Quills

This article is about the film. For the writing utensils, see Quill. For other uses, see Quill (disambiguation).
Quills

Theatrical release poster
Directed by Philip Kaufman
Produced by
Written by Doug Wright
Starring
Music by Stephen Warbeck
Cinematography Rogier Stoffers
Edited by Peter Boyle
Production
company
  • Industry Entertainment
  • Walrus & Associates
Distributed by Fox Searchlight Pictures
Release dates
  • 2 September 2000 (2000-09-02) (Telluride)
  • 22 November 2000 (2000-11-22) (United States)
  • 15 December 2000 (2000-12-15) (United Kingdom)
  • 10 February 2001 (2001-02-10) (BIFF)
  • 8 March 2001 (2001-03-08) (Germany)
Running time
 124 minutes[1]
Country
  • United States
  • United Kingdom
  • Germany
Language
  • English
  • Latin
Budget $13.5 million[2]
Box office $18 million[3]

Quills is a 2000 period film directed by Philip Kaufman and adapted from the Obie award-winning play by Doug Wright, who also wrote the original screenplay.[4] Inspired by the life and work of the Marquis de Sade, Quills re-imagines the last years of the Marquis' incarceration in the insane asylum at Charenton. It stars Geoffrey Rush as the Marquis de Sade, Joaquin Phoenix as the Abbé du Coulmier, Michael Caine as Dr. Royer-Collard, and Kate Winslet as laundress Madeleine "Maddie" LeClerc.

Well received by critics, Quills garnered numerous accolades for Rush, including nominations for an Oscar, BAFTA and a Golden Globe. The film was a modest art house success, averaging $27,709 per screen its debut weekend, and eventually grossing $17,989,277 internationally. Cited by historians as factually inaccurate, Quills filmmakers and writers said they were not making a biography of de Sade, but exploring issues such as censorship, pornography, sex, art, mental illness, and religion. It was released with an R rating from the Motion Picture Association of America and an 18 rating from the British Board of Film Classification due to "strong horror, violence, sex, sexual violence, and nudity".[5][1]

Plot

Quills begins in Paris during the Reign of Terror, with the incarcerated Marquis de Sade penning a story about the libidinous Mademoiselle Renard, a ravishing young aristocrat who meets the preeminent sadist in her executioner.

Several years later, the Marquis is confined to the asylum for the insane at Charenton, overseen by the enlightened Abbé du Coulmier. The Marquis has been publishing his work through laundress Madeleine "Maddy" LeClerc, who smuggles manuscripts through an anonymous horseman to a publisher. The Marquis' latest work, Justine, is published on the black market to great success. Emperor Napoléon I Bonaparte orders all copies of the book to be torched and the author shot, but his advisor, Delbené, tempers this contentious idea with one of his own: send alienist Dr. Royer-Collard to assess Charenton and silence the Marquis. Meanwhile, the Abbé teaches Madeleine to read and write and resists his growing attraction to her. Madeleine reads the Marquis de Sade's stories to her fellow workers. Whilst Madeleine is fascinated by the Marquis de Sade she remains reluctant to give into his advances. The Abbé and Marquis converse on the Marquis' inappropriate advances on young women.

Dr. Royer-Collard arrives, informing the Abbé that the Marquis' "therapeutic writings" have been distributed for public consumption. He presents the Abbé with the ultimatum of silencing the Marquis or Charenton will be shut down by order of the Emperor. The Abbé rejects Royer-Collard's offers of several aggressive archaic "treatments" and asks to speak with the Marquis himself, who promptly swears obedience (winking at Madeleine through a peephole). Royer-Collard takes his leave for the time being and travels to the Panthemont Convent in Paris to retrieve his promised bride, the underage orphan Simone. They are given a run-down chateau by the Emperor, with a handsome young architect, Prouix, on hand for its renovation.

The hasty marriage incites much gossip at the asylum, prompting the Marquis to write a farce to be performed at a public exhibition, which Dr Royer-Collard and his young wife attend. The audacious play, titled "The Crimes of Love", is interrupted when the inmate Bouchon molests Madeleine off-stage, prompting her to hit him in the face with an iron. The Abbé is seen publicly comforting Madeleine. Royer-Collard shuts down the public theater and demands that the Abbé do more to control the Marquis, or he will inform the ministry that the inmates are running the asylum. Infuriated, the Abbé confiscates the Marquis' quills and ink. The Marquis's wife visits him and he takes out his frustration at not being able to write on her; she retaliates by asking a surprised Dr Royer-Collard that the Marquis is entombed forever. They discuss that the ill-gotten gains from the Marquis's books could be used to effect his salvation, in other words, provide forms of restraint. The lack of writing implements results in more subversive behaviour from the Marquis, including a story written in wine on bedsheets and in blood on clothing. This results in further deprivation, eventually leaving the Marquis naked in an empty cell. Charlotte, one of the maids reveals that Madeleine has been helping the Marquis. Madeleine is whipped on the order of Dr. Royer-Collard until the Abbé stops him by offering himself instead and declaring that she will be sent away. That night she visits his chamber to beg him to reconsider sending her away and confesses her love for him in the process, prompting him to kiss her passionately. They abruptly break away at the realization of what they are doing. Madeleine runs off and Charlotte catches the Abbé calling after her.

