Pluto

Pluto

Full-disc view of Pluto in near-true color, imaged by New Horizons[lower-alpha 1]
Discovery
Discovered by	Clyde W. Tombaugh
Discovery date	February 18, 1930
Designations
MPC designation	134340 Pluto
Pronunciation	^i/ˈpluːtoʊ/
Named after	Pluto
Minor planet category	Dwarf planet Trans-Neptunian object Plutoid Kuiper belt object Plutino
Adjectives	Plutonian
Orbital characteristics[1][lower-alpha 2]
Epoch J2000
Aphelion	49.319 AU (7,378.07 Gm) February, 2114
Perihelion	29.656 AU (4,436.4 Gm) (September 5, 1989)[2]
Semi-major axis	39.54 AU (5,915 Gm)
Eccentricity	0.24905
Orbital period	248.00 years[3] 90,581 d[3] 14,164.4 Plutonian solar days[4]
Synodic period	366.73 days[3]
Average orbital speed	4.67 km/s[3]
Mean anomaly	14.53 deg
Inclination	17.1405° (11.88° to Sun's equator)
Longitude of ascending node	110.299°
Argument of perihelion	113.834°
Known satellites	5
Physical characteristics
Mean radius	1,187±4 km[5] 0.18 Earths
Flattening	<1%[5]
Surface area	1.77×10^7 km^2[lower-alpha 3] 0.035 Earths
Volume	(7.006±0.071)×10^9 km^3[lower-alpha 4] 0.00647 Earths
Mass	(1.303±0.003)×10^22 kg[5] 0.00218 Earths 0.177 Moons
Mean density	1.860±0.013 g/cm^3[5]
Surface gravity	0.620 m/s^2[lower-alpha 5] 0.063 g
Escape velocity	1.212 km/s[lower-alpha 6]
Sidereal rotation period	6.387230 d 6 d, 9 h, 17 m, 36 s
Equatorial rotation velocity	47.18 km/h
Axial tilt	119.591°±0.014° (to orbit)[6][lower-alpha 7]
North pole right ascension	132.993°[7]
North pole declination	−6.163°[7]
Albedo	0.49 to 0.66 (geometric, varies by 35%)[3][8]
Surface temp. min mean max Kelvin 33 K 44 K (−229 °C) 55 K
Apparent magnitude	13.65[3] to 16.3[9] (mean is 15.1)[3]
Absolute magnitude (H)	−0.7[10]
Angular diameter	0.06″ to 0.11″[3][lower-alpha 8]
Atmosphere
Surface pressure	1.0 Pa (2015)[5][11]
Composition by volume	Nitrogen, methane, carbon monoxide[12]

Mosaic of best-resolution images of Pluto from different angles

Pluto (minor-planet designation: 134340 Pluto) is a dwarf planet in the Kuiper belt, a ring of bodies beyond Neptune. It was the first Kuiper belt object to be discovered. It is the largest and second-most-massive known dwarf planet in the Solar System and the ninth-largest and tenth-most-massive known object directly orbiting the Sun. It is the largest known trans-Neptunian object by volume but is less massive than Eris, a dwarf planet in the scattered disc. Like other Kuiper belt objects, Pluto is primarily made of ice and rock^[13] and is relatively small—about one-sixth the mass of Earth's Moon and one-third its volume. It has a moderately eccentric and inclined orbit during which it ranges from 30 to 49 astronomical units or AU (4.4–7.4 billion km) from the Sun. This means that Pluto periodically comes closer to the Sun than Neptune, but a stable orbital resonance with Neptune prevents them from colliding. Light from the Sun takes about 5.5 hours to reach Pluto at its average distance (39.5 AU).

Pluto was discovered by Clyde Tombaugh in 1930, and was originally considered the ninth planet from the Sun. After 1992, its planethood was questioned following the discovery of several objects of similar size in the Kuiper belt. In 2005, Eris, which is 27% more massive than Pluto, was discovered, which led the International Astronomical Union (IAU) to define the term "planet" formally for the first time the following year.^[14] This definition excluded Pluto and reclassified it as a member of the new "dwarf planet" category.^[15]

Pluto has five known moons: Charon (the largest, with a diameter just over half that of Pluto), Styx, Nix, Kerberos, and Hydra.^[16] Pluto and Charon are sometimes considered a binary system because the barycenter of their orbits does not lie within either body.^[17] The IAU has not formalized a definition for binary dwarf planets, and Charon is officially classified as a moon of Pluto.^[18]

On July 14, 2015, the New Horizons spacecraft became the first spacecraft to fly by Pluto.^[19][20][21] During its brief flyby, New Horizons made detailed measurements and observations of Pluto and its moons.^[22][23][24]

History

Discovery

Discovery photographs of Pluto

Clyde Tombaugh, in Kansas

In the 1840s, Urbain Le Verrier used Newtonian mechanics to predict the position of the then-undiscovered planet Neptune after analysing perturbations in the orbit of Uranus.^[25] Subsequent observations of Neptune in the late 19th century led astronomers to speculate that Uranus's orbit was being disturbed by another planet besides Neptune.

In 1906, Percival Lowell—a wealthy Bostonian who had founded the Lowell Observatory in Flagstaff, Arizona, in 1894—started an extensive project in search of a possible ninth planet, which he termed "Planet X".^[26] By 1909, Lowell and William H. Pickering had suggested several possible celestial coordinates for such a planet.^[27] Lowell and his observatory conducted his search until his death in 1916, but to no avail. Unknown to Lowell, his surveys had captured two faint images of Pluto on March 19 and April 7, 1915, but they were not recognized for what they were.^[27][28] There are fourteen other known prediscovery observations, with the oldest made by the Yerkes Observatory on August 20, 1909.^[29]

Percival's widow, Constance Lowell, entered into a ten-year legal battle with the Lowell Observatory over her late husband's legacy, and the search for Planet X did not resume until 1929.^[30] Vesto Melvin Slipher, the observatory director, summarily handed the job of locating Planet X to 23-year-old Clyde Tombaugh, who had just arrived at the Lowell Observatory after Slipher had been impressed by a sample of his astronomical drawings.^[30]

Tombaugh's task was to systematically image the night sky in pairs of photographs, then examine each pair and determine whether any objects had shifted position. Using a blink comparator, he rapidly shifted back and forth between views of each of the plates to create the illusion of movement of any objects that had changed position or appearance between photographs. On February 18, 1930, after nearly a year of searching, Tombaugh discovered a possible moving object on photographic plates taken on January 23 and 29 of that year. A lesser-quality photograph taken on January 21 helped confirm the movement.^[31] After the observatory obtained further confirmatory photographs, news of the discovery was telegraphed to the Harvard College Observatory on March 13, 1930.^[27]

Name

The discovery made headlines around the globe. The Lowell Observatory, which had the right to name the new object, received more than 1,000 suggestions from all over the world, ranging from Atlas to Zymal.^[32] Tombaugh urged Slipher to suggest a name for the new object quickly before someone else did.^[32] Constance Lowell proposed Zeus, then Percival and finally Constance. These suggestions were disregarded.^[33]

The name Pluto, after the god of the underworld, was proposed by Venetia Burney (1918–2009), a then eleven-year-old schoolgirl in Oxford, England, who was interested in classical mythology.^[34] She suggested it in a conversation with her grandfather Falconer Madan, a former librarian at the University of Oxford's Bodleian Library, who passed the name to astronomy professor Herbert Hall Turner, who cabled it to colleagues in the United States.^[34]

The object was officially named on May 25, 1930.^[35][36] Each member of the Lowell Observatory was allowed to vote on a short-list of three: Minerva (which was already the name for an asteroid), Cronus (which had lost reputation through being proposed by the unpopular astronomer Thomas Jefferson Jackson See), and Pluto. Pluto received every vote.^[37] The name was announced on May 1, 1930.^[34] Upon the announcement, Madan gave Venetia £5 (equivalent to 300 GBP, or 450 USD in 2014)^[38] as a reward.^[34]

The final choice of name was helped in part by the fact that the first two letters of Pluto are the initials of Percival Lowell. Pluto's astronomical symbol (, Unicode U+2647, ♇) was then created as a monogram constructed from the letters "PL".^[39] Pluto's astrological symbol resembles that of Neptune (), but has a circle in place of the middle prong of the trident ().

