Localism in Hong Kong

Localism in Hong Kong is a political movement centered around the preservation of the city's autonomy and local culture. The movement encompasses a variety of groups with different goals, but all of them oppose the perceived growing encroachment of the central Chinese government on the city's management of its own political, economic, and social affairs.^[1][2] Milder elements include topical interest groups which oppose specific issues, such as parallel trading or proposed anti-subversion laws; others advocate for greater autonomy while remaining part of China; and the most radical call for the return to British rule or full independence as a sovereign state.

Though localist and nativist groups have existed since the handover, the movement as a whole gained significant traction following protests in 2014 against the Chinese government's decision to pre-screen Chief Executive candidates before allowing them to be chosen in a proposed 2017 general election. Following these protests, a number of localist political parties were formed and have begun participating in district-level legislative elections.

Terminology

Localism in the western context constitutes libertarian ideas of a decentralised local government as opposed to the central government, and stresses on self-sufficiency, agriculture and communalism. Although it also stresses on Hong Kong's economic self-sufficiency and local democracy, localism in the Hong Kong context emphasises on the mainland Chinese cultural and political threat to the city and attempts to reinforce a Hong Kong identity as opposed to the Chinese national identity. It often includes an anti-immigration stance, and it has been said that "nativism" is synonymous with localism.^[2][3][4][5] Some localists call themselves "autonomists", while the Beijing government brands them "separatists".^[6]

History of local consciousness in Hong Kong

Hong Kong was established in 1841 as a free port. The colonial government encouraged the free movement of capital and labour and there was not a strict sense of "Hong Kong residents" or "Hong Kong people" legally, as the Hong Kong identity cards were not introduced as identity documents by the government in 1949 in the light of the influx of refugees fleeing from the Communists' takeover in Mainland China.

Sociologist Lui Tai-lok in his book Four Generations of Hong Kong People, divided Hong Kong people into four generations. The first generation, he states, was the ones who were born before 1945 and had experienced the Japanese occupation of Hong Kong,^[7] while the baby boomers, the second generation who were born after the war, were the first wave of local consciousness.^[8]

First wave

The baby boomers were children of the refugees but were born and raised in Hong Kong and have a strong sense of belonging. They sought to break through the Cold War rivalry between the Communists and the Nationalists which dominated the political scene at the time.

The 1970s saw unprecedented waves of student movements, such as the Chinese Language Movement and the anti-corruption movement, the defend the Diaoyu Islands movement, and so on, which was independent of the left-right spectrum and became the first wave of local consciousness.^[8] The movement at the time consisted of some liberal, nationalist, and anti-colonialist elements.^[8]

In the 1960s and 70s, the colonial government also attempted to create an apolitical local consciousness in order to boost the legitimacy of the colonial rule. Under Governor Murray MacLehose's administration, Hong Kong underwent a massive decolonised reform. The aim of creating a local identity was to raise the bid for the British side in the upcoming negotiation over Hong Kong sovereignty after 1997. The British government also carefully avoided to provoke Hong Kong people's British belonging as it had already decided to prevent massive migration from Hong Kong to Britain.^[8]

Second wave

The second wave of local consciousness emerged in the 1990s as colonial rule was coming to an end. The 1989 Tiananmen massacre sparked massive local protest and fear about looming Communist rule. The local cultural scene responded by consolidating enthusiasm about distinctive features as well as diversity of Hong Kong culture and identity. It cited post-colonial theory, rejecting Sinocentric chauvinism and promoting the cosmopolitanism of Hong Kong as an international city, together with liberal ideals of inclusiveness, diversity and trans-nationality. It also emphasised the importance of universal values, a diverse civil society, civic education, press and academic freedoms after 1997.^[8]

Third wave

The protest against the Guangzhou-Hong Kong XRL outside of the Legislative Council building in 2010.

