Constitutional Court of South Africa

Constitutional Court

Constitutional Court building
Established 1994
Country South Africa
Location Constitution Hill, Johannesburg
Coordinates 26°11′19″S 28°2′36″E / 26.18861°S 28.04333°E / -26.18861; 28.04333Coordinates: 26°11′19″S 28°2′36″E / 26.18861°S 28.04333°E / -26.18861; 28.04333
Composition method Presidential appointment, after consultation
Authorized by Constitution of South Africa
Judge term length non-renewable 12 years (extendable by Parliament)
Number of positions 11
Website www.constitutionalcourt.org.za
Chief Justice of South Africa
Currently Mogoeng Mogoeng
Since 8 September 2011
Deputy Chief Justice of South Africa
Currently Dikgang Moseneke
Since 1 June 2005

The Constitutional Court of South Africa is a supreme constitutional court established by the Constitution of South Africa. It was originally the final appellate court for constitutional matters. Since the enactment of the Superior Courts Act in 2013, the Constitutional Court has jurisdiction to hear any matter if it is in the interests of justice for it to do so.

The court was first established by the Interim Constitution of 1993, and its first session began in February 1995.[1] It has continued in existence under the Constitution of 1996. The court sits in the city of Johannesburg; since February 2004 it has occupied a purpose-built complex on Constitution Hill.

The Constitutional Court consists of eleven judges who are appointed by the President of South Africa from a list drawn up by the Judicial Service Commission. The judges serve for a term of twelve years. The court is headed by the Chief Justice of South Africa and the Deputy Chief Justice. The Constitution requires that a matter before the Court be heard by at least eight judges. In practice, all eleven judges hear almost every case. Decisions are reached by a majority and written reasons are given.

Justices

Appointment procedure and tenure

Sections 174 to 178 of the Constitution deal with the appointment of judicial officers.[2] Judges may not be members of Parliament, of the government or of political parties. To select judges the Judicial Service Commission first draws up a list of candidates which list must have three or more names than the number of vacancies. The Commission does this after calling for nominations and holding public interviews. Then the President, after consultation with the Chief Justice and the leaders of political parties represented in the National Assembly, chooses the judges from this selection.

In terms section 176(1) of the Constitution, judges of the Constitutional Court serve for a non-renewable term of 12 years or until they reach the age of 70, whichever is earlier; but these limits may be extended by an Act of Parliament. Section 4 of the Judges Remuneration and Conditions of Employment Act 47 of 2001 has extended the term limit to an effective term of 15 years including prior service on other courts: the effect is that judges who had served more than 3 years before their appointment to the Constitutional Court retain a 12-year term limit; those who did not have a longer tenure. The same section extends the retirement age to 75. However, in terms of section 3(2)(b), if the judge has already been a judge (in any court) for 15 years by the time she reaches the age of 65, she may voluntarily retire.

Current justices

Name Born Appt. by Age at appt. First day /
Length of service
Mand. retirement Opt. retirement Previous positions Succeeded

Mogoeng, MogoengMogoeng Mogoeng

(Chief Justice)

14 January 1961
(age 55)
in Zeerust, North West
Zuma, JacobJacob Zuma 50 1 November 2009
6 years, 6 months
1 November 2021 N/A North West High Court Sandile Ngcobo

Moseneke, DikgangDikgang Moseneke

(Deputy Chief Justice)

20 December 1947
(age 68)
in Pretoria, Gauteng
Mbeki, ThaboThabo Mbeki 64 29 November 2002
13 years, 5 months
November 2016 N/A North Gauteng High Court Ismail Mahomed

Cameron, EdwinEdwin Cameron

15 February 1953
(age 63)
in Pretoria, Gauteng
Motlanthe, KgalemaKgalema Motlanthe 55 1 January 2009
7 years, 4 months
1 January 2021 15 February 2018 South Gauteng High Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Tholie Madala
Froneman, JohanJohan Froneman 10 February 1954
(age 62)
in East London, Eastern Cape
Zuma, JacobJacob Zuma 55 1 November 2009
6 years, 6 months
1 November 2021 10 February 2019 Eastern Cape High Court Kate O'Regan

