List of witnesses of the Iraq Inquiry

This is a list of witnesses of the Iraq Inquiry, sorted chronologically, who have given testimony to the Iraq Inquiry, a British public inquiry into the United Kingdom's role in the Iraq War. The inquiry, chaired by career civil servant Sir John Chilcot, commenced on 24 November 2009. From November to December 2009, the witnesses were primarily civil servants and military officials including Tim Cross and Sir Peter Ricketts. Following a Christmas break, the inquiry heard predominantly from politicians, including former cabinet ministers, including Gordon Brown as well as Tony Blair, Prime Minister at the time of the invasion. The Iraq Inquiry adjourned in March 2010 to avoid influencing the general election campaign and the last witnesses gave testimony in June 2011.[1] The report had not been issued by 2014, with publication expected to be published by February 2015.[2]

November 2009

24 November

Ricketts gave evidence regarding the buildup to the Iraq War in which he claimed there was a "palpable" threat that Saddam Hussein could have acquired weapons of mass destruction, though he went on to say that nobody in the British government was advocating Hussein's removal at that point.[1] He also told the inquiry that the British government had been reviewing its policies on Iraq as early as 2001, in anticipation of the Bush administration taking power in the USA.[3]

Patey offered similar testimony on attitudes towards "regime change", though added that the 11 September attacks "added an edge" to concerns over Iraq's acquisition of weapons of mass destruction[1][4]

Wood would also give evidence in January 2010[1]

25 November

Ehrman gave evidence that intelligence in 2003 suggested that Iraq may not have weapons of mass destruction and that Tony Blair, prime minister of the day had been aware of the evidence when he presented the "September Dossier" to Parliament. However, Ehrman went on to defend the invasion, claiming that Iraq had "flouted" United Nations resolutions.[5][6][7]

Dowse testified that most of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction were believed to have been destroyed in the first Gulf War but claimed there was a "unique threat" posed by Iraq indicating by its previous use WMD[5]

26 November

In the course of his evidence, Meyer spoke about a private meeting between Tony Blair and then US President George W. Bush, stating that the first use of the term "regime change" by Blair followed that meeting. Meyer also criticised the process of weapons inspections conducted prior to the invasion and stated that he believed the decision to go to war in Iraq had been made a full year before the invasion at the meeting at the Bush family ranch[8]

27 November

Greenstock testified that the invasion of Iraq did not have the backing of the majority of the UK or of United Nations members, going on to opine that the war was of "questionable legitimacy", though it was unlikely ever to be proven illegal.[9] Greenstock also appeared before the inquiry on 15 December.

30 November

Manning testified that Blair had lobbied Bush to pursue a second UN resolution but was "willing to undertake regime change if this didn't work"[10]

December 2009

1 December

Chaplin was highly critical of post-war planning for Iraq, stating that the US State Department had a "touching faith" that its troops would be welcomed in Iraq with an expectation that a democracy would be quickly established, calling reconstruction plans a "real blind spot"[11]

3 December

Boyce claimed that the United States assumed, in 2002, that the United Kingdom would contribute troops for a conflict in Iraq, saying "there was a complete reluctance to believe" the UK would not commit its forces without further efforts via the United Nations. Boyce also attacked the post-war planning conducted by Clare Short's Department for International Development, calling it "particularly uncooperative"[12]

Tebbit claimed that the UK's planning for an invasion was "cautious" as policy was to pursue further UN involvement and the British government insisted on parliamentary approval before committing troops. He also stated that the UK's commitment to an invasion was not confirmed "until right at the end"[12]

4 December

Wilson told the inquiry that British officials were shown the American invasion plans in June 2002 but states he told American officials that, "unless political and legal issues were resolved, [it would be] difficult for the UK to deliver even basic support"[13][14]

Wilson said the speed with which troops reached Baghdad "was no surprise [...] but that's not the end of the war". He went on to speak of the benefits a joint invasion would bring to relations between the two militaries[13][14]

Asquith told the inquiry that Her Majesty's Treasury, under then Chancellor of the Exchequer Gordon Brown, refused to allocate extra funds for reconstruction efforts in British-controlled Basra, claiming government departments were told to use existing budgets[15]

