Qubit

This article is about the quantum computing unit. For other uses, see Qubit (disambiguation).
Unsolved problem in physics:
Is it possible to have three-dimensional, self-correcting, quantum memory?
(more unsolved problems in physics)
Fundamental units
of information

bit (binary)
nat (base e)
ban (decimal)
Qubit (quantum)

In quantum computing, a qubit (/ˈkjuːbɪt/) or quantum bit (sometimes qbit) is a unit of quantum information—the quantum analogue of the classical bit. A qubit is a two-state quantum-mechanical system, such as the polarization of a single photon: here the two states are vertical polarization and horizontal polarization.  In a classical system, a bit would have to be in one state or the other. However quantum mechanics allows the qubit to be in a superposition of both states at the same time, a property which is fundamental to quantum computing.

Origin of the concept and name

The concept of the qubit was unknowingly introduced by Stephen Wiesner in 1983, in his proposal for quantum money, which he had tried to publish for over a decade.[1][2]

The coining of the term "qubit" is attributed to Benjamin Schumacher.[3] In the acknowledgments of his paper, Schumacher states that the term qubit was invented in jest due to its phonological resemblance with an ancient unit of length called cubit, during a conversation with William Wootters. The paper describes a way of compressing states emitted by a quantum source of information so that they require fewer physical resources to store. This procedure is now known as Schumacher compression.

Bit versus qubit

The bit is the basic unit of information. It is used to represent information by computers. Regardless of its physical realization, a bit has two possible states typically thought of as 0 and 1, but more generally—and according to applications—interpretable as true and false, or any other dichotomous choice. An analogy to this is a light switchits off position can be thought of as 0 and its on position as 1.

A qubit has a few similarities to a classical bit, but is overall very different. There are two possible outcomes for the measurement of a qubitusually 0 and 1, like a bit. The difference is that whereas the state of a bit is either 0 or 1, the state of a qubit can also be a superposition of both.[4] It is possible to fully encode one bit in one qubit. However, a qubit can hold even more information, e.g. up to two bits using superdense coding. A complete description of the state of a classical system requires only n bits, in quantum physics, a complete description of the state of a system requires 2n−1 complex numbers.[5]

Representation

The two states in which a qubit may be measured are known as basis states (or basis vectors). As is the tradition with any sort of quantum states, they are represented by Dirac—or "bra–ket"—notation. This means that the two computational basis states are conventionally written as | 0 \rangle and | 1 \rangle (pronounced "ket 0" and "ket 1").

Qubit states

Bloch sphere representation of a qubit. The probability amplitudes in the text are given by  \alpha = \cos\left(\frac{\theta}{2}\right) and  \beta = e^{i \phi}  \sin\left(\frac{\theta}{2}\right) .

A pure qubit state is a linear superposition of the basis states. This means that the qubit can be represented as a linear combination of |0 \rangle and |1 \rangle  :

| \psi \rangle = \alpha |0 \rangle + \beta |1 \rangle,\,

where α and β are probability amplitudes and can in general both be complex numbers.

When we measure this qubit in the standard basis, the probability of outcome |0 \rangle is | \alpha |^2 and the probability of outcome |1 \rangle is | \beta |^2. Because the absolute squares of the amplitudes equate to probabilities, it follows that α and β must be constrained by the equation

| \alpha |^2 + | \beta |^2 = 1 \,

simply because this ensures you must measure either one state or the other (the total probability of all possible outcomes must be 1).

Bloch sphere

The possible states for a single qubit can be visualised using a Bloch sphere (see diagram). Represented on such a sphere, a classical bit could only be at the "North Pole" or the "South Pole", in the locations where |0 \rangle and |1 \rangle are respectively. The rest of the surface of the sphere is inaccessible to a classical bit, but a pure qubit state can be represented by any point on the surface. For example, the pure qubit state {|0 \rangle +i|1 \rangle}\over{\sqrt{2}}  would lie on the equator of the sphere, on the positive y axis.

The surface of the sphere is two-dimensional space, which represents the state space of the pure qubit states. This state space has two local degrees of freedom. It might at first sight seem that there should be four degrees of freedom, as α and β are complex numbers with two degrees of freedom each. However, one degree of freedom is removed by the constraint | \alpha |^2 + | \beta |^2 = 1 \,. Another, the overall phase of the state, has no physically observable consequences, so we can arbitrarily choose α to be real, leaving just two degrees of freedom.

It is possible to put the qubit in a mixed state, a statistical combination of different pure states. Mixed states can be represented by points inside the Bloch sphere. A mixed qubit state has three degrees of freedom: the angles \phi and \theta , as well as the length r of the vector that represents the mixed state.

Operations on pure qubit states

There are various kinds of physical operations that can be performed on pure qubit states.

Entanglement

An important distinguishing feature between a qubit and a classical bit is that multiple qubits can exhibit quantum entanglement. Entanglement is a nonlocal property that allows a set of qubits to express higher correlation than is possible in classical systems. Take, for example, two entangled qubits in the Bell state

\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} (|00\rangle + |11\rangle).

