Microaggression theory

Microaggression is a term coined by psychiatrist and Harvard University professor Chester M. Pierce in 1970 to describe insults and dismissals he regularly witnessed non-black Americans inflict on African Americans.[1][2][3][4] In 1973, MIT economist Mary Rowe extended the term to include similar aggressions directed at women, and those of different abilities, religions, etc. She also used the word micro-inequity to describe an inequitable treatment of another person in a manner that is not overtly "aggressive", yet which might stem from negligence, ignorance, or what we now call unconscious bias. Eventually, the term came to encompass the casual degradation of any socially marginalized group, such as the poor and the disabled.[5]

Description and prevalence

Psychologist Derald Wing Sue defines microaggressions as "brief, everyday exchanges that send denigrating messages to certain individuals because of their group membership."[6] Sue describes microaggressions as generally happening below the level of awareness of well-intentioned members of the dominant culture. Microaggressions, according to Sue, are different from overt, deliberate acts of bigotry, such as the use of racist epithets, because the people perpetrating microaggressions often intend no offense and are unaware they are causing harm.[7] Sue describes microaggressions as including statements that repeat or affirm stereotypes about the minority group or subtly demean it, that position the dominant culture as normal and the minority one as aberrant or pathological, that express disapproval of or discomfort with the minority group, that assume all minority group members are the same, that minimize the existence of discrimination against the minority group, seek to deny the perpetrator's own bias, or minimize real conflict between the minority group and the dominant culture.[7]

Race or ethnicity

Main article: Racism

Social scientists Sue, Bucceri, Lin, Nadal, and Torino (2007) described microaggressions as "the new face of racism," saying that the nature of racism has shifted over time from overt expressions of racial hatred and hate crimes, towards expressions of aversive racism, such as microaggressions, that are more subtle, ambiguous and often unintentional. Researchers say this has led some Americans to wrongly believe that racism is no longer a problem for non-white Americans.[8]

Studies[9] show that a wide variety of people in the United States report experience with racial microaggressions, including Hispanic/Latino American, African American, Middle Eastern American, European American, and Asian American people. Racial microaggressions are not limited by class or circumstance, and can be experienced by college students and upper-middle class professionals.[9] For example, white students and professors seeming surprised when an African-American student makes a particularly insightful or intelligent comment in class,[18] and Asian students being pathologized or penalized as too passive or quiet.[10] One famous example of a race-related microaggression happened when during the 2008 US democratic presidential primaries Joe Biden described Barack Obama as "the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy." Sue wrote that while on the surface Biden's comment sounded like praise, the message heard by African-Americans was "Obama is an exception. Most Blacks are unintelligent, inarticulate, dirty and unattractive."[7]

According to Sue et al.,[11] microaggressions seem to appear in three forms:

Gender and sexuality

Further information: Sexism

Women, including trans women, report experiencing gender-related microaggressions.[12] Some examples of sexist microagressions are "[addressing someone by using] a sexist name, a man refusing to wash dishes because it is 'woman's work,' displaying nude pin-ups of women at places of employment, someone making unwanted sexual advances toward another person."[13]

Other, more subtle forms of microaggression take the form of seemingly benign comments that actually undermine the credibility and competence of people, such as "that's the easiest solution, yes", "we can all see that", implying that the observations and solutions are unnecessary and common knowledge, along the theme of systematic devaluation of the contribution of people.[14]

Members of sexual minorities commonly report experiencing microaggressions.[15] These commonly include the sexual exoticization of lesbians by heterosexual men; linking homosexuality with gender dysphoria or paraphilia; and prying questions about one's sexual activity.[7] Transgender people are commonly misgendered (labelled as having a gender other than the one they identify with), among other forms of microaggression.[16]

The following have been proposed as "microaggressable" themes:[7]