7 December

Cross, UK representative to the Office for Reconstruction and Humanitarian Assistance (later the CPA) and deputy to Jay Garner at the time of the invasion, told the inquiry that he had urged Tony Blair to delay military action two days before the conflict began, going on to say that planning for post-war Iraq had been "woefully thin" and claiming to have warned that "Iraq could descend into chaos" following invasion and that his concerns were not taken "sufficiently seriously" by the government.[16][17]

8 December

Scarlett was questioned at length about the "September Dossier" and the infamous claim that Iraq could launch weapons within 45 minutes. Scarlett denied that he had been under pressure to "firm up" the dossier and conceded that the dossier should have been clearer that "the 45 minute claim" referred to conventional weapons, not those of mass destruction, though stated that the dossier had been produced in good faith[18]

Chakrabarti told the inquiry that civil servants had been banned from communicating with United nations staff in the planning stages of the invasion on order to conceal the military planning, gong on to say that knowledge of Iraq was "rather scanty" due to the absence of diplomatic relations between the UK and Iraq since the first Gulf War[19]

Burridge's testimony related predominantly to the build-up to the invasion of Iraq. He claimed to have been told by US Army General Tommy Franks that military action by the United States against Iraq was a matter of "when not if" but that the military campaign was conducted in such a way as to minimise the effect on the country's infrastructure and on civilians[21]

9 December

Viggers claimed that "amateurs" were placed in key roles in Iraq, saying "we've got huge experience in this country - we're not using it and we're putting amateurs into really really important positions and people are getting killed as a result of some of these decisions".[22]

Synott was critical of the Coalition Provisional Authority, the body set up to govern Iraq in the interim, calling its planning "deeply flawed" and going on to say that the decision to shut down the CPA came as a "total surprise" and that "the assumption [...] was that the decision was greatly coloured by the imminence of the mid-term elections. The CPA was not winning, best to hand over responsibility for Iraqis and to cease to be responsible for Iraqi sovereignty"[22]

Lamb compared the CPA to "dancing with a broken doll. It was a lot of effort and your partner wasn't giving you much in return". He said that the foreign forces in the country "held the line" but that the problems that followed "had not been anticipated [and] were not structured or resourced for" and the foreign forces "contained what was unfolding chaos"[22]

10 December

Sawyers, who visited the United States in January 2001, told the inquiry that American officials were not discussing an invasion of Iraq at that time but that the UK and US concurred that the containment policy against Iraq at the time was "unsustainable"[23]

14 December

Kiszely testified that American officials in Iraq refused to admit that they were facing an insurgency, claiming that United States Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld ["had instructed that it was not to be called an insurgency". Kiszely told the inquiry that the situation in the country deteriorated after he took up his post as senior military representative. He observed a rise in attacks on coalition and Iraqi security forces, stating that "the rule of law did not really exist in a number of provinces".[24]

Riley defended the decision to disband the Iraqi Army after the invasion, saying that it had effectively "disbanded itself". However, he told the inquiry that "[he] had not [...] expected to be faced with an insurgency" and that the forces "did have to go through a process [of] relearning. And we did it on the job". However, Riley went on to say that new troops arriving in the country were ""much better prepared"[24]

15 December

Greenstock, who also appeared before the inquiry on 27 November, told the inquiry that he believed the whole campaign in Iraq had been "rushed" and lacked international input, saying "this was clearly too rushed an exercise for the size of the task we found on the ground; a task which some people had been predicting would be as difficult as it was". During the course of his evidence, Greenstock was interrupted by Sir John Chilcot, the inquiry chairman, and, for the first, the inquiry went into private session and public broadcasting, on a one-minute delay, was suspended[25]

16 December

Sawers, who also appeared before the inquiry on 10 December, claimed that the British government may have had "second thoughts" if the level of violence after the war and the attraction of Iraq to al-Qaeda and other Islamic extremists had been foreseen, quoting Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak's comment that the war would unleash "100 Bin Ladens", though he concluded that Iraq was a "better place" in 2009 than it was in 2003[26]

17 December

Drummond's evidence focused predominantly around the bombing of the United Nations headquarters in Baghdad in August 2003 which, he said, had "a very serious impact" on the rebuilding efforts as most UN personnel evacuated Iraq in its aftermath, with Drummond going on to say "I don't think we realised at the time quite how serious it was going to be, because we had envisaged a major role for the UN in this process"[27]

