Military robot

"Artificial soldier" redirects here. For the album by band Front Line Assembly, see Artificial Soldier.
Armed Predator drone

Military robots are autonomous robots or remote-controlled mobile robots designed for military applications, from transport to search & rescue and attack.

Some such systems are currently in use, and many are under development.

History

Soviet TT-26 teletank, February 1940
British soldiers with captured German Goliath remote-controlled demolition vehicles (Battle of Normandy, 1944)

Broadly defined, military robots date back to World War II and the Cold War in the form of the German Goliath tracked mines and the Soviet teletanks. The MQB-1 Predator drone was when "CIA officers began to see the first practical returns on their decade-old fantasy of using aerial robots to collect intelligence".[1]

The use of robots in warfare, although traditionally a topic for science fiction, is being researched as a possible future means of fighting wars. Already several military robots have been developed by various armies.

Some believe the future of modern warfare will be fought by automated weapons systems.[2] The U.S. Military is investing heavily in research and development towards testing and deploying increasingly automated systems. The most prominent system currently in use is the unmanned aerial vehicle (IAI Pioneer & RQ-1 Predator) which can be armed with Air-to-ground missiles and remotely operated from a command center in reconnaissance roles. DARPA has hosted competitions in 2004 & 2005 to involve private companies and universities to develop unmanned ground vehicles to navigate through rough terrain in the Mojave Desert for a final prize of 2 Million.[3]

Artillery has seen promising research with an experimental weapons system named "Dragon Fire II" which automates loading and ballistics calculations required for accurate predicted fire, providing a 12-second response time to fire support requests. However, military weapons are prevented from being fully autonomous: they require human input at certain intervention points to ensure that targets are not within restricted fire areas as defined by Geneva Conventions for the laws of war.

There have been some developments towards developing autonomous fighter jets and bombers.[4] The use of autonomous fighters and bombers to destroy enemy targets is especially promising because of the lack of training required for robotic pilots, autonomous planes are capable of performing maneuvers which could not otherwise be done with human pilots (due to high amount of G-Force), plane designs do not require a life support system, and a loss of a plane does not mean a loss of a pilot. However, the largest draw back to robotics is their inability to accommodate for non-standard conditions. Advances in artificial intelligence in the near future may help to rectify this.

Examples

In current use

Foster-Miller TALON SWORDS units equipped with various weaponry
The Platforma-M variant of the Multifunctional Utility/Combat support/Patrol. Serially produced by the Russian Army.

[5]

In development

The Armed Robotic Vehicle variant of the MULE. Image made by the U.S. Army.

Effects and impact

Advantages

Autonomous robotics would save and preserve soldiers' lives by removing serving soldiers, who might otherwise be killed, from the battlefield. Lt. Gen. Richard Lynch of the United States of America Army Installation Management Command and assistant Army chief of staff for installation stated at a conference [14]

As I think about what’s happening on the battlefield today ... I contend there are things we could do to improve the survivability of our service members. And you all know that’s true.

Major Kenneth Rose of the US Army's Training and Doctrine Command outlined some of the advantages of robotic technology in warfare:[15]

Machines don't get tired. They don't close their eyes. They don't hide under trees when it rains and they don't talk to their friends ... A human's attention to detail on guard duty drops dramatically in the first 30 minutes ... Machines know no fear.

Increasing attention is also paid to how to make the robots more autonomous, with a view of eventually allowing them to operate on their own for extended periods of time, possibly behind enemy lines. For such functions, systems like the Energetically Autonomous Tactical Robot are being tried, which is intended to gain its own energy by foraging for plant matter. The majority of military robots are tele-operated and not equipped with weapons; they are used for reconnaissance, surveillance, sniper detection, neutralizing explosive devices, etc. Current robots that are equipped with weapons are tele-operated so they are not capable of taking lives autonomously.[16] Advantages regarding the lack of emotion and passion in robotic combat is also taken into consideration as a beneficial factor in significantly reducing instances of unethical behavior in wartime. Autonomous machines are created not to be a "truly 'ethical' robots", yet ones that comply with the laws of war (LOW) and rules of engagement (ROE).[17] Hence the fatigue, stress, emotion, adrenaline, etc. that affects a human soldiers rash decisions are removed; there will be no effect on the battlefield caused by the decisions made by the individual.