The 1 July 2003 march recorded an estimated 500,000 to 700,000 people demonstrating against the government's proposed anti-sedition legislation, the largest protest since the 1989 Tiananmen square protest.^[9] Many post-80s (generation who born in the 1980s, Millennials in western terminology) were inspired by the democracy movement and came out onto the streets. 7.1 People Pile was one of the groups came to exist after the protest. They were also upset by rapid urban development which was sweeping away old neighbourhoods and communities. They were strongly opposed to the political and economic monopoly of vested interests, collusion between business and government and questioned the nature of the capitalist system in Hong Kong.^[8]

They were also dissatisfied with the established opposition pro-democracy camp, which they considered ineffective in challenging the system. Several conservation movements led by young activists emerged, protesting against demolition of the Edinburgh Place Ferry Pier, Queen's Pier, and the buildings on Lee Tung Street (known as "Wedding Card Street") in 2006 and 2007. Protests against the construction of the Hong Kong section of the high-speed rail link to Guangzhou (XRL) escalated in 2009 and 2010 and established a new high point of the localist movement.^[8]

Rise of contemporary localism

Chin Wan's city-state theory

The failure of the peaceful anti-XRL protests damaged the reputation of the left-leaning moderate activists. Some turned to a more radical approach. Scholar Chin Wan published the book, On the Hong Kong City-State in 2011 which triggered fierce public debate and was popular among the young generation.^[10] In the book, Chin suggests abandoning the hope for a democratic China and positions the democracy movement in a "localist" perspective, in order to counter Beijing's "neo-imperialist" policies toward Hong Kong. It analysed the potential threat of the influx of mainland tourists and immigrants to the established institutions and social customs of Hong Kong, which he considered likely part of a colonisation scheme by Beijing, including the increasing use of Mandarin Chinese and Simplified Chinese in daily use and schools.

He advocates "Hong Kong First" and "Hong Kong-China separation" positions in order to protect Hong Kong from "cultural genocide".^[11] He suggested building Hong Kong into an autonomous city-state, merging the British culture with a restored Chinese culture.^[12] Chin's view was largely accepted by Hong Kong independence advocates and those who advocate for the restoration of British rule in Hong Kong.

Since then, it has created a paradigm shift on Hong Kong local consciousness from the left-wing discourse of reinterpreting colonial history, cherishing the inclusive and diverse nature of the Hong Kong culture to the right-wing discourse of anti-Chinese sentiment and nostalgia for British rule.^[8] Chin also tells his followers to use violent action as the means for defending Hong Kong's autonomy. Chin also tells his followers to use violent action as the means for defending Hong Kong's autonomy. He once joined the group Hong Kong Autonomy Movement. After leaving the HKAM group, he set up his own autonomist group called the Hong Kong Resurgence Order.

Another group inspired by Chin's idea called the Hong Kong Nativism Power was set up in 2011. They protested against the inclusion of non-Hong Kong permanent residents in the HK$6,000 cash handouts program as demanded by new immigrants support groups and called for a revision of the current immigration policy.^[13]

Hong Kong–Mainland conflict

The highly controversial advertisement paid for by Hong Kong citizens, depicting Mainlanders as locusts on Apple Daily

At the same time, many conflicts between Mainlanders and Hongkongers also occurred due to the influx of the tourists and immigrants, such as the Dolce & Gabbana controversy, the Kong Qingdong incident, birth tourism, and parallel trading among mainland tourists, among others. These incidents and issues intensified the anti-Chinese sentiment among the Hong Kong public. Some of them published an advertisement on local newspapers, calling Mainlanders "locusts" who steal resources from Hongkongers.^[8]

At the same time, the localists are hostile toward the pan-democracy camp, as they disagreed with the pan-democrats' unrealistic universalism and their wish for a democratic China at Hong Kong's expense. They are also dissatisfied with the ineffectiveness of the pan-democrats as the opposition party for the past 20 years. On the other hand, the right-wing populist tendency of the localist movements was condemned as "xenophobic" and "nativist" by mainstream activists and the government.^[11] The conflict between the left and the right wings of the movement resulted in great disunity of the whole democratic cause.

In the 2012 Legislative Council election, some pan-democrat candidates, including Claudia Mo of the Civic Party and Gary Fan of the Neo Democrats, both claiming to be moderates, expressed some localist ideas and raised concerns on tourist and immigration policies. For that, they set up a parliamentary group called the Hong Kong First. Legislator Wong Yuk-man, a strong critic of the Communist Party and former member of People Power and his protégé Wong Yeung-tat, leader of the activist group Civic Passion, switched to the localist cause.

