LokottaravÄda

![]() |
Early Buddhism |
---|
|
The LokottaravÄda (Sanskrit; traditional Chinese: 說出世部; ; pinyin: ShuÅ ChÅ«shì Bù) was one of the early Buddhist schools according to Mahayana doxological sources compiled by BhÄviveka, Vinitadeva and others, and was a subgroup which emerged from the MahÄsÄṃghika.
Etymology
The name LokottaravÄda means those who follow the supramundane (Skt. lokottara), or transcendent, teachings. Despite bearing this name, all sub-sects of the MahÄsÄṃghikas seem to have accepted forms of supramundane or transcendent teachings.[1]
Early history
The ÅšÄriputraparipá¹›cchÄ and the Samayabhedoparacanacakra both suggest that the LokottaravÄda had their origins with the EkavyÄvahÄrikas and the Kukkuá¹ikas. While the MahÄsÄṃghikas initially flourished in the region around Magadha, the LokottaravÄdins are known to have flourished in the Northwest.[2]
The 6th century CE Indian monk ParamÄrtha wrote that 200 years after the parinirvÄṇa of the Buddha, much of the MahÄsÄṃghika school moved north of RÄjagá¹›ha, and were divided over whether the Mahayana teachings should be incorporated formally into their Tripiá¹aka.[3] According to this account, they split into three groups based upon the relative manner and degree to which they accepted the authority of these Mahayana texts.[4] According to ParamÄrtha, the LokottaravÄdins accepted the MahÄyÄna sÅ«tras as the words of the Buddha (buddhavacana).[5]
Texts
MahÄvastu
LokottaravÄdin views are known from the MahÄvastu, which is a rare surviving MahÄsÄṃghika text in Sanskrit. The MahÄvastu is a biography of the Buddha which attributes itself to the LokottaravÄdins, and appears to have been an extended section of their vinaya recension. The Sanskrit text of the MahÄvastu was preserved in the libraries of the Mahayana Buddhists of Nepal.[6]
SukhÄvatÄ«vyÅ«ha influences
Some scholars believe that the Mahayana Infinite Life Sutra was compiled in the era of the Kushan Empire, the first and second centuries CE, by an order of MahīśÄsaka monastics that flourished in Gandhara.[7][8] However, it is likely that the longer Infinite Life Sutra owes greatly to the LokottaravÄdins as well for its compilation: in this sÅ«tra, there are many elements in common with the MahÄvastu.[9] The earliest of these translations show traces of having been translated from the Gandhari Prakrit.[10]
Bamiyan monastery collection
The Chinese Buddhist monk Xuanzang visited a LokottaravÄda vihara in the 7th century CE at Bamyan (modern Afghanistan); this monastery site has since been rediscovered by archaeologists.[11] Birch bark and palm-leaf manuscripts of texts in this monastery's collection, including Mahayana sutras, have been discovered at the site, and these are now located in the Schøyen Collection. Some manuscripts are in Gandhari Prakrit and written in Kharosthi, while others are in Sanskrit written in Gupta scripts. Manuscripts and fragments that have survived from this monastery's collection include the following source texts:[11]
- PrÄtimoká¹£a Vibhaá¹…ga of the MahÄsÄṃghika-LokottaravÄda (MS 2382/269)
- MahÄparinirvÄṇa SÅ«tra, a sÅ«tra from the Ä€gamas (MS 2179/44)
- Caṃgī Sūtra, a sūtra from the Āgamas (MS 2376)
- Diamond Sutra, a Mahayana sutra (MS 2385)
- Bhaiṣajyaguru Sūtra, a Mahayana sutra (MS 2385)
- ÅšrÄ«mÄlÄdevÄ« SiṃhanÄda SÅ«tra, a Mahayana sutra (MS 2378)
- PravÄraṇa SÅ«tra, a Mahayana sutra (MS 2378)
- Sarvadharmapravṛttinirdeśa Sūtra, a Mahayana sutra (MS 2378)
- AjÄtaÅ›atrukauká¹›tyavinodana SÅ«tra, a Mahayana sutra (MS 2378)
- ÅšÄriputra Abhidharma ÅšÄstra (MS 2375/08)
Doctrines

Overview
It is likely that the LokottaravÄdins had no major doctrinal distinctions to distinguish them as different from MahÄsÄṃghika, but that the difference was instead a geographic one.[2] TÄranÄtha viewed the EkavyÄvahÄrikas, LokottaravÄdins, and Gokulikas as being essentially the same.[12] He even viewed EkavyÄvahÄrika as being a general term for the MahÄsaṃghikas.[13] The earlier Samayabhedoparacanacakra of Vasumitra also regards the EkavyÄvahÄrikas, Gokulikas, and LokottaravÄdins as being doctrinally indistinguishable.[14]
Emptiness
The LokottaravÄdins asserted that there are no real things in the world except two kinds of emptiness (Skt. śūnyatÄ), that is, the emptiness of a self (Skt. pudgalaśūnyatÄ) and the emptiness of phenomena (Skt. dharmaśūnyatÄ). This two-fold view of emptiness is also a distinguishing characteristic of MahÄyÄna Buddhism.[15]
Buddhas and bodhisattvas
According to Vasumitra, 48 theses were held in common by these three MahÄsÄṃghika sects.[14] Of the 48 special theses attributed by the Samayabhedoparacanacakra to these sects, 20 points concern the supramundane nature of buddhas and bodhisattvas.[16] According to the Samayabhedoparacanacakra, these four groups held that the Buddha is able to know all dharmas in a single moment of the mind.
In their view, the Buddha is equipped with the following supernatural qualities: transcendence (lokottara), lack of defilements, all of his utterances preaching his teaching, expounding all his teachings in a single utterance, all of his sayings being true, his physical body being limitless, his power (prabhÄva) being limitless, the length of his life being limitless, never tiring of enlightening sentient beings and awakening pure faith in them, having no sleep or dreams, no pause in answering a question, and always in meditation (samÄdhi).[17]
The Buddha is viewed as transcendent (Skt. lokottara) and his life and physical manifestation are mere appearance.[18] The LokottaravÄda school upheld the MahÄsÄṃghika view of the supramundane nature of the buddhas and bodhisattvas, and the imperfection and fallibility of arhats.[18]
Bodhisattva Path
The LokottaravÄdin MahÄvastu speaks of Buddhism as consisting of the Three Vehicles, and includes specific instructions regarding the Bodhisattva Path and the practices of bodhisattvas.[19] From the MahÄvastu, we know that the LokottaravÄdins had a conception of a bodhisattva's progress toward enlightenment as consisting of ten grounds, or bhÅ«mis, as required for Mahayana bodhisattvas.[20] These bhÅ«mis described in the MahÄvastu are similar to those in the MahÄyÄna Ten Stages Sutra, but the names of these stages seem to differ somewhat.[21][22]