Risks

Military robots seem to reduce the cost of war for those who have them, so they may increase the probability of military action - a known problem with Unmanned combat aerial vehicles or 'drones'. If they become Lethal autonomous weapons, they may pose significant dangers. For more discussion:

Human rights groups and NGOs such as Human Rights Watch and the Campaign to Stop Killer Robots have started urging governments and the United Nations to issue policy to outlaw the development of so-called "lethal autonomous weapons systems" (LAWS).[18] The United Kingdom opposed such campaigns, with the Foreign Office declaring that "international humanitarian law already provides sufficient regulation for this area".[19]

In July 2015, over 1,000 experts in artificial intelligence signed a letter warning of the threat of an arms race in military artificial intelligence and calling for a ban on autonomous weapons. The letter was presented in Buenos Aires at the 24th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-15) and was co-signed by Stephen Hawking, Elon Musk, Steve Wozniak, Noam Chomsky, Skype co-founder Jaan Tallinn and Google DeepMind co-founder Demis Hassabis, among others.[20][21]

Psychology

American soldiers have been known to name the robots that serve alongside them; sometimes after human friends, family, and celebrities; pets; or simply after themselves.[22] The 'gender' assigned to the robot may be related to the marital status of its operator.[22]

Some affixed fictitious medals to battle-hardened robots, and even held funerals for destroyed robots.[22] An interview of 23 explosive ordnance detection members shows that while they feel it is better to lose a robot than a human, they also felt anger and a sense of loss if they were destroyed.[22] A survey of 746 people in the military showed that 80% either 'liked' or 'loved' their military robots, with more affection being shown towards ground rather than aerial robots.[22] Surviving dangerous combat situations together increased the level of bonding between soldier and robot, and current and future advances in artificial intelligence may further intensify the bond with the military robots.[22]

In fictional media

See also

References

  1. ↑ Steve Coll, Ghost Wars (Penguin, 2005 edn), pp.529 and 658 note 6.
  2. ↑ Robots and Robotics at the Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center Pacific
  3. ↑ DARPA Grand Challenge: Home
  4. ↑ Technology Review: The Ascent of the Robotic Attack Jet
  5. ↑ http://www.arms-expo.ru/news/perspektivnye_razrabotki/platforma_m_robotizirovannyy_kompleks_shirokikh_vozmozhnostey/
  6. ↑ Guardium Military robot
  7. ↑ Korean gun bots theregister.co.uk
  8. ↑ Schafer, Ron (July 29, 2003). "Robotics to play major role in future warfighting". United States Joint Forces Command. Archived from the original on August 13, 2003. Retrieved 2013-04-30.
  9. 1 2 Page, Lewis (21 April 2009). "Flying-rifle robocopter: Hovering sniper backup for US troops". The Register. Retrieved 2009-04-21.
  10. ↑ "U.S. Army Tests Flying Robot Sniper". Fox News. 2009-04-22. Retrieved 2009-04-23.
  11. ↑ Hambling, David (May 2009). "UAV Helicopter Brings Finesse to Airstrikes". Popular Mechanics. Retrieved 2009-04-21.
  12. ↑ Hambling, David (April 21, 2009). "Army Tests Flying Robo-Sniper". Wired, "Danger Room" blog. Retrieved 2009-04-21.
  13. 1 2 "Military wants to transform Segway scooters into robots". seattlepi.com. 2003-12-02. Retrieved 2009-04-24.
  14. ↑ Cheryl Pellerin (American Forces Press Service) - DoD News:Article published Aug. 17, 2011 published by the U.S. Department of Defense, WASHINGTON (DoD) [Retrieved 2015-07-28]
  15. ↑ "Robot soldiers". BBC News. 2002-04-12. Retrieved 2010-05-12.
  16. ↑ Hellström, Thomas (June 2013). "On the moral responsibility of military robots". Ethics and Information Technology 15 (2): 99–107. doi:10.1007/s10676-012-9301-2.
  17. ↑ Lin, Bekey, Abney, Patrick, George, Keith (2009). "Robots in War: Issues of Risk and Ethics".
  18. ↑ Bowcott, Owen Bowcott. "UN urged to ban 'killer robots' before they can be developed". the Guardian. Retrieved 2015-07-28.
  19. ↑ Bowcott, Owen. "UK opposes international ban on developing 'killer robots'". the Guardian. Retrieved 2015-07-28.
  20. ↑ Gibbs, Samuel. "Musk, Wozniak and Hawking urge ban on warfare AI and autonomous weapons". the Guardian. Retrieved 2015-07-28.
  21. ↑ "Musk, Hawking Warn of Artificial Intelligence Weapons". WSJ Blogs - Digits. 2015-07-27. Retrieved 2015-07-28.
  22. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Nidhi Subbaraman. "Soldiers <3 robots: Military bots get awards, nicknames ... funerals". NBC News.

External links

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Military robots.

Ethical and legal concerns

Organizations

News articles/press releases

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Thursday, May 05, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.