Criticising the annual vigil to commemorate the Tiananmen Square crackdown held by the Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements in China for having a Chinese nationalistic theme, Civic Passion organised its alternative 4 June rally in Tsim Sha Tsui. The alternative event attracted 200 people in 2013 and 7,000 in 2014, compared with 180,000 and 150,000 respectively for the main event.^[14][15]

Hong Kong Nationalism

The Undergrad, the official publication of the Hong Kong University Students' Union (HKUSU), from February 2014, published a few articles on the subject of a Hong Kong nation. Articles entitled “The Hong Kong nation deciding its own fate” and “Democracy and Independence for Hong Kong” raise the localist discourse to the level of political autonomy for Hong Kong, which in effect would be tantamount to Hong Kong independence. Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying used his 2015 New Year’s policy address to direct harsh criticism at the magazine for promoting Hong Kong independence, fanning both the debate and sales of the book Hong Kong Nationalism which featured the articles.^[16]

Umbrella Revolution

In 2013, legal scholar Benny Tai, considered a moderate, advocated a civil obedience plan to pressure Beijing to implement genuine universal suffrage in Hong Kong. The plan matured into Occupy Central. The localists were largely against it, mainly because they believed it was a plot by pan-democrats to hijack popular support.^[17] Localists participated in the protests, many of whom advocating a more "militant" approach as opposed to the strict principles of non-violence advocated by the three promoters of Occupy Central. Localists gathered at the Mong Kok site, as opposed to the main site in Admiralty which was led by the Hong Kong Federation of Students (HKFS). They blamed the HKFS leadership for failure of the protest.^[18]

Post-occupy localist movements

The localists' disaffection toward the HKFS resulted in a great split in the student federation. The localist launched a campaign quitting the HKFS. By the end of 2015, four of the eight student unions consisting the federation, the Hong Kong University Students' Union (HKUSU), the Hong Kong Polytechnic University Students' Union (HKPUSU), the Hong Kong Baptist University Students' Union (HKBUSU) and the City University of Hong Kong Students' Union (CityUSU), broke up with the HKFS.

After the occupy movement, several organisations named "Umbrella organisations" by the media were set up, in which many of them carried certain degree of localist discourses, notably Youngspiration and Hong Kong Indigenous. Youngspiration took part in the 2015 District Council election with many other newcoming "Umbrella soldiers" and eventually won one seat out of nine candidates.^[19] Hong Kong Indigenous is notable for its protest style, in which it calls for a "militant" approach with "some kind of clash", as opposed to pan-democrats' "gentle approach" of non-violent civil disobedience.^[20]

The Hong Kong Independence Party was formed in April 2015 advocating an independent Hong Kong within the British Commonwealth.^[21]

Anti-parallel trading protests

"Liberate Sha Tin" with the British Hong Kong flag raised.

The localists including Hong Kong Indigenous and Civic Passion also mobilised on the Internet and launched several "Liberate campaigns" in districts such as Tuen Mun on 8 February, Sha Tin on 15 February and Yuen Long on 1 March where parallel traders were active. Protesters were not only against the parallel traders, but also the overcrowded environment in Hong Kong caused by the multi-entry permits issued to mainland tourists.^[22] They scolded the mainland tourists, aggressively picketed the alleged shoppersand and clashed with the police, in which many of them turned violent.^[23] After the third demonstration, the central government said it would restrict Shenzhen residents to one visit a week.^[24]

Siu Yau-wai case

In July 2015, localists including Hong Kong Indigenous and Youngspiration marched to the Immigration Department to demand deportation of an undocumented 12-year-old Mainland boy Siu Yau-wai, who lived in Hong Kong for nine years without identification.^[25]

A fire set in Mong Kok by the protesters during the clashes.

Mong Kok unrest

In February 2016 during the Chinese New Year, Hong Kong Indigenous called for action online to shield the street hawkers, who sold Hong Kong street food in which they saw as part of the Hong Kong culture, from government health department's crackdown. The protest escalated to violent clashes between the police and the protesters. The protesters threw glass bottles, bricks, flower pots and trash bins toward the police and set fires in the streets which the government condemned as riots.^[26] The Chinese Foreign Ministry for the first time labelled the involved localists as "separatists", claiming that "the riot [was] plotted mainly by local radical separatist organisation."^[27]

New Territories East by-election

Election result of Edward Leung by District Council constituency.