Meanwhile, Royer-Collard violently raped Simone on their wedding night, and continues to keep her as a virtual prisoner. She purchases a copy of Justine, seduces Prioux, and the young lovers run off to England together. She leaves behind a letter explaining her actions and her copy of Justine. Upon finding this, Royer-Collard seizes on the Marquis as the source of his troubles and embarks upon a quest for revenge, by having him tortured.

About to be sent away from Charenton for her role in assisting the Marquis, Madeleine begs a last story from him, which is to be relayed to her through the asylum patients. Bouchon, the inmate at the end of the relay, is excited by the story, breaks out of his cell, and attacks Madeleine. Royer-Collard hears Madeleine's screams but chooses to ignore them and she is killed by Bouchon. The asylum is set afire by the pyromaniac Dauphin and the inmates break out of their cells.

Madeleine's body is found by her blind mother and the Abbé in the laundry vat. The Abbé is devastated by Madeleine's death and Bouchon is captured and imprisoned inside an iron dummy. The Abbé blames the Marquis for Madeleine's death and prods him into a fury. The Marquis claims he had been with Madeleine in every way imaginable, only to be told she had died a virgin. The Abbé has the Marquis' tongue cut out as punishment for his involvement, but is riddled with remorse and physically punishes himself. The Abbé then has a dream in which Madeleine comes alive and they have sex, but ultimately it ends with him holding her corpse. The Marquis' health declines severely, but he remains perverse as ever, decorating his dungeon with a story, using faeces as ink. As the Marquis lays dying, the Abbé reads him the last rites and offers him a crucifix to kiss. The Marquis defiantly swallows the crucifix and chokes to death on it.

A year later, the new Abbé arrives at Charenton and is given the grand tour by Royer-Collard. During the tour they meet the maid Charlotte and through the exchange between herself and Royer-Collard it is apparent that there is a connection. The asylum has been converted into a print shop, with the inmates as its staff. The books being printed are the works of the Marquis de Sade. At the end of the tour, the new Abbé meets his predecessor, who resides in the Marquis' old cell. Yearning to write, he begs paper and a quill from the new Abbé, and tries to strangle Royer-Collard when he ventures to close the peephole. The Abbé is herded off by Royer-Collard before he can hear anymore from his predecessor. However, the peephole opens, and Madeleine's mother thrusts paper, quill, and ink through. The Abbé begins to scribble furiously, with the Marquis providing the narration.

Cast

Production

Filming

The interior set of the Charenton (asylum) in Quills was built at Pinewood Studios, where most of the filming took place. Oxfordshire, Bedfordshire, and London stood in for the exterior shots of early 19th century France.[10] Oscar-winning production designer Martin Childs (Shakespeare in Love) imagined the primary location of Charenton as an airy, though circuitous place, darkening as Royer-Collard takes over operations. The screenplay specifies the way the inmates' rooms link together, which plays a key role in the relay of the Marquis' climactic story to Madeleine.[11] Screenwriter/playwright Doug Wright was a constant presence on set, assisting the actors and producers in interpreting the script and bringing his vision to life.[12]

Costumes

Oscar-nominated costume designer Jacqueline West created the intricate period costumes, using each character as inspiration. West previously worked with director Philip Kaufman on his crime drama Rising Sun. For Joaquin Phoenix's Abbé, costumers designed special "pleather" clogs to accommodate the actor's veganism. In one scene, Rush's Marquis de Sade wears a suit decorated in bloody script, which West described as "challenging" to make. It features actual writings of de Sade and costumers planned exactly where each sentence should go on the fabric. Before production began, West gave Winslet a copy of French painter Léopold Boilly's "Woman Ironing" to give her a feel for the character, which Winslet said greatly influenced her performance.[13]

Casting

Casting directors Donna Isaacson and Priscilla John recruited a number of actors from a disabled actor's company to play the parts of many of the inmates at Charenton.[12]