Jafta, ChrisChris Jafta

1 January 1959
(age 57)
in Matatiele, Eastern Cape
Zuma, JacobJacob Zuma 50 1 November 2009
6 years, 6 months
1 November 2021 N/A Eastern Cape High Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Albie Sachs

Khampepe, SisiSisi Khampepe

8 January 1957
(age 59)
in Soweto, Gauteng
Zuma, JacobJacob Zuma 52 1 November 2009
6 years, 6 months
1 November 2021 N/A North Gauteng High Court Yvonne Mokgoro

Madlanga, MbuyiseliMbuyiseli Madlanga

27 March 1962
(age 54)
in Mount Frere, Eastern Cape
Zuma, JacobJacob Zuma 51 1 August 2013
2 years, 9 months
1 August 2025 N/A Eastern Cape High Court Zak Yacoob

Mhlantla, NonkosiNonkosi Mhlantla

2 May 1964
(age 52)
in Port Elizabeth, Eastern Cape
Zuma, JacobJacob Zuma 51 1 December 2015
5 months
1 December 2027 N/A Eastern Cape High Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Thembile Skweyiya

Nkabinde, BessBess Nkabinde

1 January 1959
(age 57)
in Silwerkrans, North West
Mbeki, ThaboThabo Mbeki 47 1 January 2006
10 years, 4 months
1 January 2018 N/A North West High Court Arthur Chaskalson

Zondo, RaymondRaymond Zondo

4 May 1960
(age 55)
in Ixopo, KwaZulu-Natal
Zuma, JacobJacob Zuma 47 1 September 2012
3 years, 8 months
1 September 2024 N/A Labour Court

North Gauteng High Court

Pius Langa

Following the retirement of Justice Johann van der Westhuizen in January 2016, there has been one vacancy on the Court which the Judicial Service Commission has struggled to fill due to the small number of applicants.[3][4]

Former Chief justices

Former justices

The courtroom of the Constitutional Court of South Africa

The Constitution as the supreme law

The judgments of the court are based on the constitution, which is the supreme law of the land. They guarantee the basic rights and freedoms of all persons. They are binding on all organs of government, including the parliament, the presidency, the police force, the army, the public service and all courts. This means that the court has the power to declare an Act of Parliament null and void if it conflicts with the constitution and to control executive action in the same way.

When interpreting the Constitution, the court is required to consider international human rights law and may consider the law of other democratic countries. [5]Since the enactment of the Superior Courts Act, the Constitutional Court has jurisdiction to hear any matter if it is in the interests of justice for it to do so.

Other bodies protecting human rights

The court is one of many bodies created by the constitution to defend the rights of citizens. It is concerned basically with matters of broad constitutional principle. Bad or incorrect conduct by state officials can be reported to the Office of the Public Protector, formerly called the Ombudsman. A Human Rights Commission has been established to handle complaints of violation of human rights in daily life. The ordinary courts, notably the small claims courts, the Magistrates' Courts, the High Courts and the Supreme Court of Appeal, deal with day-to-day disputes between citizens and the state.

Co-operation with Parliament and Provincial Assemblies

The Constitutional Court has a special responsibility to parliament and provincial legislatures. If there is a dispute in parliament or in a provincial legislature concerning whether or not legislation that has been passed and assented to is constitutional, a third of the members of the body concerned may apply to the Constitutional Court to give a ruling. Similarly, the President or the Premier of a Province may refer a bill to the court for a decision on its constitutionality before assenting to that Bill.

Proceedings in court

The court does not hear evidence or question witnesses. It does not decide directly whether accused persons are guilty or whether damages should be awarded to an injured person. These are matters for the ordinary courts. Its function is to determine the meaning of the Constitution in relation to matters in dispute. One consequence of this is that the court works largely with written arguments presented to it by the parties. The hearings of the court are intended to address particularly difficult issues raised by the written arguments of the parties.