The Legislative Council by-election in New Territories East on 28 February 2016 was a milestone of the localist movements, as it was the first attempt for them to contest for the Legislative Council under localist banner.^[28] Youngspiration was initially considering fielding a candidate and called for a primary with the pan-democratic Civic Party. It later dropped out due to the lack of time for holding a primary.^[29]

Hong Kong Indigenous nominated Edward Leung Tin-kei who would later rise to prominence by his involvement in the Mong Kok clashes and arrest by police. Localist groups and figures who campaigned for Leung included Youngspiration, Civic Passion, Chin Wan and Wong Yuk-man.^[30] Leung finished in third place, with 15 per cent of the vote, behind the Civic Party democrat Alvin Yeung with 37 per cent and pro-Beijing Democratic Alliance for the Betterment and Progress of Hong Kong's Holden Chow with 34 per cent.^[31] Leung claimed localism had gained a foothold as the third most important power in local politics, standing side by side with the pan-democracy and pro-Beijing camps.^[32] The better-than-expected result was considered to further boost the localists' morale and their ambition of running in the September general election.^[33]

Hong Kong independence

The University of Hong Kong student magazine Undergrad published an article in March 2016 headed “Hong Kong Youth’s Declaration” argues for Hong Kong independence on expiry of the Sino-British Joint Declaration in 2047. It demands a democratic government be set up after 2047 and for the public to draw up the Hong Kong constitution. It also denounces the Hong Kong government for becoming a “puppet” of the Communist Party, “weakening” the city’s autonomy. Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying dismissed the claim, stating that “Hong Kong has been a part of China since ancient times, and this is a fact that will not change after 2047.” University of Hong Kong council chairman Arthur Li Kwok-cheung described the idea of independence as nonsense, saying that “I don’t think any wise person would listen.”^[34]

Hong Kong National Party, the first party openly advocates for Hong Kong independence and a Republic of Hong Kong established on 28 March 2016, drew attacks from the Beijing and SAR governments. The State Council’s Hong Kong and Macau Affairs Office issued a statement through the official Xinhua News Agency on 30 March 2016 condemning the party: "The action to establish a pro-independence organisation by an extremely small group of people in Hong Kong has harmed the country’s sovereignty, security, endangered the prosperity and stability of Hong Kong, and the core interests of Hong Kong... It is firmly opposed by all Chinese people, including some seven million Hong Kong people. It is also a serious violation of the country’s constitution, Hong Kong’s Basic Law and the relevant existing laws."^[35] The Hong Kong government issued a statement after the formation of the party, stating that "any suggestion that Hong Kong should be independent or any movement to advocate such 'independence' is against the Basic Law, and will undermine the stability and prosperity of Hong Kong and impair the interest of the general public… The SAR Government will take action according to the law.”^[35]

Localist parties and groups

• Civic Passion
• CUHK Local Society
• Democratic Progressive Party of Hong Kong
• East Kowloon Community
• Hong Kong First
• Hong Kong Autonomy Movement
• Hong Kong Independence Party
• Hong Kong Indigenous
• Hong Kong Localism Power
• Hong Kong National Party
• Hong Kong Resurgence Order
• Hongkonger Front
• Hongkongers Priority
• Neo Democrats
• North District Parallel Imports Concern Group
• Proletariat Political Institute
• Sha Tin Community Network
• Valiant Frontier
• Youngspiration

Localist leaders

• Alvin Cheng
• Chin Wan
• Gary Fan
• Edward Leung
• Claudia Mo
• Ray Wong
• Wong Yeung-tat
• Wong Yuk-man

See also

• Conservatism in Hong Kong
• Hong Kong independence movement
• Liberalism in Hong Kong
• Pan-Green Coalition (Taiwan)
• Socialism in Hong Kong
• Taiwanese localization movement

