Rodent

Rodents Temporal range: 56–0 Ma PreЄ Є O S D C P T J K Pg N Late Paleocene–Holocene
Clockwise from top: capybara, spring hare, golden-mantled ground squirrel, house mouse and beaver representing the suborders Hystricomorpha, Anomaluromorpha, Sciuromorpha, Myomorpha, and Castorimorpha, respectively.
Scientific classification
Kingdom:	Animalia
Phylum:	Chordata
Clade:	Synapsida
Class:	Mammalia
Superorder:	Euarchontoglires
(unranked):	Glires
Order:	Rodentia Bowdich, 1821
Suborders
Anomaluromorpha Castorimorpha Hystricomorpha (inc. Caviomorpha) Myomorpha Sciuromorpha
Combined range of all rodent species (not including introduced populations)

Rodents (from Latin rodere, "to gnaw") are mammals of the order Rodentia, which are characterized by a single pair of unremittingly growing incisors in each of the upper and lower jaws. About forty percent of all mammal species are rodents; they are found in vast numbers on all continents except Antarctica. They are the most diversified mammalian order and live in a variety of terrestrial habitats, including human-made environments. There are species that are arboreal, fossorial (burrowing), and semiaquatic. Well-known rodents include mice, rats, squirrels, prairie dogs, porcupines, beavers, guinea pigs, hamsters, and capybaras. Other animals such as rabbits, hares and pikas were once included with them, but are now considered to be in a separate order, Lagomorpha.

Most rodents are small animals with robust bodies, short limbs and long tails. They use their sharp incisors to gnaw food, excavate burrows and defend themselves. Most eat seeds or other plant material, but some have more varied diets. They tend to be social animals and many species live in societies with complex ways of communicating with each other. Mating among rodents can vary from monogamy, to polygyny, to promiscuity. Many have litters of underdeveloped, altricial young, while others have precocial young that are relatively well developed at birth.

The rodent fossil record dates back to the Paleocene on the supercontinent of Laurasia. They greatly diversified in the Eocene, as they spread across continents, sometimes even finding means to cross oceans. Rodents reached both South America and Madagascar from Africa, and were the only terrestrial placental mammals to reach and colonize Australia.

Rodents have been used as food, for clothing, as pets and as laboratory animals in research. Some species, in particular the brown rat, the black rat, and the house mouse are serious pests, eating and spoiling food stored by humans, and spreading diseases. Accidentally introduced species of rodents are often considered to be invasive, and have caused the extinction of numerous species, such as island birds, previously isolated from land-based predators.

Characteristics

Drawing of typical rodent tooth system. The front surface of the incisors is hard enamel, whereas the rear is softer dentine. The act of chewing wears down the dentine leaving a sharp, chisel-like edge.

The distinguishing feature of the rodents is their single pair of continuously growing, razor-sharp incisors.^[1] These incisors have thick layers of enamel on the front and little enamel on the back.^[2] Because they do not stop growing, the animal must continue to wear them down so that they do not reach and pierce the skull. As the incisors grind against each other, the softer dentine on the rear of the teeth wears away, leaving the sharp enamel edge shaped like the blade of a chisel.^[3] Most species have up to 22 teeth with no canines or anterior premolars. There is a gap, or diastema, between the incisors and the cheek teeth in most species. This allows them to suck in their cheeks or lips to shield their mouth and throat from wood shavings and other inedible material, discarding this waste from the sides of their mouth.^[4] Chinchillas and guinea pigs have a high fiber diet; their molars have no roots and grow continuously like their incisors.^[5]

In many species, the molars are relatively large, intricately structured and highly cusped or ridged, though some, such as Pseudohydromys, have smaller and simpler ones. Rodent molars are well equipped to grind food into small particles.^[1] The jaw musculature is strong. The lower jaw is thrust forward while gnawing and is pulled backwards during chewing.^[2] Rodent groups differ in the arrangement of the jaw muscles and associated skull structures, both from other mammals and amongst themselves. The Sciuromorpha, such as the eastern grey squirrel, have a large deep masseter, making them efficient at biting with the incisors. The Myomorpha, such as the brown rat, have an enlarged temporalis muscle, making them able to chew powerfully with the molars. The Hystricomorpha, such as the guinea pig, have a larger superficial masseter muscle and a smaller deep masseter muscle than rats or squirrels, possibly making them less efficient at biting with the incisors, but their enlarged internal pterygoid muscle may allow them to move the jaw further sideways when chewing.^[6]

While the largest species, the capybara, can weigh as much as 66 kg (146 lb), most rodents weigh less than 100 g (3.5 oz). The smallest rodent is the Baluchistan pygmy jerboa, which averages only 4.4 cm (1.7 in) in head and body length, with adult females weighing only 3.75 g (0.132 oz). Rodents have wide-ranging morphologies, but typically have squat bodies and short limbs.^[1] The forelimbs usually have five digits, including an opposable thumb, while the hindlimbs have three to five digits. The elbow gives the forearms great flexibility.^[3][7] The majority of species are plantigrade, walking on both the palms and soles of their feet, and have claw-like nails. The nails of burrowing species tend to be long and strong, while arboreal rodents have shorter, sharper nails.^[7] Rodent species use a wide variety of methods of locomotion including quadrupedal walking, running, burrowing and climbing, bipedal hopping (kangaroo rats and hopping mice), swimming and even gliding. Scaly-tailed squirrels and flying squirrels, although not closely related, can both glide from tree to tree using parachute-like membranes that stretch from the forelimbs to the hindlimbs.^[8] The agouti is fleet-footed and antelope-like, being digitigrade and having hoof-like nails. The majority of rodents have tails, which can be of many shapes and sizes. Some tails are prehensile, as in the Eurasian harvest mouse, and the fur on the tails can vary from bushy to completely bald. The tail is sometimes used for communication, as when beavers slap their tails on the water surface or house mice rattle their tails to indicate alarm. Some species have vestigial tails or no tails at all.^[1] In some species, the tail is capable of regeneration if a part is broken off.^[3]

Wood mouse with its long whiskers

Rodents generally have well-developed senses of smell, hearing and vision. Nocturnal species often have enlarged eyes and some are sensitive to ultraviolet light. Many species have long, sensitive whiskers or vibrissae for touch or "whisking". Some rodents have cheek pouches, which may be lined with fur. These can be turned inside out for cleaning. In many species, the tongue cannot reach past the incisors. Rodents have efficient digestive systems, absorbing nearly 80 percent of ingested energy. When eating cellulose, the food is softened in the stomach and passed to the cecum, where bacteria reduce it to its carbohydrate elements. The rodent then practices coprophagy, eating its own fecal pellets, so that the nutrients can be absorbed by the gut. Rodents therefore often produce a hard and dry fecal pellet.^[1] In many species, the penis contains a bone, the baculum; the testes can be located either abdominally or at the groin.^[3]

Sexual dimorphism occurs in many rodent species. In some rodents, males are larger than females while in others the reverse is true. Male-bias sexual dimorphism is typical for ground squirrels, kangaroo rats, solitary mole rats and pocket gophers; it likely developed due to sexual selection and greater male-male combat. Female-bias sexual dimorphism exists among chipmunks and jumping mice. It is not understood why this pattern occurs, but in the case of yellow-pine chipmunks it may be that males selected larger females due to their greater reproductive success. In some species, like voles, sexual dimorphism can vary from population to population. In bank voles, females are typically larger than males, however male-bias sexual dimorphism occurs in alpine populations, possibly because of the lack of predators and greater competition between males.^[9]

The diversity of characteristics of rodents is great, sometimes even in closely related species. Characteristics of several rodents are given in the table below.^[10]

Species	Maximum longevity years († in captivity)	Adult weight grams	Gestation days	Litters per year	Litter size average (range)
House mouse (Mus musculus)[11]	4.0^†	20	19	5.4	5.5 (3 to 12)
Naked mole rat (Heterocephalus glaber)[12]	31.0	35	70	3.5	11.3
Black rat (Rattus rattus)[13]	4.0^†	200	21	4.3	7.3 (6 to 12)
Brown rat (Rattus norvegicus)[14]	3.8^†	300	21	3.7	9.9 (2 to 14)
Eurasian red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris)[15]	14.8^†	600	38	2.0	5.0 (1 to 10)
Long-tailed chinchilla (Chinchilla lanigera)[16]	17.2^†	642	111	2.0	2.0 (1 to 6)
Guinea pig (Cavia porcellus)[17]	12.0	728	68	5.0	3.8 (1 to 8)
Coypu (Myocastor coypus)[18]	8.5^†	7,850	131	2.4	5.8 (3 to 12)
Capybara (Hydrochoerus hydrochaeris)[19]	15.1^†	55,000	150	1.3	4.0 (2 to 8)

Distribution and habitat

Brown rat in a flowerbox. Some rodents thrive in human habitats.

One of the most widespread groups of mammals, rodents can be found on every continent except Antarctica. They are the only terrestrial placental mammals that have colonized Australia and New Guinea without human intervention. Humans have also allowed the animals to spread to many remote oceanic islands (e.g., the Polynesian rat).^[3] Rodents have adapted to almost every terrestrial habitat, from cold tundra (where they can live under snow) to hot deserts. Some species such as tree squirrels and New World porcupines are arboreal, while some, such as gophers, tuco-tucos and mole rats, live almost completely underground, where they build complex burrow systems. Others dwell on the surface of the ground but may have a burrow into which they can retreat. Beavers and muskrats are known for being semiaquatic,^[1] but the rodent best-adapted for aquatic life is probably the earless water rat from New Guinea.^[20] Rodents have also thrived in human-created environments such as agricultural and urban areas.^[21]

Some rodents, like this North American beaver with its dam of gnawed tree trunks and the lake it has created, are considered ecosystem engineers.