The name was soon embraced by wider culture. In 1930, Walt Disney was apparently inspired by it when he introduced for Mickey Mouse a canine companion named Pluto, although Disney animator Ben Sharpsteen could not confirm why the name was given.^[40] In 1941, Glenn T. Seaborg named the newly created element plutonium after Pluto, in keeping with the tradition of naming elements after newly discovered planets, following uranium, which was named after Uranus, and neptunium, which was named after Neptune.^[41]

Most languages use the name "Pluto" in various transliterations.^{[lower-alpha 9]} In Japanese, Houei Nojiri suggested the translation Meiōsei (冥王星^?, "Star of the King (God) of the Underworld") , and this was borrowed into Chinese, Korean, and Vietnamese.^[42][43][44] Some Indian languages use the name Pluto, but others, such as Hindi, use the name of Yama, the Guardian of Hell in Hindu and Buddhist mythology.^[43] Polynesian languages also tend to use the indigenous god of the underworld, as in Maori Whiro.^[43]

Planet X disproved

Once found, Pluto's faintness and lack of a resolvable disc cast doubt on the idea that it was Lowell's Planet X.^[26] Estimates of Pluto's mass were revised downward throughout the 20th century.^[45]

Mass estimates for Pluto

Year	Mass	Estimate by
1915	7 Earth	Lowell (prediction for Planet X)[26]
1931	1 Earth	Nicholson & Mayall[46][47][48]
1948	0.1 (1/10) Earth	Kuiper[49]
1976	0.01 (1/100) Earth	Cruikshank, Pilcher, & Morrison[50]
1978	0.0015 (1/650) Earth	Christy & Harrington[51]
2006	0.00218 (1/459) Earth	Buie et al.[6]

Astronomers initially calculated its mass based on its presumed effect on Neptune and Uranus. In 1931, Pluto was calculated to be roughly the mass of Earth, with further calculations in 1948 bringing the mass down to roughly that of Mars.^[47][49] In 1976, Dale Cruikshank, Carl Pilcher and David Morrison of the University of Hawaii calculated Pluto's albedo for the first time, finding that it matched that for methane ice; this meant Pluto had to be exceptionally luminous for its size and therefore could not be more than 1 percent the mass of Earth.^[50] (Pluto's albedo is 1.4–1.9 times greater than that of Earth.^[3])

In 1978, the discovery of Pluto's moon Charon allowed the measurement of Pluto's mass for the first time: roughly 0.2% that of Earth, and far too small to account for the discrepancies in the orbit of Uranus. Subsequent searches for an alternative Planet X, notably by Robert Sutton Harrington,^[52] failed. In 1992, Myles Standish used data from Voyager 2's flyby of Neptune in 1989, which had revised the estimates of Neptune's mass downward by 0.5%—an amount comparable to the mass of Mars—to recalculate its gravitational effect on Uranus. With the new figures added in, the discrepancies, and with them the need for a Planet X, vanished.^[53] Today, the majority of scientists agree that Planet X, as Lowell defined it, does not exist.^[54] Lowell had made a prediction of Planet X's orbit and position in 1915 that was fairly close to Pluto's actual orbit and its position at that time; Ernest W. Brown concluded soon after Pluto's discovery that this was a coincidence,^[55] a view still held today.^[53]

Classification

Artistic comparison of Pluto, Eris, Makemake, Haumea, Sedna, 2007 OR₁₀, Quaoar, Orcus, and Earth along with the Moon.

From 1992 onward, many bodies were discovered orbiting in the same area as Pluto, showing that Pluto is part of a population of objects called the Kuiper belt. This made its official status as a planet controversial, with many questioning whether Pluto should be considered together with or separately from its surrounding population. Museum and planetarium directors occasionally created controversy by omitting Pluto from planetary models of the Solar System. The Hayden Planetarium reopened—in February 2000, after renovation—with a model of only eight planets, which made headlines almost a year later.^[56]

As objects increasingly closer in size to Pluto were discovered in the region, it was argued that Pluto should be reclassified as one of the Kuiper belt objects, just as Ceres, Pallas, Juno and Vesta eventually lost their planet status after the discovery of many other asteroids. On July 29, 2005, astronomers at Caltech announced the discovery of a new trans-Neptunian object, Eris, which was substantially more massive than Pluto and the most massive object discovered in the Solar System since Triton in 1846. Its discoverers and the press initially called it the tenth planet, although there was no official consensus at the time on whether to call it a planet.^[57] Others in the astronomical community considered the discovery the strongest argument for reclassifying Pluto as a minor planet.^[58]

IAU classification

The debate came to a head on August 24, 2006 with an IAU resolution that created an official definition for the term "planet". According to this resolution, there are three main conditions for an object in the Solar System to be considered a planet:

1. The object must be in orbit around the Sun.
2. The object must be massive enough to be rounded by its own gravity. More specifically, its own gravity should pull it into a shape of hydrostatic equilibrium.
3. It must have cleared the neighborhood around its orbit.^[59][60]

Pluto fails to meet the third condition, because its mass is only 0.07 times that of the mass of the other objects in its orbit (Earth's mass, by contrast, is 1.7 million times the remaining mass in its own orbit).^[58][60] The IAU further decided that bodies that, like Pluto, meet criteria 1 and 2 but do not meet criterion 3 would be called dwarf planets. On September 13, 2006, the IAU included Pluto, and Eris and its moon Dysnomia, in their Minor Planet Catalogue, giving them the official minor planet designations "(134340) Pluto", "(136199) Eris", and "(136199) Eris I Dysnomia".^[61] Had Pluto been included upon its discovery in 1930, it would have likely been designated 1164, following 1163 Saga, which was discovered a month earlier.^[62]

There has been some resistance within the astronomical community toward the reclassification.^[63][64][65] Alan Stern, principal investigator with NASA's New Horizons mission to Pluto, publicly derided the IAU resolution, stating that "the definition stinks, for technical reasons".^[66] Stern's contention was that, by the terms of the new definition, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, and Neptune, all of which share their orbits with asteroids, would be excluded.^[67] He argued that all big spherical moons, including the Moon, should likewise be considered planets.^[68] His other claim was that because less than five percent of astronomers voted for it, the decision was not representative of the entire astronomical community.^[67] Marc W. Buie, then at Lowell Observatory, voiced his opinion on the new definition on his website and petitioned against the definition.^[69] Others have supported the IAU. Mike Brown, the astronomer who discovered Eris, said "through this whole crazy circus-like procedure, somehow the right answer was stumbled on. It's been a long time coming. Science is self-correcting eventually, even when strong emotions are involved."^[70]

Public reception to the IAU decision was mixed. Although many accepted the reclassification, some sought to overturn the decision with online petitions urging the IAU to consider reinstatement. A resolution introduced by some members of the California State Assembly facetiously called the IAU decision a "scientific heresy".^[71] The New Mexico House of Representatives passed a resolution in honor of Tombaugh, a longtime resident of that state, that declared that Pluto will always be considered a planet while in New Mexican skies and that March 13, 2007, was Pluto Planet Day.^[72][73] The Illinois Senate passed a similar resolution in 2009, on the basis that Clyde Tombaugh, the discoverer of Pluto, was born in Illinois. The resolution asserted that Pluto was "unfairly downgraded to a 'dwarf' planet" by the IAU.^[74] Some members of the public have also rejected the change, citing the disagreement within the scientific community on the issue, or for sentimental reasons, maintaining that they have always known Pluto as a planet and will continue to do so regardless of the IAU decision.^[75]

In 2006, in its 17th annual words of the year vote, the American Dialect Society voted plutoed as the word of the year. To "pluto" is to "demote or devalue someone or something".^[76]

Researchers on both sides of the debate gathered on August 14–16, 2008, at the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory for a conference that included back-to-back talks on the current IAU definition of a planet.^[77] Entitled "The Great Planet Debate",^[78] the conference published a post-conference press release indicating that scientists could not come to a consensus about the definition of planet.^[79] Just before the conference, on June 11, 2008, the IAU announced in a press release that the term "plutoid" would henceforth be used to refer to Pluto and other objects that have an orbital semi-major axis greater than that of Neptune and enough mass to be of near-spherical shape.^[80][81][82]

Orbit

Pluto's orbital period is 248 Earth years. Its orbital characteristics are substantially different from those of the planets, which follow nearly circular orbits around the Sun close to a flat reference plane called the ecliptic. In contrast, Pluto's orbit is moderately inclined relative to the ecliptic (over 17°) and moderately eccentric (elliptical). This eccentricity means a small region of Pluto's orbit lies nearer the Sun than Neptune's. The Pluto–Charon barycenter came to perihelion on September 5, 1989,^{[2][lower-alpha 10]} and was last closer to the Sun than Neptune between February 7, 1979, and February 11, 1999.^[83]

In the long term, Pluto's orbit is chaotic. Although computer simulations can be used to predict its position for several million years (both forward and backward in time), after intervals longer than the Lyapunov time of 10–20 million years, calculations become speculative: Pluto is sensitive to immeasurably small details of the Solar System, hard-to-predict factors that will gradually change Pluto's position in its orbit.^[84][85]

Orbit of Pluto—ecliptic view. This "side view" of Pluto's orbit (in red) shows its large inclination to the ecliptic.

Orbit of Pluto—polar view. This "view from above" shows how Pluto's orbit (in red) is less circular than Neptune's (in blue), and how Pluto is sometimes closer to the Sun than Neptune. The darker halves of both orbits show where they pass below the plane of the ecliptic.

Relationship with Neptune

Despite Pluto's orbit appearing to cross that of Neptune when viewed from directly above, the two objects' orbits are aligned so that they can never collide or even approach closely. There are several reasons why.