References

1. "Hong Kong suffers identity crisis as China's influence grows". The Guardian. 18 April 2016.
2. "Localism: Why is support for the political perspective growing - and who's behind it?". 1 July 2015.
3. Chan, Danny (6 July 2015). "Hong Kong nativists' constant need to find the next enemy makes no sense". South China Morning Post.
4. Veg, Sebastian (16 March 2013). "Hong Kong's Enduring Identity Crisis". The Atlantic.
5. "Determined". The Economist. 30 May 2015.
6. "旺角騷亂 京定性本土激進分離組織策動 議員：為23條立法鋪路". Apple Daily. 13 February 2016.
7. 呂大樂 (2007). 香港四代人. 進一步多媒體有限公司.
8. 羅永生. "香港本土意識的前世今生". 思想.
9. Williams, Louise; Rich, Roland (2000). Losing Control: Freedom of the Press in Asia. Asia Pacific Press. ISBN 0-7315-3626-6.
10. Hung, Ho Fung (3 November 2014). "Three Views of Local Consciousness in Hong Kong 香港　地元の意識、三つの視点". The Asia-Pacific Journal 12 (44).
11. Lau, Stuart (10 June 2013). "Independent thinker Horace Chin treads bold path". South China Morning Post.
12. Chang, Ping (9 June 2013). "Will a democratic China harm Hong Kong?". South China Morning Post.
13. "Hong Kong Nativism Power: No cashout for new immigrants". Retrieved 10 March 2011.
14. Ip, Kelly; Phneah, Jeraldine; NectarGan (5 June 2013) "Undampened". The Standard.
15. Tiananmen massacre remembered at massive Hong Kong vigil, chinaworker.info, 6 June 2014
16. Lim, John (31 January 2015). "HK following in Taiwan’s footsteps". Taipei Times.
17. 陳雲 (2013-02-24). "殖民遺恨——感懷呂大樂《那似曾相識的七十年代》". 明報.
18. Sataline, Suzanne (29 April 2015). "What Happened to Hong Kong’s Pro-Democracy Movement?". Foreign Policy.
19. "Out with the old: Two big-name pan-democrats ousted in tight district council election races". South China Morning Post. 23 November 2015.
20. Hewitt, Duncan (8 April 2015). "Hong Kong's Clashes Over Mainland Shoppers Show Rising Cultural Tensions With China". International Business Times.
21. "港獨黨拒中國人當技術員". Ta Kung Pao. 4 April 2015.
22. Chan, KY (20 April 2016). "Anti-parallel trading protests: How does it start and has it ended?". Hong Kong stories.
23. Chan, Kevin (2 March 2015). "Chinese shoppers latest target of Hong Kong protest anger". USA Today.
24. Sataline, Suzanne (18 May 2015). "Meet the Man Who Wants to Make Hong Kong a City-State". Foreign Policy.
25. "Localism: Why is support for the political perspective growing - and who's behind it?". Time Out Hong Kong. 1 July 2015.
26. "【A1頭條】本土派號召300人旺角撐小販 警噴椒驅散". Apple Daily. 9 February 2016.
27. "Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Hong Lei's Remarks on the Riot in Hong Kong". Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People's Republic of China. 11 February 2016.
28. "【馬嶽．評新東補選】66,524票從何而來？". HK01. 29 February 2016.
29. "‘Umbrella soldier’ group invites Civic Party to hold a primary for coming LegCo by-election". Hong Kong Free Press. 25 November 2016.
30. Yuen, Chantal (28 February 2016). "Who came out for whom? Famous figures and who they backed on by-election day". Hong Kong Free Press.
31. "2016 Legislative Council Geographical Constituency New Territories By-election - Election Result". Electoral Affairs Commission. 29 February 2016.
32. Chung, Kang-chung (2 March 2016). "All Around Town: So which Hong Kong politician keeps gunning for losing candidate?". South China Morning Post.
33. "【新東補選】馬嶽：本土派有市場料更多名單爭泛民票源". Apple Daily. 29 February 2016.
34. Fung, Owen; Cheung, Tony. "HKU student magazine says Hong Kong should become independent from China after 2047". South China Morning Post.
35. Cheng, Kris (31 March 2016). "Beijing slams new pro-independence party as gov’t warns of legal action". Hong Kong Free Press.