Though some species are common pests for humans, rodents also play important ecological roles.^[1] Some rodents are considered keystone species and ecosystem engineers in their respective habitats. In the Great Plains of North America, the burrowing activities of prairie dogs play important roles in soil aeration and nutrient redistribution, raising the organic content of the soil and increasing the absorption of water. They maintain these grassland habitats,^[22] and some large herbivores like bison and pronghorn prefer to graze near prairie dog colonies due to the increased nutritional quality of forage.^[23] Prairie dogs can, however, also contribute to regional and local biodiversity loss, increased seed depredation and the establishment and spread of invasive shrubs.^[22] Burrowing rodents may eat the fruiting bodies of fungi and spread spores through their feces, thereby allowing the fungi to disperse and form symbiotic relationships with the roots of plants (which usually cannot thrive without them). As such, these rodents may play a role in maintaining healthy forests.^[24]

In many temperate regions, beavers play an essential hydrological role. When building their dams and lodges, beavers alter the paths of streams and rivers^[25] and allow for the creation of extensive wetland habitats. One study found that engineering by beavers leads to a 33 percent increase in the number of herbaceous plant species in riparian areas.^[26] Another study found that beavers increase wild salmon populations.^[27]

Behavior and life history

Feeding

Eastern chipmunk carrying food in cheek pouches

Most rodents are herbivorous, feeding exclusively on plant material such as seeds, stems, leaves, flowers and roots. Some are omnivorous and a few are predators.^[2] The field vole is a typical herbivorous rodent and feeds on grasses, herbs, root tubers, moss and other vegetation, and gnaws on bark during the winter. It occasionally eats invertebrates such as insect larvae.^[28] The plains pocket gopher eats plant material found underground during tunneling, and also collects grasses, roots and tubers in its cheek pouches and caches them in underground larder chambers.^[29] The Texas pocket gopher avoids emerging onto the surface to feed by seizing the roots of plants with its jaws and pulling them downwards into its burrow. It also practices coprophagy.^[30] The African pouched rat forages on the surface, gathering anything that might be edible into its capacious cheek pouches until its face bulges out sideways. It then returns to its burrow to sort through the material it has gathered and eats the nutritious items.^[31]

The agouti is one of the few animals that can break open the large capsules of the Brazil nut fruit. There are too many seeds inside to be consumed in one meal, so the agouti carries some off and caches them. This helps dispersal of the seeds as any that the agouti fails to retrieve are distant from the parent tree when they germinate. Other nut-bearing trees tend to bear a glut of fruits in the autumn. These are too numerous to be eaten in one meal and squirrels gather and store the surplus in crevices and hollow trees. In desert regions, seeds are often only available for short periods. The kangaroo rat collects all it can find and stores them in larder chambers in its burrow.^[31]

Capybara grazing

A strategy for dealing with seasonal plenty is to eat as much as possible and store the surplus nutrients as fat. Marmots do this, and may be 50 percent heavier in the autumn than in the spring. They rely on their fat reserves during their long winter hibernation.^[31] Beavers feed on the leaves, buds and inner bark of growing trees, as well as aquatic plants. They store food for winter use by felling small trees and leafy branches in the autumn and immersing them in their pond, sticking the end into the mud to anchor them. Here, they can access their food supply underwater even when their pond is frozen over.^[32]

Although traditionally rodents have been regarded as herbivores, a number of species opportunistically include insects, fish or meat in their diet and more specialized forms rely on such foods. A functional-morphological study of the rodent tooth system supports the idea that primitive rodents were omnivores rather than herbivores. Studies of the literature show that numerous members of the Sciuromorpha and Myomorpha, and a few members of Hystricomorpha, have either included animal matter in their diet or been prepared to eat such food when offered it in captivity. Examination of the stomach contents of the North American white-footed mouse, normally considered to be herbivorous, showed 34% animal matter.^[33]

More specialized carnivores include the shrewlike rats of the Philippines, which feed on insects and soft-bodied invertebrates, and the Australian water rat, which devours aquatic insects, fish, crustaceans, mussels, snails, frogs, birds' eggs and water birds.^[33][34] The grasshopper mouse from dry regions of North America feeds on insects, scorpions, other small mice and only a small part of its diet is plant material. It has a chunky body with short legs and tail, but is agile and can easily overpower prey as large as itself.^[35]

Social behavior

Prairie dog "town"

Rodents exhibit a wide range of types of social behavior ranging from the first known mammalian caste system of the naked mole rat,^[36] the extensive "town" of the colonial prairie dog,^[37] through family groups to the independent, solitary life of the edible dormouse. Adult dormice may have overlapping feeding ranges, but they live in individual nests and feed separately, coming together briefly in the breeding season to mate. The pocket gopher is also a solitary animal outside the breeding season, each individual digging a complex tunnel system and maintaining a territory.^[7]

Larger rodents tend to live in family units where parents and their offspring live together until the youngsters disperse. Beavers live in extended family units typically with a pair of adults, this year's kits, the previous year's offspring and sometimes older young.^[38] Brown rats usually live in small colonies with up to six females sharing a burrow and one male defending a territory around the burrow. At high population densities, this system breaks down and males show a hierarchical system of dominance with overlapping ranges. Female offspring remain in the colony while male young disperse.^[39] The prairie vole is monogamous and forms a lifelong pair bond. Outside the breeding season, prairie voles live in close proximity with others in small colonies. A male is not aggressive towards other males until he has mated, after which time he defends a territory, a female and a nest against other males. The pair huddle together, groom one another, and share nesting and pup-raising responsibilities.^[40]

A nest of naked mole rats

Among the most social of rodents are the ground squirrels, which typically form colonies based on female kinship, males dispersing after weaning and becoming nomadic as adults. Cooperation in ground squirrels varies between species and typically includes making alarm calls, defending territories, sharing food, protecting nesting areas and preventing infanticide.^[41] The black-tailed prairie dog forms large towns that may cover many hectares. The burrows do not interconnect but are excavated and occupied by territorial family groups known as coteries. A coterie often consists of an adult male, three or four adult females, several non-breeding yearlings and this year's offspring. Individuals within coteries are friendly with each other, but hostile towards outsiders.^[37]

Perhaps the most extreme examples of colonial behavior in rodents are the eusocial naked mole rat and Damaraland mole rat. The naked mole rat lives completely underground and can form colonies of up to eighty individuals. Only one female and up to three males in the colony reproduce, while the rest of the members are smaller, sterile and function as workers. Some individuals are of intermediate size. They help with the rearing of the young and can take the place of a reproductive if one dies.^[42] The Damaraland mole rat is characterized by having a single reproductively active male and female in a colony where the remaining animals are not truly sterile, but only become fertile if they establish a colony of their own.^[43]

Communication

Olfactory

Nepotistic species such as house mice rely on urine, feces and glandular secretions to recognize their kin.

Rodents use scent marking in many social contexts including inter- and intra-species communication, the marking of trails and the establishment of territories. Their urine provides genetic information about individuals including the species, the sex and individual identity, and metabolic information on dominance, reproductive status and health. Compounds derived from the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) are bound to several urinary proteins. The odor of a predator depresses scent-marking behavior.^[44]

Rodents are able to recognize close relatives by smell and this allows them to show nepotism (preferential behavior toward their kin) and also avoid inbreeding. This kin recognition is by olfactory cues from urine, feces and glandular secretions. The main assessment may involve the MHC, where the degree of relatedness of two individuals is correlated to the MHC genes they have in common. In non-kin communication, where more permanent odor markers are required, as at territorial borders, then non-volatile major urinary proteins (MUPs), which function as pheromone transporters, may also be used. MUPs may also signal individual identity, with each male house mouse (Mus musculus) excreting urine containing about a dozen genetically encoded MUPs.^[45]

House mice deposit urine, which contains pheromones, for territorial marking, individual and group recognition, and social organization. This can occur in a range of ways:^[46]

• The Bruce effect: Pheromones from strange adult males cause females to terminate their pregnancies^[46]
• The Whitten effect: Pheromones from familiar males cause synchronous estrus in a female population^[46]
• The Vandenbergh effect: Pheromones from mature male house mice cause an early induction of the first estrous cycle in prepubertal female mice^[46]
• The Lee–Boot effect: Pheromones from mature females cause the suppression or prolongation of oestrous cycles of other female house mice (and other rodents) when they are housed in groups and isolated from males^[46]
• Pheromones from males or from pregnant or lactating females can speed up or retard sexual maturation in juvenile females^[46]

Territorial beavers and red squirrels investigate and become familiar with the scents of their neighbors and respond less aggressively to intrusions by them than to those made by non-territorial "floaters" or strangers. This is known as the "dear enemy effect".^[47][48]

Auditory

Degus have a complex vocal repertoire.

Many rodent species, particularly those that are diurnal and social, have a wide range of alarm calls that are emitted when they perceive threats. There are both direct and indirect benefits of doing this. A potential predator may stop when it knows it has been detected, or an alarm call can allow conspecifics or related individuals to take evasive action.^[49] Several species, for example prairie dogs, have complex anti-predator alarm call systems. These species may have different calls for different predators (e.g. aerial predators or ground-based predators) and each call contains information about the nature of the precise threat.^[50] The urgency of the threat is also conveyed by the acoustic properties of the call.^[51]

Social rodents have a wider range of vocalizations than do solitary species. Fifteen different call-types have been recognized in adult Kataba mole rats and four in juveniles.^[52] Similarly, the degu, another social, burrowing rodent, exhibits a wide array of communication methods and has an elaborate vocal repertoire comprising fifteen different categories of sound.^[53] Ultrasonic calls play a part in social communication between dormice and are used when the individuals are out of sight of each other.^[54]

House mice use both audible and ultrasonic calls in a variety of contexts. Audible vocalizations can often be heard during agonistic or aggressive encounters, whereas ultrasound is used in sexual communication and also by pups when they have fallen out of the nest.^[46]

Marmot whistling

Laboratory rats (which are brown rats, Rattus norvegicus) emit short, high frequency, ultrasonic vocalizations during purportedly pleasurable experiences such as rough-and-tumble play, when anticipating routine doses of morphine, during mating, and when tickled. The vocalization, described as a distinct "chirping", has been likened to laughter, and is interpreted as an expectation of something rewarding. In clinical studies, the chirping is associated with positive emotional feelings, and social bonding occurs with the tickler, resulting in the rats becoming conditioned to seek the tickling. However, as the rats age, the tendency to chirp declines. Like most rat vocalizations, the chirping is at frequencies too high for humans to hear without special equipment, so bat detectors have been used for this purpose.^[55]

It has been reported that brown rats use ultrasound for echolocation.^[46] The frequencies heard by rodents differ between species. The table below shows the hearing ranges of several species.^[56]

Species	Lower limit (Hz)	Higher limit (Hz)	Specific calls
Human	20	23,000
Rat	200	76,000	High frequency ultrasonic "pleasure" call emitted at 50 kHz
Mouse	1,000	91,000	Distress call of young emitted at 40 kHz
Gerbil	100	60,000
Guinea pig	54	50,000
Chinchilla	90	22,800

Visual

Rodents, like all placental mammals except primates, have just two types of light receptive cones in their retina,^[57] a short wavelength "blue-UV" type and a middle wavelength "green" type. They are therefore classified as dichromats; however, they are visually sensitive into the ultraviolet (UV) spectrum and therefore can see light that humans can not. The functions of this UV sensitivity are not always clear. In degus, for example, the belly reflects more UV light than the back. Therefore, when a degu stands up on its hind legs, which it does when alarmed, it exposes its belly to other degus and ultraviolet vision may serve a purpose in communicating the alarm. When it stands on all fours, its low UV-reflectance back could help make the degu less visible to predators.^[58] Ultraviolet light is abundant during the day but not at night. There is a large increase in the ratio of ultraviolet to visible light in the morning and evening twilight hours. Many rodents are active during twilight hours (crepuscular activity), and UV-sensitivity would be advantageous at these times. Ultraviolet reflectivity is of dubious value for nocturnal rodents.^[59]

The urine of many rodents (e.g. voles, degus, mice, rats) strongly reflects UV light and this may be used in communication by leaving visible as well as olfactory markings.^[60] However, the amount of UV that is reflected decreases with time, which in some circumstances can be disadvantageous; the common kestrel can distinguish between old and fresh rodent trails and has greater success hunting over more recently marked routes.^[61]

Tactile

The Middle East blind mole rat uses vibrational communication.

