Comparison of cryptographic hash functions
The following tables compare general and technical information for a number of cryptographic hash functions.[1] An overview of hash function security/cryptanalysis can be found at hash function security summary.
General information
Basic general information about the cryptographic hash functions: year, designer, references, etc.
Function | Year[gi 1] | Designer | Derived from | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
HAVAL | 1992 | Yuliang Zheng Josef Pieprzyk Jennifer Seberry |
Website | |
MD2 | 1989 | Ronald Rivest | RFC 1319 | |
MD4 | 1990 | RFC 1320 | ||
MD5 | 1992 | MD4 RFC 1321 page 1 |
RFC 1321 | |
MD6 | 2008 | md6_report.pdf | ||
RIPEMD | 1990 | The RIPE Consortium | MD4 | |
RIPEMD-128 RIPEMD-256 RIPEMD-160 RIPEMD-320 |
1996 | Hans Dobbertin Antoon Bosselaers Bart Preneel |
RIPEMD | Website |
SHA-0 | 1993 | NSA | SHA-0 | |
SHA-1 | 1995 | SHA-0 | ||
SHA-256 SHA-512 SHA-384 |
2002 | |||
SHA-224 | 2004 | |||
GOST R 34.11-94 | 1994 | FAPSI and VNIIstandart | GOST 28147-89 | RFC 5831, RFC 4357 |
Tiger | 1995 | Ross Anderson Eli Biham |
Website | |
Whirlpool | 2004 | Vincent Rijmen Paulo Barreto |
Website | |
BLAKE | 2008 | Jean-Philippe Aumasson Luca Henzen Willi Meier Raphael C.-W. Phan |
ChaCha20 | Website |
SHA-3 (Keccak) | 2008[2] | Guido Bertoni Joan Daemen Michaël Peeters Gilles Van Assche |
Website | |
BLAKE2 | 2012 | Jean-Philippe Aumasson Samuel Neves Zooko_Wilcox-O'Hearn Christian Winnerlein |
BLAKE | Website |
Notes
- ↑ It refers to the first official description of the algorithm, not designed date.
Parameters
Algorithm | Output size (bits) | Internal state size[p 1] | Block size | Length size | Word size | Rounds |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOST | 256 | 256 | 256 | 256 | 32 | 32 |
HAVAL | 256/224/192/160/128 | 256 | 1,024 | 64 | 32 | 3/4/5 |
MD2 | 128 | 384 | 128 | - | 32 | 18 |
MD4 | 128 | 128 | 512 | 64 | 32 | 3 |
MD5 | 128 | 128 | 512 | 64 | 32 | 64 |
PANAMA | 256 | 8,736 | 256 | - | 32 | - |
RadioGatún | Up to 608/1,216 (19 words) | 58 words | 3 words | - | 1–64 | - |
RIPEMD | 128 | 128 | 512 | 64 | 32 | 48 |
RIPEMD-128/256 | 128/256 | 128/256 | 512 | 64 | 32 | 64 |
RIPEMD-160 | 160 | 160 | 512 | 64 | 32 | 80 |
RIPEMD-320 | 320 | 320 | 512 | 64 | 32 | 80 |
SHA-0 | 160 | 160 | 512 | 64 | 32 | 80 |
SHA-1 | 160 | 160 | 512 | 64 | 32 | 80 |
SHA-224, SHA-256 | 224/256 | 256 | 512 | 64 | 32 | 64 |
SHA-384, SHA-512, SHA-512/224, SHA-512/256 | 384/512/224/256 | 512 | 1,024 | 128 | 64 | 80 |
SHA-3 | 224/256/384/512[p 2] | 1600 | 1600-2*bits | - | 64 | 24 |
SHA3-224 | 224 | 1600 | 1152 | - | 64 | 24 |
SHA3-256 | 256 | 1600 | 1088 | - | 64 | 24 |
SHA3-384 | 384 | 1600 | 832 | - | 64 | 24 |
SHA3-512 | 512 | 1600 | 576 | - | 64 | 24 |
Tiger(2)-192/160/128 | 192/160/128 | 192 | 512 | 64 | 64 | 24 |
WHIRLPOOL | 512 | 512 | 512 | 256 | 8 | 10 |
BLAKE2b | 512 | 1024 | 512 | - | 64 | 12 |
BLAKE2s | 256 | 512 | 256 | - | 32 | 10 |
Notes
- ↑ The internal state here means the "internal hash sum" after each compression of a data block. Most hash algorithms also internally use some additional variables such as length of the data compressed so far since that is needed for the length padding in the end. See the Merkle-Damgård construction for details.
- ↑ Although the underlying algorithm Keccak has arbitrary hash lengths, the NIST specified 224, 256, 384 and 512 bits output as valid modes for SHA-3.
Compression function
The following tables compare technical information for compression functions of cryptographic hash functions. The information comes from the specifications, please refer to them for more details.