In this state, called an equal superposition, there are equal probabilities of measuring either |00\rangle or |11\rangle, as |1/\sqrt{2}|^2 = 1/2.

Imagine that these two entangled qubits are separated, with one each given to Alice and Bob. Alice makes a measurement of her qubit, obtainingwith equal probabilitieseither |0\rangle or |1\rangle. Because of the qubits' entanglement, Bob must now get exactly the same measurement as Alice; i.e., if she measures a |0\rangle, Bob must measure the same, as |00\rangle is the only state where Alice's qubit is a |0\rangle. Entanglement also allows multiple states (such as the Bell state mentioned above) to be acted on simultaneously, unlike classical bits that can only have one value at a time. Entanglement is a necessary ingredient of any quantum computation that cannot be done efficiently on a classical computer. Many of the successes of quantum computation and communication, such as quantum teleportation and superdense coding, make use of entanglement, suggesting that entanglement is a resource that is unique to quantum computation.

Quantum register

A number of qubits taken together is a qubit register. Quantum computers perform calculations by manipulating qubits within a register. A qubyte (quantum byte) is a collection of eight qubits.[6]

Variations of the qubit

Similar to the qubit, a qutrit is a unit of quantum information in a 3-level quantum system. This is analogous to the unit of classical information trit. The term "qudit" is used to denote a unit of quantum information in a d-level quantum system.

Physical representation

Any two-level system can be used as a qubit. Multilevel systems can be used as well, if they possess two states that can be effectively decoupled from the rest (e.g., ground state and first excited state of a nonlinear oscillator). There are various proposals. Several physical implementations which approximate two-level systems to various degrees were successfully realized. Similarly to a classical bit where the state of a transistor in a processor, the magnetization of a surface in a hard disk and the presence of current in a cable can all be used to represent bits in the same computer, an eventual quantum computer is likely to use various combinations of qubits in its design.

The following is an incomplete list of physical implementations of qubits, and the choices of basis are by convention only.

Physical support Name Information support |0 \rangle |1 \rangle
Photon Polarization encoding Polarization of light Horizontal Vertical
Number of photons Fock state Vacuum Single photon state
Time-bin encoding Time of arrival Early Late
Coherent state of light Squeezed light Quadrature Amplitude-squeezed state Phase-squeezed state
Electrons Electronic spin Spin Up Down
Electron number Charge No electron One electron
Nucleus Nuclear spin addressed through NMR Spin Up Down
Optical lattices Atomic spin Spin Up Down
Josephson junction Superconducting charge qubit Charge Uncharged superconducting island (Q=0) Charged superconducting island (Q=2e, one extra Cooper pair)
Superconducting flux qubit Current Clockwise current Counterclockwise current
Superconducting phase qubit Energy Ground state First excited state
Singly charged quantum dot pair Electron localization Charge Electron on left dot Electron on right dot
Quantum dot Dot spin Spin Down Up

Qubit storage

In a paper entitled: "Solid-state quantum memory using the 31P nuclear spin", published in the October 23, 2008 issue of the journal Nature,[7] a team of scientists from the U.K. and U.S. reported the first relatively long (1.75 seconds) and coherent transfer of a superposition state in an electron spin "processing" qubit to a nuclear spin "memory" qubit. This event can be considered the first relatively consistent quantum data storage, a vital step towards the development of quantum computing. Recently, a modification of similar systems (using charged rather than neutral donors) has dramatically extended this time, to 3 hours at very low temperatures and 39 minutes at room temperature.[8]

See also

References

  1. S. Weisner (1983). "Conjugate coding". Association for Computing Machinery, Special Interest Group in Algorithms and Computation Theory 15: 78–88.
  2. A. Zelinger, Dance of the Photons: From Einstein to Quantum Teleportation, Farrar, Straus & Giroux, New York, 2010, pp. 189, 192, ISBN 0374239665
  3. B. Schumacher (1995). "Quantum coding". Physical Review A 51 (4): 2738–2747. Bibcode:1995PhRvA..51.2738S. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.51.2738.
  4. Nielsen, Michael A.; Chuang, Isaac L. (2010). Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press. p. 13. ISBN 978-1-107-00217-3.
  5. Shor, Peter (1996). "Polynomial-Time Algorithms for Prime Factorization and Discrete Logarithms on a Quantum Computer∗". arXiv. Retrieved 4/15/2016. Check date values in: |access-date= (help)
  6. R. Tanburn; E. Okada; N. S. Dattani (2015). "Reducing multi-qubit interactions in adiabatic quantum computation without adding auxiliary qubits. Part 1: The "deduc-reduc" method and its application to quantum factorization of numbers".
  7. J. J. L. Morton; et al. (2008). "Solid-state quantum memory using the 31P nuclear spin". Nature 455 (7216): 1085–1088. arXiv:0803.2021. Bibcode:2008Natur.455.1085M. doi:10.1038/nature07295.
  8. Kamyar Saeedi; et al. (2013). "Room-Temperature Quantum Bit Storage Exceeding 39 Minutes Using Ionized Donors in Silicon-28". Science 342 (6160): 830–833. Bibcode:2013Sci...342..830S. doi:10.1126/science.1239584.

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Tuesday, April 26, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.