Music

The Quills soundtrack was released by RCA Victor on 21 November 2000 featuring the music of Oscar-winning composer Stephen Warbeck (Shakespeare in Love).[14] Featuring experimental instrumentation on such instruments as the serpent, shawm, and bucket,[15] most reviewers were intrigued by the unconventional and thematic score. Cinemusic.net reviewer Ryan Keaveney called the album a "macabre masterpiece," with an "addicting and mesmerizing" sound.[16] Urban Cinephile contributor Brad Green described the album as a "hedonistic pleasure" that "captures the spirit of an incorrigible, perverse genius."[15] Soundtrack.net's Glenn McClanan disliked the "lack of unifying unified themes and motifs" that may have served each individual scene, but made the film feel "incoherent."[17]

Au Clair de la Lune

Though not included on the soundtrack, the opening notes of "Au Clair de la Lune", a traditional French children's song, recur throughout the film, usually hummed by the Marquis. The song is originally sung by John Hamway during the opening scene of a beheading which was filmed in Oxford. The English translation provides some illumination as to its selection as a theme for the Marquis:
Au Clair de la Lune
The opening notes to the traditional French children's song "Au Clair de la Lune"
Problems playing this file? See media help.

By the light of the moon,
My friend Pierrot,
Lend me your quill,
To write a word.
My candle is dead,
I have no more fire.
Open your door for me
For the love of God.

By the light of the moon,
Pierrot replied:
"I don't have any pens,
I am in my bed
Go to the neighbor's,
I think she's there
Because in her kitchen
Someone is lighting the fire"

By the light of the moon
Likeable Lubin
Knock's on the brunette's door.
She suddenly responds:
- Who's knocking like that?
He then replies:
- Open your door
For the God of Love!

By the light of the moon
One could barely see
The pen was looked for,
The light was looked for.
With all that looking
I don't know what was found,
But I do know that the door
Shut itself on them.

Track listing
  1. "The Marquis and the Scaffold" – 3:08
  2. "The Abbe and Madeleine" – 2:19
  3. "The Convent" – 2:22
  4. "Plans for a Burial" – 1:18
  5. "Dream of Madeleine" – 4:42
  6. "Royer-Collard and Bouchon" – 4:15
  7. "Aphrodisiac" – 2:59
  8. "The Last Story" – 7:35
  9. "The Marquis' Cell at Charenton" – 4:38
  10. "The End: A New Manuscript" – 7:32
  11. "The Printing Press" – 2:22

Release

Box office

Distributed by Fox Searchlight Pictures in 2000, Quills premiered in the United States at the Telluride Film Festival on 2 September 2000. It was given a limited release on 22 November 2000, with a wider release following on 15 December 2000. The film earned $249,383 its opening weekend in nine theaters, totaling $7,065,332 domestically and $10,923,895 internationally, for a total of $17,989,227.[3]

Home media

Quills was released on NTSC VHS and Region 1 DVD on 8 May 2001, with PAL VHS and Region 2 DVD to follow on 29 October 2001. The DVD contains a feature-long commentary track by screenwriter/playwright Doug Wright and three featurettes: "Marquis on Marquee," "Creating Charenton," and "Dressing the Part." Also included are the theatrical trailer, a television spot, a photo gallery, a music promotional spot, and a feature called "Fact & Film: Historical and Production Information."

Reaction

Critical reception

Reviews were generally positive, with a 75% "fresh" rating at the review aggregate site Rotten Tomatoes and an average score of 70/100 at Metacritic.[18][19]

Elvis Mitchell of The New York Times complimented the "euphoric stylishness" of Kaufman's direction and Geoffrey Rush's "gleeful...flamboyant" performance.[20] Peter Travers for Rolling Stone wrote about the "exceptional" actors, particularly Geoffrey Rush's "scandalously good" performance as the Marquis, populating a film that is "literate, erotic, and spoiling to be heard."[21] Stephanie Zacharek of Salon.com enthused over the "delectable and ultimately terrifying fantasy" of Quills, with Rush as "sun king," enriched by a "luminous" supporting cast.[22]

In December 2000, film critic Roger Ebert wrote an article on Quills in which he rated it 4.5 stars out of 5 and stated, "The message of "Quills" is perhaps that we are all expressions of our natures, and to live most successfully we must understand that."[23]

The film was not without its detractors, including Richard Schickel of Time magazine, who decried director Philip Kaufman's approach as "brutally horrific, vulgarly unamusing," creating a film that succeeds only as "soft-gore porn."[24] Kenneth Turan of the Los Angeles Times dismissed the film as an "overripe contrivance masquerading as high art",[25] while de Sade biographer Neil Schaeffer in The Guardian criticized the film for historical inaccuracies and for simplifying de Sade's complex life (see below).[26]

