Terry Eagleton

Terry Eagleton

Terry Eagleton holding one of his books after a talk at the Mechanics' Institute, Manchester, in 2008
Born Terence Francis Eagleton
(1943-02-22) 22 February 1943[1]
Salford, Lancashire, England, UK[1]
Alma mater Trinity College, Cambridge
Notable work Literary Theory: An Introduction (1983)
The Ideology of the Aesthetic (1990)
The Illusions of Postmodernism (1996)
Notable ideas
 Good utopianism/bad utopianism[2]

Terence Francis "Terry" Eagleton FBA[1] (born 22 February 1943)[1] is a prominent British literary theorist, critic and public intellectual.[5][6][7][8] He is currently Distinguished Professor of English Literature at Lancaster University.

Eagleton has published over forty books, but remains best known for Literary Theory: An Introduction (1983), which has sold over 750,000 copies.[9] The work elucidated the emerging literary theory of the period. He has also been a prominent critic of postmodernism, publishing works such as The Illusions of Postmodernism (1996).

Formerly the Thomas Warton Professor of English Literature at the University of Oxford (1992–2001) and John Edward Taylor Professor of Cultural Theory at the University of Manchester (2001–2008), Eagleton has held visiting appointments at universities around the world including Cornell, Duke, Iowa, Melbourne, Trinity College in Dublin, and Yale.[10]

Eagleton delivered Yale University's 2008 Terry Lectures and the 2010 Edinburgh Gifford Lecture entitled The God Debate.[11] He gave the 2010 Richard Price Memorial Lecture at Newington Green Unitarian Church, speaking on "The New Atheism and the War on Terror".[12] In 2009 he published a book which accompanied his lectures on religion, entitled Reason, Faith, and Revolution: Reflections on the God Debate.

Early life

Eagleton was born to Francis Paul Eagleton and his wife, Rosaleen (née Riley).[13] He grew up in a working class Irish Catholic family in Salford, with roots in County Galway. His mother's side of the family had strong Irish republican sympathies. He served as an altar boy at a local Carmelite convent where he was responsible for escorting novice nuns taking their vows, a role referred to in the title of his memoir The Gatekeeper.[14]

Education and academia

He was educated at De La Salle College, a Roman Catholic grammar school in Pendleton, Salford.[3] In 1961 he went to read English at Trinity College, Cambridge from where he graduated with a First.[4] He later described his undergraduate experience as a "waste of time".[3] In 1964, he moved to Jesus College, Cambridge, where as a junior research fellow and doctoral student, he became the youngest fellow at the college since the 18th century.[10] He was supervised by Raymond Williams.[4] It was during this period that his leftist convictions began to take hold, and he edited a radical Catholic leftist periodical called Slant.[4]

In 1969 he moved to the University of Oxford where he became a fellow and tutor of Wadham College (1969–1989), Linacre College (1989–1993) and St Catherine's College, becoming Thomas Warton Professor of English in 1992. At Wadham, Eagleton ran a well-known seminar on Marxist literary theory which, in the 1980s, metamorphosed into the radical pressure group Oxford English Limited and its journal News from Nowhere: Journal of the Oxford English Faculty Opposition, to which he contributed several pieces. In 2001 Eagleton left Oxford to occupy the John Edward Taylor chair of Cultural Theory at the University of Manchester.

Career

He began his literary studies with the 19th and 20th centuries, then conformed to the stringent academic Marxism of the 1970s. He then published an attack on his mentor Williams's relation to the Marxist tradition in the pages of the New Left Review, in the mode of the French critic Louis Althusser. In the 1960s, he became involved with the left-wing Catholic group Slant, authoring a number of theological articles (including A Marxist Interpretation of Benediction), as well as a book Towards a New Left Theology. A major turning point was his Criticism & Ideology (1976) in which Eagleton discusses various theorists and critics from F.R. Leavis and (his tutor) Raymond Williams to Pierre Macherey. This earliest response to Theory is critical and substantive with Eagleton supplying a dense web of categories for "a materialist criticism" which situates the author as well as the text in the general mode of production, the literary mode of production and particular ideologies. In Chapter 4 he gives a thorough overview of one theme in the English context - "organicist concepts of society" or "community" - as worked by petty-bourgeois Victorian writers, from George Eliot to D.H. Lawrence, and how this determines textual form in each instance.