Intersectionality

People who are marginalized in multiple ways (e.g., a gay Asian-American man or a trans woman) experience microaggressions rooted in multiple forms of marginalization.[17] For example, in one study Asian-American women reported feeling sexually exoticized by majority-culture men or viewed by them as potential trophy wives.[18] Latina women report being assumed to be "spicy and sassy."[19] African-American women report experiencing microaggressions such as ones involving their hair (particularly that it is "unprofessional") or assumptions of stereotypes (such as being labeled an "angry black woman").[20] African-American women often experience microaggressions rooted in the assumption that they are scary, aggressive, loud and/or violent, that they are criminals, intellectually inferior to others, and/or that their culture is pathological.[21] Researchers say black women attribute most microaggression to their race, with gender as a secondary contributor.[21]

People with mental illness

Further information: Disability abuse

People with mental illness report experiencing more overt forms of microaggression than subtle ones, coming from family and friends and authority figures. In a study involving college students and adults experiencing community care, five themes were identified: invalidation, assumption of inferiority, fear of mental illness, shaming of mental illness, and being treated as a second class citizen.[22]

Perpetrators

Researchers report that most perpetrators of microaggressions consider themselves to be unprejudiced, with one U.S. study finding that even mental health professionals with extensive antiracist training engaged in microaggressions with African-American clients.[23]

Because perpetrators are generally well-meaning and microaggressions are subtle, their recipients often experience attributional ambiguity, which may lead them to dismiss the experience and blame themselves as overly sensitive.[24] If challenged by the minority person or an observer, perpetrators will often defend their microaggression as a misunderstanding, a joke, or something small that shouldn't be blown out of proportion.[25]

Effects

Recipients of microaggressions may feel anger, frustration, or exhaustion. African-Americans have reported feeling under pressure to "represent" their group or to suppress their own cultural expression and "act white".[26] Over time, the cumulative effect of microaggressions can lead to diminished self-confidence and a poor self-image, and potentially also to mental health problems such as depression, anxiety and trauma.[23][25][26][27] Many researchers, Greer & Chwalisz, 2007; Solórzano, Ceja, & Yosso, 2000; Watkins, LaBarrie, & Appio, 2010, have argued that microaggressions are actually more damaging than overt expressions of bigotry precisely because they are small and therefore often ignored or downplayed, leading the victim to feel self-doubting rather than justifiably angry, and isolated rather than supported. On the other hand, some people report that microaggressions have made them more resilient.[27] Harvard’s DuBois Institute associate Paula J. Caplan and research assistant Jordan C. Ford, wrote that although microaggressions "might seem minor" they are "so numerous that trying to function in such a setting is 'like lifting a ton of feathers."'[28]

Studies have shown evidence that when women experience microaggressions, they may become depressed, develop low self-esteem, or experience sexual dysfunction. Some develop eating disorders and body image issues.[27] There are also studies showing evidence that microaggressions can lead people of color to fear, distrust and avoid relationships with white people.[23] A 2016 study found that microaggressions may increase the risk of preterm birth among black women, but only among those who were not already at a high risk of it already.[29]

Impact of microaggressions on invisibility

Psychologist and Boston College professor Anderson J. Franklin links the experience of microaggressions directly to what he calls "invisibility syndrome," a syndrome defined as an "'inner struggle with the feeling that one's talents, abilities, personality, and worth are not values or even recognized because of prejudice and racism.'"[30] Invisibility syndrome links hyperexposure to the microaggressions that result from racism and prejudice to the manifestation of these slights and describes the resulting altered perception of self.[30][31] Moreover, Franklin asserts that feelings of invisibility emanate from incessant experiences with prejudice "while attempting to maintain a healthy racial identity in a predominantly European American society."[30] Franklin's invisibility syndrome presents a dichotomous self-development of which there exists a self "defined by social prejudice"[32][33] alongside the individual self. According to Franklin, and to individuals who experience them, microaggressions contribute to the duality of self and to invisibility syndrome in that they "have an additive effect over time, shaping one's view of self in the world."[31] Franklin also suggests that these covert slights "act as status reminders by their implicit suggestion of unworthiness, and have a leveling effect on the recipient."[31] Similarly, Simba Runyowa of The Atlantic states that microaggressions fuel alienation,[34] or in Franklin's terms, invisibility, by magnifying "cultural differences in ways that put the recipient's non-conformity into sharp relief."[34] In this respect, microaggressions typically elicit apprehension that the recipient either confirms running stereotypes of his or her culture, or that the person is unfit or unworthy to belong to a setting dominated by a majority group.[34]