January 2010

5 January

Patey, who previously appeared before the inquiry on 24 November, told the inquiry that ambitions for post-war reform and reconstruction of Iraq were "probably higher than the ability to deliver" and recalled writing "the prospect of descent into civil war [...] was probably more likely than the transition to a stable Iraq unless certain things happened" and concluded that "what could be delivered on Powerpoint couldn't necessarily be delivered on Earth. That's something that struck me in my time there"[28]

6 January

Wall, a division commander in Iraq in 2003/4, spoke to the inquiry about a controversial claim that British troops were "sitting ducks" at Basra palace and of the boredom of young soldiers in the drawdown of the operation when troops moved from Basra Palace to the airport[29]

Prentice offered evidence about relations between the United Kingdom and Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki[29]

Day gave evidence to the inquiry regarding the negotiation of a ceasefire between British forces and the Mahdi Army militia group[29]

McDonald gave evidence that the US was concerned at the British plans for early withdrawal from Basra and, as a result, the British government "adjusted our plans in accordance with our discussions with them" and the scale and speed of the withdrawal was altered.[30][31]

7 January

White-Spunner told the inquiry that he had been asked by Iraqi forces to conduct aerial bombing of areas potentially occupied by civilians but that he refused and the resistance "crumbled quickly" in the face of the resulting ground operation[29]

8 January

Watkins told the inquiry of the complexities of the British withdrawal from Basra in 2009, saying "we should have applied the Balkans principle of in together out together"[29]

11 January

Shirreff told the inquiry that British forces were not providing security in Basra in 2006, saying that, for a city of 1.3 million people, only 200 troops could be sent out on patrol at one time and that "the [UK's] troops were deployed [...] effectively" while "the militia filled the gap". As a result, Shirreff implemented further training for the Iraqi security forces[31]

12 January

Campbell "defend[ed] every single word" of the "September Dossier" on the threat posed by Iraq published in 2002 and arguing that the UK should be "proud" of its role "in changing Iraq from what it was to what it is now becoming". Campbell also revealed that Prime Minister at the time, Tony Blair had told then President George W. Bush in private that the UK would support the US in military action against Iraq, prompting calls for the publication of private correspondence between Bush and Blair[32]

13 January

Turnbull attacked Alastair Campbell (who appeared before the committee the previous day), calling his comments "very poor" but going on to say of Tony Blair that "my hypothesis is he starts as a regime changer"[33]

15 January

Binns had the responsibility of formally handing over control of the city of Basra to Iraqi officials. In his evidence to the inquiry, he described a shortage of helicopters and a reliance on those provided by American forces, though described the American helicopters as "magnificent".[29]

It emerged on 16 January that Reith had given evidence in private to the inquiry on 15 January, with Reith citing "personal reasons", though a transcript of his evidence was later made available on the inquiry's website with five words blanked on the grounds of "national security". Reith's evidence predominantly focused on defence procurement in which he was critical of the Ministry of Defence, whom he claims were reluctant to commence procurement planning for an invasion of Iraq so as not to alert the public. Reith said that there were no equipment shortages in the end, but some equipment could not be found.[29][34]

18 January

Powell dismissed the claims made by Sir Christopher Meyer (who appeared before the inquiry on 26 November) that Tony Blair's rhetoric hardened after a private meeting with then President Bush, going on to say "there was not an undertaking in blood to go to war with Iraq. There was no firm decision to go to war"[35]

19 January

Hoon was the first member of Tony Blair's cabinet to give evidence to The Iraq Inquiry. Hoon told the inquiry that the first he heard of the claim that Iraq could launch weapons in 45 minutes was when it was published in the so-called "September Dossier". When he asked for clarification, he was told that it referred to 'battlefield weapons' only, after which Hoon did "not think much more of it". Hoon also stated that British backing for an invasion was not "inevitable" and, in response to criticisms of the MoD's allocation of resources, claimed his department was under-funded[36]

20 January

Omand told the inquiry of the "September Dossier" that it was feared "we would end up with a document that was simply a series of assertions [...] one can see that adding a bit of local colour like that is asking for trouble but we didn't really spot that at the time"[37]

21 January

Straw (then Secretary of State for Justice) was the second member of Tony Blair's cabinet and the first serving cabinet minister to give evidence to The Iraq Inquiry, telling the members he acted "on the basis of the best evidence available at the time" but that the "45 minute claim" had "haunted us ever since". He called the decision to go to war in Iraq the "most difficult decision" of his life[38]