Accolades

Quills received three Oscar nominations at the 73rd Annual Academy Awards for Actor in a Leading Role (Geoffrey Rush, previous winner for the 1996 movie Shine), Art Direction (Art: Martin Childs, Sets: Jill Quertier), and Costume Design (Jacqueline West).[27] The film was also nominated by the Hollywood Foreign Press, organizers of the Golden Globes, for Best Actor in a Drama (Geoffrey Rush) and Best Screenplay (Douglas Wright).[28] The National Board of Review selected Quills as its Best Film of 2000.[29]

Historical inaccuracy

Neil Schaeffer, whose The Marquis de Sade: A Life[30] was used by Director Philip Kaufman as reference,[5] in a review published in The Guardian, criticized the film for historical inaccuracies and for simplifying de Sade's complex life.[26]

Schaeffer especially criticized the depiction of the de Sade as a "martyr to the oppression and censorship of church and state" and the films' sacrificing facts "to a surreal and didactic conclusion that has no connection with the truth, and is probably overwrought even as a twist of a fictional plot", namely that "the seemingly good people are all bad underneath, are all hypocrites, while the seemingly bad person, de Sade, probably has some redeeming qualities".[26]

Schaeffer detailed a number of disparities between fact and film:

Schaeffer relates that de Sade's initial incarceration "had nothing to do with his writing" but with sexual scandals involving servants, prostitutes and his sister-in-law. He also criticized the opening scene's implication that the reign of terror caused the "sanguinary streak" of de Sade's writing, when "his bloodiest and best work, 120 Days of Sodom, was written in the Bastille - obviously before the revolution" and not at Charenton, as suggested by the film. In contrast to the film, the historical de Sade was "not at the height of his literary career nor of his literary powers" while at Charenton, nor did he cut the "tall, trim figure of the Australian actor Geoffrey Rush" but was of middling height and, at the time, of a "considerable, even a grotesque, obesity".[26]

The manuscripts smuggled out of the asylum were not the novel Justine, which features prominently in the film but was published thirteen years before de Sade's incarceration at the asylum. De Sade's smuggled works were not particularly outrageous, mostly consisting of conventional novels and a number of plays he worked on throughout his life in hopes of having them performed. Most of these were soundly rejected by publishers. De Sade was, in fact, involved in the theater productions at Charenton, though none like the play featured in Quills. The plays performed were popular, conventional Parisian dramas.[31] The government shut the Charenton theater down on 6 May 1813, years before the real Dr. Royer-Collard had any influence at Charenton.[26][32]

Schaeffer criticized also the film's treatment of de Sade's personal relations regarding his wife (who had formally separated from him after the revolution), the chambermaid (who did not serve as a liaison to a publisher but with whom he had a sexual relationship from her early teens until shortly before his death) and his "companion of many years", who had a room at Charenton (and actually smuggled out the manuscripts) but is ignored by the film. Furthermore, "De Sade's hideous death in the movie is nothing like the truth, for he died in his sleep, in his 74th year, as peacefully as any good Christian".[26][32]

Schaeffer argues that the main point of de Sade's life and writing was not, "as movie-makers and reviewers alike seem to think [...] to oppose censorship" but "to push the limits - sexual, spiritual, and political - as a means of feeling out the limits of his times and of his own mind." Schaeffer criticized that the film "simplifies de Sade into a modern "victim" and over-emphasises his potential as a focus for liberal-political meanings when, in fact, his life and perhaps his literary intentions - if you think of him as a satirist - can be seen as an object lesson, warning against the excesses of cultural relativism and nihilism; a very modern lesson, it would seem."[26]

Schaeffer advised the viewer to distinguish between de Sade and the protagonist of the film: "To see if Quills is valid in its own terms, let the viewer imagine it is about someone else, let us say the Marquis de Newcastle, and that the scene is Bedlam and then see if the movie makes any sense."[26]

However, copyright issues could be considered to be a partial reason to at least one aspect of the historical inaccuracies in Quills. According to Kaufman, Doug Wright did not have the rights to the original translations and therefore had to create and write the passages of de Sade's work that are included in the original play and the film. He applied the vocabulary used in the translations to the passages to imitate de Sade's style but the archaic language comes across as funny to a modern viewer whereas in the 1700s, as stated by Kaufman, these words were "incendiary". [5]