Buddha-fields
From the MahÄvastu, it is evident that the LokottaravÄdins also held that there were innumerable pure lands (Skt. buddhaká¹£etra "buddha-fields"), throughout which there are innumerable buddhas and innumerable tenth-ground bodhisattvas who will become buddhas. Each is said to lead limitless sentient beings to liberation, yet the number of sentient beings remains essentially infinite.[23]
Equality of buddhas
In the MahÄvastu, there are some LokottaravÄdin accounts of the nature of buddhas which have strong parallels to those in Mahayana sutras. In one section, a multitude of devas are described as putting up sunshades in honor of the Buddha, who in turn shows himself sitting beneath each and every one. Each deva believes himself to be particularly honored, unaware of the fictitious character of his own buddha, who is no different from the others he sees.[24] This has a parallel with an account in the Śūraá¹…gama SamÄdhi SÅ«tra.[24] In this text, the Buddha appears simultaneously on a vast number of lion-thrones prepared by various devas, but each deva sees only the buddha that is sitting on his own throne. At the appropriate moment, all the buddhas are revealed to the devas, and one asks which is real – his own buddha, or all the others. In the Śūraá¹…gama SamÄdhi SÅ«tra, the Buddha's answer is ultimately that they are all equal, because the nature of buddhas is not apart from all phenomena.[24]
Future buddhas
In the MahÄvastu, the future buddha Maitreya is mentioned a number of times, and the text states that he will be just one of the one thousand buddhas who are destined to appear in the future following Gautama Buddha. The MahÄsÄṃghika-LokottaravÄda view is contrasted with that of the Theravada, which holds that five buddhas are destined to follow Gautama.[25]
See also
References
- ↑ Williams 2008, p. 20.
- 1 2 Baruah 2008, p. 47.
- ↑ Walser 2005, pp. 50-51.
- ↑ Walser 2005, p. 51.
- ↑ Padma 2008, p. 68.
- ↑ Warder 2000, p. 266.
- ↑ Nakamura 1999, p. 205.
- ↑ Williams 2008, p. 239.
- ↑ Nakamura & 1999 p. 205.
- ↑ Mukherjee 1996, p. 15.
- 1 2 "Schøyen Collection: Buddhism". Retrieved 23 June 2012.
- ↑ Baruah 2008, p. 48.
- ↑ Baruah 2008, p. 19.
- 1 2 Walser 2005, p. 214.
- ↑ Baruah 2008, p. 461.
- ↑ Padma 2008, p. 56.
- ↑ Yao 2005, p. 11.
- 1 2 Baruah 2008, p. 446.
- ↑ Baruah 2008, p. 462.
- ↑ Baruah 2008, p. 459.
- ↑ Baruah 2008, p. 463.
- ↑ Williams 2004, p. 182.
- ↑ Williams 2008, p. 215.
- 1 2 3 Pye 2004, p. 68.
- ↑ Sponberg & Hardacre 1988, p. 62.
Bibliography
- Baruah, Bibhuti (2000). Buddhist Sects and Sectarianism. Sarup & Sons. ISBN 978-81-7625-152-5.
- Mukherjee, Bratindra Nath (1996). India in Early Central Asia: A Survey of Indian Scripts, Languages, and Literatures in Central Asia of the First Millennium A.D. Harman Publishing House. ISBN 978-81-85151-98-4.
- Nakamura, Hajime (1980). Indian Buddhism: A Survey with Bibliographical Notes. Motilal Banarsidass Publ. ISBN 978-81-208-0272-8.
- Padma, Sree (2008). Buddhism in the Krishna River Valley of Andhra. SUNY Press. ISBN 978-0-7914-7814-1.
- Pye, Michael (2004). Skilful Means: A Concept in Mahayana Buddhism. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-134-38063-3.
- Sponberg, Alan; Hardacre, Helen (1988). Maitreya, the Future Buddha: Edited by Alan Sponberg and Helen Hardacre. CUP Archive. ISBN 978-0-521-34344-2.
- Walser, Joseph (2013). Nagarjuna in Context: Mahayana Buddhism and Early Indian Culture. Columbia University Press. p. 476. ISBN 978-0-231-50623-6.
- Yao, Zhihua (2012). The Buddhist Theory of Self-Cognition. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-134-28745-1.
- Williams, Paul (2008). Mahayana Buddhism: The Doctrinal Foundations. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-134-25056-1.