Vibrations can provide cues to conspecifics about specific behaviors being performed, predator warning and avoidance, herd or group maintenance, and courtship. The Middle East blind mole rat was the first mammal for which vibrational communication was documented. These fossorial rodents bang their head against the walls of their tunnels. This behavior was initially interpreted as part of their tunnel building behavior, but it was eventually realized that they generate temporally patterned vibrational signals for long-distance communication with neighboring mole rats.^[62]

Footdrumming is used widely as a predator warning or defensive action. It is used primarily by fossorial or semi-fossorial rodents.^[63] The banner-tailed kangaroo rat produces several complex footdrumming patterns in a number of different contexts, one of which is when it encounters a snake. The footdrumming may alert nearby offspring but most likely conveys that the rat is too alert for a successful attack, thus preventing the snake's predatory pursuit.^[62][64] Several studies have indicated intentional use of ground vibrations as a means of intra-specific communication during courtship among the Cape mole rat.^[65] Footdrumming has been reported to be involved in male-male competition; the dominant male indicates its resource holding potential by drumming, thus minimizing physical contact with potential rivals.^[62]

Mating strategies

The Cape ground squirrel is an example of a promiscuous rodent.

Some species of rodent are monogamous, with an adult male and female forming a lasting pair bond. Monogamy can come in two forms; obligate and facultative. In obligate monogamy, both parents care for the offspring and play an important part in their survival. This occurs in species such as California mice, oldfield mice, Malagasy giant rats and beavers. In these species, males usually mate only with their partners. In addition to increased care for young, obligate monogamy can also be beneficial to the adult male as it decreases the chances of never finding a mate or mating with an infertile female. In facultative monogamy, the males do not provide direct parental care and stay with one female because they cannot access others due to being spatially dispersed. Prairie voles appear to be an example of this form of monogamy, with males guarding and defending females within their vicinity.^[66]

In polygynous species, males will try to monopolize and mate with multiple females. As with monogamy, polygyny in rodents can come in two forms; defense and non-defense. Defense polygyny involves males controlling territories that contain resources that attract females. This occurs in ground squirrels like yellow-bellied marmots, California ground squirrels, Columbian ground squirrels and Richardson's ground squirrels. Males with territories are known as "resident" males and the females that live within the territories are known as "resident" females. In the case of marmots, resident males do not appear to ever lose their territories and always win encounters with invading males. Some species are also known to directly defend their resident females and the ensuing fights can lead to severe wounding. In species with non-defense polygyny, males are not territorial and wander widely in search of females to monopolize. These males establish dominance hierarchies, with the high-ranking males having access to the most females. This occurs in species like Belding's ground squirrels and some tree squirrel species.^[66]

A mating plug in a female Richardson's ground squirrel

Promiscuity, in which both males and females mate with multiple partners, also occurs in rodents. In species such as the white-footed mouse, females give birth to litters with multiple paternities. Promiscuity leads to increased sperm competition and males tend to have larger testicles. In the Cape ground squirrel, the male's testes can be 20 percent of its head-body length.^[66] Several rodent species have flexible mating systems that can vary between monogamy, polygyny and promiscuity.^[66]

Female rodents play an active role in choosing their mates. Factors that contribute to female preference may include the size, dominance and spatial ability of the male.^[67] In the eusocial naked mole rats, a single female monopolizes mating from at least three males.^[42]

In most rodent species, such as brown rats and house mice, ovulation occurs on a regular cycle while in others, such as voles, it is induced by mating. During copulation, males of some rodent species deposit a mating plug in the female's genital opening, both to prevent sperm leakage and to protect against other males inseminating the female. Females can remove the plug and may do so either immediately or after several hours.^[67]

Birth and parenting

Young bank voles in their nest beneath a wood pile

Rodents may be born either altricial (blind, hairless and relatively underdeveloped) or precocial (mostly furred, eyes open and fairly developed) depending on the species. The altricial state is typical for squirrels and mice, while the precocial state usually occurs in species like guinea pigs and porcupines. Females with altricial young typically build elaborate nests before they give birth and maintain them until their offspring are weaned. The female gives birth sitting or lying down and the young emerge in the direction she is facing. The newborns first venture out of the nest a few days after they have opened their eyes and initially keep returning regularly. As they get older and more developed, they visit the nest less often and leave permanently when weaned.^[68]

In precocial species, the mothers invest little in nest building and some do not build nests at all. The female gives birth standing and the young emerge behind her. Mothers of these species maintain contact with their highly mobile young with maternal contact calls. Though relatively independent and weaned within days, precocial young may continue to nurse and be groomed by their mothers. Rodent litter sizes also vary and females with smaller litters spend more time in the nest than those with larger litters.^[68]

Two Patagonian maras with young, an example of a monogamous and communal nesting species

Mother rodents provide both direct parental care, such as nursing, grooming, retrieving and huddling, and indirect parenting, such as food caching, nest building and protection to their offspring.^[68] In many social species, young may be cared for by individuals other then their parents, a practice known as alloparenting or cooperative breeding. This is known to occur in black-tailed prairie dogs and Belding's ground squirrels, where mothers have communal nests and nurse unrelated young along with their own. There is some question as to whether these mothers can distinguish which young are theirs. In the Patagonian mara, young are also placed in communal warrens, but mothers do not permit youngsters other than their own to nurse.^[69]

Infanticide exists in numerous rodent species and may be practiced by adult conspecifics of either sex. Several reasons have been proposed for this behavior, including nutritional stress, resource competition, avoiding misdirecting parental care and, in the case of males, attempting to make the mother sexually receptive. The latter reason is well supported in primates and lions but less so in rodents.^[70] Infanticide appears to be widespread in black-tailed prairie dogs, including infanticide from invading males and immigrant females, as well as occasional cannibalism of an individual's own offspring.^[71] To protect against infanticide from other adults, female rodents may employ avoidance or direct aggression against potential perpetrators, multiple mating, territoriality or early termination of pregnancy.^[70] Feticide can also occur among rodents; in Alpine marmots, dominant females tend to suppress the reproduction of subordinates by being antagonistic towards them while they are pregnant. The resulting stress causes the fetuses to abort.^[72]

Cognition

Kangaroo rats can locate food caches by spatial memory.

Rodents have advanced cognitive abilities. They can quickly learn to avoid poisoned baits, which makes them difficult pests to deal with.^[1] Guinea pigs can learn and remember complex pathways to food.^[73] Squirrels and kangaroo rats are able to locate caches of food by spatial memory, rather than just by smell.^[74][75]

Because laboratory mice (house mice) and rats (brown rats) are widely used as scientific models to further our understanding of biology, a great deal has come to be known about their cognitive capacities. Brown rats exhibit cognitive bias, where information processing is biased by whether they are in a positive or negative affective state.^[76] For example, laboratory rats trained to respond to a specific tone by pressing a lever to receive a reward, and to press another lever in response to a different tone so as to avoid receiving an electric shock, are more likely to respond to an intermediate tone by choosing the reward lever if they have just been tickled (something they enjoy), indicating "a link between the directly measured positive affective state and decision making under uncertainty in an animal model."^[77]

Laboratory (brown) rats may have the capacity for metacognition—to consider their own learning and then make decisions based on what they know, or do not know, as indicated by choices they make apparently trading off difficulty of tasks and expected rewards, making them the first animals other than primates to have this capacity,^[78][79] but these findings are disputed, since the rats may have been following simple operant conditioning principles,^[80] or a behavioral economic model.^[81]

Brown rats use social learning in a wide range of situations, but perhaps especially so in acquiring food preferences. Learning about suitable foods can be divided into four life stages.^[82][83]

• Before birth: In utero, fetal rats detect odor-bearing particles that come from their mother's diet and cross the placental barrier. Shortly after birth, newborn rats respond positively to these foods.^[82][83]
• During nursing: Nursing rats receive information about their mother's diet through her milk. They prefer the foods she ate during lactation.^[82][83]
• Weaning: When young rats are weaning and eating solid foods for the first time, they use adult rats as guides. They forage where the adults are foraging or where adults have previously scent-marked.^[82][83]
• Adolescence and adulthood: When rats forage on their own, their food choices are influenced by social interactions that may take place far away from foraging sites. They smell foods on the fur, whiskers and especially the breath of other rats and strongly prefer the foods those rats had previously eaten.^[82] This inclines them not to eat poisons avoided by older rats.^[83]

Classification and evolution

Evolutionary history

Masillamys sp. fossil from the Eocene Messel Pit fossil site, Germany

Dentition is the key feature by which fossil rodents are recognized and the earliest record of such mammals comes from the Paleocene, shortly after the extinction of the non-avian dinosaurs some 66 million years ago. These fossils are found in Laurasia,^[84] the supercontinent composed of modern-day North America, Europe, and Asia. The divergence of Glires, a clade consisting of rodents and lagomorphs (rabbits, hares and pikas), from other placental mammals occurred within a few million years after the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary; rodents and lagomorphs then radiated during the Cenozoic.^[85] Some molecular clock data suggest modern rodents (members of the order Rodentia) had appeared by the late Cretaceous, although other molecular divergence estimations are in agreement with the fossil record.^[86][87]

Rodents are thought to have evolved in Asia, where local multituberculate faunas were severely affected by the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event and never fully recovered, unlike their North American and European relatives. In the resulting ecological vacuum, rodents and other Glires were allowed to evolve and diversify, taking the niches left by extinct multituberculates. The correlation between the spread of rodents and the demise of multituberculates is a controversial topic, not fully resolved. American and European multituberculate assemblages do decline in diversity in correlation with the introduction of rodents in these areas, but the remaining Asian multituberculates co-existed with rodents with no observable replacement taking place, and ultimately both clades co-existed for at least 15 million years.^[88]

The history of the colonization of the world's continents by rodents is complex. The movements of the large superfamily Muroidea (including hamsters, gerbils, true mice and rats) may have involved up to seven colonizations of Africa, five of North America, four of Southeast Asia, two of South America and up to ten of Eurasia.^[89]

The horned gopher Ceratogaulus hatcheri, a burrowing mammal of the late Miocene to early Pleistocene, was the only horned rodent.^[90]

During the Eocene, rodents began to diversify. Beavers appeared in North America in the late Eocene before spreading to Eurasia.^[91] Late in the Eocene, hystricognaths invaded Africa, most probably having originated in Asia at least 39.5 million years ago.^[92] From Africa, fossil evidence shows that some hystricognaths (caviomorphs) colonized South America, which was an isolated continent at the time, evidently making use of ocean currents to cross the Atlantic on floating debris.^[93] Caviomorphs had arrived in South America by 41 million years ago (implying a date at least as early as this for hystricognaths in Africa),^[92] and had reached the Greater Antilles by the early Oligocene, suggesting that they must have dispersed rapidly across South America.^[94]

Nesomyid rodents are thought to have rafted from Africa to Madagascar 20–24 million years ago.^[95] All 27 species of native Malagasy rodents appear to be descendents of a single colonization event.

