Oryzomys dimidiatus

Oryzomys dimidiatus
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Class: Mammalia
Order: Rodentia
Family: Cricetidae
Genus: Oryzomys
Species: O. dimidiatus
Binomial name
Oryzomys dimidiatus
(Thomas, 1905)
Map of Central America, marked yellow in southeastern Nicaragua and red elsewhere
Range of Oryzomys dimidiatus (yellow) and the related O. couesi (red and yellow) in Central America.
Synonyms

Oryzomys dimidiatus, also known as the Nicaraguan oryzomys,[4] Thomas's rice rat,[1] or Nicaraguan rice rat,[5] is a rodent in the genus Oryzomys of the family Cricetidae. It is known from only three specimens, all collected in southeastern Nicaragua since 1904. Placed in Nectomys upon its discovery, it was later classified in its own subgenus of Oryzomys and finally recognized as closely related to other species now placed in Oryzomys, including the marsh rice rat and Oryzomys couesi, which occurs in the same region.

With a head and body length of 110 to 128 mm (4.3 to 5.0 in), Oryzomys dimidiatus is a medium-sized rice rat. The upperparts are gray-brown and the underparts are grayish, not buffy as in O. couesi. The tail is only slightly darker above than below. All three specimens were caught near water and the species may be semiaquatic, spending some time in the water. Its conservation status is currently assessed as "Least Concern".

Taxonomy

The first known specimen was obtained by W.G. Palmer in 1904[6] and the next year, Oldfield Thomas of the British Museum of Natural History described this animal as the holotype of a new species he named Nectomys dimidiatus.[2] He placed it in the genus Nectomys, commenting that it was much smaller than but otherwise similar to previously known members of that genus.[2] The species was listed as a Nectomys in taxonomic overviews in the next decades, including a 1944 review of the genus by Philip Hershkovitz.[7]

After examining the holotype in London, Hershkovitz instead placed the species in the genus Oryzomys in 1948. He remarked that it was an especially distinctive member of that genus, and hence classified it in its own subgenus Micronectomys.[8] J. Hernández-Camacho described a second species of Micronectomys, Oryzomys (Micronectomys) borreroi, from Colombia in 1957.[9] In 1970, Hershkovitz treated O. dimidiatus in another publication and conceded that his name Micronectomys was a nomen nudum ("naked name") because he had not explicitly mentioned characters differentiating it from other taxa in his 1948 publication.[10] Nevertheless, he did not do anything to rectify the situation, and Micronectomys remains a nomen nudum.[11] Hershkovitz also noted that while O. dimidiatus resembles a juvenile Nectomys in external anatomy, it is otherwise similar to the marsh rice rat (Oryzomys palustris).[10] He accepted O. borreroi as an Oryzomys, but did not think it closely related to O. dimidiatus.[9] Six years later, Alfred Gardner and James Patton instead suggested that O. borreroi was a Zygodontomys, and in his 1991 review of that genus Robert Voss confirmed that it is the same as Zygodontomys brunneus.[12]

A second specimen was obtained in 1966 and the find was published in 1971 by Hugh Genoways and Knox Jones, who noted that the species is closely similar to O. palustris.[13] Later workers affirmed the relationship between O. dimidiatus, O. palustris and associated species like O. couesi.[14] Fiona Reid reported in 1997 that a third specimen had been found.[15] In 2006, Marcelo Weksler and coworkers removed most of the species formerly placed in Oryzomys from the genus, because they are not closely related to the type species O. palustris, but kept O. dimidiatus as an Oryzomys.[14]

Oryzomys dimidiatus is now recognized as one of eight species in the genus Oryzomys.[16] O. dimidiatus is further part of the O. couesi section, which is centered around the widespread Central American O. couesi and also includes six other species with more limited and peripheral distributions.[17] O. couesi occurs with O. dimidiatus in southeastern Nicaragua.[18] Many aspects of the systematics of the O. couesi section remain unclear and it is likely that the current classification underestimates the true diversity of the group.[19] Oryzomys is classified in the tribe Oryzomyini ("rice rats"), a diverse assemblage of American rodents of over a hundred species,[20] and on higher taxonomic levels in the subfamily Sigmodontinae of family Cricetidae, along with hundreds of other species of mainly small rodents.[21]

Description

A rat, grayish above and pale below, among reed and leaf litter.
The marsh rice rat (Oryzomys palustris) is similar to O. dimidiatus.[13]

Oryzomys dimidiatus is a medium-sized rice rat, smaller than O. couesi, with thick, glossy fur and velvety underfur. The hairs on the back are about 6 mm in length. The upperparts are gray-brown with some dark hairs, appearing darker overall than in O. couesi; the color becomes more yellowish towards the sides. According to Thomas, a faint buff line extends from the sides to the inner sides of the hindlegs. The underparts are grayish, contrasting with the buffy underparts of O. couesi. The snout is short and the well-haired ears are partly hidden by the fur. The hands and feet are off-white or brownish above, not white as in O. couesi. The hindfeet show small interdigital webs, but they lack long tufts of hair on the digits and some of the pads are reduced or absent. The tail is about as long as the head and body and contains about 15 rings per centimeter. It is slightly darker (grayish) above than below (whitish), but the difference in color is much less pronounced than in O. couesi.[22]