Literary Theory

Literary Theory: an Introduction (1983, revised 1996), probably his best-known work, traces the history of the study of texts, from the Romantics of the 19th century to the postmodernists of the later 20th century. Eagleton's approach to literary criticism remains firmly rooted in the Marxian tradition though he has also incorporated techniques and ideas from more recent modes of thought as structuralism, Lacanian analysis and deconstruction. As his memoir The Gatekeeper recounts, Eagleton's Marxism has never been solely an academic pursuit. He was active in the International Socialists (along with Christopher Hitchens) and then the Workers' Socialist League whilst in Oxford. He is a regular contributor to the London Review of Books.

After Theory (2003) represents a kind of about-face: an indictment of current cultural and literary theory, and what Eagleton regards as the bastardisation of both. He does not conclude that the interdisciplinary study of literature and culture that comprises Theory is without merit. He argues that such a merging is effective in opening cultural study to a wider range of significant topics. His indictment instead centres on "relativism"—theorists' and postmodernity's rejection of absolutes. He concludes that an absolute does exist: Every person lives in a body that cannot be owned because nothing was done to acquire it, and nothing (besides suicide) can be done to be rid of it. Our bodies and their subsequent deaths provide the absolute around which humankind can focus its actions. Instead of the denial of non-being which makes one obviate one's freedom in fundamentalism (dogma) or others freedom in willful pragmatism (exploitation), during the last pages of the book Eagleton advises us rather to recognise "non-being as an awareness of human frailty and unfoundedness." Agreeing but not entirely with Sartre that humans have no essence, he avows that nevertheless they exist in neediness and dependency on others, their freedom bounded by the common fact of death.

Dawkins, Hitchens and the New Atheism

Eagleton has become a vocal critic of what has been called the New Atheism. In October 2006, he published a review of Richard Dawkins's The God Delusion in the London Review of Books. Eagleton begins by questioning Dawkins's methodology and understanding: "Imagine someone holding forth on biology whose only knowledge of the subject is the Book of British Birds, and you have a rough idea of what it feels like to read Richard Dawkins on theology". Eagleton further writes, "Nor does [Dawkins] understand that because God is transcendent of us (which is another way of saying that he did not have to bring us about), he is free of any neurotic need for us and wants simply to be allowed to love us."[15] He concludes by suggesting Dawkins has not been attacking organised faith so much as a sort of rhetorical straw man: "Apart from the occasional perfunctory gesture to 'sophisticated' religious believers, Dawkins tends to see religion and fundamentalist religion as one and the same. This is not only grotesquely false; it is also a device to outflank any more reflective kind of faith by implying that it belongs to the coterie and not to the mass. The huge numbers of believers who hold something like the theology I outlined above can thus be conveniently lumped with rednecks who murder abortionists and malign homosexuals."[16]

Terry and Gifford Lectures

In April 2008 Eagleton delivered Yale University's Terry Lectures with the title of his subject being, Faith and Fundamentalism: Is belief in Richard Dawkins necessary for salvation? constituting a continuation of the critique he had begun in The London Review of Books. Introducing his first lecture with an admission of ignorance of both theology and science Eagleton goes on to affirm, "All I can claim in this respect, alas, is that I think I may know just about enough theology to be able to spot when someone like Richard Dawkins or Christopher Hitchens—a couplet I shall henceforth reduce for convenience to the solitary signifier Ditchkins—is talking out of the back of his neck."[17][18] His "Terry Lectures" were published in 2009, in Reason, Faith, and Revolution.

Football

Eagleton sees football as a new opium of the people distracting ordinary people from the type of social change Eagleton wants. Eagleton looks pessimistic as to whether this distraction can be ended.

“ the most part football these days is the opium of the people, not to speak of their crack cocaine. Its icon is the impeccably Tory, slavishly conformist Beckham. The Reds are no longer the Bolsheviks. Nobody serious about political change can shirk the fact that the game has to be abolished. And any political outfit that tried it on would have about as much chance of power as the chief executive of BP has in taking over from Oprah Winfrey. ”
— Terry Eagleton[19]

Criticism of Martin and Kingsley Amis

Eagleton in 2012

In late 2007, a critique of Martin Amis included in the introduction to a 2007 edition of Eagleton's book Ideology was widely reprinted in the British press. In it, Eagleton took issue with Amis' widely quoted writings on "Islamism", directing particular attention to one specific passage from an interview with Ginny Dougary published in the Times on 9 September 2006.