By 20 million years ago, fossils recognizably belonging to the current families such as Muridae had emerged.^[84] By the Miocene, when Africa had collided with Asia, African rodents such as the porcupine began to spread into Eurasia.^[96] Some fossil species were very large in comparison to modern rodents and included the giant beaver, Castoroides ohioensis, which grew to a length of 2.5 m (8 ft 2 in) and weight of 100 kg (220 lb).^[97] The largest known rodent was Josephoartigasia monesi, a pacarana with an estimated body length of 3 m (10 ft).^[98]

The first rodents arrived in Australia via Indonesia around 5 million years ago. Although marsupials are the most prominent mammals in Australia, many rodents, all belonging to the subfamily Murinae, are among the continent's mammal species.^[99] There are about fifty species of 'old endemics', the first wave of rodents to colonize the country in the Miocene and early Pliocene, and eight true rat (Rattus) species of 'new endemics', arriving in a subsequent wave in the late Pliocene or early Pleistocene. The earliest fossil rodents in Australia have a maximum age of 4.5 million years,^[100] and molecular data is consistent with the colonization of New Guinea from the west during the late Miocene or early Pliocene followed by rapid diversification. A further wave of adaptive radiation occurred after one or more colonizations of Australia some 2 to 3 million years later.^[101]

Rodents participated in the Great American Interchange that resulted from the joining of the Americas by formation of the Isthmus of Panama, around 3 million years ago in the Piacenzian age.^[102] In this exchange, a small number of species such as the New World porcupines (Erethizontidae) headed north.^[84] However, the main southward invasion of sigmodontines preceded formation of the land bridge by at least several million years, probably occurring via rafting.^{[103][104][105]} Sigmodontines diversified explosively once in South America, although some degree of diversification may have already occurred in Central America before the colonization.^[104][105] Their "head start" has relegated other North American rodent groups (sciurids, geomyids, heteromyids and nonsigmodontine cricetids) to a minor presence in the contemporary South American fauna.

Standard classification

The use of the order name "Rodentia" is attributed to the English traveler and naturalist Thomas Edward Bowdich (1821).^[106] The Modern Latin word "Rodentia" is derived from "rodens", present participle of "rodere" – "to gnaw", "eat away".^[107] The hares, rabbits and pikas (order Lagomorpha) have continuously growing incisors, as do rodents, and were at one time included in the order. However, they have an additional pair of incisors in the upper jaw and the two orders have quite separate evolutionary histories.^[108] The phylogeny of the rodents places them in the clades Glires, Euarchontoglires and Boreoeutheria. The cladogram below shows the inner and outer relations of Rodentia based on a 2012 attempt by Wu et al. to align the molecular clock with paleontological data:^[109]

Boreoeutheria

Laurasiatheria Perissodactyla Carnivora Euarchontoglires Primates Glires Lagomorpha Ochotona (Old World rabbits) Sylvilagus (New World rabbits) Rodentia Hystricomorpha Ctenodactylus (gundis) Atherurus (brush-tailed porcupines) Octodontomys (mountain degus) Erethizon (North American porcupines) Cavia (guinea pigs) Sciuromorpha Aplodontia (mountain beavers) Glaucomys (New World flying squirrels) Tamias (chipmunks) Castorimorpha Castor (beavers) Dipodomys (kangaroo rats) Thomomys (pocket gophers) Myodonta Muroidea Peromyscus (deer mice) Mus ([true] mice) Rattus (rats) Dipodoidea Sicista (birch mice) Zapus (jumping mice) Cardiocranius (pygmy jerboas)

The living rodent families based on the study done by Fabre et al. 2012.^[110]

Rodentia classification

Rodentia Sciuromorpha Gliridae Sciurida Aplodontidae Sciuridae Ctenohystrica Ctenodactylomorpha Ctenodactylidae Diatomyidae Hystricognatha Hystricidae Bathyergomorpha Bathyergidae Pteromuridae Thryonomyidae Caviida Cavioidea Erethizontidae Cuniculidae Caviidae Dasyproctidae Chinchilloidea Dinomyidae Chinchillidae Octodontoidea Abrocomidae Echimyidae Ctenomyidae Octodontidae Castorimorpha Castoroidea Castoridae Geomyoidea Heteromyidae Geomyidae Anomaluromorpha Anomaluridae Pedetidae Myomorpha Dipodoidea Dipodidae Muroidea Platacanthomyidae Spalacidae Calomyscidae Nesomyidae Cricetidae Muridae

The order Rodentia may be divided into suborders, infraorders, superfamilies and families. There is a great deal of parallelism and convergence among rodents caused by the fact that they have tended to evolve to fill largely similar niches. This parallel evolution includes not only the structure of the teeth, but also the infraorbital region of the skull (below the eye socket) and makes classification difficult as similar traits may not be due to common ancestry.^[111][112] Brandt (1855) was the first to propose dividing Rodentia into three suborders, Sciuromorpha, Hystricomorpha and Myomorpha, based on the development of certain muscles in the jaw and this system was widely accepted. Schlosser (1884) performed a comprehensive review of rodent fossils, mainly using the cheek teeth, and found that they fitted into the classical system, but Tullborg (1899) proposed just two sub-orders, Sciurognathi and Hystricognathi. These were based on the degree of inflection of the lower jaw and were to be further subdivided into Sciuromorpha, Myomorpha, Hystricomorpha and Bathyergomorpha. Matthew (1910) created a phylogenetic tree of New World rodents but did not include the more problematic Old World species. Further attempts at classification continued without agreement, with some authors adopting the classical three suborder system and others Tullborg's two suborders.^[111]

These disagreements remain unresolved, nor have molecular studies fully resolved the situation though they have confirmed the monophyly of the group and that the clade has descended from a common Paleocene ancestor. Carleton and Musser (2005) in Mammal Species of the World have provisionally adopted a five suborder system: Sciuromorpha, Castorimorpha, Myomorpha, Anomaluromorpha, and Hystricomorpha. These include 33 families, 481 genera and 2277 species:^[113][114]

Order Rodentia (from Latin, rodere, to gnaw)

Anomaluromorpha: East African springhare

Castorimorpha: Botta's pocket gopher

Caviomorpha: North American porcupine

Myomorpha: Golden or Syrian hamster

Sciuromorpha: African dormouse

• Suborder Anomaluromorpha

  • Family Anomaluridae: scaly-tailed squirrels
  • Family Pedetidae: springhares

• Suborder Castorimorpha

  • Superfamily Castoroidea
    • Family Castoridae: beavers
  • Superfamily Geomyoidea
    • Family Geomyidae: pocket gophers (true gophers)
    • Family Heteromyidae: kangaroo rats, kangaroo mice

• Suborder Hystricomorpha

  • Family incertae sedis Diatomyidae: Laotian rock rat

  • Infraorder Ctenodactylomorphi

    • Family Ctenodactylidae: gundis

  • Infraorder Hystricognathi

    • Family Bathyergidae: African mole rats
    • Family Hystricidae: Old World porcupines
    • Family Petromuridae: dassie rat
    • Family Thryonomyidae: cane rats

    • Parvorder Caviomorpha
      • Family †Heptaxodontidae: giant hutias
      • Family Abrocomidae: chinchilla rats
      • Family Capromyidae: hutias
      • Family Caviidae: cavies, including Guinea pigs and the capybara
      • Family Chinchillidae: chinchillas, viscachas
      • Family Ctenomyidae: tuco-tucos
      • Family Dasyproctidae: agoutis
      • Family Cuniculidae: pacas
      • Family Dinomyidae: pacaranas
      • Family Echimyidae: spiny rats
      • Family Erethizontidae: New World porcupines
      • Family Myocastoridae: nutria, coypu
      • Family Octodontidae: octodonts
• Suborder Myomorpha

  • Superfamily Dipodoidea
    • Family Dipodidae: jerboas and jumping mice
  • Superfamily Muroidea
    • Family Calomyscidae: mouse-like hamsters
    • Family Cricetidae: hamsters, New World rats and mice, muskrats, voles, lemmings
    • Family Muridae: true mice and rats, gerbils, spiny mice, crested rat
    • Family Nesomyidae: climbing mice, rock mice, white-tailed rat, Malagasy rats and mice
    • Family Platacanthomyidae: spiny dormice
    • Family Spalacidae: mole rats, bamboo rats, zokors

• Suborder Sciuromorpha

  • Family Aplodontiidae: mountain beaver
  • Family Gliridae (also Myoxidae, Muscardinidae): dormice
  • Family Sciuridae: squirrels, including chipmunks, prairie dogs, marmots

Interaction with humans

Conservation

Drawing of the critically endangered red crested soft-furred spiny rat

While rodents are not the most seriously threatened order of mammals, there are 168 species in 126 genera that are said to warrant conservation attention^[115] in the face of limited appreciation by the public. Since 76 percent of rodent genera contain only one species, much phylogenetic diversity could be lost with a comparatively small number of extinctions. In the absence of more detailed knowledge of species at risk and accurate taxonomy, conservation must be based mainly on higher taxa (such as families rather than species) and geographical hot spots.^[115] Several species of rice rat have become extinct since the 19th century, probably through habitat loss and the introduction of alien species.^[116] In Colombia, the brown hairy dwarf porcupine was recorded from only two mountain localities in the 1920s, while the red crested soft-furred spiny rat is known only from its type locality on the Caribbean coast, so these species are considered vulnerable.^[117] The IUCN Species Survival Commission writes "We can safely conclude that many South American rodents are seriously threatened, mainly by environmental disturbance and intensive hunting".^[118]