At the simplest level, one can examine the two orbits and see that they do not intersect. When Pluto is closest to the Sun, and hence closest to Neptune's orbit as viewed from above, it is also the farthest above Neptune's path. Pluto's orbit passes about 8 AU above that of Neptune, preventing a collision.^[86][87][88] Pluto's ascending and descending nodes, the points at which its orbit crosses the ecliptic, are currently separated from Neptune's by over 21°.^[89]

This alone is not enough to protect Pluto; perturbations from the planets (especially Neptune) could alter aspects of Pluto's orbit (such as its orbital precession) over millions of years so that a collision could be possible. Some other mechanism or mechanisms must therefore be at work. The most significant of these is that Pluto lies in the 2:3 mean-motion resonance with Neptune: for every two orbits that Pluto makes around the Sun, Neptune makes three. The two objects then return to their initial positions and the cycle repeats, each cycle lasting about 500 years. This pattern is such that, in each 500-year cycle, the first time Pluto is near perihelion, Neptune is over 50° behind Pluto. By Pluto's second perihelion, Neptune will have completed a further one and a half of its own orbits, and so will be a similar distance ahead of Pluto. Pluto and Neptune's minimum separation is over 17 AU, which is greater than Pluto's minimum separation from Uranus (11 AU).^[88]

The 2:3 resonance between the two bodies is highly stable, and is preserved over millions of years.^[90] This prevents their orbits from changing relative to one another; the cycle always repeats in the same way, and so the two bodies can never pass near each other. Thus, even if Pluto's orbit were not inclined, the two bodies could never collide.^[88]

Other factors

Numerical studies have shown that over periods of millions of years, the general nature of the alignment between the orbits of Pluto and Neptune does not change.^[86][91] There are several other resonances and interactions that govern the details of their relative motion, and enhance Pluto's stability. These arise principally from two additional mechanisms (besides the 2:3 mean-motion resonance).

First, Pluto's argument of perihelion, the angle between the point where it crosses the ecliptic and the point where it is closest to the Sun, librates around 90°.^[91] This means that when Pluto is closest to the Sun, it is at its farthest above the plane of the Solar System, preventing encounters with Neptune. This is a direct consequence of the Kozai mechanism,^[86] which relates the eccentricity of an orbit to its inclination to a larger perturbing body—in this case Neptune. Relative to Neptune, the amplitude of libration is 38°, and so the angular separation of Pluto's perihelion to the orbit of Neptune is always greater than 52° (90°–38°). The closest such angular separation occurs every 10,000 years.^[90]

Second, the longitudes of ascending nodes of the two bodies—the points where they cross the ecliptic—are in near-resonance with the above libration. When the two longitudes are the same—that is, when one could draw a straight line through both nodes and the Sun—Pluto's perihelion lies exactly at 90°, and hence it comes closest to the Sun when it is highest above Neptune's orbit. This is known as the 1:1 superresonance. All the Jovian planets, particularly Jupiter, play a role in the creation of the superresonance.^[86]

To understand the nature of the libration, imagine a polar point of view, looking down on the ecliptic from a distant vantage point where the planets orbit counterclockwise. After passing the ascending node, Pluto is interior to Neptune's orbit and moving faster, approaching Neptune from behind. The strong gravitational pull between the two causes angular momentum to be transferred to Pluto, at Neptune's expense. This moves Pluto into a slightly larger orbit, where it travels slightly more slowly, according to Kepler's third law. As its orbit changes, this has the gradual effect of changing the perihelion and longitude of Pluto's orbit (and, to a lesser degree, of Neptune). After many such repetitions, Pluto is sufficiently slowed, and Neptune sufficiently speeded up, that Neptune begins to catch up with Pluto at the opposite side of its orbit (near the opposing node to where we began). The process is then reversed, and Pluto loses angular momentum to Neptune, until Pluto is sufficiently speeded up that it begins to catch Neptune again at the original node. The whole process takes about 20,000 years to complete.^[88][90]

Quasi-satellite

At least one minor body, (15810) 1994 JR1, is a quasi-satellite of Pluto, a specific type of co-orbital configuration.^[92] It has been a quasi-satellite of Pluto for about 100,000 years and it will remain so for perhaps another 250,000 years. Its quasi-satellite behavior is recurrent with a periodicity of 2 million years.^[92][93] There may be additional Pluto co-orbitals.

Rotation

Pluto's rotation period, its day, is equal to 6.39 Earth days.^[94] Like Uranus, Pluto rotates on its "side" on its orbital plane, with an axial tilt of 120°, and so its seasonal variation is extreme; at its solstices, one-fourth of its surface is in continuous daylight, whereas another fourth is in continuous darkness.^[95]

The amount of light from the Sun on Pluto is weak, analogous to twilight on Earth. NASA has posted a "Pluto Time" calculator^[96] that determines when the light on Earth is equivalent to that on Pluto on a clear day. For example, on July 13, 2015, at the coordinates of the Applied Physics Laboratory where the probe was constructed, the Pluto Time was 8:38 p.m.,^[96][97] four minutes later than the apparent sunset of 8:34 p.m. reported for that location by NOAA.^[98]

Geology

High-resolution MVIC image of Pluto in enhanced color to bring out differences in surface composition

Regions where water ice has been detected (blue regions)

Due to Pluto's distance from Earth, in-depth study from Earth is difficult. On July 14, 2015, NASA's New Horizons space probe flew through the Pluto system, and the information it gathered is still being transmitted to Earth.^[99]

Surface

Pluto's surface is composed of more than 98 percent nitrogen ice, with traces of methane and carbon monoxide.^[100] Nitrogen and carbon monoxide are most abundant on the anti-Charon face of Pluto (around 180° longitude, where Tombaugh Regio's western lobe, Sputnik Planum, is located), whereas methane is most abundant near 300° east.^[101] Pluto's surface is quite varied, with large differences in both brightness and color.^[102] Pluto is one of the most contrastive bodies in the Solar System, with as much contrast as Saturn's moon Iapetus.^[103] The color varies between charcoal black, dark orange and white.^[104] Pluto's color is more similar to that of Io with slightly more orange, significantly less red than Mars.^[105] Notable geographical features include Tombaugh Regio, or the "Heart" (a large bright area on the side opposite Charon), Cthulhu Regio, or the "Whale" (a large dark area on the trailing hemisphere), and the "Brass Knuckles" (a series of equatorial dark areas on the leading hemisphere). Sputnik Planum, the western lobe of the "Heart", is a 1000-km-wide plain of frozen nitrogen and carbon monoxide ices, divided into polygonal cells which are interpreted as convection cells that carry floating blocks of water ice crust and sublimation pits towards their margins; there are obvious signs of glacial flows both into and out of the plain.^[106][107] It has no craters that were visible to New Horizons, indicating that its surface is less than 10 million years old.^[108] The New Horizons science team summarized initial findings as "Pluto displays a surprisingly wide variety of geological landforms, including those resulting from glaciological and surface–atmosphere interactions as well as impact, tectonic, possible cryovolcanic, and mass-wasting processes."^[5]

Distribution of over 1000 craters of all ages on Pluto. The variation in density (with none found in Sputnik Planum) indicates a long history of varying geological activity.

Geologic map of Sputnik Planum and surroundings (context), with convection cell margins outlined in black

Internal structure

Pluto's density is 1.860±0.013 g/cm³.^[5] Because the decay of radioactive elements would eventually heat the ices enough for the rock to separate from them, scientists expect that Pluto's internal structure is differentiated, with the rocky material having settled into a dense core surrounded by a mantle of water ice. The diameter of the core is hypothesized to be approximately 1700 km, 70% of Pluto's diameter.^[109] It is possible that such heating continues today, creating a subsurface ocean layer of liquid water some 100 to 180 km thick at the core–mantle boundary.^[109][110]

Mass and size

Selected size estimates for Pluto

Year	Radius (diameter)	Notes
1993	1195 (2390) km	Millis, et al.[111] (if no haze)[112]
1993	1180 (2360) km	Millis, et al. (surface & haze)[112]
1994	1164 (2328) km	Young & Binzel[113]
2006	1153 (2306) km	Buie, et al.[6]
2007	1161 (2322) km	Young, Young, & Buie[114]
2011	1180 (2360) km	Zalucha, et al.[115]
2014	1184 (2368) km	Lellouch, et al.[116]
2015	1186 (2372) km	New Horizons measurement[117]

Pluto's diameter is 2372 km^[117] and its mass is (1.303±0.003)×10²² kg, 17.7% that of the Moon (0.22% that of Earth).^[118] Its surface area is 1.665×10⁷ km², or roughly the same surface area as Russia. Its surface gravity is 0.063 g (compared to 1 g for Earth).

The discovery of Pluto's satellite Charon in 1978 enabled a determination of the mass of the Pluto–Charon system by application of Newton's formulation of Kepler's third law. Observations of Pluto in occultation with Charon allowed scientists to establish Pluto's diameter more accurately, whereas the invention of adaptive optics allowed them to determine its shape more accurately.^[119]

Size comparisons: Earth, the Moon, and Pluto

With less than 0.2 lunar masses, Pluto is much less massive than the terrestrial planets, and also less massive than seven moons: Ganymede, Titan, Callisto, Io, the Moon, Europa, and Triton. The mass is much less than thought before Charon was discovered.