Function | Size (bits)[cf 1] | Words × Passes = Rounds[cf 2] |
Operations[cf 3] | Endian[cf 4] | Specification | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Word | Digest | Chaining values[cf 5] |
Computation values[cf 6] |
Block | Length [cf 7] | |||||
HAVAL-3-128 | 32 | ×4 = 128 | ×8 = 256 | ×32 = 1,024 | 64 | 32 × 3 = 96 | A B S | Little | HAVAL | |
HAVAL-3-160 | ×5 = 160 | |||||||||
HAVAL-3-192 | ×6 = 192 | |||||||||
HAVAL-3-224 | ×7 = 224 | |||||||||
HAVAL-3-256 | ×8 = 256 | |||||||||
HAVAL-4-128 | ×4 = 128 | 32 × 4 = 128 | ||||||||
HAVAL-4-160 | ×5 = 160 | |||||||||
HAVAL-4-192 | ×6 = 192 | |||||||||
HAVAL-4-224 | ×7 = 224 | |||||||||
HAVAL-4-256 | ×8 = 256 | |||||||||
HAVAL-5-128 | ×4 = 128 | 32 × 5 = 160 | ||||||||
HAVAL-5-160 | ×5 = 160 | |||||||||
HAVAL-5-192 | ×6 = 192 | |||||||||
HAVAL-5-224 | ×7 = 224 | |||||||||
HAVAL-5-256 | ×8 = 256 | |||||||||
MD2 | 8 | ×16 = 128 | ×32 = 256 | ×48 = 384 | ×16 = 128 | None | 48 × 18 = 864 | B | N/A | RFC 1319 |
MD4 | 32 | ×4 = 128 | ×16 = 512 | 64 | 16 × 3 = 48 | A B S | Little | RFC 1320 | ||
MD5 | 16 × 4 = 64 | RFC 1321 | ||||||||
RIPEMD | 32 | ×4 = 128 | ×8 = 256 | ×16 = 512 | 64 | 16 × 3 = 48 | A B S | Little | ||
RIPEMD-128 | 16 × 4 = 64 | RIPEMD-160[3] | ||||||||
RIPEMD-256 | ×8 = 256 | |||||||||
RIPEMD-160 | ×5 = 160 | ×10 = 320 | 16 × 5 = 80 | |||||||
RIPEMD-320 | ×10 = 320 | |||||||||
SHA-0 | 32 | ×5 = 160 | ×16 = 512 | 64 | 16 × 5 = 80 | A B S | Big | |||
SHA-1 | FIPS 180--3 | |||||||||
SHA-256 | ×8 = 256 | ×8 = 256 | 16 × 4 = 64 | |||||||
SHA-224 | ×7 = 224 | |||||||||
SHA-512 | 64 | ×8 = 512 | ×8 = 512 | ×16 = 1024 | 128 | 16 × 5 = 80 | ||||
SHA-384 | ×6 = 384 | |||||||||
GOST R 34.11-94 | 32 | ×8 = 256 | ×8 = 256 | 32 | 4 | A B L S | Little | RFC 5831 | ||
Tiger-192 | 64 | ×3 = 192 | ×3 = 192 | ×8 = 512 | 64 | 8 × 3 = 24 | A B L S | Not Specified | Tiger | |
Tiger-160 | ×2.5=160 | |||||||||
Tiger-128 | ×2 = 128 |
Notes
- ↑ The omitted multiplicands are word sizes.
- ↑ Some authors interchange passes and rounds.
- ↑ A: addition, subtraction; B: bitwise operation; L: lookup table; S: shift, rotation.
- ↑ It refers to byte endianness only. If the operations consist of bitwise operations and lookup tables only, the endianness is irrelevant.
- ↑ The size of message digest equals to the size of chaining values usually. In truncated versions of certain cryptographic hash functions such as SHA-384, the former is less than the latter.
- ↑ The size of chaining values equals to the size of computation values usually. In certain cryptographic hash functions such as RIPEMD-160, the former is less than the latter because RIPEMD-160 use two sets of parallel computaion values and then combine into a single set of chaining values.
- ↑ The maximum input size = 2length size − 1 bits. For example, the maximum input size of SHA-1 = 264 − 1 bits.
See also
References
- ↑ See the individual functions' articles for further information. This article is not all-inclusive or necessarily up-to-date.
- ↑ Bertoni, Guido; Daemen, Joan; Peeters, Michael; Assche, Gilles Van (Oct 2008), Keccak sponge function family main document (PDF), 1.0, retrieved 2013-07-30
- ↑ Dobbertin, Hans; Bosselaers, Antoon; Preneel, Bart (1996-04-18), RIPEMD-160: A Strengthened Version of RIPEMD (PDF), retrieved 2010-02-16
External links
- The Hash Function Lounge - A list of hash functions and known attacks, by Paulo Barreto
- The eHash Main Page - A wiki for cryptographic hash functions
- The NIST Hash Competition Main Page - The competition to become SHA-3
|
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Monday, April 25, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.