Puncoviscana Formation
| Puncoviscana Formation Stratigraphic range: Ediacaran–Cambrian | |
|---|---|
| Type | Formation |
| Underlies | Mesón Group |
| Lithology | |
| Primary | Shale, sandstone, conglomerate, limestone, slate, schist |
| Location | |
| Country | Argentina, Bolivia |
Puncoviscana Formation (Spanish: Formación Puncoviscana) is a formation of sedimentary and metasedimentary rocks Late Ediacaran and Lower Cambrian age the that crop out in the Argentine Northwest. Most of the formation lies in Jujuy, Salta and Tucumán Province albeit some authors extend the formation further south to the Sierras Pampeanas near Córdoba.[1]
There are various tectonic interpretations on the origin and type of sedimentary basin that accumulated Puncoviscana Formations sediments. An early interpretation was that the sediments originated from a passive marginal basin of the ancient continent Gondwana. Others suggested an intra-cratonic rift or aulacogen basin between Río de la Plata-Pampia Craton and Arequipa Massif. Other hypotheses revolved around the idea that the Puncoviscana Formation is related to terrane called Pampia that accreted to Gondwana causing the closure of a sea in the way.[1]
Stratigraphy, lithology and fossils
The formation includes rocks such as shales, sandstones, conglomerates, limestones, slates and schists. Stratigraphically, the upper boundary of the Puncoviscana Formation is the Tilcarian unconformity, which is overlain by Cambrian and Ordovician sedimentary rocks of the Mesón Group that extend across the Argentine Northwest and Bolivia.[1][2][3]
Among the fossils found in the formation are:[1]
- Archaeonassa fossulata
- Asaphoidichnus isp.
- Beltanelloides
- Paliela
- Selkirkia
- Ichnofossils
Tectonic interpretations of the Puncoviscana Basin
The Puncoviscana Basin was the sedimentary basin where the sediments of the Puncosviscana Formation were deposited. There have been differing views among geologists on the tectonic and paleogeographic position of the Puncoviscana Basin in relation to the events of the Pampean orogeny.
- The Pampean orogeny is believed by some geologists to be associated with the accretion of a "Pampia Terrane" to the Río de la Plata Craton, causing in the way the closure of a sea that existed in-between. This closed seabed would have contained the sediments of the Puncoviscana Basin.[4]
- Víctor Ramos proposes instead that the Puncoviscana Basin was a foreland basin located west of a "Pampia block" that collided with Río de la Plata Craton.[4][5]
- Contrasting to this view, Aceñolaza and Toselli contend instead that the Puncuviscana Basin originated from an aulacogen splitting the Arequipa-Antofalla Craton from the Río de la Plata and Guaporé cratons. Following this interpretation the aulacogen would have closed during the Pampean orogeny.[4]
References
- 1 2 3 4 Aceñolaza, Florencio; Guillermo, Aceñolaza (2005). "La formación Puncoviscana y unidades estratigráficas vinculadas en el neoproterozoico - Cámbrico temprano del noroeste argentino" (PDF). Latin American Journal of Sedimentology and Basin Analysis (in Spanish) (Asociación Argentina de Sedimentología) 12 (2): 65–87. Retrieved 7 December 2015.
- ↑ Gaucher, Claudio; Bossi, Jorge; Blanco, Gonzalo (2010). "Paleogeography". In Gaucher, Claudio; Sial, Alcides; Haverson, Galen. Neoproterozoic-cambrian tectonics, global change and evolution: a focus on south western Gondwana. Elsevier. p. 137.
- ↑ Aceñolaza, G.F. (2003). "The Cambrian System in Northwestern Argentina: stratigraphical and palaeontological framework". Geologica Acta 1 (1): 23–39. Retrieved 28 December 2015.
- 1 2 3 Aceñolaza, Florencio G.; Toselli, Alejandro (2010). "The Pampean Orogen: Ediacaran-Lower Cambrian Evolutionary History of Central and Northwest Region of Argentina". In Gaucher, Claudio; Sial, Alcides; Haverson, Galen. Neoproterozoic-cambrian tectonics, global change and evolution: a focus on south western Gondwana. Elsevier. p. 239–254.
- ↑ Ramos, Victor A. (2008). "The Basement of the Central Andes: The Arequipa and Related Terranes" (PDF). Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 36: 289–324. doi:10.1146/annurev.earth.36.031207.124304. Retrieved 15 December 2015.