The "three now cosmopolitan commensal rodent pest species"^[119] (the brown rat, the black rat and the house mouse) have been dispersed in association with humans, partly on sailing ships in the Age of Exploration, and with a fourth species in the Pacific, the Polynesian rat (Rattus exulans), have severely damaged island biotas around the world. For example, when the black rat reached Lord Howe Island in 1918, over 40 percent of the terrestrial bird species of the island, including the Lord Howe fantail,^[120] became extinct within ten years. Similar destruction has been seen on Midway Island (1943) and Big South Cape Island (1962). Conservation projects can with careful planning completely eradicate these pest rodents from islands using an anticoagulant rodenticide such as brodifacoum.^[119] This approach has been successful on the island of Lundy in the United Kingdom, where the eradication of an estimated 40,000 brown rats is giving populations of Manx shearwater and Atlantic puffin a chance to recover from near-extinction.^[121][122]

Exploitation

Chinchilla fur coat, exhibited at the 1900 Exposition Universal, Paris

Humanity has long used animal skins for clothing, as the leather is durable and the fur provides extra insulation.^[2] The native people of North America made much use of beaver pelts, tanning and sewing them together to make robes. Europeans appreciated the quality of these and the North American fur trade developed and became of prime importance to early settlers. In Europe, the soft underfur known as "beaver wool" was found to be ideal for felting and was made into beaver hats and trimming for clothing.^[123][124] Later, the coypu took over as a cheaper source of fur for felting and was farmed extensively in America and Europe; however, fashions changed, new materials became available and this area of the animal fur industry declined.^[125] The chinchilla has a soft and silky coat and the demand for its fur was so high that it was nearly wiped out in the wild before farming took over as the main source of pelts.^[125] The quills and guardhairs of porcupines are used for traditional decorative clothing. For example, their guardhairs are used in the creation of the Native American "porky roach" headdress. The main quills may be dyed, and then applied in combination with thread to embellish leather accessories such as knife sheaths and leather bags. Lakota women would harvest the quills for quillwork by throwing a blanket over a porcupine and retrieving the quills it left stuck in the blanket.^[126]

At least 89 species of rodent, mostly Hystricomorpha such as guinea pigs, agoutis and capybaras, are eaten by humans; in 1985, there were at least 42 different societies in which people eat rats.^[127] Guinea pigs were first raised for food around 2500 B.C. and by 1500 B.C. had become the main source of meat for the Inca Empire. Dormice were raised by the Romans in special pots called "gliraria", or in large outdoor enclosures, where they were fattened on walnuts, chestnuts, and acorns. The dormice were also caught from the wild in autumn when they were fattest, and either roasted and dipped into honey or baked while stuffed with a mixture of pork, pine nuts, and other flavorings. Researchers found that in Amazonia, where large mammals were scarce, pacas and common agoutis accounted for around 40 percent of the annual game taken by the indigenous people, but in forested areas where larger mammals were abundant, these rodents constituted only about 3 percent of the take.^[127]

Guinea pigs are used in the cuisine of Cuzco, Peru, in dishes such as cuy al horno, baked guinea pig.^[2][128] The traditional Andean stove, known as a qoncha or a fogón, is made from mud and clay reinforced with straw and hair from animals such as guinea pigs.^[129] In Peru, there are at any time 20 million domestic guinea pigs, which annually produce 64 million edible carcasses. This animal is an excellent food source since the flesh is 19% protein.^[127] In the United States, mostly squirrels, but also muskrats, porcupines, and ground hogs are eaten by humans. The Navajo people ate prairie dog baked in mud, while the Paiute ate gophers, squirrels, and rats.^[127]

Rodents including guinea pigs,^[130] mice, rats, hamsters, gerbils, chinchillas, degus and chipmunks make convenient pets able to live in small spaces, each species with its own qualities.^[131] Most are normally kept in cages of suitable sizes and have varied requirements for space and social interaction. If handled from a young age, they are usually docile and do not bite. Guinea pigs have a long lifespan and need a large cage.^[73] Rats also need plenty of space and can become very tame, can learn tricks and seem to enjoy human companionship. Mice are short-lived but take up very little space. Hamsters are solitary but tend to be nocturnal. They have interesting behaviors, but unless handled regularly they may be defensive. Gerbils are not usually aggressive, rarely bite and are sociable animals that enjoy the company of humans and their own kind.^[132]

Laboratory house mouse

Rodents are used widely as model organisms in animal testing.^[2][133] Albino mutant rats were first used for research in 1828 and later became the first animal domesticated for purely scientific purposes.^[134] Nowadays, the house mouse is the most commonly used laboratory rodent, and in 1979 it was estimated that fifty million were used annually worldwide. They are favored because of their small size, fertility, short gestation period and ease of handling and because they are susceptible to many of the conditions and infections that afflict humans. They are used in research into genetics, developmental biology, cell biology, oncology and immunology.^[135] Guinea pigs were popular laboratory animals until the late 20th century; about 2.5 million guinea pigs were used annually in the United States for research in the 1960s,^[136] but that total decreased to about 375,000 by the mid-1990s.^[137] In 2007, they constituted about 2% of all laboratory animals.^[136] Guinea pigs played a major role in the establishment of germ theory in the late 19th century, through the experiments of Louis Pasteur, Émile Roux, and Robert Koch.^[138] They have been launched into orbital space flight several times—first by the USSR on the Sputnik 9 biosatellite of March 9, 1961, with a successful recovery.^[139] The naked mole rat is the only known mammal that is poikilothermic; it is used in studies on thermoregulation. It is also unusual in not producing the neurotransmitter substance P, a fact which researchers find useful in studies on pain.^[140]

Rodents have sensitive olfactory abilities, which have been used by humans to detect odors or chemicals of interest.^[141] The Gambian pouched rat is able to detect tuberculosis bacilli with a sensitivity of up to 86.6%, and specificity (detecting the absence of the bacilli) of over 93%; the same species has been trained to detect land mines.^[142][143] Rats have been studied for possible use in hazardous situations such as in disaster zones. They can be trained to respond to commands, which may be given remotely, and even persuaded to venture into brightly lit areas, which rats usually avoid.^{[144][145][146]}

As pests and disease vectors

Rodents cause significant losses to crops, such as these potatoes damaged by voles.

Some rodent species are serious agricultural pests, eating large quantities of food stored by humans.^[147] For example, in 2003, the amount of rice lost to mice and rats in Asia was estimated to be enough to feed 200 million people. Most of the damage worldwide is caused by a relatively small number of species, chiefly rats and mice.^[148] In Indonesia and Tanzania, rodents reduce crop yields by around fifteen percent, while in some instances in South America losses have reached ninety percent. Across Africa, rodents including Mastomys and Arvicanthis damage cereals, groundnuts, vegetables and cacao. In Asia, rats, mice and species such as Microtus brandti, Meriones unguiculatus and Eospalax baileyi damage crops of rice, sorghum, tubers, vegetables and nuts. In Europe, as well as rats and mice, species of Apodemus, Microtus and in occasional outbreaks Arvicola terrestris cause damage to orchards, vegetables and pasture as well as cereals. In South America, a wider range of rodent species, such as Holochilus, Akodon, Calomys, Oligoryzomys, Phyllotis, Sigmodon and Zygodontomys, damage many crops including sugar cane, fruits, vegetables, and tubers.^[148]

Rodents are also significant vectors of disease.^[149] The black rat, with the fleas that it carries, plays a primary role in spreading the bacterium Yersinia pestis responsible for bubonic plague,^[150] and carries the organisms responsible for typhus, Weil's disease, toxoplasmosis and trichinosis.^[151] A number of rodents carry hantaviruses, including the Puumala, Dobrava and Saaremaa viruses, which can infect humans.^[152] Rodents also help to transmit diseases including babesiosis, cutaneous leishmaniasis, human granulocytic anaplasmosis, Lyme disease, Omsk hemorrhagic fever, Powassan virus, rickettsialpox, relapsing fever, Rocky Mountain spotted fever, and West Nile virus.^[153]

Because rodents are a nuisance and endanger public health, human societies often attempt to control them. Traditionally, this involved poisoning and trapping, methods that were not always safe or effective. More recently, integrated pest management attempts to improve control with a combination of surveys to determine the size and distribution of the pest population, the establishment of tolerance limits (levels of pest activity at which to intervene), interventions, and evaluation of effectiveness based on repeated surveys. Interventions may include education, making and applying laws and regulations, modifying the habitat, changing farming practices, and biological control using pathogens or predators, as well as poisoning and trapping.^[154] The use of pathogens such as Salmonella has the drawback that they can infect man and domestic animals, and rodents often become resistant. The use of predators including ferrets, mongooses and monitor lizards has been found unsatisfactory. Domestic and feral cats are able to control rodents effectively, provided the rodent population is not too large.^[155] In the UK, two species in particular, the house mouse and the brown rat, are actively controlled to limit damage in growing crops, loss and contamination of stored crops and structural damage to facilities, as well as to comply with the law.^[156]