What can we do to raise the price of them doing this? There's a definite urge – don't you have it? – to say, 'The Muslim community will have to suffer until it gets its house in order.' What sort of suffering? Not letting them travel. Deportation – further down the road. Curtailing of freedoms. Strip-searching people who look like they're from the Middle East or from Pakistan ... Discriminatory stuff, until it hurts the whole community and they start getting tough with their children ... It's a huge dereliction on their part.[20]

Eagleton criticised Amis and expressed surprise as to its source, stating: "[these are] not the ramblings of a British National Party thug ... but the reflections of Martin Amis, leading luminary of the English metropolitan literary world." He drew a connection between Amis and his father (the novelist Kingsley Amis). Eagleton went on to write that Martin Amis had learned more from his father – whom Eagleton described as a reactionary "racist, anti-Semitic boor, a drink-sodden, self-hating reviler of women, gays and liberals" – than merely "how to turn a shapely phrase." Eagleton added there was "something rather stomach-churning at the sight of those such as Amis and his political allies, champions of a civilisation that for centuries has wreaked untold carnage throughout the world, shrieking for illegal measures when they find themselves for the first time on the sticky end of the same treatment."[21]

The essay became a cause célèbre in British literary circles. Yasmin Alibhai-Brown, a commentator for The Independent, wrote an article[22] about the affair, to which Amis responded via open letter, calling Eagleton an ideological relict ... unable to get out of bed in the morning without the dual guidance of God and Karl Marx.[23] Amis said the views Eagleton attributed to him as his considered opinion was in fact his spoken description of a tempting urge, in relation to the need to "raise the price" of terrorist actions. Eagleton's personal comments on Kingsley Amis prompted a further response from Kingsley's widow, the novelist Elizabeth Jane Howard. Howard wrote to the Daily Telegraph, noting that for a supposed "anti-semitic homophobe", it was peculiar that the only guests at the Howard-Amis nuptials were either Jewish or gay.[24] As Howard explained, "Kingsley was never a racist, nor an anti-Semitic boor. Our four great friends who witnessed our wedding were three Jews and one homosexual." In a later interview, Howard added: I have never even heard of this man Eagleton. But he seems to be a rather lethal combination of a Roman Catholic and a Marxist ... He strikes me as like a spitting cobra: if you get within his range he'll unleash some poison.[25] Colin Howard, Lady Elizabeth Howard's homosexual brother, called Prof Eagleton "a little squirt", adding that Sir Kingsley, far from being homophobic, had extended an affectionate friendship to him and helped him come to terms with his sexuality.[24]

Eagleton defended his comments about Martin and Kingsley Amis in The Guardian, claiming the main bone of contention – the substance of Amis' remarks and views – had been lost amid the media furore.[21]

Critical reactions

William Deresiewicz wrote of After Theory, Eagleton's book, as follows:

"[I]s it that hard to explain what Eagleton's up to? The prolificness, the self-plagiarism, the snappy, highly consumable prose and, of course, the sales figures: Eagleton wishes for capitalism's demise, but as long as it's here, he plans to do as well as he can out of it. Someone who owns three homes shouldn't be preaching self-sacrifice, and someone whose careerism at Oxbridge was legendary shouldn't be telling interviewers of his longstanding regret at having turned down a job at the Open University."[26]

Novelist and critic David Lodge, writing in the May 2004 New York Review of Books on Theory and After Theory, concluded:

Some of Theory's achievements are genuine and permanent additions to knowledge, or intellectual self-knowledge. Eagleton is quite right to assert that we can never go back to a state of pre-Theory innocence about the transparency of language or the ideological neutrality of interpretation ... But like all fashions it was bound to have a limited life of novelty and vitality, and we are now living through its decadence without any clear indication of what will supersede it. Theory has, in short, become boringly predictable to many people who were once enthusiastic about it, and that After Theory is most interesting when its focus is furthest from its nominal subject is perhaps evidence that Terry Eagleton is now bored by it too.[27]