Pluto is more than twice the diameter and a dozen times the mass of the dwarf planet Ceres, the largest object in the asteroid belt. It is less massive than the dwarf planet Eris, a trans-Neptunian object discovered in 2005, though Pluto has a larger diameter of 2372 km^[117] compared to Eris's approximate diameter of 2326 km.^[120]

Determinations of Pluto's size had been complicated by its atmosphere,^[114] and hydrocarbon haze.^[112] In March 2014, Lellouch, de Bergh et al. published findings regarding methane mixing ratios in Pluto's atmosphere consistent with a Plutonian diameter greater than 2360 km, with a "best guess" of 2368 km.^[116] On July 13, 2015, images from NASA's New Horizons mission Long Range Reconnaissance Imager (LORRI), along with data from the other instruments, determined Pluto's diameter to be 2,370 km (1,470 mi),^[120][121] which was later revised to be 2,372 km (1,474 mi) on July 24.^[117]

Atmosphere

A near-true-color image of Pluto taken by NASA's New Horizons probe after its flyby. The photo shows blue haze layers in Pluto's atmosphere.

Pluto has a tenuous atmosphere consisting of nitrogen (N₂), methane (CH₄), and carbon monoxide (CO), which are in equilibrium with their ices on Pluto's surface.^[122][123] According to the measurements by New Horizons, the surface pressure is about 1 Pa (10 μbar),^[5] roughly one million to 100,000 times less than Earth's atmospheric pressure. It was initially thought that, as Pluto moves away from the Sun, its atmosphere should gradually freeze onto the surface; however, studies of New Horizons data and ground-based occultations show that Pluto's atmospheric density actually increases, and that it likely remains gaseous throughout Pluto's orbit.^[124][125] New Horizons observations showed that atmospheric escape of nitrogen to be 10,000 times less than expected.^[125] Alan Stern has contended that even a small increase in Pluto's surface temperature can lead to exponential increases in Pluto's atmospheric density; from 18 to as much as 280 millibars (three times that of Mars to a quarter that of the Earth). At such densities, nitrogen could flow across the surface as liquid.^[125] Just like sweat cools the body as it evaporates from the skin, the sublimation of Pluto's atmosphere cools its surface.^[126] The presence of atmospheric gases was traced up to 1670 kilometers high, although the atmosphere does not have a sharp upper boundary.

The presence of methane, a powerful greenhouse gas, in Pluto's atmosphere creates a temperature inversion, with the average temperature of its atmosphere tens of degrees warmer than its surface, ^[127] though observations by New Horizons have revealed Pluto's upper atmosphere to be far colder than expected (70 K, as opposed to about 100 K).^[125] Pluto's atmosphere is divided into roughly 20 regularly spaced haze layers up to 150 km high,^[5] thought to be the result of pressure waves created by airflow across Pluto's mountains.^[125]

Satellites

Pluto has five known natural satellites: Charon, first identified in 1978 by astronomer James Christy; Nix and Hydra, both discovered in 2005;^[128] Kerberos, discovered in 2011;^[129] and Styx, discovered in 2012.^[130] The satellites' orbits are circular (eccentricity < 0.006) and coplanar with Pluto's equator (inclination < 1°),^[131][132] and therefore tilted approximately 120° relative to Pluto's orbit. The Plutonian system is highly compact: the five known satellites orbit within the inner 3% of the region where prograde orbits would be stable.^[133] Closest to Pluto is Charon, which is large enough to be in hydrostatic equilibrium and to cause the barycenter of the Pluto–Charon system to be outside Pluto. Beyond Charon there are four much smaller circumbinary moons, Styx, Nix, Kerberos, and Hydra.

The orbital periods of all Pluto's moons are linked in a system of orbital resonances and near resonances.^[132][134] When precession is accounted for, the orbital periods of Styx, Nix, and Hydra are in an exact 18:22:33 ratio.^[132] There is a sequence of approximate ratios, 3:4:5:6, between the periods of Styx, Nix, Kerberos, and Hydra with that of Charon; the ratios become closer to being exact the further out the moons are.^[132][135]

An oblique view of the Pluto–Charon system showing that Pluto orbits a point outside itself. Also visible is the mutual tidal locking between the two bodies.

The Pluto–Charon system is one of the few in the Solar System whose barycenter lies outside the primary body; 617 Patroclus is a smaller example, and the Sun–Jupiter system is the only larger one.^[136] The similar sizes of Charon and Pluto has prompted some astronomers to call it a double dwarf planet.^[137] The system is also unusual among planetary systems in that each is tidally locked to the other, which means that Pluto and Charon always have the same hemisphere facing each other. From any position on either body, the other is always at the same position in the sky, or always obscured.^[138] This also means that the rotation period of each is equal to the time it takes the entire system to rotate around its barycenter.^[94]

In 2007, observations by the Gemini Observatory of patches of ammonia hydrates and water crystals on the surface of Charon suggested the presence of active cryo-geysers.^[139]

Pluto's moons are hypothesized to have been formed by a collision between Pluto and a similar-sized body, early in the history of the Solar System. The collision released material that consolidated into the moons around Pluto.^[140] However, Kerberos has a much lower albedo than the other moons of Pluto,^[141] which is difficult to explain with a giant collision.^[142]

1. The Pluto system: Pluto, Charon, Styx, Nix, Kerberos, and Hydra, imaged by the Hubble Space Telescope in July 2012. 2. Pluto and Charon, to scale. Image acquired by New Horizons on July 8, 2015. 3. Family portrait of the five moons of Pluto, to scale.^[143] 4. Pluto's moon Charon as viewed by New Horizons on July 13, 2015

Origin

Plot of the known Kuiper belt objects, set against the four giant planets

Pluto's origin and identity had long puzzled astronomers. One early hypothesis was that Pluto was an escaped moon of Neptune, knocked out of orbit by its largest current moon, Triton. This idea was eventually rejected after dynamical studies showed it to be impossible because Pluto never approaches Neptune in its orbit.^[144]

Pluto's true place in the Solar System began to reveal itself only in 1992, when astronomers began to find small icy objects beyond Neptune that were similar to Pluto not only in orbit but also in size and composition. This trans-Neptunian population is thought to be the source of many short-period comets. Pluto is now known to be the largest member of the Kuiper belt,^{[lower-alpha 11]} a stable belt of objects located between 30 and 50 AU from the Sun. As of 2011, surveys of the Kuiper belt to magnitude 21 were nearly complete and any remaining Pluto-sized objects are expected to be beyond 100 AU from the Sun.^[145] Like other Kuiper-belt objects (KBOs), Pluto shares features with comets; for example, the solar wind is gradually blowing Pluto's surface into space.^[146] It has been claimed that if Pluto were placed as near to the Sun as Earth, it would develop a tail, as comets do.^[147] This claim has been disputed with the argument that Pluto's escape velocity is too high for this to happen.^[148]

Though Pluto is the largest Kuiper belt object discovered,^[112] Neptune's moon Triton, which is slightly larger than Pluto, is similar to it both geologically and atmospherically, and is thought to be a captured Kuiper belt object.^[149] Eris (see above) is about the same size as Pluto (though more massive) but is not strictly considered a member of the Kuiper belt population. Rather, it is considered a member of a linked population called the scattered disc.

A large number of Kuiper belt objects, like Pluto, are in a 2:3 orbital resonance with Neptune. KBOs with this orbital resonance are called "plutinos", after Pluto.^[150]

Like other members of the Kuiper belt, Pluto is thought to be a residual planetesimal; a component of the original protoplanetary disc around the Sun that failed to fully coalesce into a full-fledged planet. Most astronomers agree that Pluto owes its current position to a sudden migration undergone by Neptune early in the Solar System's formation. As Neptune migrated outward, it approached the objects in the proto-Kuiper belt, setting one in orbit around itself (Triton), locking others into resonances, and knocking others into chaotic orbits. The objects in the scattered disc, a dynamically unstable region overlapping the Kuiper belt, are thought to have been placed in their current positions by interactions with Neptune's migrating resonances.^[151] A computer model created in 2004 by Alessandro Morbidelli of the Observatoire de la Côte d'Azur in Nice suggested that the migration of Neptune into the Kuiper belt may have been triggered by the formation of a 1:2 resonance between Jupiter and Saturn, which created a gravitational push that propelled both Uranus and Neptune into higher orbits and caused them to switch places, ultimately doubling Neptune's distance from the Sun. The resultant expulsion of objects from the proto-Kuiper belt could also explain the Late Heavy Bombardment 600 million years after the Solar System's formation and the origin of the Jupiter trojans.^[152] It is possible that Pluto had a near-circular orbit about 33 AU from the Sun before Neptune's migration perturbed it into a resonant capture.^[153] The Nice model requires that there were about a thousand Pluto-sized bodies in the original planetesimal disk, which included Triton and Eris.^[152]

Observation and exploration

Pluto's distance from Earth makes its in-depth study and exploration difficult. On July 14, 2015, NASA's New Horizons space probe flew through the Pluto system, providing much information about it.^[24]

Observation

Computer-generated rotating image of Pluto based on observations by the Hubble Space Telescope in 2002–2003

Pluto's visual apparent magnitude averages 15.1, brightening to 13.65 at perihelion.^[3] To see it, a telescope is required; around 30 cm (12 in) aperture being desirable.^[154] It looks star-like and without a visible disk even in large telescopes, because its angular diameter is only 0.11".

