Liophis miliaris

Liophis miliaris
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Subphylum: Vertebrata
Class: Reptilia
Order: Squamata
Suborder: Serpentes
Family: Colubridae
Subfamily: Xenodontinae
Genus: Liophis
Species: L. miliaris
Binomial name
Liophis miliaris
(Linnaeus, 1758)
Synonyms
  • Coluber miliaris Linnaeus, 1758
  • Coluber merremii Wied, 1821
  • Rhadinæa merremi
    — Boulenger, 1894[1]
  • Liophis miliaris
    — Starace, 1998
  • Ertyhrolamprus miliaris
    — Forlani et al., 2010[2]

Liophis miliaris is a species of colubrid snake endemic to South America. In 1964 Gans gave it the common name common water snake.[3][4]

Common names

South American common names for this species include cobra-d'água (water snake) and cobra-lisa (smooth snake) in Portuguese, and simply culebra (snake) in Spanish.[5]

Taxonomy

Originally described as Coluber miliaris by Carl Linnaeus in 1758, Liophis miliaris is one of more than fifty species in the genus Liophis.[4] The original generic name, Coluber, was indicated to mean "common snake".[4] Liophis miliaris is very polymorphic with a wide range of distribution.

Subspecies

Seven subspecies are recognized, including the nominotypical subspecies.[2]

The subspecific name, merremi is in honor of German herpetologist Blasius Merrem.[6]

Geographic range

Liophis miliaris is found in Brazil, Paraguay, Uruguay, and northeastern Argentina.[7]

Physical characteristics

Liophis miliaris is stout-bodied (muscular) and relatively short-tailed. Tail length/total length ratios vary from 15.0%-19.8% with an average of 18.6.[8]

Adults may attain a total length of about 50 cm (about 20 in).[1]

Dorsally, it is pale olive-brown or yellowish, with each smooth dorsal scale edged with black. Ventrally, it is uniformly yellow.[1]

Feeding

Liophis miliaris feeds on a wide range of prey items. They include amphibians (also, eggs and tadpoles), invertebrates, lizards, fish, birds, and small rodents. However, there is little information on its feeding habits.[9] A study indicated that females with oviductal eggs did not feed, whereas those Liophis miliaris snakes with secondary vitellogenic follicles fed more often than did the non-reproductive females.

Sexual maturity

Sexual maturity is regarded by experts as difficult to determine; however, it can be assessed by the snout-vent length (SVL). Sexual maturity is positively correlated to mean body size. In order to determine the sexual maturity of a Liophis, scientists have determined the diameter of ovarian follicles if seen to be >10 as indicative of sexual maturity in females, as is the presence of oviducal eggs. Males were considered mature if the testes were large and turgid or if the deferent ducts were opaque and convoluted, indicating the presence of sperm. Females in the subspecies populations of Liophis miliaris meremmi and Liophis miliaris orinus were seen to be greater in body size than the males.[8]

Sexual dimorphism

There is sexual dimorphism with respect to size of adult Liophis. Adult females are larger in the subspecies merremi and orinus. They were seen to be larger than the adult males. The sexual dimorphism index was seen to be similar in the geographic areas of the northern coastal Atlantic forest, southern coastal Atlantic forest, northern inland Atlantic forest and southern inland Atlantic forest. This was indicative of no geographic variation in sexual size dimorphism. It is believed that body size may differ either because of local genetic modification or direct phenotypic effect of food availability on the growth rates. In addition to body size, the comparison of head size in Liophis miliaris is seen to show no dimorphism. Head size is considered to be associated with inter-sexual dietary divergence.[8]

Reproductive output

With respect to reproductive output in the northern and southern coast Atlantic forest, and the northern and southern inland forest, the reproductive output recorded for Liophis miliaris orinus and Liophis miliaris merremi were determined via number of eggs, size of eggs, and number of neonates. The mean egg volume in the southern coast Atlantic forest was seen to be the largest of the four regions. The reproductive frequency was lower in the northern coast Atlantic forest than the other regions.[8]

Parasitism

Parasitism is not understood very well in the context of snake ecology. The only inferences that have been made are those with the influence on natural populations. It is thought to be related to the snakes feeding behavior and immunological resistance. Two parasites were discovered in the subspecies orinus and merremi. The first were adults of Ophidiascaris sp. (Nemaotoda) in the stomach. Also Cystacaths of Oligatanthorynchus spira (Acanthocephala) were in the peritoneum. The prevalence found in the four different regions, northern and southern coastal Atlantic forest and northern and southern inland Atlantic forest, were observed in Pizatto's and Marques' study. The lowest prevalence was seen in the northern coastal Atlantic forest. The level of parasite infestation did not differ between the males and females. Female reproductive status was unaffected by the level of infection, nor was the number of eggs she carried. The male reproductive system was unaffected by the level of infestation as well.[8]

Liophis milaris intermedius, a taxonomic error

In 1991, Liophis miliaris intermedius was classified by Henle and Ehrl. However, they made a mistake. It was later discovered by Dixon and Tipton, through various comparisons of body composition, that Liophis miliaris intermedius was actually Liophis reginae.[8]

Habitat

Liophis miliaris is seen in the Atlantic forest of South America, the rainforest in eastern Brazil, and the semideciduous forests in southeastern Brazil.[4]

References

  1. 1 2 3 Boulenger, G.A. 1894. Catalogue of the Snakes in the British Museum (Natural History). Volume II., Containing the Conclusion of the Colubridæ Aglyphæ. Trustees of the British Museum (Natural History). (Taylor and Francis, Printers.) London. xi + 382 pp. + Plates I.- XX. (Rhadinæa merremii, pp. 168-169.)
  2. 1 2 "Erthrolamprus miliaris ". The Reptile Database. www.reptile-database.org.
  3. ↑ Gans, Carl. (1964)."A Rediscription of, and Geographic Variation in, Liophis miliaris Linné, the Common Water Snake of Southeastern South America." American Museum Novitates (2178): 1-58.
  4. 1 2 3 4 Esquedo, Luis F., Marco Natera-Mumaw, and Enrique La Marca. (2003)."First record of salamander predation by a Liophis (Wagler, 1830) snake in the Venezuelan Andes." Journal of Herpetology 37 (1): 191.
  5. ↑ Freiberg, Marcos (1982). Snakes of South America. T.F.H. Publications. Hong Kong. 189 pp. ISBN 0-87666-912-7. (Liophis miliaris, pp. 102, 136 + photograph on p. 59.)
  6. ↑ Beolens, Bo; Michael Watkins; Michael Grayson. 2011. The Eponym Dictionary of Reptiles. Johns Hopkins University Press. Baltimore. xiii + 312 pp. ISBN 978-1-4214-0135-5. (Liophis miliaris merremi, p. 176.)
  7. ↑ Marques, Otavio A.V., André Eterovic, and Whaldener Endo. (2001)."Seasonal activity of snakes in the Atlantic forest in southeastern Brazil." Amphibia-Reptilia 22 : 103-111.
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Dixon, James R. (1993)."Liophis miliaris intermedius (Henle and Ehrl, 1991) Is Actually Liophis reginae (Serpentes: Colubridae)." Journal of Herpetology 37 (1): 191.
  9. ↑ Pizzatto, Lígia, and Otavio A.V. Marques. (2006)."Interpopulation variation in sexual dimorphism, reproductive output, and parasitism of Liophis miliaris (Colubridae) in the Atlantic forest of Brazil." Amphibia-Reptilia 27 (1): 37-46.

Further reading

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Sunday, March 27, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.