the grandees of his court. Among the exchanged prisoners was Sayf al-Dawla's cousin and celebrated poet, Abu Firas.[7][16]
969 The exchange took place between the Byzantines and the Fatimid Caliphate, after both powers had partitioned Syria between them.[16]

What is notable in the numbers reported for the exchanges, according to Arnold Toynbee, is that even in 845, before the Byzantines gained the upper hand in the Battle of Lalakaon (863), they held more prisoners than the Arabs, despite the wholesale capture and deportation of Byzantine subjects in events like the Sack of Amorion in 838. According to Toynbee, this attests to the efficiency of the Byzantine military's strategy of "dogging and pouncing" the Muslim armies that raided Asia Minor.[17]

References

  1. ↑ Toynbee 1973, pp. 382–383, 388–390.
  2. ↑ Toynbee 1973, p. 383.
  3. ↑ Toynbee 1973, pp. 384–385.
  4. ↑ Toynbee 1973, pp. 385–386.
  5. ↑ Cappel, Cutler & Kazhdan 1991, pp. 1722–1723.
  6. 1 2 Oikonomides 1991, p. 1722.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Huart 1986, p. 647.
  8. ↑ Toynbee 1973, p. 388.
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Toynbee 1973, p. 390.
  10. ↑ Al-Mas'udi 1896, pp. 255-256.
  11. ↑ Al-Mas'udi 1896, pp. 256-257.
  12. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Toynbee 1973, p. 391.
  13. ↑ Toynbee 1973, pp. 391–392.
  14. 1 2 3 Toynbee 1973, p. 392.
  15. ↑ Toynbee 1973, pp. 392–393.
  16. 1 2 3 4 Toynbee 1973, p. 393.
  17. ↑ Toynbee 1973, pp. 388–389.

Sources

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Friday, November 06, 2015. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.