Poloidal–toroidal decomposition

In vector calculus, a poloidal–toroidal decomposition is a restricted form of the Helmholtz decomposition that is often used in the spherical-coordinates analysis of solenoidal vector fields, for example, magnetic fields and incompressible fluids.[1] For a three-dimensional F, such that

 \nabla \cdot \mathbf{F} = 0,

can be expressed as the sum of a toroidal and poloidal vector fields:

\mathbf{F} = \mathbf{T} + \mathbf{P} = \nabla \times \Psi \mathbf{r} + \nabla \times (\nabla \times \Phi \mathbf{r}),

where  \mathbf{r} is a radial vector in spherical coordinates  (r,\theta,\phi) , and where  \mathbf{T} is a toroidal field

 \mathbf{T} = \nabla \times \Psi \mathbf{r}

for scalar field  \Psi (r,\theta,\phi),[2] and where  \mathbf{P} is a poloidal field

 \mathbf{P} = \nabla \times \nabla \times \Phi \mathbf{r}

for scalar field  \Phi (r,\theta,\phi).[3] This decomposition is symmetric in that the curl of a toroidal field is poloidal, and the curl of a poloidal field is toroidal.[4] A toroidal vector field is tangential to spheres around the origin

 \mathbf{r} \cdot \mathbf{T} = 0 ,[4]

while the curl of a poloidal field is tangential to those spheres

 \mathbf{r} \cdot (\nabla \times \mathbf{P}) = 0 .[5]

The poloidal–toroidal decomposition is unique if it is required that the average of the scalar fields  \Psi and  \Phi vanishes on every sphere of radius  r .[3]

Cartesian decomposition

A poloidal–toroidal decomposition also exists in Cartesian coordinates, but a mean-field flow has to be included in this case. For example, every solenoidal vector field can be written as

\mathbf{F}(x,y,z) = \nabla \times g(x,y,z) \hat{\mathbf{z}} + \nabla \times (\nabla \times h(x,y,z) \hat{\mathbf{z}}) + b_x(z) \hat{\mathbf{x}} + b_y(z)\hat{\mathbf{y}},

where \hat{\mathbf{x}}, \hat{\mathbf{y}}, \hat{\mathbf{z}} denote the unit vectors in the coordinate directions.[6]

See also

Notes

  1. Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar (1961). Hydrodynamic and hydromagnetic stability. International Series of Monographs on Physics. Oxford: Clarendon. See discussion on page 622.
  2. Backus 1986, p. 87.
  3. 1 2 Backus 1986, p. 88.
  4. 1 2 Backus, Parker & Constable 1996, p. 178.
  5. Backus, Parker & Constable 1996, p. 179.
  6. Jones 2008, p. 62.

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Friday, February 05, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.