The earliest maps of Pluto, made in the late 1980s, were brightness maps created from close observations of eclipses by its largest moon, Charon. Observations were made of the change in the total average brightness of the Pluto–Charon system during the eclipses. For example, eclipsing a bright spot on Pluto makes a bigger total brightness change than eclipsing a dark spot. Computer processing of many such observations can be used to create a brightness map. This method can also track changes in brightness over time.^[155][156]

Better maps were produced from images taken by the Hubble Space Telescope (HST), which offered higher resolution, and showed considerably more detail,^[103] resolving variations several hundred kilometers across, including polar regions and large bright spots.^[105] These maps were produced by complex computer processing, which finds the best-fit projected maps for the few pixels of the Hubble images.^[157] These remained the most detailed maps of Pluto until the flyby of New Horizons in July 2015, because the two cameras on the HST used for these maps were no longer in service.^[157]

Exploration

The portions of Pluto's surface mapped by New Horizons (annotated)

The New Horizons spacecraft, which flew by Pluto in July 2015, is the first and so far only attempt to explore Pluto directly. Launched in 2006, it captured its first (distant) images of Pluto in late September 2006 during a test of the Long Range Reconnaissance Imager.^[158] The images, taken from a distance of approximately 4.2 billion kilometers, confirmed the spacecraft's ability to track distant targets, critical for maneuvering toward Pluto and other Kuiper belt objects. In early 2007 the craft made use of a gravity assist from Jupiter.

New Horizons made its closest approach to Pluto on July 14, 2015 after a 3,462-day journey across the Solar System. Scientific observations of Pluto began five months before the closest approach and continued for at least a month after the encounter. Observations were conducted using a remote sensing package that included imaging instruments and a radio science investigation tool, as well as spectroscopic and other experiments. The scientific goals of New Horizons were to characterize the global geology and morphology of Pluto and its moon Charon, map their surface composition, and analyze Pluto's neutral atmosphere and its escape rate.

Gallery

View of the Norgay Montes (left-foreground), Hillary Montes (left-skyline), and Sputnik Planum (right).
Near-sunset view includes several layers of atmospheric haze.

Spherical mosaic of New Horizons images showing the expanse of Sputnik Planum
(released September 10, 2015)^[159][160]

Pluto as viewed by New Horizons during flyby (color; animation; July 14, 2015)[161]

Pluto and Charon as viewed by New Horizons (highest-resolution; color; July 14, 2015)

Pluto and Charon as viewed by New Horizons (natural color; July 11, 2015)  Pluto and Charon as viewed by New Horizons (false color; July 13, 2015)

Pluto viewed by New Horizons (July 9, 2015)  Pluto viewed by New Horizons (July 11, 2015)  Pluto viewed by New Horizons (July 11, 2015)  Pluto viewed by New Horizons (July 12, 2015)  Pluto viewed by New Horizons (July 13, 2015)

Pluto as viewed by New Horizons (color; July 11, 2015)  Pluto as viewed by New Horizons (color; July 13, 2015)

Videos

Pluto flyover animated (July 14, 2015)

(00:30; released September 18, 2015)

(00:50; released December 5, 2015)

See also

• How I Killed Pluto and Why It Had It Coming
• Pluto in astrology
• Pluto in fiction

Notes

1. This is a composite of four near-true color photographs taken by the New Horizons spacecraft on July 14, 2015 from a distance of 720,000 km (450,000 mi). The most prominent feature in the image, the bright, youthful plains of Tombaugh Regio and Sputnik Planum, can be seen at lower right. It contrasts the darker, more cratered terrain of Cthulhu Regio at lower left. Because of Pluto's 119.591° tilt at its axis, the southern hemisphere is barely visible in this image; the equator runs through Cthulhu and the southern parts of Sputnik Planum.
2. The mean elements here are from the Theory of the Outer Planets (TOP2013) solution by the Institut de mécanique céleste et de calcul des éphémérides (IMCCE). They refer to the standard equinox J2000, the barycenter of the Solar System, and the epoch J2000.
3. Surface area derived from the radius r: $4\pi r^2$.
4. Volume v derived from the radius r: $4\pi r^3/3$.
5. Surface gravity derived from the mass M, the gravitational constant G and the radius r: $GM/r^2$.
6. Escape velocity derived from the mass M, the gravitational constant G and the radius r: $\sqrt{2GM/r}$.
7. Based on the orientation of Charon's orbit, which is assumed the same as Pluto's spin axis due to the mutual tidal locking.
8. Based on geometry of minimum and maximum distance from Earth and Pluto radius in the factsheet
9. The equivalence is less close in languages whose phonology differs widely from Greek's, such as Somali Buluuto and Navajo Tłóotoo.
10. The discovery of Charon in 1978 allowed astronomers to accurately calculate the mass of the Plutonian system. But it did not indicate the two bodies' individual masses, which could only be estimated after other moons of Pluto's were discovered in late 2005. As a result, because Pluto came to perihelion in 1989, most Pluto perihelion date estimates are based on the Pluto–Charon barycenter. Charon came to perihelion 4 September 1989. The Pluto–Charon barycenter came to perihelion 5 September 1989. Pluto came to perihelion 8 September 1989.
11. The dwarf planet Eris is roughly the same size as Pluto, about 2330 km; Eris is, however, 28% more massive than Pluto. Eris is a scattered-disc object, often considered a distinct population from Kuiper-belt objects like Pluto; Pluto is the largest body in the Kuiper belt proper, which excludes the scattered-disc objects.

