Forest migration

Forest migration is the movement of large seed plant dominated communities in geographical space over time.

The emphasis of forest migration is placed on the movement of the tree communities that make up the forest community. Though an individual tree is permanently fixed in a location, tree populations may migrate over the landscape through generations. Tree migration is controlled by two overlying forces: environmental suppression and dispersal capacity of the population by seed.[1] Though the true rate of forest expansion is difficult to quantify, efforts are being made to evaluate and predict past, current, and future rates and extents of forest movements.

Forces controlling forest migrations

Plant populations are governed by two major controlling forces.[1] The population expansion favoring force, positive force, is the sexual reproductive dispersal of the forest population. The population expansion limiting force, negative force, is the suppression by the environment of seed and plant success in an area. These two major forces compete and change through time causing advances and retreats in the borders of plant populations' regions. An advance in the range border of the forest population occurs when environmental suppressive forces are below the population's dispersal potential, thus allowing for seedling success outside the current range. Range border contractions occur when environmental suppressive forces increase to a point where seedling success is limited in the current range, thus no successive generation is established to replace the individuals within a portion of the current range through time. Though dispersal and environmental suppressive forces continually act, a static range boundary may occur when there is no change in the rate of these two factors.

Zones within a plant population

There are three basic zones within each plant population; the reproductive core, the marginal establishment zone, and the outer seed shadow.[1] The reproductive core of the plant population is the area in which sexually mature parental plants are present. This is the established reproductive source that provides the positive force for the population's expansion. The second region is the marginal establishment zone. In this region, seeds are successful and plants establish. The plants in this region have yet to reach reproductive maturity, thus they do not contribute to the seed dispersal potential of the population. The final region is the seed shadow region. In this region, inflow of seeds from the reproductive core is occurring, but because of environmental conditions germination or seedling survival is repressed causing an absence of species representatives in this region. This region is controlled by the negative force of the environment to the extent of zero success of the population.

Rapid plant migration

There has been debate over how plant populations move under rapid climate change situations.[2][3] This debate stems from an issue called "Reid's paradox of rapid plant migration".[2] After the last glacial period, tree species spread to recover the newly exposed land. Through studies, it was calculated that this expansion occurred faster than perceived possible.[4] The two explanations for this rapid movement of forest populations across the landscape that came to the forefront were the retention of low-density founder populations and long distance migration.[2][3][5]

Retention of low-density founder populations

In this theory, small forest populations were retained within the affected region of the last glacial period.[3] The repopulation of this region, after the recession the glaciers, manifested as a relatively slow expansion outward of these retained populations. The expansion was mostly due to diffusion in a normal distribution from the reproductive core. The expansion of these populations was then dictated by the dispersal ability of the population. Through this process, waves of short distance expansion were seen over time as seeds dispersed, grew, matured, and set seed themselves. High rates of spread, similar to those obtained under the long distance migration assumption, have been obtained with diffusion models incorporating low-density founder populations.[5]

Range limits of many plant species are expected to shift dramatically if climatic warming, driven by the release of greenhouse gases, occurs in the next century. The ability of species to migrate in response to the range shifts has been questioned, especially in the context of extensive habitat fragmentation which occurs in modern-day landscapes.

Simulation models are presented which incorporate two factors, land use pattern and means of dispersal, to assess potential responses of forest species to climatic warming. Study areas displayed a range of human influence on the landscape, from heavily forested areas to areas dominated by urbanization and agriculture. The effect of establishing corridors (greenways) through fragmented landscapes is also assessed.

Results indicate that many species may be unable to track shifts in climatically-controlled range limits, resulting in widespread disequilibrium between vegetation and climate. A variety of mitigating options likely will be necessary to offset the negative consequences of climatic warming on biological diversity. Land use planners and managers are encouraged to incorporate climate warming into long-term planning.

Rapid long distance migration

In this theory, populations moved directly from the area unaffected by glacial movement to their present boundaries by rare, long distance, successful dispersals.[2] The movement of the population was dictated by rare events that occurred long distances from the parent population. These rare successes created their own parent populations, allowing for the subpopulation to disperse additional rare, long distance successes perpetuating the movement of the population. The distribution created by this kind of movement is described as a fat-tailed distribution. Though normal distribution, short distance expansion of each individual population still occurs, the overall expansion of the entire cluster of populations is determined by the long distance, rare events. This stretches the distribution due to increased weight at the extremes of the distribution. Long distance migration is usually modeled using integro-difference equations with slowly decreasing dispersal kernels.[2]