Microaggressions are deceptively subtle but carry enough weight to "force the individual into a mold structured by stereotypes and the negative associations attached to them."[35] Degrees of vigilance to the racial and ethnic prejudices experienced from microaggressions vary, but "the burden of constant vigilance"[36] facilitates the gradual deterioration of an individual's psyche.[37][36] The "need for a dual consciousness to satisfy social ends"[37] and the continuous alienation not only from oneself but from his or her environment significantly decrease self-worth[30] and can lead to self-destructive disorders.[37]

Culture of victimhood

A review of sociological literature conducted by two sociologists—Bradley Campbell and Jason Manning[38]—argues that the culture of microaggression leads to a culture of victimhood. Jonathan Haidt points out that being a victim is at the height of this culture.[39]

The victim complex caused by the microaggression theory can have fatal results. In 2015, an African-American TV news reporter in Virginia killed two white colleagues because he thought they were racially abusing him by eating watermelon, telling him to do "field work" or to "swing by a location".[40][41]

Criticism

Writing for The Federalist, Paul Rowan Brian argued that microaggression theory pools trivial and ignorable instances of racism with real, genuine prejudice and exclusion.[42] Viv Regan, writing for Spiked Online, wondered whether the comfort provided by having a convenient label for alleged rudeness outweighs the damage caused by overreaction.[43] Amitai Etzioni, writing in The Atlantic, speculated that obsession about microaggressions is a distraction from dealing with much more serious acts.[44] Another article in The Atlantic expressed concern that the obsession with microaggressions can actually cause more emotional trauma than the microaggressions themselves.[45]

Microaggression theory has also been criticized by several conservative think tanks. Christina Hoff Sommers, in a video for the American Enterprise Institute, criticized microaggression theory calling it oversensitive and paranoid.[46] Heather Mac Donald, writing for the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research's City Journal, believes the theory is simply self-victimization, and refers to it critically as both a "farce" and a "fad".[47]

