Broadrick v. Oklahoma
| Broadrick v. Oklahoma | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| Argued Monday March 26, 1973 Decided Monday June 25, 1973 | |||||||
| Full case name | Broadrick v. Oklahoma | ||||||
| Citations | |||||||
| Prior history | Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma | ||||||
| Holding | |||||||
| The Oklahoma statute is not overly broad; the State of Oklahoma has the power to regulate partisan political activities | |||||||
| Court membership | |||||||
| |||||||
| Case opinions | |||||||
| Majority | White, joined by Burger, Blackmum, Powell, Rehnquist | ||||||
| Dissent | Brennan, joined by Stewart, Marshall | ||||||
| Dissent | Douglas | ||||||
| Laws applied | |||||||
| First Amendment to the United States Constitution | |||||||
Broadrick v. Oklahoma, 413 U.S. 601 (1973) is a United States Supreme Court decision upholding an Oklahoma statute which prohibited state employees from engaging in partisan political activities. Broadrick is often cited to enunciate the test for a facial overbreadth challenge, that "the overbreadth of a statute must not only be real, but substantial as well, judged in relation to the statute's plainly legitimate sweep."
External links
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Friday, January 30, 2015. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.