References

1. Simon, J.L.; Francou, G.; Fienga, A.; Manche, H. (September 2013). "New analytical planetary theories VSOP2013 and TOP2013". Astronomy and Astrophysics 557 (2): A49. Bibcode:2013A&A...557A..49S. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321843. The elements in the clearer and usual format is in the spreadsheet and the original TOP2013 elements here.
2. "Horizon Online Ephemeris System for Pluto Barycenter". JPL Horizons On-Line Ephemeris System @ Solar System Dynamics Group. Retrieved January 16, 2011. (set Observer Location to @0 to place the observer at the center of the Sun-Jupiter system)
3. Williams, David R. (July 24, 2015). "Pluto Fact Sheet". NASA. Retrieved August 6, 2015.
4. Seligman, Courtney. "Rotation Period and Day Length". Retrieved August 13, 2009.
5. Stern, S. A.; et al. (2015). "The Pluto system: Initial results from its exploration by New Horizons". Science 350 (6258): 249–352. arXiv:1510.07704. Bibcode:2015Sci...350.1815S. doi:10.1126/science.aad1815. PMID 26472913.
6. Buie, Marc W.; Grundy, William M.; Young, Eliot F.; et al. (2006). "Orbits and photometry of Pluto's satellites: Charon, S/2005 P1, and S/2005 P2". Astronomical Journal 132 (1): 290–298. arXiv:astro-ph/0512491. Bibcode:2006AJ....132..290B. doi:10.1086/504422.
7. Archinal, B. A.; a'Hearn, M. F.; Bowell, E.; Conrad, A.; Consolmagno, G. J.; et al. (2010). "Report of the IAU Working Group on Cartographic Coordinates and Rotational Elements: 2009". Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy 109 (2): 101–135. doi:10.1007/s10569-010-9320-4.
8. Hamilton, Calvin J. (February 12, 2006). "Dwarf Planet Pluto". Views of the Solar System. Retrieved January 10, 2007.
9. "AstDys (134340) Pluto Ephemerides". Department of Mathematics, University of Pisa, Italy. Retrieved June 27, 2010.
10. "JPL Small-Body Database Browser: 134340 Pluto". Retrieved June 12, 2008.
11. Amos, Jonathan (July 23, 2015). "New Horizons: Pluto may have 'nitrogen glaciers'". BBC News. Retrieved July 26, 2015. It could tell from the passage of sunlight and radiowaves through the Plutonian "air" that the pressure was only about 10 microbars at the surface
12. "Pluto has carbon monoxide in its atmosphere". Physorg.com. April 19, 2011. Retrieved November 22, 2011.
13. Stern, S. Alan; Mitton, Jacqueline (2005). Pluto and Charon: ice worlds on the ragged edge of the solar system. Weinheim:Wiley-VCH. ISBN 3-527-40556-9. Retrieved July 3, 2013.
14. "Astronomers Measure Mass of Largest Dwarf Planet". hubblesite. 2007. Retrieved November 3, 2007.
15. Akwagyiram, Alexis (August 2, 2005). "Farewell Pluto?". BBC News. Retrieved March 5, 2006.
16. Showalter, Mark R. (July 11, 2012). "Hubble Discovers a Fifth Moon Orbiting Pluto (News Release STScI-2012-32)". HubbleSite NewsCenter. Retrieved July 11, 2012.
17. Olkin, Catherine B.; Wasserman, Lawrence H.; Franz, Otto G. (2003). "The mass ratio of Charon to Pluto from Hubble Space Telescope astrometry with the fine guidance sensors" (PDF). Icarus (Lowell Observatory) 164 (1): 254–259. Bibcode:2003Icar..164..254O. doi:10.1016/S0019-1035(03)00136-2. Retrieved March 13, 2007.
18. "Pluto and the Developing Landscape of Our Solar System" International Astronomical Union. Retrieved on October 27, 2010.
19. Chang, Kenneth (July 14, 2015). "NASA's New Horizons Spacecraft Completes Flyby of Pluto". New York Times. Retrieved July 14, 2015.
20. Dunn, Marcia (July 14, 2015). "Pluto close-up: Spacecraft makes flyby of icy, mystery world". AP News. Retrieved July 14, 2015.
21. Chang, Kenneth (July 18, 2015). "The Long, Strange Trip to Pluto, and How NASA Nearly Missed It". New York Times. Retrieved July 19, 2015.
22. Chang, Kenneth (March 17, 2016). "What We've Learned about Pluto". The New York Times. Retrieved March 17, 2016.
23. Talbert, Tricia (March 17, 2016). "Science Papers Reveal New Aspects of Pluto and its Moons". NASA. Retrieved March 18, 2016.
24. Talbert, Tricia (March 17, 2016). "Top New Horizons Findings Reported in Science". NASA. Retrieved March 18, 2016.
25. Croswell, Ken (1997). Planet Quest: The Epic Discovery of Alien Solar Systems. New York: The Free Press. p. 43. ISBN 978-0-684-83252-4.
26. Tombaugh, Clyde W. (1946). "The Search for the Ninth Planet, Pluto". Astronomical Society of the Pacific Leaflets 5: 73–80. Bibcode:1946ASPL....5...73T.
27. Hoyt, William G. (1976). "W. H. Pickering's Planetary Predictions and the Discovery of Pluto". Isis 67 (4): 551–564. doi:10.1086/351668. JSTOR 230561.
28. Littman, Mark (1990). Planets Beyond: Discovering the Outer Solar System. Wiley. p. 70. ISBN 0-471-51053-X.
29. Buchwald, Greg; Dimario, Michael; Wild, Walter (2000). "Pluto is Discovered Back in Time". Amateur—Professional Partnerships in Astronomy (San Francisco: San Francisco: Astronomical Society of the Pacific) 220: 335. Bibcode:2000ASPC..220..355B. ISBN 1-58381-052-8.
30. Croswell 1997, p. 50.
31. Croswell 1997, p. 52.
32. Rao, Joe (March 11, 2005). "Finding Pluto: Tough Task, Even 75 Years Later". Space.com. Retrieved September 8, 2006.
33. Mager, Brad. "The Search Continues". Pluto: The Discovery of Planet X. Retrieved November 29, 2011.
34. Rincon, Paul (January 13, 2006). "The girl who named a planet". BBC News. Retrieved April 12, 2007.
35. "The Trans-Neptunian Body: Decision to call it Pluto". The Times. May 27, 1930. p. 15.
36. "Name Pluto Given to Body Believed to Be Planet X". The New York Times. Associated Press. May 25, 1930. p. 1. ISSN 0362-4331. Pluto, the title of the Roman gods of the region of darkness, was announced tonight at Lowell Observatory here as the name chosen for the recently discovered trans-Neptunian body, which is believed to be the long-sought Planet X.
37. Croswell 1997, pp. 54–55.
38. UK CPI inflation numbers based on data available from Gregory Clark (2016), "The Annual RPI and Average Earnings for Britain, 1209 to Present (New Series)" MeasuringWorth.
39. "NASA's Solar System Exploration: Multimedia: Gallery: Pluto's Symbol". NASA. Retrieved November 29, 2011.
40. Heinrichs, Allison M. (2006). "Dwarfed by comparison". Pittsburgh Tribune-Review. Retrieved March 26, 2007.
41. Clark, David L.; Hobart, David E. (2000). "Reflections on the Legacy of a Legend" (PDF). Retrieved November 29, 2011.
42. Renshaw, Steve; Ihara, Saori (2000). "A Tribute to Houei Nojiri". Retrieved November 29, 2011.
43. "Planetary Linguistics". Archived from the original on December 17, 2007. Retrieved June 12, 2007.
44. 'Bathrobe'. "Uranus, Neptune, and Pluto in Chinese, Japanese, and Vietnamese". cjvlang.com. Retrieved November 29, 2011.
45. Stern, Alan; Tholen, David James (1997). Pluto and Charon. University of Arizona Press. pp. 206–208. ISBN 978-0-8165-1840-1.
46. Crommelin, Andrew Claude de la Cherois (1931). "The Discovery of Pluto". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 91: 380–385. Bibcode:1931MNRAS..91..380.. doi:10.1093/mnras/91.4.380.
47. Nicholson, Seth B.; Mayall, Nicholas U. (December 1930). "The Probable Value of the Mass of Pluto". Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 42 (250): 350. Bibcode:1930PASP...42..350N. doi:10.1086/124071.
48. Nicholson, Seth B.; Mayall, Nicholas U. (January 1931). "Positions, Orbit, and Mass of Pluto". Astrophysical Journal 73: 1. Bibcode:1931ApJ....73....1N. doi:10.1086/143288.
49. Kuiper, Gerard P. (1950). "The Diameter of Pluto". Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 62 (366): 133–137. Bibcode:1950PASP...62..133K. doi:10.1086/126255.
50. Croswell 1997, p. 57.
51. Christy, James W.; Harrington, Robert Sutton (1978). "The Satellite of Pluto". Astronomical Journal 83 (8): 1005–1008. Bibcode:1978AJ.....83.1005C. doi:10.1086/112284.
52. Seidelmann, P. Kenneth; Harrington, Robert Sutton (1988). "Planet X – The current status". Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy 43: 55–68. Bibcode:1987CeMec..43...55S. doi:10.1007/BF01234554. Retrieved November 29, 2011.
53. Standish, E. Myles (1993). "Planet X—No dynamical evidence in the optical observations". Astronomical Journal 105 (5): 200–2006. Bibcode:1993AJ....105.2000S. doi:10.1086/116575.
54. Standage, Tom (2000). The Neptune File. Penguin. p. 168. ISBN 0-8027-1363-7.
55. "History I: The Lowell Observatory in 20th century Astronomy". The Astronomical Society of the Pacific. June 28, 1994. Retrieved November 29, 2011.
56. Tyson, Neil deGrasse (February 2, 2001). "Astronomer Responds to Pluto-Not-a-Planet Claim". Space.com. Retrieved November 30, 2011.
57. "NASA-Funded Scientists Discover Tenth Planet". NASA press releases. July 29, 2005. Retrieved February 22, 2007.
58. Soter, Steven (2007). "What is a Planet?". The Astronomical Journal (Department of Astrophysics, American Museum of Natural History) 132 (6): 2513–2519. arXiv:astro-ph/0608359. Bibcode:2006AJ....132.2513S. doi:10.1086/508861.
59. "IAU 2006 General Assembly: Resolutions 5 and 6" (PDF). IAU. August 24, 2006.
60. "IAU 2006 General Assembly: Result of the IAU Resolution votes". International Astronomical Union (News Release – IAU0603). August 24, 2006. Retrieved June 15, 2008.