See also

References

  1. Derald Wing Sue (2010). Microaggressions in Everyday Life: Race, Gender, and Sexual Orientation. Wiley. pp. xvi. ISBN 047049140X.
  2. Delpit, Lisa (2012). "Multiplication Is for White People": Raising Expectations for Other People's Children. The New Press. ISBN 1595580468.
  3. Treadwell, Henrie M. (2013). Beyond Stereotypes in Black and White: How Everyday Leaders Can Build Healthier Opportunities for African American Boys and Men. Praeger. p. 47. ISBN 1440803994.
  4. Sommers-Flanagan, Rita (2012). Counseling and Psychotherapy Theories in Context and Practice: Skills, Strategies, and Techniques. Wiley. p. 294. ISBN 0470617934.
  5. Paludi, Michele (2010). Victims of Sexual Assault and Abuse: Resources and Responses for Individuals and Families (Women's Psychology). Praeger. p. 22. ISBN 031337970X.
  6. Paludi, Michele A. (2012). Managing Diversity in Today's Workplace: Strategies for Employees and Employers. Praeger. ISBN 0313393176.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 Sue, Derard Wing (2010). Microaggressions and Marginality: Manifestation, Dynamics, and Impact. Wiley. pp. 229–233. ISBN 0470491396.
  8. Derald Wing Sue; et al. (Summer 2008). "Racial Microaggressions Against Black Americans: Implications for Counseling" (PDF). Journal of Counseling & Development. Retrieved 11 September 2014.
  9. 1 2 "Ethnic and Racial Disparities in Education:Psychology’s Contributions to Understanding and ReducingDisparities" (PDF). American Psychological Association. August 3, 2012.
  10. Paniagua, Freddy A., and Ann-Marie Yamada (2013). Handbook of Multicultural Mental Health: Assessment and Treatment of Diverse Populations. Academic Press. p. 308. ISBN 0123944201.
  11. Sue, D., et al. (2007). Racial Microaggressions in Everyday Life: Implications for Clinical Practice. American Psychologist, 62(4), 271-286.
  12. Wing, D. W., ed. (2010). Microaggressions and Marginality: Manifestation, Dynamics, and Impact. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 9780470627204.
  13. Wing, D. W. (2010). Microaggressions in Everyday Life: Race, Gender, and Sexual Orientation. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. p. 169. ISBN 9780470491409. OCLC 430842664.
  14. Voeten, Erik (October 4, 2013). "Why is work by women systematically devalued?". Washington Post.
  15. "Look Different Toolkit" (PDF). MTV.
  16. Paludi, Michele A. (2013). Women and Management: Global Issues and Promising Solutions. Praeger. p. 237. ISBN 0313399417.
  17. Zesiger, Heather (July 25, 2013). "Racial Microaggressions and College Student Wellbeing" (PDF).
  18. Derald Wing Sue, Jennifer Bucceri, Annie I. Lin, Kevin L. Nadal, and Gina C. Torino (2007). "Racial Microaggressions and the Asian American Experience" (PDF). Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology 13 (1): 72–81. doi:10.1037/1099-9809.13.1.72.
  19. Sánchez, Erika L. (August 22, 2012). "The Anxiety of Fulfilling Latina Stereotypes". Huffington Post.
  20. Lundberg-Love, Paula K. (2011). Women and Mental Disorders. Praeger Women's Psychology. p. 98. ISBN 9780313393198.
  21. 1 2 Chambers, Crystal Renee (2012). Black Female Undergraduates on Campus: Successes and Challenges. Emerald Group Publishing (Diversity in Higher Education). pp. 83–87. ISBN 1780525028.
  22. Gonzales L, Davidoff KC, Nadal KL, Yanos PT (2015). "Microaggressions experienced by persons with mental illnesses: An exploratory study". Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal 38 (3): 234–41. doi:10.1037/prj0000096. PMID 25402611.
  23. 1 2 3 Evans, Stephanie Y. (2009). African Americans and Community Engagement in Higher Education: Community Service, Service-learning, and Community-based Research. State University of New York Press. pp. 126–127. ISBN 143842874X.
  24. David, E.J.R (2013). Internalized Oppression: The Psychology of Marginalized Groups. Springer Publishing Company. p. 5. ISBN 0826199259.
  25. 1 2 Love, Katie Lynn (2009). An Emancipatory Study with African-American Women in Predominantly White Nursing Schools. Proquest. p. 221.
  26. 1 2 Sue, D., Capodilupo, C.M., & Holder, A.M.B. (2008). Racial microaggressions in the life experience of black Americans. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 39, 329-336.
  27. 1 2 3 Lundberg, Paula K. (2011). Women and Mental Disorders. Praeger. pp. 89–92. ISBN 0313393192.
  28. "Harvard Study Suggests Microaggressions Might Make People Die Sooner". Retrieved 2015-09-10.
  29. Slaughter-Acey, Jaime C.; Sealy-Jefferson, Shawnita; Helmkamp, Laura; Caldwell, Cleopatra H.; Osypuk, Theresa L.; Platt, Robert W.; Straughen, Jennifer K.; Dailey-Okezie, Rhonda K.; Abeysekara, Purni; Misra, Dawn P. (January 2016). "Racism in the form of micro aggressions and the risk of preterm birth among black women". Annals of Epidemiology 26 (1): 7–13.e1. doi:10.1016/j.annepidem.2015.10.005.