See also

• Mouse models of breast cancer metastasis

References

1. Single, G.; Dickman, C. R.; MacDonald, D. W. (2001). "Rodents". In MacDonald, D. W. The Encyclopedia of Mammals (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. pp. 578–587. ISBN 978-0-7607-1969-5.
2. Waggoner, Ben (15 August 2000). "Introduction to the Rodentia". University of California Museum of Paleontology. Retrieved 4 July 2014.
3. Nowak, R. M. (1999). Walker's Mammals of the World. Johns Hopkins University Press. p. 1244. ISBN 0-8018-5789-9.
4. Blashfield, Jean F. "Rodents". Science Encyclopedia. Retrieved 14 July 2014.
5. Niemiec, Brook A. (15 October 2011). Small Animal Dental, Oral and Maxillofacial Disease: A Colour Handbook. CRC Press. p. 13. ISBN 978-1-84076-630-1.
6. Cox, Philip G.; Jeffery, Nathan (2011). "Reviewing the Morphology of the Jaw-Closing Musculature in Squirrels, Rats, and Guinea Pigs with Contrast-Enhanced MicroCT". The Anatomical Record 294: 915–928. doi:10.1002/ar.21381.
7. Stefoff, Rebecca (2008). The Rodent Order. Marshall Cavendish. pp. 62–63, 71–73. ISBN 978-0-7614-3073-5.
8. Thorington, R. W Jr.; Darrow, K.; Anderson, C. G. (1998). "Wing tip anatomy and aerodynamics in flying squirrels" (PDF). Journal of Mammalogy 79 (1): 245–250. doi:10.2307/1382860. JSTOR 1382860.
9. Schulte-Hostedde, A. I. (2008). "Chapter 10: Sexual Size Dimorphism in Rodents". In Wolff, Jerry O.; Sherman, Paul W. Rodent Societies: An Ecological and Evolutionary Perspective. University of Chicago Press. pp. 117–119. ISBN 978-0-226-90538-9.
10. "AnAge: The animal ageing and longevity database". Human Ageing and Genomics Resources. Retrieved September 23, 2014.
11. Berry, R. J. (1970). "The natural history of the house mouse" (PDF). Field Studies (Field Studies Council) 3: 222.
12. "Heterocephalus glaber: Naked mole rat". Encyclopedia of Life. Retrieved 2 October 2014.
13. Schwartz, Charles Walsh; Schwartz, Elizabeth Reeder (2001). The Wild Mammals of Missouri. University of Missouri Press. p. 250. ISBN 978-0-8262-1359-4.
14. "Rattus norvegicus: Brown rat". Encyclopedia of Life. Retrieved 2 October 2014.
15. "Sciurus vulgaris: Eurasian red squirrel". Encyclopedia of Life. Retrieved 2 October 2014.
16. Spotorno, Angel E.; Zuleta, C. A.; Valladares, J. P.; Deane, A. L.; Jiménez, J. E. (2004). "Chinchilla laniger". Mammalian Species 758: 1–9. doi:10.1644/758.
17. Vanderlip, Sharon (2003). The Guinea Pig Handbook. Barron's. p. 13. ISBN 0-7641-2288-6.
18. "Myocastor coypus: Coypu". Encyclopedia of Life. Retrieved 2 October 2014.
19. "Hydrochaeris hydrochaeris:Capybara". Encyclopedia of Life. Retrieved 2 October 2014.
20. Helgen, Kristofer M. (2005). "The amphibious murines of New Guinea (Rodentia, Muridae): the generic status of Baiyankamys and description of a new species of Hydromys". Zootaxa 913: 1–20. ISSN 1175-5326.
21. Parshad, V.R. (1999). "Rodent control in India" (PDF). Integrated Pest Management Reviews 4: 97–126. doi:10.1023/A:1009622109901.
22. Janke, Axel; Martínez-Estévez, Lourdes; Balvanera, Patricia; Pacheco, Jesús; Ceballos, Gerardo (2013). "Prairie dog decline reduces the supply of ecosystem services and leads to desertification of semiarid grasslands". PLOS ONE 8 (10): e75229. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0075229. ISSN 1932-6203.
23. Krueger, Kirsten (1986). "Feeding relationships among bison, pronghorn, and prairie dogs: an experimental analysis". Ecology 67 (3): 760–770. doi:10.2307/1937699. ISSN 0012-9658.
24. Pérez, Francisco; Castillo-Guevara, Citlalli; Galindo-Flores, Gema; Cuautle, Mariana; Estrada-Torres, Arturo (2012). "Effect of gut passage by two highland rodents on spore activity and mycorrhiza formation of two species of ectomycorrhizal fungi (Laccaria trichodermophora and Suillus tomentosus)". Botany 90 (11): 1084–1092. doi:10.1139/b2012-086. ISSN 1916-2790.
25. Burchsted, D.; Daniels, M.; Thorson, R.; Vokoun, J. (2010). "The river discontinuum: applying beaver modifications to baseline conditions for restoration of forested headwaters". BioScience 60 (11): 908. doi:10.1525/bio.2010.60.11.7.
26. Wright, J. P.; Jones, C. G.; Flecker, A. S. (2002). "An ecosystem engineer, the beaver, increases species richness at the landscape scale" (PDF). Oecologia 132 (1): 96–101. doi:10.1007/s00442-002-0929-1.
27. Kemp, P. S.; Worthington, T. A.; Langford, T. E. l.; Tree, A. R. J.; Gaywood, M. J. (2012). "Qualitative and quantitative effects of reintroduced beavers on stream fish". Fish and Fisheries 13 (2): 158–181. doi:10.1111/j.1467-2979.2011.00421.x.
28. Hansson, Lennart (1971). "Habitat, food and population dynamics of the field vole Microtus agrestis (L.) in south Sweden". Viltrevy 8: 268–278. ISSN 0505-611X.
29. Connior, M. B. (2011). "Geomys bursarius (Rodentia: Geomyidae)". Mammalian Species 43 (1): 104–117. doi:10.1644/879.1.
30. "Texan pocket gopher". The Mammals of Texas: Rodents. NSRL: Museum of Texas Tech University. Retrieved 4 July 2014.
31. Attenborough, David (2002). The Life of Mammals. BBC Books. pp. 61–86. ISBN 978-0-563-53423-5.
32. Müller-Schwarze, Dietland; Sun, Lixing (2003). The Beaver: Natural History of a Wetlands Engineer. Cornell University Press. pp. 67–75. ISBN 978-0-8014-4098-4.
33. Landry, Stuart O. Jr. (1970). "The Rodentia as omnivores". The Quarterly Review of Biology 45 (4): 351–372. doi:10.1086/406647. JSTOR 2821009.
34. "Hydromys chrysogaster: Water rat". Water for a healthy country. CSIRO. 30 June 2004. Retrieved 4 July 2014.
35. "Northern grasshopper mouse". The Mammals of Texas: Rodents. NSRL: Museum of Texas Tech University. Retrieved 4 July 2014.
36. Jarvis, Jennifer (1981). "Eusociality in a Mammal: Cooperative Breeding in Naked Mole-Rat Colonies". Science 212 (4494): 571–573. doi:10.1126/science.7209555. JSTOR 1686202.
37. Hoogland, John L. (1995). The Black-Tailed Prairie Dog: Social Life of a Burrowing Mammal. University of Chicago Press. p. 1. ISBN 978-0-226-35118-6.
38. Baker, Bruce W.; Hill, Edward P. (2003). "Chapter 15: Beaver". In Feldhamer, George A.; Thompson, Bruce C.; Chapman, Joseph A. Wild Mammals of North America: Biology, Management, and Conservation. JHU Press. pp. 288–310. ISBN 978-0-8018-7416-1.
39. Hanson, Anne (25 October 2006). "Wild Norway rat behavior". Rat behavior and biology. Retrieved 1 July 2014.
40. Winslow, James T.; Hastings, Nick; Carter, C. Sue; Harbaugh, Carroll R.; Insel, Thomas R. (1993). "A role for central vasopressin in pair bonding in monogamous prairie voles" (PDF). Letters to Nature 365 (6446): 545–548. doi:10.1038/365545a0. PMID 8413608.
41. Yensen, Eric; Sherman, Paul W. (2003). "Chapter 10: Ground Squirrels". In Feldhamer, George A.; Thompson, Bruce C.; Chapman, Joseph A. Wild Mammals of North America: Biology, Management, and Conservation. JHU Press. pp. 211–225. ISBN 978-0-8018-7416-1.
42. Jarvis, Jennifer (1981). "Eusociality in a mammal: Cooperative breeding in naked mole-rat colonies". Science 212 (4494): 571–573. doi:10.1126/science.7209555. JSTOR 1686202.
43. Bennett, N. C.; Jarvis, J. U. M. (2004). "Cryptomys damarensis". Mammalian Species: Number 756: pp. 1–5. doi:10.1644/756.
44. Arakawa, Hiroyuki; Blanchard, D. Caroline; Arakawa, Keiko; Dunlap, Christopher; Blanchard, Robert J. (2008). "Scent marking behavior as an odorant communication in mice". Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 32 (7): 1236–1248. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.05.012.
45. Holmes, Warren G.; Mateo, Jill M. (2008). "Chapter 19: Kin Recognition in Rodents: Issues and Evidence". In Wolff, Jerry O.; Sherman, Paul W. Rodent Societies: An Ecological and Evolutionary Perspective. University of Chicago Press. pp. 216–230. ISBN 978-0-226-90538-9.
46. Sherwin, C.M. (2002). "Comfortable quarters for mice in research institutions". In Viktor and Annie Reinhardt. Comfortable Quarters For Laboratory Animals (9 ed.). Animal Welfare Institute.
47. Bjorkoyli, Tore; Rosell, Frank (2002). "A test of the dear enemy phenomenon in the Eurasian beaver". Animal Behavior 63 (6): 1073–1078. doi:10.1006/anbe.2002.3010.
48. Vaché, M.; Ferron, J.; Gouat, P. (2001). "The ability of red squirrels (Tamiasciurus hudsonicus) to discriminate conspecific olfactory signatures". Canadian Journal of Zoology 79 (7): 1296–1300. doi:10.1139/z01-085.
49. Shelley, Erin L.; Blumstein, Daniel T. (2005). "The evolution of vocal alarm communication in rodents". Behavioral Ecology 16 (1): 169–177. doi:10.1093/beheco/arh148.
50. Slobodchikoff, C. N.; Paseka, Andrea; Verdolin, Jennifer L (2009). "Prairie dog alarm calls encode labels about predator colors" (PDF). Animal Cognition 12 (3): 435–439. doi:10.1007/s10071-008-0203-y.
51. Zimmermann, Elke; Leliveld, Lisette; Schehka, Lisette (2013). "8: Toward the evolutionary roots of affective prosody in human acoustic communication: A comparative approach to mammalian voices". In Altenmüller, Eckart; Schmidt, Sabine; Zimmermann, Elke. The Evolution of Emotional Communication: From Sounds in Nonhuman Mammals to Speech and Music in Man. Oxford University Press. pp. 123–124. ISBN 978-0-19-164489-4.
52. Vanden Hole, Charlotte; Van Daele, Paul A. A. G.; Desmet, Niels; Devos, Paul; Adriaens, Dominique (2014). "Does sociality imply a complex vocal communication system? A case study for Fukomys micklemi (Bathyergidae, Rodentia)". Bioacoustics 23 (2): 143–160. doi:10.1080/09524622.2013.841085.
53. Long, C. V. (2007). Vocalisations of the degu (Octodon degus), a social caviomorph rodent. Bioacoustics 16. pp. 223–244. doi:10.1080/09524622.2007.9753579. ISSN 0952-4622.
54. Ancillotto, Leonardo; Sozio, Giulia; Mortelliti, Alessio; Russo, Danilo (2014). "Ultrasonic communication in Gliridae (Rodentia): the hazel dormouse (Muscardinus avellanarius) as a case study". Bioacoustics 23 (2): 129–141. doi:10.1080/09524622.2013.838146.