61. Green, Daniel W. E. (September 13, 2006). "(134340) Pluto, (136199) Eris, and (136199) Eris I (Dysnomia)" (PDF). IAU Circular 8747. Archived from the original on February 5, 2007. Retrieved December 1, 2011.
62. "JPL Small-Body Database Browser". California Institute of Technology. Retrieved July 15, 2015.
63. Britt, Robert Roy (August 24, 2006). "Pluto Demoted: No Longer a Planet in Highly Controversial Definition". Space.com. Retrieved September 8, 2006.
64. Ruibal, Sal (January 6, 1999). "Astronomers question if Pluto is real planet". USA Today.
65. Britt, Robert Roy (November 21, 2006). "Why Planets Will Never Be Defined". Space.com. Retrieved December 1, 2006.
66. Britt, Robert Roy (August 24, 2006). "Scientists decide Pluto's no longer a planet". MSNBC. Retrieved September 8, 2006.
67. Shiga, David (August 25, 2006). "New planet definition sparks furore". NewScientist.com. Retrieved September 8, 2006.
68. "Should Large Moons Be Called 'Satellite Planets'?". News.discovery.com. May 14, 2010. Retrieved November 4, 2011.
69. Buie, Marc W. (September 2006). "My response to 2006 IAU Resolutions 5a and 6a". Southwest Research Institute. Archived from the original on June 3, 2007. Retrieved December 1, 2011.
70. Overbye, Dennis (August 24, 2006). "Pluto Is Demoted to 'Dwarf Planet'". The New York Times. Retrieved December 1, 2011.
71. DeVore, Edna (September 7, 2006). "Planetary Politics: Protecting Pluto". Space.com. Retrieved December 1, 2011.
72. Holden, Constance (March 23, 2007). "Rehabilitating Pluto". Science 315 (5819): 1643. doi:10.1126/science.315.5819.1643c.
73. Gutierrez, Joni Marie (2007). "A joint memorial. Declaring Pluto a planet and declaring March 13, 2007, 'Pluto planet day' at the legislature". Legislature of New Mexico. Retrieved September 5, 2009.
74. "Illinois General Assembly: Bill Status of SR0046, 96th General Assembly". ilga.gov. Illinois General Assembly. Retrieved March 16, 2011.
75. "Pluto's still the same Pluto". Independent Newspapers. Associated Press. October 21, 2006. Retrieved November 29, 2011. Mickey Mouse has a cute dog.
76. "'Plutoed' chosen as '06 Word of the Year". Associated Press. January 8, 2007. Retrieved January 10, 2007.
77. Minkel, J. R. (April 10, 2008). "Is Rekindling the Pluto Planet Debate a Good Idea?". Scientific American. Retrieved December 1, 2011.
78. "The Great Planet Debate: Science as Process. A Scientific Conference and Educator Workshop". gpd.jhuapl.edu. Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory. June 27, 2008. Retrieved December 1, 2011.
79. "Scientists Debate Planet Definition and Agree to Disagree", Planetary Science Institute press release of September 19, 2008, PSI.edu
80. "Plutoid chosen as name for Solar System objects like Pluto". Paris: International Astronomical Union (News Release – IAU0804). June 11, 2008. Retrieved December 1, 2011.
81. "Plutoids Join the Solar Family", Discover Magazine, January 2009, p. 76
82. Science News, July 5, 2008, p. 7
83. "Pluto to become most distant planet". JPL/NASA. January 28, 1999. Retrieved January 16, 2011.
84. Sussman, Gerald Jay; Wisdom, Jack (1988). "Numerical evidence that the motion of Pluto is chaotic". Science 241 (4864): 433–437. Bibcode:1988Sci...241..433S. doi:10.1126/science.241.4864.433. PMID 17792606.
85. Wisdom, Jack; Holman, Matthew (1991). "Symplectic maps for the n-body problem". Astronomical Journal 102: 1528–1538. Bibcode:1991AJ....102.1528W. doi:10.1086/115978.
86. Wan, Xiao-Sheng; Huang, Tian-Yi; Innanen, Kim A. (2001). "The 1:1 Superresonance in Pluto's Motion". The Astronomical Journal 121 (2): 1155–1162. Bibcode:2001AJ....121.1155W. doi:10.1086/318733.
87. Hunter, Maxwell W. (2004). "Unmanned scientific exploration throughout the Solar System". Space Science Reviews 6 (5): 501. Bibcode:1967SSRv....6..601H. doi:10.1007/BF00168793.
88. Malhotra, Renu (1997). "Pluto's Orbit". Retrieved March 26, 2007.
89. Williams, David R. (November 17, 2010). "Planetary Fact Sheet – Metric". NASA Goddard Space Flight Center. Retrieved November 29, 2011.
90. Alfvén, Hannes; Arrhenius, Gustaf (1976). "SP-345 Evolution of the Solar System". Retrieved March 28, 2007.
91. Williams, James G.; Benson, G. S. (1971). "Resonances in the Neptune-Pluto System". Astronomical Journal 76: 167. Bibcode:1971AJ.....76..167W. doi:10.1086/111100.
92. de la Fuente Marcos, Carlos; de la Fuente Marcos, Raúl (2012). "Plutino 15810 (1994 JR₁), an accidental quasi-satellite of Pluto". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Letters 427: L85. arXiv:1209.3116. Bibcode:2012MNRAS.427L..85D. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2012.01350.x.
93. "Pluto's fake moon". Retrieved September 24, 2012.
94. Faure, Gunter; Mensing, Teresa M. (2007). Pluto and Charon: The Odd Couple. Introduction to Planetary Science (Springer). pp. 401–408. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-5544-7. ISBN 978-1-4020-5544-7.
95. Schombert, Jim; University of Oregon Astronomy 121 Lecture notes, Pluto Orientation diagram
96. "Pluto Time". NASA Solar System Exploration. Retrieved July 13, 2015.
97. "NASA Lets You Experience "Pluto Time" with New Custom Tool". NASA. June 5, 2015.
98. "NOAA Solar Calculator". NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory Global Monitoring Division. Retrieved July 13, 2015.
99. Brown, Dwayne; Buckley, Michael; Stothoff, Maria (January 15, 2015). "January 15, 2015 Release 15-011 – NASA's New Horizons Spacecraft Begins First Stages of Pluto Encounter". NASA. Retrieved January 15, 2015.
100. Owen, Tobias C.; Roush, Ted L.; Cruikshank, Dale P.; et al. (1993). "Surface Ices and the Atmospheric Composition of Pluto". Science 261 (5122): 745–748. Bibcode:1993Sci...261..745O. doi:10.1126/science.261.5122.745. JSTOR 2882241. PMID 17757212.
101. Grundy, W. M.; Olkin, C. B.; Young, L. A.; Buie, M. W.; Young, E. F. (2013). "Near-infrared spectral monitoring of Pluto's ices: Spatial distribution and secular evolution" (PDF). Icarus 223 (2): 710–721. arXiv:1301.6284. Bibcode:2013Icar..223..710G. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2013.01.019. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 8, 2015.
102. Buie, Marc W.; Grundy, William M.; Young, Eliot F.; et al. (2010). "Pluto and Charon with the Hubble Space Telescope: I. Monitoring global change and improved surface properties from light curves". Astronomical Journal 139 (3): 1117–1127. Bibcode:2010AJ....139.1117B. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/139/3/1117.
103. Buie, Marc W. "Pluto map information". Retrieved February 10, 2010.
104. Villard, Ray; Buie, Marc W. (February 4, 2010). "New Hubble Maps of Pluto Show Surface Changes". News Release Number: STScI-2010-06. Retrieved February 10, 2010.
105. Buie, Marc W.; Grundy, William M.; Young, Eliot F.; et al. (2010). "Pluto and Charon with the Hubble Space Telescope: II. Resolving changes on Pluto's surface and a map for Charon". Astronomical Journal 139 (3): 1128–1143. Bibcode:2010AJ....139.1128B. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/139/3/1128.
106. Lakdawalla, Emily (2015-12-21). "Pluto updates from AGU and DPS: Pretty pictures from a confusing world". The Planetary Society. Retrieved 2016-01-24.
107. Umurhan, O. (2016-01-08). "Probing the Mysterious Glacial Flow on Pluto’s Frozen ‘Heart’". blogs.nasa.gov. NASA. Retrieved 2016-01-24.
108. Marchis, F.; Trilling, D. E. (2016-01-20). "The Surface Age of Sputnik Planum, Pluto, Must Be Less than 10 Million Years". PLOS ONE 11 (1): e0147386. arXiv:1601.02833. Bibcode:2016PLoSO..1147386T. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0147386.
109. Hussmann, Hauke; Sohl, Frank; Spohn, Tilman (November 2006). "Subsurface oceans and deep interiors of medium-sized outer planet satellites and large trans-neptunian objects" (PDF). Icarus 185 (1): 258–273. Bibcode:2006Icar..185..258H. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2006.06.005.
110. "The Inside Story". pluto.jhuapl.edu – NASA New Horizons mission site. Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory. 2007. Retrieved February 15, 2014.
111. Millis, Robert L.; Wasserman, Lawrence H.; Franz, Otto G.; et al. (1993). "Pluto's radius and atmosphere – Results from the entire 9 June 1988 occultation data set". Icarus 105 (2): 282–297. Bibcode:1993Icar..105..282M. doi:10.1006/icar.1993.1126.
112. Brown, Michael E. (November 22, 2010). "How big is Pluto, anyway?". Mike Brown's Planets. Retrieved June 9, 2015. (Franck Marchis on 8 November 2010)
113. Young, Eliot F.; Binzel, Richard P. (1994). "A new determination of radii and limb parameters for Pluto and Charon from mutual event lightcurves". Icarus 108 (2): 219–224. Bibcode:1994Icar..108..219Y. doi:10.1006/icar.1994.1056.
114. Young, Eliot F.; Young, Leslie A.; Buie, Marc W. (2007). "Pluto's Radius". American Astronomical Society, DPS meeting No. 39, #62.05; Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society 39: 541. Bibcode:2007DPS....39.6205Y.