The hearings of the court are open to the public and the press. No cameras or recorders are ordinarily permitted. The public is invited to attend all sessions. Ordinary rules of decent dress and decorum apply.

Notable judgments

Hlophe controversy

On 30 May 2008 the judges of the Constitutional Court issued a statement reporting that they had referred Cape Judge President Judge John Hlophe to the Judicial Service Commission as a result of what they described in their statement as an approach to certain of them "in an improper attempt to influence this Court's pending judgement in one or more cases".[6] The statement stated further that the complaint related to four matters in which either Thint (Pty) Ltd or the Deputy President, Jacob Zuma, were involved. Judge Hlophe was reported to have rejected the allegations as "utter rubbish" and as "another ploy" to damage his reputation.

Though Justices Chris Jafta and Bess Nkabinde had been the primary complainants and had supported the Court's complaint. Yet, six years later, when the misconduct enquiry against Hlophe was pending, Jafta and Nkabinde brought a court challenge to the tribunal's jurisdiction, saying their own complaint was not legally valid.[7] Commentators slammed Jafta and Nkabinde's "cowardice", which had brought the Constitutional Court into disrepute.[8] The judges claimed, in response, that they were simply upholding the Constitution.[9] The High Court dismissed the judges' application on 26 September 2014,[10] but they appealed.[11] The Supreme Court of Appeal dismissed that appeal in March 2016, criticising Jafta and Nkabinde's damaging court application and implying that the case raised questions about their "integrity".[12] On 6 April 2016, Jafta and Nkabinde filed an appeal to the Constitutional Court – their own court – asking it to overturn the Supreme Court of Appeal's judgment.[13] They did so partly on the basis that the SCA made "hurtful" imputations about them. The Constitutional Court has already held, in 2012, that it cannot hear appeals in the Hlophe matter and that any SCA judgment is final.[14]

See also

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Constitutional Court of South Africa.

References

  1. http://www.constitutionalcourt.org.za/text/judges/current/justicebessnkabinde/1.html
  2. Constitutional Court of South Africa's official website
  3. Rabkin, Franny. "Call goes out for Constitutional Court judge". Business Day Live. Retrieved 2016-04-09.
  4. Rabkin, Franny. "LAW MATTERS: Lack of enthusiasm for Constitutional Court a worry". Business Day Live. Retrieved 2016-04-09.
  5. Erskine, Daniel H (December 2008). "Judgments of the United States Supreme Court and the South African Constitutional Court as a Basis for a Universal Method to Resolve Conflicts Between Fundamental Rights". Journal of Civil Rights and Economic Development 3 (22): 595. Retrieved 30 April 2016.
  6. Smook, Ella (13 October 2008). "Judge Jafta pulls ConCourt application". IOL.
  7. SAPA (21 October 2013). "Judges file Hlophe review application". IOL.
  8. Mackaiser, Eusebius (7 October 2013). "Shame on those two Concourt judges". IOL.
  9. Hawker, Dianne (21 October 2013). "Nkabinde and Jafta: We are fighting for the Constitution". eNCA.
  10. Nkabinde and Another v Judicial Service Commission and Others [2014 ZAGPJHC 217]; 2015 (1) SA 279 (GJ).
  11. Tolsi, Niren (6 October 2014). "Hlophe ‘misconduct’: Jafta, Nkabinde stall matter". News24. City Press.
  12. "Nkabinde and Another v Judicial Service Commission and Others (20857/2014) [2016] ZASCA 12". SAFLII. 10 March 2016.
  13. Affairs, SABC News and Current. "HLOPHE CONCOURT". iono.fm. Retrieved 2016-04-07.
  14. "Hlophe v Premier of the Western Cape Province". SAFLII. 30 March 2012.
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Sunday, May 01, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.