Descent to Undermountain
Descent to Undermountain | |
---|---|
Cover art: "Spellfire" by Clyde Caldwell | |
Developer(s) | Interplay |
Publisher(s) | Interplay |
Designer(s) | Chris Avellone, Scott Bennie, John Deiley, Robert Holloway, Steve Perrin |
Composer(s) | Richard Band, Rick Jackson, Ron Valdez |
Engine | Descent engine |
Platform(s) | PC (DOS) |
Release date(s) | 1997 |
Genre(s) | Role-playing video game |
Mode(s) | Single player |
Descent to Undermountain is a role-playing video game developed and published by Interplay in 1997. Based on the Dungeons & Dragons setting of Undermountain in the Forgotten Realms, it casts the player as an adventurer out to explore the treasure-filled recesses of the Undermountain dungeon. The "Descent" part of the name refers to the game's use of the 3D rendering engine from the 1995 game Descent.
Descent to Undermountain had a troubled development cycle. The Descent engine turned out to be unsuited for a role-playing game, leading to ballooning budgets and protracted delays. Interplay decided to ship the game in time for Christmas 1997, resulting in a rushed product. The game earned awful reviews and has been called the worst Dungeons & Dragons video game ever.
Development
It was developed by Chris Avellone, Scott Bennie, John Deiley, Robert Holloway, and Steve Perrin. The game is based on the Dungeons & Dragons fantasy role-playing game, which was published at the time by TSR, Inc.. Programmers were Andrew Pal, James Gardner, Robert Holloway and Chris Farenetta.
The game partially derives its title from the use of the Descent 3D graphical engine. The game was not the first to bring PC role-playing into a 3D environment: Bethesda Softworks' Elder Scrolls series and Looking Glass Studios' Ultima Underworld series preceded it. However, Descent was the first to use a true 3D engine as opposed to a sprite-based 2.5D solution.
The game was initially designed with multiplayer in mind, but there was no time left to implement it.
Plot
The player character is an adventurer who has come to Waterdeep looking for employ from Khelben Blackstaff, high mage of the city. Blackstaff informs the player that people have disappearing mysteriously, and some return from Undermountain with frightening tales. Blackstaff assigns several quests to the player character so he can find out the cause behind the renewed activity from the dungeon.
It soon emerges that the Flame Sword of Lolth is buried somewhere deep within the dungeon. Whomever should possess the artifact would gain control of an undead army from the Abyss. The followers of Lolth, the Drow, are seeking for the sword. The only way to subdue the power of the Sword is to reassemble the Spider Amulet, which was broken into eight pieces and scattered throughout Undermountain.
Lolth is the final boss of the game.
Gameplay
Descent to Undermountain uses the same game mechanics as Advanced Dungeons & Dragons. At the start of the game, the player chooses one of six different races and four different classes for his character, with multi-classing as an option. These choices impact the player's statistics, which are used to determine the probability of successfully completing ingame actions.
The Yawning Portal Inn in Waterdeep serves as a hub area. In between quests to Undermountain, the player may trade with NPCs at the inn for goods and services.
Undermountain allowed the player to interact with NPCs, monsters, and the general environment from a first-person perspective. Real-time combat would mix with puzzles to provide a variety of challenges throughout the vast dungeon.
Defeated enemies may drop items or gold coins. Other such "loot" may also be found lying at random on dungeon floors. These collectibles can be traded with merchants at the Waterdeep hub.
Reception
Descent to Undermountain was generally poorly received.[1] The decision to use the Descent graphics engine was cited as a design issue, as it required heavy rewrites to the code in order to support an RPG setting such as Undermountain.[2] According to game designer Eric Bethke, bugs, poor AI, the unappealing and shoddy nature of the graphics, and several other issues have attributed to a general consensus of the game as an example of a title that was pushed to release before it was ready.[3] Technical issues existed in the concept which delayed development, forcing redesigns and re-engineering. Ultimately the "quick change" to Descent's rendering engine proved to be extremely challenging which exceeded the technical understanding of the corporate leadership who were resolved to predetermined delivery dates. This lack of understanding led to a hurried development cycle, and the game was maligned by Bethke as "a classic example of a game that was shipped too early."[4]
Julian Schoffel, in the Australian PCWorld, called the game "woeful", with the hope that the following release, Baldur's Gate, might "redeem" Interplay as a company.[5] On the other hand, Ahmed Kamal Nava of the New Straits Times called it the best role-playing game of 1997.[6]
According to GameSpy, "Descent to Undermountain had only one virtue - it made everybody forget about Gorgon's Alliance and the entire previous two years of atrocious Dungeons & Dragons games".[7]
See also
References
- ↑ Gregson, Chris (1997). "Gamespot review". Gamespot.
- ↑ "Interplay 98 (Part 1)". IGN. May 13, 1998. Archived from the original on 2014-02-25.
- ↑ Bethke, Eric (April 11, 2003). "Structural Key Design Elements". Gamasutra. Retrieved September 12, 2012.
- ↑ Bethke, Erik (2003). Game Development and Production. Wordware Publishing, Inc. p. 79.
- ↑ Schoffel, Julian (April 1, 1998). "RPG Revival". PCWorld. Retrieved September 26, 2012. – via HighBeam Research (subscription required)
- ↑ Rausch, Allen (2004-08-18). "A History of D&D Video Games - Part IV". Game Spy. Retrieved November 17, 2012.