55. Panksepp, Jaak; Burgdorf, Jeff (2003). ""Laughing" rats and the evolutionary antecedents of human joy?". Physiology & Behavior 79 (3): 533–547. doi:10.1016/S0031-9384(03)00159-8. PMID 12954448.
56. "Hearing range". Louisiana State University. Retrieved 3 September 2014.
57. Haverkamp, Silke; Waessle, Heinz; Duebel, Jens; Kuner, Thomas; Augustine, George J.; Feng, Guoping; Euler, Thomas (2005). "The primordial, blue-cone color system of the mouse retina" (PDF). Journal of Neuroscience 25 (22): 5438–5445. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1117-05.2005.
58. Hanson, Anne. "What do rats see?". Rat behavior and biology. Retrieved 1 July 2014.
59. Pickrell, John (8 July 2003). "Urine vision? How rodents communicate with UV light". National Geographic News. Retrieved 8 July 2014.
60. Desjardins, C.; Maruniak, J. A.; Bronson, F. H. (1973). "Social rank in house mice: Differentiation revealed by ultraviolet visualization of urinary marking patterns". Science 182 (4115): 939–941. doi:10.1126/science.182.4115.939. PMID 4745598.
61. Viitala, J.; Korpimäki, E.; Palokangas, P.; Koivula, M. (1995). "Attraction of kestrels to vole scent marks visible in ultraviolet light". Nature 373 (6513): 425–427. doi:10.1038/373425a0.
62. "Vibrational communication in mammals". Map of Life: Convergent evolution online. University of Cambridge. 4 August 2010. Retrieved 5 July 2014.
63. Randall, J. A. (2001). "Evolution and function of drumming as communication in mammals". American Zoologist 41: 1143–1156. doi:10.1093/icb/41.5.1143.
64. Randall, Jan A.; Matocq, Marjorie D. (1997). "Why do kangaroo rats (Dipodomys spectabilis) footdrum at snakes?". Behavioral Ecology 8: 404–413. doi:10.1093/beheco/8.4.404.
65. Narins, P. M.; Reichman, O. J.; Jarvis, J. U. M.; Lewis, E. R. (1992). "Seismic signal transmission between burrows of the Cape mole-rat Georychus capensis". Journal of Comparative Physiology [A] 170: 13–22. doi:10.1007/BF00190397.
66. Waterman, Jane (2008). "Chapter 3: Male Mating Strategies in Rodents". In Wolff, Jerry O.; Sherman, Paul W. Rodent Societies: An Ecological and Evolutionary Perspective. University of Chicago Press. pp. 28–39. ISBN 978-0-226-90538-9.
67. Soloman, Nancy G.; Keane, Brain (2008). "Chapter 4: Reproductive Strategies in Female Rodents". In Wolff, Jerry O.; Sherman, Paul W. Rodent Societies: An Ecological and Evolutionary Perspective. University of Chicago Press. pp. 42–52. ISBN 978-0-226-90538-9.
68. McGuire, Betty; Bernis, William E. (2008). "Chapter 20: Parental Care". In Wolff, Jerry O.; Sherman, Paul W. Rodent Societies: An Ecological and Evolutionary Perspective. University of Chicago Press. pp. 231–235. ISBN 978-0-226-90538-9.
69. Holmes, Warren G.; Mateo, Jill M. (2008). "Chapter 19: Kin Recognition in Rodents: Issues and Evidence". In Wolff, Jerry O.; Sherman, Paul W. Rodent Societies: An Ecological and Evolutionary Perspective. University of Chicago Press. pp. 226–227. ISBN 978-0-226-90538-9.
70. Ebensperger, Luis A.; Blumsperger, Daniel T. (2008). "Chapter 23: Nonparental Infanticide". In Wolff, Jerry O.; Sherman, Paul W. Rodent Societies: An Ecological and Evolutionary Perspective. University of Chicago Press. pp. 274–278. ISBN 978-0-226-90538-9.
71. Hoogland, J. L. (1985). "Infanticide in prairie dogs: Lactating females kill offspring of close kin". Science 230 (4729): 1037–1040. doi:10.1126/science.230.4729.1037. PMID 17814930.
72. Hackländera, Klaus; Möstlb, Erich; Arnold, Walter (2003). "Reproductive suppression in female Alpine marmots, Marmota marmota". Animal Behaviour 65 (6): 1133–1140. doi:10.1006/anbe.2003.2159.
73. Charters, Jessie Blount Allen (1904). "The associative processes of the guinea pig: A study of the psychical development of an animal with a nervous system well medullated at birth". Journal of Comparative Neurology and Psychology (University of Chicago Press) XIV (4): 300–337.
74. Jacobs, Lucia F.; Liman, Emily R. (1991). "Grey squirrels remember the locations of buried nuts" (PDF). Animal Behaviour 41: 103–110. doi:10.1016/s0003-3472(05)80506-8.
75. Jacobs, Lucia F. (1992). "Memory for cache locations in Merriam's kangaroo rats" (PDF). Animal Behaviour 43 (4): 585–593. doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(05)81018-8.
76. Harding, E. J.; Paul, E. S.; Mendl, M. (2004). "Animal behaviour: Cognitive bias and affective state". Nature 427 (6972): 312. doi:10.1038/427312a. PMID 14737158.
77. Rygula, Rafal; Pluta, Helena; Popik, Piotr (2012). "Laughing rats are optimistic". PLOS ONE 7 (12): e51959. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0051959. PMC 3530570. PMID 23300582.
78. Carlyle, Kim (8 March 2007). "Rats capable of reflecting on mental processes". University of Georgia. Retrieved 13 August 2014.
79. Foote, Allison L.; Crystal, J. D. (2007). "Metacognition in the rat". Current Biology 17 (6): 551–555. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2007.01.061. PMC 1861845. PMID 17346969.
80. Smith, J. David; Beran, M. J.; Couchman, J. J.; Coutinho, M. V. C. (2008). "The comparative study of metacognition: Sharper paradigms, safer inferences". Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 15 (4): 679–691. doi:10.3758/PBR.15.4.679.
81. Jozefowiez, J.; Staddon, J. E. R.; Cerutti, D. T. (2009). "Metacognition in animals: how do we know that they know?". Comparative Cognition & Behavior Reviews 4: 29–39. doi:10.3819/ccbr.2009.40003.
82. Hanson, Anne (2012). "How do rats choose what to eat?". Rat behavior and biology. Retrieved 24 August 2014.
83. Galef, Bennett G.; Laland, Kevin N. (June 2005). "Social Learning in Animals: Empirical Studies and Theoretical Models". BioScience 55 (6): 489–499. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0489:sliaes]2.0.co;2.
84. Kay, Emily H.; Hoekstra, Hopi E. (2008). "Rodents". Current Biology 18 (10): R406–R410. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2008.03.019.
85. Asher1, Robert J.; Meng, Jin; Wible, John R.; McKenna, Malcolm C.; Rougier, Guillermo W.; Dashzeveg, Demberlyn; Novacek, Michael J. (2005). "Stem Lagomorpha and the Antiquity of Glires". Science 307 (5712): 1091–1094. doi:10.1126/science.1107808. PMID 15718468.
86. Douzery, E. J. P.; Delsuc, F.; Stanhope, M. J.; Huchon, D. (2003). "Local molecular clocks in three nuclear genes: divergence times for rodents and other mammals and incompatibility among fossil calibrations". Journal of Molecular Evolution 57: S201–13. doi:10.1007/s00239-003-0028-x. PMID 15008417.
87. Horner, D. S.; Lefkimmiatis, K.; Reyes, A.; Gissi, C.; Saccone, C.; Pesole, G. (2007). "Phylogenetic analyses of complete mitochondrial genome sequences suggest a basal divergence of the enigmatic rodent Anomalurus". BMC Evolutionary Biology 7 (1): 16. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-7-16. PMC 1802082. PMID 17288612.
88. Wood, D. Joseph (2010). The Extinction of the Multituberculates Outside North America: a Global Approach to Testing the Competition Model (M.S.). The Ohio State University.
89. Schenk, John J.; Rowe, Kevin C.; Steppan, Scott J. (2013). "Ecological opportunity and incumbency in the diversification of repeated continental colonizations by muroid rodents". Systematic Biology 62 (6): 837–864. doi:10.1093/sysbio/syt050.
90. Hopkins, Samantha S.B. (2005). "The evolution of fossoriality and the adaptive role of horns in the Mylagaulidae (Mammalia: Rodentia)". Proceedings of the Royal Society B 272 (1573): 1705–1713. doi:10.1098/rspb.2005.3171.
91. Samuels, Joshua X.; Zancanella, John (2011). "An early hemphillian occurrence of Castor (Castoridae) from the Rattlesnake Formation of Oregon" (PDF) 85 (5): 930–935. doi:10.1666/11-016.1.
92. Marivaux, Laurent; Essid, El Mabrouk; Marzougui, Wissem; Ammar, Hayet Khayati; Adnet, Sylvain; Marandat, Bernard; Merzeraud, Gilles; Tabuce, Rodolphe; Vianey-Liaud, Monique (2014). "A new and primitive species of Protophiomys (Rodentia, Hystricognathi) from the late middle Eocene of Djebel el Kébar, Central Tunisia". Palaeovertebrata 38 (1): 1–17.
93. Gheerbrant, Emmanuel; Rage, Jean-Claude (2006). "Paleobiogeography of Africa: How distinct from Gondwana and Laurasia?". Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 241: 224–246. doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2006.03.016.
94. Vélez-Juarbe, Jorge; Martin, Thomas; Macphee, Ross D. E. (2014). "The earliest Caribbean rodents: Oligocene caviomorphs from Puerto Rico". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 34 (1): 157–163. doi:10.1080/02724634.2013.789039.
95. Ali, J. R.; Huber, M. (2010-01-20). "Mammalian biodiversity on Madagascar controlled by ocean currents". Nature (Nature Publishing Group) 463 (4 Feb. 2010): 653–656. Bibcode:2010Natur.463..653A. doi:10.1038/nature08706. PMID 20090678. Retrieved 2010-01-20.
96. Vekua, A.; Bendukidze, O.; Bukhsianidze, M.; Vanishvili, N.; Augusti, J.; Martinez-Navarro, B.; Rook, L. (2010). "Porcupine in the Late Neogene and Quaternary of Georgia" (PDF). Bulletin of the Georgian National Academy Of Sciences 4 (3): 140–149.
97. "Giant beaver". Natural History Notebooks. Canadian Museum of Nature. 28 May 2013. Retrieved 19 October 2014.
98. Rinderknecht, Andrés; Blanco, R. Ernesto (2008). "The largest fossil rodent". Proceedings of the Royal Society B 275 (1637): 923–928. doi:10.1098/rspb.2007.1645. PMC 2599941. PMID 18198140.
99. Breed, Bill; Ford, Fred (2007). Native Mice and Rats (PDF). CSIRO Publishing. pp. 3, 5, and passim. ISBN 978-0-643-09166-5.
100. "The Action Plan for Australian Rodents". Environment Australia. 1 April 1995. Retrieved 18 September 2014.
101. Rowe, K. C.; Reno, M. L.; Richmond, D. M.; Adkins, R. M.; Steppan, S. J. (2008). "Pliocene colonization and adaptive radiations in Australia and New Guinea (Sahul): multilocus systematics of the old endemic rodents (Muroidea: Murinae)". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 47 (1): 84–101. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2008.01.001. PMID 18313945.