References

  1. 1 2 "QUILLS (18)". British Board of Film Classification. 2000-10-19. Retrieved 2012-09-27.
  2. ↑ "Quills (2000) - Box office / business". Amazon.com. Internet Movie Database. 2001-05-18. Retrieved 2012-09-27.
  3. 1 2 "Box Office Mojo listing for Quills". Box Office Mojo Quills Listing. Retrieved 2007-03-18.
  4. ↑ Sanello 2002, p. 132
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 Lemons, Steven (2000-11-30). "A Conversation with Philip Kaufman". Salon.com. Retrieved 2016-02-18.
  6. ↑ Sragow, Michael (2000-11-30). "A demented peacock". Salon.com. Retrieved 2016-02-16.
  7. ↑ Thomas, Rebecca (2000-12-28). "Quills Ruffling Feathers". BBC News Online. Retrieved 2007-03-27.
  8. ↑ Fleming, Michael (1999-04-16). "Winslet, Rush eye Quills". Variety. Retrieved 2007-03-27.
  9. ↑ "News You're Not Supposed to Know (October): Phoenix Rising". Premiere Magazine: Short Takes. Archived from the original on 2000-10-19. Retrieved 2007-03-21.
  10. ↑ "MovieLocations.com Listing for Quills'". MovieLocations.com Guide to Movie Locations. Archived from the original on 2006-11-17. Retrieved 2016-02-16.
  11. ↑ Childs, Martin (Production Designer) (2000). Quills: Creating Charenton (DVD). 20th Century Fox.
  12. 1 2 Wright, Doug (Screenwriter, Playwright), Kaufman, Philip (Director), Winslet, Kate (Actor), Phoenix, Joaquin (Actor) (200). Quills: Marquis on the Marquee (DVD). 20th Century Fox.
  13. ↑ Kaufman, Philip (Director), Winslet, Kate (Actor), Phoenix, Joaquin (Actor), Caine, Michael (Actor) (2000). Quills: Dressing the Part (DVD). 20th Century Fox.
  14. ↑ "Quills Music from the Original Soundtrack". Game-Ost. Retrieved 2016-02-16.
  15. 1 2 "Urban Cinephile review of the Quills soundtrack". Urban Cinephile Soundtrack Reviews. Retrieved 2007-03-21.
  16. ↑ "Cinemusic.net archived review of the Quills soundtrack". Cinemusic.net Reviews. Archived from the original on 2005-09-01. Retrieved 2007-03-22.
  17. ↑ "Soundtrack.net review of Quills". Soundtrack.net Soundtrack Reviews. Retrieved 2016-02-16.
  18. ↑ "Quills". Rotten Tomatoes. Retrieved 13 February 2011.
  19. ↑ "Quills Reviews, Ratings, Credits, and More at Metacritic". Metacritic. Retrieved 13 February 2011.
  20. ↑ Mitchell, Elvis (2000-11-22). "'Quills': Torturing Everybody, and Loving It". New York Times. Archived from the original on 22 October 2007. Retrieved 2007-03-18.
  21. ↑ Travers, Peter (2000-12-10). "Quills". Rolling Stone Magazine. Retrieved 2011-03-10.
  22. ↑ Zacharek, Stephanie (2000-11-22). "Quills". Salon.com. Retrieved 2016-02-16.
  23. ↑ Ebert, Roger (2000-12-15). "Quills". rogerebert.com. Retrieved 2016-02-18.
  24. ↑ Schickel, Richard (2000-11-27). "Soft Gore Porn". Time Magazine. Archived from the original on 2001-02-11. Retrieved 2007-03-18.
  25. ↑ Turan, Kenneth (2000-11-22). ""Quills" Pushes Well Past the Point of Discomfort". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on 15 May 2006. Retrieved 2007-03-18.
  26. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Schaeffer, Neil (2001-01-13). "Perverting de Sade". The Guardian. Retrieved 2007-04-01.
  27. ↑ "Academy Awards listing for Quills". Academy Awards Database. Retrieved 2007-03-18.
  28. ↑ "HFPA listing for Quills". Hollywood Foreign Press Association Database. Retrieved 2007-03-18.
  29. ↑ "Quills wins top prize from National Board of Review". The Guardian. Retrieved 2016-02-16.
  30. ↑ "The Marquis de Sade: Timeline (1804–1814)". Neil Schaeffer's Life and Times of the Marquis de Sade. Retrieved 2007-04-03.
  31. ↑ These productions were also the inspiration for the 1963 play and 1967 film Marat/Sade. "MGM.com's Official Marat/Sade Synopsis". MGM Vault. Retrieved 2007-04-10.
  32. 1 2 "The Marquis de Sade: Timeline (1804–1814)". Neil Schaeffer's Life and Times of the Marquis de Sade. Retrieved 2007-04-03.

Bibliography

External links

Wikiquote has quotations related to: Quills
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Friday, February 19, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.