Family

Eagleton is married to his second wife, an American academic, Willa Murphy, with whom he has three children. The couple live in Northern Ireland where Murphy is a lecturer at the University of Ulster. Eagleton has two other sons by his first marriage, which ended in 1976 after ten years.[5]

Publications

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 Prof Terry Eagleton profile, Debrett’s People of Today, FBA Profile
  2. ↑ T. Eagleton, Ideology: An Introduction (1991), pg. 131.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 James Smith (2013). Terry Eagleton. Wiley. ISBN 978-0-7456-5795-0.
  4. 1 2 3 4 James Smith (2013). Terry Eagleton. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-0-7456-5795-0.
  5. 1 2 Vallely, Paul (13 October 2007). "Terry Eagleton: Class warrior". The Independent. ...the man who succeeded F R Leavis as Britain's most influential academic critic.
  6. ↑ Professor John Sitter, Chairman of the English Department at the University of Notre Dame and Editor of The Cambridge Companion to Eighteenth Century Poetry, has describes Eagleton as "someone widely regarded as the most influential contemporary literary critic and theorist in the English-speaking world"
  7. ↑ "Eagleton himself has also replaced Leavis as the best known and most influential academic critic in Britain." Duke Maskell, as cited by Nicholas Wroe
  8. ↑ "Terry Eagleton is arguably the most influential contemporary British literary critic and theorist." James Smith. Cited in the Introduction to Terry Eagleton: A Critical Introduction (Key Contemporary Thinkers) Polity Press, 2008.
  9. ↑ http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/news/a-theoretical-blow-for-democracy/160508.article
  10. 1 2 Departmental web page at Lancaster
  11. ↑ "Professor Terry Eagleton". College of Humanities & Social Science. University of Edinburgh.
  12. ↑ "Terry Eagleton to speak at Newington Green". Hackney Citizen. 29 August 2010. Retrieved 30 December 2011.
  13. ↑ "EAGLETON, Prof. Terence Francis" at Who's Who 2012, A & C Black, 2012; online edn, Oxford University Press, December 2011; online edn November 2011; accessed 23 September 2012
  14. ↑ Andrews, Kernan (18 December 2008). "Terry Eagleton – taking on the capitalists and atheists in Galway". Galway Advertiser.
  15. ↑ Eagleton, Terry (19 October 2006). "Lunging, Flailing, Mispunching". London Review of Books 28 (20). Retrieved 26 November 2006.
  16. ↑ Eagleton, Terry (19 October 2006). "Lunging, Flailing, Mispunching". London Review of Books 28 (20). Retrieved 1 September 2013.
  17. ↑ Terry Eagleton (lecturer) (1 April 2008). Christianity Fair and Foul (rm) (Podcast). Yale University. Event occurs at 6:23. Retrieved 4 August 2009.
  18. ↑ Eagleton, Terry (April 2008). "Faith and Fundamentalism: Is Belief in Richard Dawkins Necessary for Salvation?". Dwight H. Terry Lectureship. Yale University.
  19. ↑ Football: a dear friend to capitalism
  20. ↑ "The voice of experience" at ginnydougary.co.uk, 17 September 2006
  21. 1 2 Eagleton, Terry (10 October 2007). "Rebuking obnoxious views is not just a personality kink". The Guardian (London). Retrieved 1 July 2008.
  22. ↑ Alibhai-Brown, Yasmin (8 October 2007). "It's time for civilised and honest engagement". The Independent. Retrieved 1 September 2013.
  23. ↑ Brown, Jonathan (12 October 2007). "Amis launches scathing response to accusations of Islamophobia". The Independent. Retrieved 1 July 2008.
  24. 1 2 Cockcroft, Lucy (10 October 2007). "Family defends 'racist' Sir Kingsley Amis". The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 1 July 2008.
  25. ↑ Levy, Geoffrey (11 October 2007). "Spicier than a novel, the literary feud raging between the Amis dynasty and the Marxist critic". Mail Online.
  26. ↑ Deresiewicz, William (29 January 2004). "The Business of Theory". The Nation. Retrieved 29 October 2015.
  27. ↑ Lodge, David (27 May 2004). "Goodbye to All That" (fee required). The New York Review of Books. Retrieved 1 July 2008.

Further reading

External links

Wikiquote has quotations related to: Terry Eagleton
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Saturday, May 07, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.