Overlap–add method
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/776d6/776d6eecfaeb9daf0a3b9c76db447a1a1243fdb3" alt="\scriptstyle y(t) = x(t) * h(t),"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/211e6/211e6f323ef914877105c2750658bd5504ee0de7" alt="\scriptstyle y(t) = \mathcal{H}\{x(t)\},"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9bead/9beada8db6bc884f7da4a6fff95e6df915ceaefd" alt="t."
In signal processing, the overlap–add method (OA, OLA) is an efficient way to evaluate the discrete convolution of a very long signal with a finite impulse response (FIR) filter
:
where h[m] = 0 for m outside the region [1, M].
The concept is to divide the problem into multiple convolutions of h[n] with short segments of :
where L is an arbitrary segment length. Then:
and y[n] can be written as a sum of short convolutions:
where is zero outside the region [1, L + M − 1]. And for any parameter
it is equivalent to the
-point circular convolution of
with
in the region [1, N].
The advantage is that the circular convolution can be computed very efficiently as follows, according to the circular convolution theorem:
-
(Eq.1)
where FFT and IFFT refer to the fast Fourier transform and inverse
fast Fourier transform, respectively, evaluated over discrete
points.
The algorithm
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db6ce/db6cefc0f8e056545e3d9d4479f4fb78098c3ac3" alt=""
Fig. 1 sketches the idea of the overlap–add method. The
signal is first partitioned into non-overlapping sequences,
then the discrete Fourier transforms of the sequences
are evaluated by multiplying the FFT of
with the FFT of
. After recovering of
by inverse FFT, the resulting
output signal is reconstructed by overlapping and adding the
as shown in the figure. The overlap arises from the fact that a linear
convolution is always longer than the original sequences. In the early days of development of the fast Fourier transform,
was often chosen to be a power of 2 for efficiency, but further development has revealed efficient transforms for larger prime factorizations of L, reducing computational sensitivity to this parameter. A pseudocode of the algorithm is the
following:
Algorithm 1 (OA for linear convolution) Evaluate the best value of N and L (L>0, N = M+L-1 nearest to power of 2). Nx = length(x); H = FFT(h,N) (zero-padded FFT) i = 1 y = zeros(1, M+Nx-1) while i <= Nx (Nx: the last index of x[n]) il = min(i+L-1,Nx) yt = IFFT( FFT(x(i:il),N) * H, N) k = min(i+N-1,M+Nx-1) y(i:k) = y(i:k) + yt(1:k-i+1) (add the overlapped output blocks) i = i+L end
Circular convolution with the overlap–add method
When sequence x[n] is periodic, and Nx is the period, then y[n] is also periodic, with the same period. To compute one period of y[n], Algorithm 1 can first be used to convolve h[n] with just one period of x[n]. In the region M ≤ n ≤ Nx, the resultant y[n] sequence is correct. And if the next M − 1 values are added to the first M − 1 values, then the region 1 ≤ n ≤ Nx will represent the desired convolution. The modified pseudocode is:
Algorithm 2 (OA for circular convolution) Evaluate Algorithm 1 y(1:M-1) = y(1:M-1) + y(Nx+1:Nx+M-1) y = y(1:Nx) end
Cost of the overlap-add method
The cost of the convolution can be associated to the number of complex
multiplications involved in the operation. The major computational
effort is due to the FFT operation, which for a radix-2 algorithm
applied to a signal of length roughly calls for
complex multiplications. It turns out that the number of complex multiplications
of the overlap-add method are:
accounts for the FFT+filter multiplication+IFFT operation.
The additional cost of the sections involved in the circular
version of the overlap–add method is usually very small and can be
neglected for the sake of simplicity. The best value of
can be found by numerical search of the minimum of
by spanning the integer
in the range
.
Being
a power of two, the FFTs of the overlap–add method
are computed efficiently. Once evaluated the value of
it
turns out that the optimal partitioning of
has
.
For comparison, the cost of the standard circular convolution of
and
is:
Hence the cost of the overlap–add method scales almost as
while the cost of the standard circular convolution method is almost
. However such functions accounts
only for the cost of the complex multiplications, regardless of the
other operations involved in the algorithm. A direct measure of the
computational time required by the algorithms is of much interest.
Fig. 2 shows the ratio of the measured time to evaluate
a standard circular convolution using Eq.1 with
the time elapsed by the same convolution using the overlap–add method
in the form of Alg 2, vs. the sequence and the filter length. Both algorithms have been implemented under Matlab. The
bold line represent the boundary of the region where the overlap–add
method is faster (ratio>1) than the standard circular convolution.
Note that the overlap–add method in the tested cases can be three
times faster than the standard method.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d303b/d303bb36c94070c3e3f2fd3162d6623e036eadd6" alt=""
See also
References
- Rabiner, Lawrence R.; Gold, Bernard (1975). Theory and application of digital signal processing. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall. pp. 63–67. ISBN 0-13-914101-4.
- Oppenheim, Alan V.; Schafer, Ronald W. (1975). Digital signal processing. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall. ISBN 0-13-214635-5.
- Hayes, M. Horace (1999). Digital Signal Processing. Schaum's Outline Series. New York: McGraw Hill. ISBN 0-07-027389-8.