102. Baskin, Jon A.; Thomas, Ronny G. (2007). "South Texas and the Great American Interchange" (PDF). Gulf Coast Association of Geological Societies Transactions 57: 37–45.
103. Marshall, L. G.; Butler, R. F.; Drake, R. E.; Curtis, G. H.; Tedford, R. H. (1979). "Calibration of the Great American Interchange". Science 204 (4390): 272–279. doi:10.1126/science.204.4390.272. PMID 17800342.
104. Smith, Margaret F.; Patton, James L. (1999). "Phylogenetic relationships and the radiation of Sigmodontine rodents in South America: evidence from cytochrome b". Journal of Mammalian Evolution 6 (2): 89–128. doi:10.1023/A:1020668004578.
105. Parada, A.; Pardiñas, U. F. J.; Salazar-Bravo, J.; D’Elía, G.; Palma, R. E. (March 2013). "Dating an impressive Neotropical radiation: Molecular time estimates for the Sigmodontinae (Rodentia) provide insights into its historical biogeography". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 66 (3): 960–968. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2012.12.001.
106. Steppan, Scott J. (18 April 2006). "Rodentia". Tree of Life Web Project. Retrieved 14 July 2014.
107. "rodent (n.)". Online Etymology Dictionary. Retrieved 7 May 2015.
108. Smith, Andrew T. "Lagomorph". Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved 11 August 2014.
109. Wu, Shaoyuan; Wu, Wenyu; Zhang, Fuchun; Ye, Jie; Ni, Xijun; Sun, Jimin; Edwards, Scott V.; Meng, Jin; Organ, Chris L. (2012). "Molecular and paleontological evidence for a post-Cretaceous origin of rodents". PLOS ONE. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0046445.
110. Fabre; et al. (2012). "A glimpse on the pattern of rodent diversification: a phylogenetic approach". Retrieved 30 December 2015.
111. Wood, Albert E. (1955). "A Revised Classification of the Rodents". Journal of Mammalogy 36 (2): 165–187. doi:10.2307/1375874. JSTOR 1375874.
112. Wood, Albert E. (1958). "Are there rodent suborders?". Systematic Biology 7 (4): 169–173. doi:10.2307/2411716.
113. Carleton, M. D.; Musser, G. G. (2005). "Order Rodentia". In Wilson, Don E.; Reeder, DeeAnn M. Mammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference, Volume 12. JHU Press. pp. 745–752. ISBN 978-0-8018-8221-0.
114. Honeycutt, Rodney L. (2009). "Rodents (Rodentia)" (PDF). In Hedges, S.B.; Kumar, S. The Timetree of Life. Oxford University Press. Retrieved 2014-09-26.
115. Amori, G.; Gippoliti, S. (2003). "A higher-taxon approach to rodent conservation priorities for the 21st century". Animal Biodiversity and Conservation 26 (2): 1–18.
116. Morgan, G. S. (1993). "Quaternary land vertebrates of Jamaica". Geological Society of America Memoir 182: 417–442. doi:10.1130/mem182-p417.
117. "Rodent Conservation Assessment". WAZA. Retrieved 27 June 2014.
118. Gudynas, Eduardo (1989). Lidicker, William Zander, ed. Rodents: A World Survey of Species of Conservation Concern: Based on the Proceedings of a Workshop of the IUCN/SSC Rodent Specialist Group, Held at the Fourth International Theriological Congress, August 17, 1985, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. IUCN. p. 23.
119. Buckle, A. P.; Fenn, M. G. P. (1992). "Rodent Control in the Conservation of Endangered Species". Proceedings of the 15th Vertebrate Pest Conference (Hyatt Newporter, Newport Beach, California): Paper 12. 3–5 March 1992
120. Hindwood, K.A. (1940). "Birds of Lord Howe Island". Emu 40: 1–86. doi:10.1071/mu940001.
121. "Lundy puffins back from the brink". BBC Devon. 22 February 2008. Retrieved 30 June 2014.
122. Mitchell, Heather (27 May 2014). "Puffins a-plenty? New hope for Lundy and other UK seabird islands". RSPB. Retrieved 30 June 2014.
123. Feinstein, Kelly (1 March 2006). "Felting a beaver hat". Fashionable Felted Fur. UC Santa Cruz. Retrieved 24 September 2014.
124. Innis, Harold A. (1999). The Fur Trade in Canada: An Introduction to Canadian Economic History. University of Toronto Press. pp. 9–12. ISBN 978-0-8020-8196-4.
125. "Excessive trade: Clothes and trimming". Granby Zoo. Retrieved 9 August 2014.
126. "Lakota Quillwork Art and Legend". Akta Lakota Museum and Cultural Center. Retrieved 29 June 2013.
127. Fiedler, Lynwood A. (1990). "Rodents as a Food Source". Proceedings of the Fourteenth Vertebrate Pest Conference 1990. University of California, Davis. pp. 149–155.
128. Knowlton, David (13 July 2011). "Guinea Pig, Pet or Festive Meal". Cuzco Eats. Retrieved 5 July 2014.
129. Morveli, Walter Coraza; Knowlton, David (5 March 2012). "Traditional Mud Stoves and Ovens Make the Best Food". Cuzco Eats. Retrieved 6 July 2014.
130. "Guinea pigs". RSPCA. 2014. Retrieved 21 June 2014.
131. "Pet Rodents". RSPCA. 2014. Retrieved 21 June 2014.
132. Broekel, Ray (1983). Gerbil Pets and Other Small Rodents. Childrens Press. pp. 5–20. ISBN 978-0-516-01679-5.
133. Wolff, Jerry O.; Sherman, Paul W. (2008). Rodent Societies: An Ecological and Evolutionary Perspective. University of Chicago Press. pp. 3–8. ISBN 978-0-226-90538-9.
134. Krinke, George J.; Bullock, Gillian R.; Bunton, Tracie (2000). "History, strains and models". The Laboratory Rat (Handbook of Experimental Animals). Academic Press. pp. 3–16. ISBN 0-12-426400-X.
135. Morse, Herbert C. (1981). "The Laboratory Mouse: A Historical Assessment". In Foster, Henry. The Mouse in Biomedical Research: History, Genetics, and Wild Mice. Elsevier. pp. xi, 1. ISBN 978-0-323-15606-6.
136. Gad, Shayne C. (2007). Animal Models in Toxicology (2nd ed.). Taylor & Francis. pp. 334–402. ISBN 0-8247-5407-7.
137. Harkness, John E.; Wagner, Joseph E. (1995). The Biology and Medicine of Rabbits and Rodents. Williams & Wilkins. pp. 30–39. ISBN 0-683-03919-9.
138. Guerrini, Anita (2003). Experimenting with Humans and Animals. Johns Hopkins. pp. 98–104. ISBN 0-8018-7196-4.
139. Gray, Tara (1998). "A Brief History of Animals in Space". National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Retrieved 5 March 2007.
140. Sherwin, C. M. (2010). "25: The Husbandry and Welfare of Non-traditional Laboratory Rodents". In Hubrecht, R.; Kirkwood, J. UFAW Handbook on the Care and Management of Laboratory Animals. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 359–369.
141. Wines, Michael (19 May 2004). "Gambian rodents risk death for bananas". The Age. Retrieved 21 June 2014.
142. Mhelela, Hassan (13 September 2012). "Giant rats trained to detect land mines and tuberculosis in Africa". BBC. Retrieved 27 June 2014.
143. Bakalar, Nicholas (3 January 2011). "Detecting Tuberculosis: No Microscopes, Just Rats". New York Times. Retrieved 23 August 2014.
144. Harder, Ben (1 May 2002). "Scientists "Drive" rats by remote control". National Geographic. Retrieved 9 November 2013.
145. Solon, O. (9 September 2013). "Man's mission to build remote control systems for dogs, roaches and sharks". Wired. Retrieved 9 December 2013.
146. Xu, S.; Talwar, S. K.; Hawley, E. S.; Li, L.; Chapin, J. K. (2004). "A multi-channel telemetry system for brain microstimulation in freely roaming animals". Journal of Neuroscience Methods 133 (1–2): 57–63. doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.09.012.
147. Meerburg, B. G.; Singleton, G. R; Leirs, H. (2009). "The Year of the Rat ends: time to fight hunger!". Pest Management Science 65 (4): 351–2. doi:10.1002/ps.1718. PMID 19206089.
148. Stenseth, Nils Chr; Leirs, Herwig; Skonhoft, Anders; Davis, Stephen A.; Pech, Roger P.; Andreassen, Harry P.; Singleton, Grant R.; Lima, Mauricio; Machang'u, Robert S.; Makundi, Rhodes H.; Zhang, Zhibin; Brown, Peter R.; Shi, Dazhao; Wan, Xinrong (2003). "Mice, rats, and people: The bio-economics of agricultural rodent pests". Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 1 (77): 367–375. doi:10.2307/3868189. JSTOR 3868189.
149. Meerburg, B. G.; Singleton, G. R.; Kijlstra, A. (2009). "Rodent-borne diseases and their risks for public health". Critical Reviews in Microbiology 35 (3): 221–70. doi:10.1080/10408410902989837. PMID 19548807.
150. McCormick, M. (2003). "Rats, communications, and plague: Toward an ecological history" (PDF). Journal of Interdisciplinary History 34 (1): 1–25. doi:10.1162/002219503322645439.
151. Meerburg, B. G.; Singleton, G. R.; Kijlstra, A. (2009). "Rodent-borne diseases and their risks for public health". Critical Reviews in Microbiology 35 (3): 221–70. doi:10.1080/10408410902989837. PMID 19548807.
152. "Rodent-borne diseases". European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Retrieved 1 September 2014.
153. "Diseases indirectly transmitted by rodents". Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2012. Retrieved 1 September 2014.
154. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2006). Integrated pest management: conducting urban rodent surveys (PDF). Atlanta: US Department of Health and Human Services.
155. Wodzicki, K. (1973). "Prospects for biological control of rodent populations". Bulletin of the World Health Organization 48 (4): 461–467. PMC 2481104. PMID 4587482.
156. "Rodent control in agriculture - an HGCA guide". Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board. 2012. Retrieved 1 September 2014.

Further reading

• Carleton, M. D.; Musser, G. G. "Order Rodentia", pages 745–752 in Wilson & Reeder (2005).
• McKenna, Malcolm C.; Bell, Susan K. (1997). Classification of Mammals Above the Species Level. Columbia University Press. ISBN 0-231-11013-8.
• Wilson, D. E.; Reeder, D. M., ed. (2005). Mammal Species of the World: A Taxonomic and Geographic Reference. Johns Hopkins University Press. ISBN 978-0-8018-8221-0.

External links

Zoology, osteology, comparative anatomy

• ArchéoZooThèque : Rodent osteology (photos)
• ArchéoZooThèque : Rodent skeleton drawings

Various

• African rodentia
• Rodent photos
• Rodent Species Fact Sheets from the National Pest Management Association on Deer Mice, Norway Rats, and other rodent species