Recognition of same-sex unions in Oceania
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2b12d/2b12d8bde091c58026fc39f396a82d33988f31db" alt=""
Oceania
Same-sex marriage
Other type of partnership (or unregistered cohabitation)
No recognition
Same-sex sexual activity illegal
Debate has occurred throughout Oceania over proposals to legalize same-sex marriage as well as civil unions.
Currently two countries and seven dependent territories in Oceania recognize some type of same-sex unions. One Oceanian country, New Zealand,[nb 1] and seven territories, namely French Polynesia, Guam, New Caledonia, the Northern Mariana Islands, the Pitcairn Islands and Wallis and Futuna allow same-sex couples to legally marry. One country, Australia, recognizes unregistered cohabitation as well as six of its jurisdictions having some form of civil unions. Additionally, as a territory of Chile, Easter Island performs civil unions.
Current situation
National level
Status | Country | Legal since | Country population (Last Census count) |
---|---|---|---|
Marriage (1 country) |
![]() |
2013[1] | 4,242,048 |
Subtotal | — | — | 4,242,048 (12.7% of the Oceanian population) |
Unregistered cohabitation (1 country) |
![]() |
2009[2][3] | 21,507,717 |
Subtotal | — | — | 21,507,717 (64.8% of the Oceanian population) |
Total | — | — | 25,749,765 (77.5% of the Oceanian population) |
No recognition ( 11 countries) | |||
![]() |
— | 135,869 | |
![]() |
— | 856,346 | |
![]() |
— | 96,335 | |
![]() |
— | 73,630 | |
![]() |
— | 12,329 | |
![]() |
— | 5,172,033 | |
![]() |
— | 179,000 | |
![]() |
— | 494,786 | |
![]() |
— | 106,137 | |
![]() |
— | 11,146 | |
![]() |
— | 240,000 | |
Subtotal | — | — | 7,377,611 (22.4% of the Oceanian population) |
Constitutional ban on marriage ( 1 country) |
![]() |
2008[4][5] | 19,409 |
Subtotal | — | — | 7,397,020 (0.1% of the Oceanian population) |
Total | — | — | 7,397,020 (22.5% of the Oceanian population) |
Sub-national level
Status | Country | Jurisdiction | Legal since |
---|---|---|---|
Marriage (7 jurisdictions) | |||
![]() |
2013[6] | ||
![]() |
2015[7] | ||
![]() |
Varies | ||
Other type of partnership (7 jurisdictions) | |||
![]() |
|
Varies | |
![]() |
2015 | ||
No recognition (3 jurisdictions) | |||
![]() |
— | ||
Legality of recognition ambiguous or unknown (1 jurisdiction) | |||
![]() |
— |
See also
Notes
- ↑ Excluding Tokelau, Niue and the Cook Islands.
References
- ↑ Marriage (Definition of Marriage) Amendment Act 2013
- ↑ Same-Sex Relationships (Equal Treatment in Commonwealth Laws—Superannuation) Act 2008
- ↑ Same-Sex Relationships (Equal Treatment in Commonwealth Laws—General Law Reform) Act 2008
- ↑ Constitutional proposal 2-274: Marriages between men and women only
- ↑ The Rights and Liberties of the Palau Constitution by Kevin Bennardo
- ↑ (French) LOI n° 2013-404 du 17 mai 2013 ouvrant le mariage aux couples de personnes de même sexe
- ↑ Same Sex Marriage and Civil Partnership Ordinance 2015
- ↑ Chief Judge Frances M. Tydingco-Gatewood, District Court of Guam, Order and Opinion Re: Motion for Summary Judgement, Aguero v. Calvo Case 1:15-cv-00009, 8 June 2015
- ↑ Hawaii Marriage Equality Act of 2013
- ↑ De La Torre, Ferdie (June 30, 2015). "AG says they will be working with Inos admin in drafting regs". Saipan Tribune. Retrieved June 30, 2015.
- ↑ Civil Unions Act 2012
- ↑ RELATIONSHIPS REGISTER ACT 2010
- ↑ RELATIONSHIPS ACT 2011
- ↑ Statutes Amendment (Domestic Partners) Act 2006
- ↑ Statutes Amendment (Domestic Partners) Act (Commencement) Proclamation 2007
- ↑ RELATIONSHIPS ACT 2003
- ↑ PROCLAMATION UNDER THE RELATIONSHIPS ACT 2003 (S.R. 2003, NO. 174)
- ↑ RELATIONSHIPS ACT 2008 (NO. 12 OF 2008)
- ↑ Gonzales-Pagan, Omar. "No Same-Sex Couple Left Behind: SCOTUS Ruling for the Freedom to Marry Would Apply with Equal Force to U.S. Territories". Lambda Legal. Retrieved 1 July 2015.
- ↑ "American Samoa is lone US territory questioning gay marriage validity; no licenses sought". U.S. News and World Report. 10 July 2015. Retrieved 10 July 2015.
- ↑ "Same-sex marriage: American Samoa may be the only territory in the US where the historic Supreme Court ruling does not apply". The Independent. 10 July 2015. Retrieved 10 July 2015.
|
|
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Monday, August 03, 2015. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.