115. Zalucha, Angela M.; Gulbis, Amanda A. S.; Zhu, Xun; et al. (2011). "An analysis of Pluto occultation light curves using an atmospheric radiative-conductive model". Icarus 211 (1): 804–818. Bibcode:2011Icar..211..804Z. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2010.08.018.
116. Lellouch, Emmanuel; de Bergh, Catherine; Sicardy, Bruno; et al. (January 15, 2015). "Exploring the spatial, temporal, and vertical distribution of methane in Pluto's atmosphere". Icarus 246: 268–278. arXiv:1403.3208. Bibcode:2015Icar..246..268L. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2014.03.027.
117. NASA's New Horizons Team Reveals New Scientific Findings on Pluto. NASA. July 24, 2015. Event occurs at 52:30. Retrieved July 30, 2015. We had an uncertainty that ranged over maybe 70 kilometers, we've collapsed that to plus and minus two, and it's centered around 1186
118. Davies, John (2001). "Beyond Pluto (extract)" (PDF). Royal Observatory, Edinburgh. Retrieved March 26, 2007.
119. Close, Laird M.; Merline, William J.; Tholen, David J.; et al. (2000). "Adaptive optics imaging of Pluto–Charon and the discovery of a moon around the Asteroid 45 Eugenia: the potential of adaptive optics in planetary astronomy". Proceedings of the International Society for Optical Engineering (European Southern Observatory) 4007: 787–795. Bibcode:2000SPIE.4007..787C. doi:10.1117/12.390379.
120. "How Big Is Pluto? New Horizons Settles Decades-Long Debate". NASA. July 13, 2015. Retrieved July 13, 2015.
121. Lakdawalla, Emily (July 13, 2015). "Pluto minus one day: Very first New Horizons Pluto encounter science results". The Planetary Society. Retrieved July 13, 2015.
122. "Conditions on Pluto: Incredibly Hazy With Flowing Ice". New York Times. July 24, 2015. Retrieved July 24, 2015.
123. Croswell, Ken (1992). "Nitrogen in Pluto's Atmosphere". KenCroswell.com. New Scientist. Retrieved April 27, 2007.
124. Olkin, C. B.; Young, L. A.; Borncamp, D.; et al. (January 2015). "Evidence that Pluto's atmosphere does not collapse from occultations including the 2013 May 04 event". Icarus 246: 220–225. Bibcode:2015Icar..246..220O. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2014.03.026.
125. Kelly Beatty (2016). "Pluto’s Atmosphere Confounds Researchers". Sky & Telescope. Retrieved 2016-04-02.
126. Than, Ker (2006). "Astronomers: Pluto colder than expected". Space.com (via CNN.com). Retrieved November 30, 2011.
127. Lellouch, Emmanuel; Sicardy, Bruno; de Bergh, Catherine; et al. (2009). "Pluto's lower atmosphere structure and methane abundance from high-resolution spectroscopy and stellar occultations". Astronomy and Astrophysics 495 (3): L17–L21. arXiv:0901.4882. Bibcode:2009A&A...495L..17L. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200911633.
128. Gugliotta, Guy (November 1, 2005). "Possible New Moons for Pluto". Washington Post. Retrieved October 10, 2006.
129. "NASA's Hubble Discovers Another Moon Around Pluto". NASA. July 20, 2011. Retrieved July 20, 2011.
130. Wall, Mike (July 11, 2012). "Pluto Has a Fifth Moon, Hubble Telescope Reveals". Space.com. Retrieved July 11, 2012.
131. Buie, M.; Tholen, D.; Grundy, W. (2012). "The Orbit of Charon is Circular". The Astronomical Journal 144: 15. Bibcode:2012AJ....144...15B. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/144/1/15.
132. Showalter, M. R.; Hamilton, D. P. (June 3, 2015). "Resonant interactions and chaotic rotation of Pluto’s small moons". Nature 522 (7554): 45–49. Bibcode:2015Natur.522...45S. doi:10.1038/nature14469. PMID 26040889.
133. Stern, S. Alan; Weaver, Harold A., Jr.; Steffl, Andrew J.; et al. (2005). "Characteristics and Origin of the Quadruple System at Pluto". Submitted to Nature. arXiv:astro-ph/0512599.
134. Witze, Alexandra (2015). "Pluto’s moons move in synchrony". Nature. doi:10.1038/nature.2015.17681.
135. Matson, J. (July 11, 2012). "New Moon for Pluto: Hubble Telescope Spots a 5th Plutonian Satellite". Scientific American web site. Retrieved July 12, 2012.
136. Richardson, Derek C.; Walsh, Kevin J. (2005). "Binary Minor Planets". Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 34 (1): 47–81. Bibcode:2006AREPS..34...47R. doi:10.1146/annurev.earth.32.101802.120208.
137. Sicardy, Bruno; Bellucci, Aurélie; Gendron, Éric; et al. (2006). "Charon's size and an upper limit on its atmosphere from a stellar occultation". Nature 439 (7072): 52–4. Bibcode:2006Natur.439...52S. doi:10.1038/nature04351. PMID 16397493.
138. Young, Leslie A. (1997). "The Once and Future Pluto". Southwest Research Institute, Boulder, Colorado. Retrieved March 26, 2007.
139. "Charon: An ice machine in the ultimate deep freeze". Gemini Observatory News Release. 2007. Retrieved July 18, 2007.
140. "NASA's Hubble Finds Pluto’s Moons Tumbling in Absolute Chaos". Retrieved June 3, 2015.
141. "Pluto's moons are even weirder than thought". Retrieved June 20, 2015.
142. "Pluto's moons dance to a random beat". Retrieved June 20, 2015.
143. "HubbleSite – NewsCenter – Hubble Finds Two Chaotically Tumbling Pluto Moons (06/03/2015) – Introduction". hubblesite.org. Retrieved June 3, 2015.
144. Stern, S. Alan; Tholen, David J. (1997). Pluto and Charon. University of Arizona Press. p. 623. ISBN 978-0-8165-1840-1.
145. Sheppard, Scott S.; Trujillo, Chadwick A.; Udalski, Andrzej; et al. (2011). "A Southern Sky and Galactic Plane Survey for Bright Kuiper Belt Objects". Astronomical Journal 142 (4): 98. arXiv:1107.5309. Bibcode:2011AJ....142...98S. doi:10.1088/0004-6256/142/4/98.
146. "Colossal Cousin to a Comet?". pluto.jhuapl.edu – NASA New Horizons mission site. Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory. Archived from the original on November 13, 2014. Retrieved February 15, 2014.
147. Tyson, Neil deGrasse (1999). "Pluto Is Not a Planet". The Planetary Society. Archived from the original on September 27, 2011. Retrieved November 30, 2011.
148. "Nine Reasons Why Pluto Is a Planet" by Philip Metzger
149. "Neptune's Moon Triton". The Planetary Society. Archived from the original on December 10, 2011. Retrieved November 30, 2011.
150. Jewitt, David C. (2004). "The Plutinos". University of Hawaii. Archived from the original on April 19, 2007. Retrieved March 26, 2007.
151. Hahn, Joseph M. (2005). "Neptune's Migration into a Stirred–Up Kuiper Belt: A Detailed Comparison of Simulations to Observations" (PDF). Saint Mary's University. Retrieved March 5, 2008.
152. Levison, Harold F.; Morbidelli, Alessandro; Van Laerhoven, Christa; et al. (2007). "Origin of the Structure of the Kuiper Belt during a Dynamical Instability in the Orbits of Uranus and Neptune". Icarus 196 (1): 258–273. arXiv:0712.0553. Bibcode:2008Icar..196..258L. doi:10.1016/j.icarus.2007.11.035.
153. Malhotra, Renu (1995). "The Origin of Pluto's Orbit: Implications for the Solar System Beyond Neptune". Astronomical Journal 110: 420. arXiv:astro-ph/9504036. Bibcode:1995AJ....110..420M. doi:10.1086/117532.
154. "This month Pluto's apparent magnitude is m=14.1. Could we see it with an 11" reflector of focal length 3400 mm?". Singapore Science Centre. 2002. Archived from the original on November 11, 2005. Retrieved November 29, 2011.
155. Young, Eliot F.; Binzel, Richard P.; Crane, Keenan (2001). "A Two-Color Map of Pluto's Sub-Charon Hemisphere". The Astronomical Journal 121 (1): 552–561. Bibcode:2001AJ....121..552Y. doi:10.1086/318008.
156. Buie, Marc W.; Tholen, David J.; Horne, Keith (1992). "Albedo maps of Pluto and Charon: Initial mutual event results". Icarus 97 (2): 221–227. Bibcode:1992Icar...97..211B. doi:10.1016/0019-1035(92)90129-U.
157. Buie, Marc W. "How the Pluto maps were made". Retrieved February 10, 2010.
158. "New Horizons, Not Quite to Jupiter, Makes First Pluto Sighting". pluto.jhuapl.edu – NASA New Horizons mission site. Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory. November 28, 2006. Retrieved November 29, 2011.
159. Talbert, Tricia (September 10, 2015). "New Pluto Images from NASA's New Horizons: It's Complicated". NASA. Retrieved September 10, 2015.
160. Chang, Kenneth (September 10, 2015). "No Surf, but Maybe Dunes in NASA's Latest Pluto Photos". New York Times. Retrieved September 10, 2015.
161. Albert, P.T. (August 28, 2015). "To Pluto and Beyond: Animating New Horizons' Flight Through the Pluto System". NASA. Retrieved August 31, 2015.

Further reading

• Stern, S A and Tholen, D J (1997), Pluto and Charon, University of Arizona Press ISBN 978-0816518401

External links

• Quiz based on the Nova video Chasing Pluto

• New Horizons homepage
• Pluto Profile at NASA's Solar System Exploration site
• NASA Pluto factsheet
• Website of the observatory that discovered Pluto
• Earth telescope image of Pluto system
• Keck infrared with AO of Pluto system
• Gray, Meghan (2009). "Pluto". Sixty Symbols. Brady Haran for the University of Nottingham.
• Video - Pluto - viewed through the years (GIF) (NASA; animation; July 15, 2015).
• Video - Pluto - "FlyThrough" (00:22; MP4) (YouTube) (NASA; animation; August 31, 2015).
• "A Day on Pluto Video made from July 2015 New Horizon Images" Scientific American