25 January

Browne told the inquiry that, having no military background, he found it "difficult to come to terms" with fatalities he had to deal with as Defence Secretary and that there had been some discontent that he simultaneously held the post of Secretary of State for Scotland[39]

Hutton stated that a lack of helicopters had "undoubtedly been a factor" of the British mission in Iraq [...] the military would have liked more helicopters and the politicians would have liked to make more available" but he defended the war overall[39]

26 January

Wood claimed to have told Jack Straw (then Foreign Secretary) that to invade Iraq without a second Security Council resolution would "amount to the crime of aggression" but that his advice was dismissed as "dogmatic"[40]

Wilmshurst, the only civil servant to resign in the wake of the decision to invade Iraq told the inquiry that it was "extraordinary" that the Attorney General was asked for his opinion only days before the invasion[40]

27 January

Goldsmith admitted to the inquiry that, a month before the invasion of Iraq, he believed it was "safer" to obtain a second UN resolution, however, he approved military action based on the wording of the existing resolutions dating back to 1991 but was surprised that the cabinet did not discuss his advice. Justifying his position, Goldsmith said "the military deserved an unequivocal judgement on the legality of its action". Goldsmith also denied reports that he had been "pinned" into altering his advice in a meeting with Lord Falconer of Thoroton, then Lord Chancellor[41]

29 January

In the most eagerly anticipated evidence to be given to the Iraq Inquiry, Tony Blair, the prime minister who took the UK to war in Iraq, gave testimony totalling over six hours in length. In particular, Blair emphasised the effect of the 11 September attacks on global security though he denied any "secret deal" was struck in his private meeting with George W. Bush in April 2002. Of the "September Dossier", Blair conceded that he should have corrected media reports that the "45 minute claim" referred to weapons of mass destruction but he "stood by" the claim that Iraq's possession of WMD was "beyond doubt". He also denied being motivated by "regime change", telling the inquiry that he would not have taken the UK into the war had the attorney general advised it was not legally justifiable. Asked by Sir John Chilcot, the inquiry chairman, if he had "any regrets", Blair responded "it was better to deal with this threat, to remove him from office and I do genuinely believe the world is a safer place as a result" to which members of the public gallery heckled Blair, calling him a "liar" and a "murderer" along with booing as he left the inquiry room[42][43]

February 2010

1 February

Stirrup, the professional head of British armed forces, told the inquiry that commanders "simply didn't have enough time" prior to the invasion to procure all the equipment they required and that an extra two months of preparation would have made a "significant difference". Amongst the equipment Stirrup claimed was lacking were body armour, desert combats and boots. Stirrup went on to say that he and other commanders had voiced their concerns to ministers[44]

Walker told the inquiry that the military lacked funding to mount an invasion of Iraq and that the situation was so tense that there was a danger of resignations from senior officers[44]

2 February

Short resigned from the Cabinet in 2003 in protest at the planning for post-war Iraq. She claimed that Lord Goldsmith, then attorney general, had been "leaned on" to declare that the war was legal (denied on Goldsmith's evidence) and the cabinet had been "misled" as to the legality of the invasion and that parliamentary approval had been a "rubber stamp" for Tony Blair. Short went on to tell the inquiry that the war had been conducted "on a wing and a prayer" and to claim that she was "conned" into remaining in her cabinet post until two months after the invasion instead of resigning at the same time as Robin Cook[45]

3 February

Tebbit accused Gordon Brown, then Chancellor of the Exchequer, Gordon Brown of "guillotining" defence spending shortly after the invasion of Iraq and that "I think it's fair to say that the Treasury as a whole didn't want us to get as much as we got"[46]

Reid claimed that the "failures of Vietnam" had haunted the US military during the early days of the campaign in Iraq, telling the panel "the inheritance of that was that American soldiers fought on the battlefield and away from nation-building" and that the UK was likely to remain in Iraq for longer than had been hoped, maintaining "pinch points" such as helicopter support, specialist intelligence and medical provision[47]

Clwyd told the inquiry that she had been convinced of the need for military action in Iraq and that Kurds believed that it was the only way to uphold their human rights[48][49]

8 February

Straw was recalled (having previously given evidence on 21 January) to the inquiry in the light of evidence given by foreign office lawyers Sir Michael Wood and Elizabeth Wilmshurst. Straw claimed that there was no need for the cabinet to hear how the then attorney general, Lord Goldsmith, reached his conclusions on the legality of the invasion and that the cabinet needed "essentially a yes or no decision"[50]