Forest migrations past, present and future

To gain knowledge about the effects current climate change will have on the Earth's forests; many researchers have looked to past examples to draw information. Many studies have investigated the movement of forest species across glacially disrupted areas in the early Holocene period. Some studies have utilized fossilized pollen analysis, while others have used molecular genetics.[2][3] Overall, it is perceived that forests can and did alter their geographical distributions to populate land through time.[1][2][3][6][7][8][9][10][11] There is also strong evidence to support these movements were, in some cases, directional with respect to an outside force.[1][2][6][7][9]

Investigations are also taking place on current forest migration based on recent information.[7][9] These studies are generally directed to the altitudinal shifts in forest species on mountains. The conclusion drawn from these studies is that forest populations are increasing in altitudes. This movement is strongly correlated to the current era of climate change.[9]

Lastly, much effort has been put forth to try to model and predict future fates of forest populations.[2][3][12][13] The results of these efforts have been varied and, in many cases, inconclusive. The future of plant migrations has proven to be hard to predict. The many unknowns about the limits of population migration, phenotypic plasticity, genetic capacity, species interaction, and current climate change cause have complicated the issue, and have made modeling, at this point, difficult.[9][11][12][14] Studies should be directed to gaining knowledge about adaptation genetics, phenotypic limits of ecotypes, and create models incorporating more relevant factors.[12]

Examples of forest species migration

Scandinavian tree species migration

Scandinavian species of Tilia, Picea, Fagus, and Quercus have moved in their distributions in the past 8,000 years.[6] Through fossilized pollen, it was found that Tilia and Quercus species moved significantly and directionally northward. Though Fagus and Picea populations did not expand directionally, they have grown in the Scandinavian range. The movement of Picea species in the past 1000 years has shown a strong connection to climate change through a model comparison.

Catalonia, Spain tree species elevation shifts

In the more recent past, there has been documentation of elevation shifts in distribution of many core forest tree species of Catalonia.[9] The populations of two tree species (European Beech, Fagus sylvatica; and Holm Oak, Quercus ilex) were evaluated in their dynamics over elevations through time. Generally, Holm Oak reside lower on mountain slopes than does European Beech. In the past fifty years an increase in temperature of 1.5 °C was seen in the tested mountain range. This rise in temperature altered the transpiration rates and is believed to be causing the area to become more arid. The change in local microclimate of the region seemed to favor the success of the Holm Oak population, causing it to rise in elevation invading the natural range of European Beech. European Birch (Betula pendula) has also elevated its range in altitude. The movements of these ranges are strongly linked to climate change, which has allowed for better establishment and success at higher latitudes.

Elevation rise in tree and shrub species in the Swedish Scandes

In 2002, it was found that saplings were occurring in elevations previously not seen.[7] Birch saplings were found at elevations between 1370 and 1410 m above sea level (a.s.l). In 1955 no seedlings of this species were found above 1095 m a.s.l. It was found that the populations of Picea abies had moved 240 m in elevation in the previous 50 years. Increases were also found in other regional tree and shrub species. The plants growing outside of the previous established range also have shown low injury rate, and signs of healthy growth. In addition to these increases in elevation the past century, increases in birch seed viability has been seen in a long term study.

Current climate change and its effects

The Earth has entered another period of rapid climate change, known as global warming.[15] Since the early 20th century, the global air and sea surface temperature has increased about 0.8 °C (1.4 °F), with about two-thirds of the increase occurring since 1980.[16] It is important to consider this statistic as being a global average. The effects of climate change may be highly heterogeneous over the landscape effecting different areas in different ways and magnitudes. The current climate change regime could have effects on the movement, persistence, and competition within and between plant communities.[3][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][17] Also, the fact that forests are major constituents of habitat raises concerns on the effects of forest movement on climate change and greenhouse gas risk factors.[10] Also some concern on the effects of forest migrations should be evaluated for wildlife because of the possibilities of forest fragmentations and extirpations.

It is important to consider that temperature is not the only factor affected by climate change. Alterations in precipitation, diurnal timing, and season length all can reduce the survivability or reproductive ability of plant species by disrupting phenology and genetic fitness of the population.[11][12]

The ability of plant species to move with changing conditions will be valuable information in predicting the future of the Earth's forests. If forest population cannot move with or at an equivalent speed to the rates of climate change, the consequences include disrupted reproductive cycles, fragmentation, genetic bottlenecking, and extirpation.[12] Knowledge in the genetic structure and phenotypic limits of plant populations would give much needed insight as to the extent of climate change a population could forgo before movement or increased rates of movement are required for survival.

