Dipak Misra

Hon'ble Justice
Dipak Misra
Judge of the Supreme Court of India
Assumed office
10 October 2011
Appointed by President Pranab Mukherjee
Chief Justice of the High Court of Patna
In office
December 2009  May 2010
Chief Justice of the High Court of Delhi
In office
24 May 2010  10 October 2011
Personal details
Born (1953-10-03) 3 October 1953

Justice Dipak Misra (born 3 October 1953) is a judge of the Supreme Court of India. A former Chief Justice of the Patna and Delhi High Courts, he is in line to become the Chief Justice of India in 2017, succeeding Justice J. S. Khehar.[1][2]

Yakub Memon Issue

The Supreme Court judge, who led the bench that rejected 1993 Mumbai serial blasts convict Yakub Memon's last-ditch appeal to stop his execution, received a death threat in writing, reports said on Friday. Justice Dipak Misra received an anonymous letter which says "irrespective of the protection you may avail, we will eliminate you", NDTV new channels reported.[3]

Career

Justice Misra enrolled at the Bar on 14 February 1977 and practised at the Orissa High Court and the Service Tribunal. He was appointed as an Additional Judge of the Orissa High Court in 1996 and was later transferred to the Madhya Pradesh High Court in 1997 where he was made a Permanent Judge on 19 December 1997. He served as Chief Justice of the Patna High Court from December 2009 to May 2010 and thereafter he was appointed Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court where he served till October 2011.[1] As Chief Justice of the Delhi High Court, he helped decide over 5000 cases and helped clear the backlog of cases by making the Mediation Centre and Lok Adalats more effective.

He was elevated to the Supreme Court on 10 October 2011. Justice Misra has a tenure of almost 7 years at the Supreme Court and he is in line to become the Chief Justice in 2017 and will have a tenure of just under 14 months.[4]

Notable judgements

His verdict in Own Motion vs State that Delhi Police upload FIRs on their website within 24 hours of their lodging to enable the accused to file appropriate applications before the court for redressal of their grievances was a notable one.[5]

In a case on Reservation in promotion, Justice Misra and Justice Dalveer Bhandari upheld the Allahabad High Court judgement and held that reservation in promotions can be provided only if there is sufficient data and evidence to justify the need. The bench rejected Uttar Pradesh government's decision to provide reservation in promotion on the ground that it failed to furnish sufficient valid data.[6][7][8]

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Thursday, January 07, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.