March 2010

5 March

June 2010

29 June

30 June

July 2010

2 July

5 July

6 July

7 July

9 July

16 July

19 July

20 July

21 July

23 July

26 July

27 July

30 July

January 2011

18 January

19 January

21 January

25 January

26 January

27 January

28 January

31 January

February 2011

2 February

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 "Iraq inquiry told of 'clear' threat from Saddam Hussein". BBC News (BBC). 24 November 2009. Retrieved 27 January 2010.
  2. ↑ "Iraq Inquiry set to cost taxpayers £10m". BBC News Online. 3 November 2014. Retrieved 14 November 2014.
  3. ↑ "Iraq inquiry: Bush administration 'discussing regime change two years before invasion'". The Daily Telegraph (London: Telegraph Media Group). 24 November 2009. Retrieved 12 February 2010.
  4. ↑ "Iraq Inquiry: British officials discussed regime change two years before war". Daily Telegraph (London: Telegraph Media Group). 25 November 2009. Retrieved 12 February 2010.
  5. 1 2 "Inquiry told Iraq could not 'use' chemical weapons". BBC News (BBC). 25 November 2009. Retrieved 27 January 2010.
  6. ↑ Hines, Nico; Brown, David (25 November 2009). "Gordon Brown accused of suffocating the Chilcot Iraq Inquiry". The Times (London: Times Newspapers Ltd). Retrieved 12 February 2010.
  7. ↑ Rayner, Gordon (25 November 2009). "Iraq inquiry: Tony Blair told ‘days before invasion’ WMD had been dismantled". Daily Telegraph (London: Telegraph Media Group). Retrieved 12 February 2010.
  8. ↑ "Blair's view on Iraq 'tightened' after Bush meeting". BBC News (BBC). 26 November 2009. Retrieved 27 January 2010.
  9. ↑ "Iraq war legitimacy 'questionable' says ex-diplomat". BBC News (BBC). 27 November 2009. Retrieved 28 January 2010.
  10. ↑ "Blair 'ready to back regime change in 2002' - adviser". BBC News (BBC). 30 November 2009. Retrieved 28 January 2010.
  11. ↑ "US neglected post-war planning for Iraq, inquiry told". BBC News (BBC). 1 December 2009. Retrieved 28 January 2010.
  12. 1 2 "The US 'assumed' UK participation in Iraq, inquiry told". BBC News (BBC). 3 December 2009. Retrieved 28 January 2010.
  13. 1 2 3 Tran, Mark (22 December 2009). "Iraq war inquiry key witnesses: Lieutenant General Sir Anthony Pigott and Major General David Wilson". The Guardian (London: Guardian News and Media). Retrieved 28 January 2010.
  14. 1 2 "'Defining moment' as US revealed Iraq plans". BBC News (BBC). 4 December 2009. Retrieved 28 January 2010.
  15. ↑ "Treasury accused over Iraq funds". BBC News (BBC). 4 December 2009. Retrieved 28 January 2010.
  16. ↑ Tran, Mark (6 January 2010). "Iraq war inquiry key witnesses: Major General Tim Cross and Edward Chaplin". The Guardian (London: Guardian News and Media). Retrieved 13 January 2010.
  17. ↑ "Tony Blair was urged by officer to delay Iraq war". BBC News (BBC). 7 December 2009. Retrieved 28 January 2010.
  18. ↑ "Ex-spy chief says Iraqi WMD claims not manipulated". BBC News (BBC). 8 December 2009. Retrieved 28 January 2010.
  19. ↑ "Iraq details for aid workers 'were scanty before war'". BBC News (BBC). 8 December 2009. Retrieved 28 January 2010.
  20. ↑ "Profile: Air Marshal Sir Brian Burridge". BBC News (BBC). 8 May 2003. Retrieved 28 January 2010.
  21. ↑ "UK military chief told 'when not if' over Iraq invasion". BBC News (BBC). 8 December 2009. Retrieved 28 January 2010.
  22. 1 2 3 "Army chief lambasts 'amateurs' in post-invasion Iraq". BBC News (BBC). 9 December 2009. Retrieved 28 January 2010.
  23. ↑ "US in 2001 'did not discuss military invasion of Iraq'". BBC News (BBC). 10 December 2009. Retrieved 28 January 2010.