Human assistance in forest migration

The use of assisted migration has been proposed as a mitigation tool in forest decline due to climate change.[8][12] This process involves the movement and establishment of forest species in new areas in hopes they will colonize.[8] It is thought that if assisted migration is utilized in an organized manner, species could be saved by allowing for rapid movement across the landscape. This process has been debated for its advantages and disadvantages with the intent of using it in the most beneficial manner. Supporters of this tool focus on the benefits of saving tree species from extinction, while those who oppose the idea have the concern of introducing pest species into unexposed regions. Attention must also be paid to the genetic effects translocation of plants may have to the population and surrounding populations.[12] The possible problems associated with this process include founder effects, and the introduction of unadapted genotypes which could harm the fitness of surrounding populations.

A proposed aid to natural forest migration is the upkeep of intraspecific biodiversity.[8][12][17] Biodiversity within a species is an important factor in the ability of a population to adapt. This is both beneficial for population stability as climates change, as well as increasing the likelihood of progeny success in new areas outside the current range.

See also

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 Sauer, J.D. 1988. Plant migration the dynamics of geographic patterning in seed plant species. University of California Press. Berkeley and Los Angeles, California.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Clark, J.S., C. Fastie, G. Hurtt, S.T. Jackson, C. Johnson, G.A. King, M. Lewis, J. Lynch, S. Pacala, C. Prentice, E.W. Schupp, T. Webb III, and P. Wyckoff. 1998. Reid's paradox of rapid plant migration. BioScience. 48(1):13-24.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 McLachlan, J.S., J.S. Clark, and P.S. Manos. 2005. Molecular indicators of three migration capacity under rapid climate change. Ecology. 86(8):2088-2098.
  4. ↑ Skellam, J.G. 1951. Random dispersal in theoretical populations. Biometrika. 38:196-218.
  5. 1 2 Roques, L., F. Hamel, J. Fayard, B. Fady, and E.K. Klein. 2010. Recolonisation by diffusion can generate increasing rates of spread. Theoretical Population Biology. 77(3):205-212.
  6. 1 2 3 4 Bradshaw, H.W., B.H. Holmquist, S.A. Crowling, and M.T. Sykes. 2000. The effects of climate change on the distribution and management of Picea abies in southern Scandinavia. Can. J. For. Res. 30:1992-1998.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 Kullman, L. 2002. Rapid recent range-margin rise of tree and shrub species in the Swedish Scandes. Journal of Ecology. 90:68-77.
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 McLachlan, J.S., J.J Hellmann, and M.W. Schwartz. 2007. A framework for debate of assisted migration in an era of climate change. Conservation Biology. 21(2):297-302.
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Peñuelas, J., R. Ogaya, M. Boada, and A.S. Jump. 2007. Migration, invasion and decline: changes in recruitment and forest structure in a warming-linked shift in European beech forest in Catalonia (NE Spain). Ecography. 30:830-838.
  10. 1 2 3 Pitelka, L.F. 1997. Plant migration and climate change. American Scientist. 85(5):464(10).
  11. 1 2 3 4 Walther, G., E. Post, P. Convey, A. Menzel, C. Parmesan, T.J.C Beebee, J. Fromentin, O. Hoegh-Guldberg, and F. Bairein. 2002. Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature. 416:389-395.
  12. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Aitken, S.N., S. Yeaman, J.A. Holliday, T. Wang, and S. Curtis-McLane. Adaptation, migration or extirpation: climate change outcomes for tree populations. Evolutionary Applications ISSN. 1:95-111.
  13. 1 2 Woodall, C.W., C.M Oswalt, J.A. Westfall, C.H. Perry, M.D. Nelson, A.O. Finley. 2009. An indicator of tree migration in forests of the eastern United States. Forest Ecology and Management. 257:1434-1444.
  14. 1 2 Pearson, R.G. 2006. Climate change and the migration capacity of species. TRENDS in Ecology and Evolution. 21(3):111-113.
  15. ↑ "Warming of the climate system is unequivocal" p.2, IPCC, Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis - Summary for Policymakers, Observed Changes in the Climate System, p. 2, in IPCC AR5 WG1 2013.
  16. ↑ America's Climate Choices. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press. 2011. p. 15. ISBN 978-0-309-14585-5. The average temperature of the Earth's surface increased by about 1.4 °F (0.8 °C) over the past 100 years, with about 1.0 °F (0.6 °C) of this warming occurring over just the past three decades.
  17. 1 2 Noss, R.F. 2001. Beyond Kyoto: forest management in a time of rapid climate change. Conservation Biology. 15(3):578-590.

Further reading

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Sunday, June 28, 2015. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.