Compared to that of Nectomys, the skull is lightly built and has narrow nasals and a broad, round braincase without conspicuous ridges on it. The zygomatic plate is broad. The incisive foramina (perforations of the front part of the palate) extend between the first molars and are broadest in their back halves. The broad mesopterygoid fossa, the gap behind the end of the palate, is perforated by sphenopalatine vacuities. The molar crowns are not as simplified as in Nectomys species, but the front cusps of the upper (anterocone) and lower first molar (anteroconid) are not divided in two. In addition to the main roots, the upper and lower first molars have smaller additional roots.[23]

Measurements for the first two known examples are as follows (in each case, the first measurement given is from the holotype, taken in 1904, the second, from the specimen taken in 1966): head and body length 125 and 118 mm (4.9 and 4.6 in), tail length 115 and 110 mm (4.5 and 4.3 in), hindfoot length 27 and 28 mm (1.1 and 1.1 in), ear length 13 and 15 mm (0.51 and 0.59 in), skull length 29.8 and 29.0 mm (1.17 and 1.14 in). The 1966 specimen weighed 46.0 g (1.62 oz) and had testes 11 mm (0.43 in) long; these measurements were not recorded in the 1904 specimen.[24] Reid, who mentioned the third specimen, reported a maximum head and body length of 128 mm (5.0 in), tail length of 150 mm (5.9 in), hindfoot length of 31 mm (1.2 in), and ear length of 19 mm (0.75 in).[25]

Distribution, ecology, and behavior

Oryzomys dimidiatus is known from three specimens collected in the lowlands of the South Caribbean Coast Autonomous Region in southeastern Nicaragua.[26] The first, an old male, was collected on November 5, 1904, in a banana plantation with very moist red clay on the Río Escondido near El Rama.[6] The second, a young adult male, was caught on July 26, 1966, in dense cane on the south bank of the Río Mico at El Recreo, 15 km (9 mi) west from the location of the first specimen, along with three other rice rats (O. couesi, Melanomys caliginosus, and Oligoryzomys fulvescens), the cotton rat Sigmodon hirsutus, and the cottontail rabbit Sylvilagus brasiliensis.[27] The third was caught at a stream near Bluefields. Reid suggested that the species is semiaquatic, spending some time in the water,[25] like other Oryzomys.[28]

Conservation status

The 2009 IUCN Red List assessed the conservation status of Oryzomys dimidiatus as "Least Concern", noting that its distribution may be larger than currently known. Its population is presumed to be large and no threats to its habitat are known.[1]

References

  1. 1 2 3 Timm and Reid, 2008
  2. 1 2 3 Thomas, 1905, p. 586
  3. ↑ Hershkovitz, 1948, p. 55
  4. ↑ Musser and Carleton, 2005, p. 1148
  5. ↑ Duff and Lawson, 2004, p. 54; Jones and Engstrom, 1986, p. 12
  6. 1 2 Thomas, 1905, p. 587
  7. ↑ Hershkovitz, 1944, p. 80
  8. ↑ Hershkovitz, 1948, pp. 54–55
  9. 1 2 Hershkovitz, 1970, p. 792
  10. 1 2 Hershkovitz, 1970, p. 791
  11. ↑ Musser and Carleton, 2005, p. 1144
  12. ↑ Voss, 1991, p. 46
  13. 1 2 Genoways and Jones, 1971, p. 433
  14. 1 2 Weksler et al., 2006, table 1, footnote e
  15. ↑ Reid, 1997, p. 204
  16. ↑ Carleton and Arroyo-Cabrales, 2009, p. 116
  17. ↑ Carleton and Arroyo-Cabrales, 2009, p. 117
  18. ↑ Jones and Engstrom, 1986, p. 12
  19. ↑ Carleton and Arroyo-Cabrales, 2009, p. 107
  20. ↑ Weksler, 2006, p. 3
  21. ↑ Musser and Carleton, 2005
  22. ↑ Thomas, 1905, p. 586; Genoways and Jones, 1971, p. 833; Sánchez et al., 2001, pp. 209–210; Reid, 2009, p. 207
  23. ↑ Hershkovitz, 1948, p. 55; Sánchez et al., 2001, pp. 209–210
  24. ↑ Jones and Engstrom, 1986, p. 13
  25. 1 2 Reid, 2009, p. 207
  26. ↑ Timm and Reid, 2008; Reid, 2009, p. 207
  27. ↑ Genoways and Jones, 1971, p. 833; Musser and Carleton, 2005, pp. 1125, 1141, 1147, 1175
  28. ↑ Carleton and Arroyo-Cabrales, 2009, p. 114

Literature cited

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Saturday, April 25, 2015. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.