  24. 1 2 "US would not 'admit' the insurgency in post-war Iraq". BBC News (BBC). 15 December 2009. Retrieved 28 January 2010.
  25. ↑ "Diplomat urges UK to 'avoid' Iraq mistakes in future". BBC News (BBC). 15 December 2009. Retrieved 29 January 2010.
  26. ↑ "Iraq violence 'may have prompted UK rethink'". BBC News (BBC). 17 December 2009. Retrieved 29 January 2010.
  27. ↑ "Baghdad UN bomb blast 'hindered the UK's work'". BBC News (BBC). 17 December 2009. Retrieved 29 January 2010.
  28. ↑ "Former Iraq ambassador queries post-war ambition". BBC News (BBC). 5 January 2010. Retrieved 29 January 2010.
  29. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 "Iraq inquiry - day by day timeline of evidence given". BBC News (BBC). Retrieved 29 January 2010.
  30. ↑ Hough, Andrew (6 January 2010). "Iraq inquiry: British troop withdrawal 'slowed after discussions with US'". The Daily Telegraph (London: Telegraph Media Group). Retrieved 29 January 2010.
  31. 1 2 Biles, Peter (8 January 2010). "Iraq inquiry awaits 'big fish' Blair and Campbell". BBC News (BBC). Retrieved 29 January 2010.
  32. ↑ "Alastair Campbell defends 'every word' of Iraq dossier". BBC News (BBC). 12 January 2010. Retrieved 29 January 2010.
  33. ↑ "Campbell attacked for criticism of Short's Iraq stance". BBC News (BBC). 13 January 2010. Retrieved 29 January 2010.
  34. ↑ "Iraq inquiry hears evidence behind closed doors". BBC News (BBC). 15 January 2010. Retrieved 29 January 2010.
  35. ↑ "Iraq inquiry: No deal in blood, says Jonathan Powell". BBC News (BBC). 18 January 2010. Retrieved 29 January 2010.
  36. ↑ "Iraq inquiry: 45-minute weapon claim 'new' to Hoon". BBC News (BBC). 19 January 2010. Retrieved 29 January 2010.
  37. ↑ "Iraq inquiry: 45-minute claim 'asking for trouble'". BBC News (BBC). 20 January 2010. Retrieved 29 January 2010.
  38. ↑ "Straw says Iraq 'most difficult decision' in his life". BBC News (BBC). 21 January 2010. Retrieved 29 January 2010.
  39. 1 2 "Ex-defence secretary speaks of strain of Iraq losses". BBC News (BBC). 25 January 2010. Retrieved 29 January 2010.
  40. 1 2 "Straw rejected advice that Iraq invasion was 'unlawful'". BBC News (BBC). 26 January 2010. Retrieved 29 January 2010.
  41. ↑ "Goldsmith admits to changing view over Iraq advice". BBC News (BBC). 27 January 2010. Retrieved 29 January 2010.
  42. ↑ "Iraq inquiry hears defiant Blair say: I'd do it again". BBC News (BBC). 29 January 2010. Retrieved 2 February 2010.
  43. ↑ "The Full Story: Tony Blair at the Iraq inquiry". BBC News (BBC). 29 January 2010. Retrieved 2 February 2010.
  44. 1 2 "Ministers told of Iraq kit risk - armed forces chief". BBC News (BBC). 1 February 2010. Retrieved 2 February 2010.
  45. ↑ "Clare Short says cabinet misled on Iraq war legality". BBC News (BBC). 2 February 2010. Retrieved 2 February 2010.
  46. ↑ "Gordon Brown denies 'guillotining' UK defence budget". BBC News (BBC). 3 February 2010. Retrieved 10 February 2010.
  47. ↑ "Vietnam war affected US planning for Iraq - John Reid". BBC News (BBC). 3 February 2010. Retrieved 10 February 2010.
  48. ↑ Livingstone, Tomos (4 February 2010). "Ann Clwyd tells inquiry why she backed Iraq invasion". Wales Online (Media Wales Ltd). Retrieved 10 February 2010.
  49. ↑ "Clwyd says Iraq war needed to stop human rights abuse". BBC News (BBC). 3 February 2010. Retrieved 10 February 2010.
  50. ↑ Norton-Taylor, Richard (8 February 2010). "Cabinet did not need to hear legal doubts over Iraq invasion, says Straw". The Guardian (London: Guardian News and Media). Retrieved 11 February 2010.

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Friday, March 04, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.