  30. 1 2 3 4 Tovar-Murray D, Tovar-Murray M. A Phenomenological Analysis of the Invisibility Syndrome. Journal Of Multicultural Counseling & Development [serial online]. January 2012;40(1):24-36 13p. Available from: CINAHL Complete, Ipswich, MA. Accessed March 15, 2016.
  31. 1 2 3 Franklin A, Boyd-Franklin N. Invisibility syndrome: A clinical model of the effects of racism on African-American males. American Journal Of Orthopsychiatry [serial online]. January 2000;70(1):33-41. Available from: PsycARTICLES, Ipswich, MA. Accessed March 15, 2016.
  32. "The Professional Counselor » A Phenomenological Analysis of Invisibility Among African-American Males: Implications for Clinical Practice and Client Retention". tpcjournal.nbcc.org. Retrieved 2016-04-21Sociologist W.E.B. DuBois provides another articulation of this identity dichotomy in the framework of his dual or double consciousness.This phenomenon posits that those who experience oppression develop a split persona of a "genuine self" and an "oppressed self"where "the former represents healthy drives, needs, and the latter serves as a mirror to "the realities of societal stereotypes and prejudices" and "must somehow suppress self-efficacy in order to adapt to the demands of oppression."With invisibility syndrome comes the inherent quest for visibility or "to become a respected person of value in society." This ideal becomes increasingly difficult to achieve by individuals experiencing dual consciousness as DuBois deems it a "sense of measuring one’s soul by the tape of a world that looks on in amused contempt and pity."
  33. ""The Veil" and "Double Consciousness""Sociologist W.E.B. DuBois provides another articulation of this identity dichotomy in the framework of his dual or double consciousness.This phenomenon posits that those who experience oppression develop a split persona of a "genuine self" and an "oppressed self"where "the former represents healthy drives, needs, and the latter serves as a mirror to "the realities of societal stereotypes and prejudices" and "must somehow suppress self-efficacy in order to adapt to the demands of oppression."With invisibility syndrome comes the inherent quest for visibility or "to become a respected person of value in society." This ideal becomes increasingly difficult to achieve by individuals experiencing dual consciousness as DuBois deems it a "sense of measuring one’s soul by the tape of a world that looks on in amused contempt and pity."
  34. 1 2 3 Runyowa, Simba. "Microaggressions Are Real". The Atlantic. Retrieved 2016-03-15.
  35. Franklin, A. J. (1999). Invisibility Syndrome and Racial Identity Development in Psychotherapy and Counseling African American Men. Counseling Psychologist, 27(6), 761-93.
  36. 1 2 "Racial Microaggressions in Everyday Life". Psychology Today. Retrieved 2016-03-16.
  37. 1 2 3 Dobbins J, Skillings J. Racism as a clinical syndrome. American Journal Of Orthopsychiatry [serial online]. January 2000;70(1):14-27. Available from: PsycARTICLES, Ipswich, MA. Accessed March 15, 2016.
  38. Campbell, Bradley; Manning, Jason (2014). "Microaggression and Moral Cultures". Comparative Sociology 13 (6): 692–726. doi:10.1163/15691330-12341332. Retrieved 20 September 2015.
  39. "Where microaggressions really come from: A sociological account". Retrieved 20 September 2015. The key idea is that the new moral culture of victimhood fosters 'moral dependence' and an atrophying of the ability to handle small interpersonal matters on one's own. At the same time that it weakens individuals, it creates a society of constant and intense moral conflict as people compete for status as victims or as defenders of victims.
  40. Shammas, John (28 August 2015). "Virginia shooting gunman Bryce Williams thought WATERMELON in newsroom was racist". Mirror Online.
  41. A. B. Wilkinson (28 August 2015). "Making Sense Out of Bryce Williams and the Virginia Shooting". The Huffington Post.
  42. Paul Rowan Brian (December 16, 2013). "Unmasking The Mustachioed Menace Of Microaggression". The Federalist.
  43. Regan, Viv (29 December 2014). "Microaggression: desperately seeking discrimination". Spiked.
  44. Etzioni, Amitai (April 8, 2014). "Don't Sweat the Microaggressions". The Atlantic.
  45. Lukianoff, Greg; Haidt, Jonathan (September 2015), The Coddling of the American Mind, The Atlantic, retrieved 14 February 2016
  46. Trigger warnings demean feminism. Here's why. on YouTube
  47. "The Microaggression Farce". City Journal. Autumn 2014.

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Monday, May 02, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.