Swedish general election, March–April 1887
 |
| This article is part of a series on the politics and government of Sweden |
|
| Foreign relations |
|
Related topics |
|
Politics portal |
Early general elections were held in Sweden in March and April 1887, having not been due until the autumn.[1] They had been called following a debate over rye tariffs, and became known as the "tariff election".[1]
Background
Tariffs had become a major political issue in Sweden during the mid-1880s. In 1885 a campaign for tariffs to be introduced on grain was rejected by both chambers of the Riksdag. The following year the issue was debated again, and whilst the Second Chamber approved their introduction, the First Chamber rejected them. The matter was settled when a joint sitting of the two chambers rejected the initiative.[1]
In 1887 a tariff on rye was voted down 70–68 in the First Chamber, which went onto vote down all other tariffs.[1] The Second Chamber then approved the rye tariff by 111–101. With it looking as if the tariff proposal would be passed at a joint sitting, King Oscar II dissolved Parliament with the support of Prime Minister Robert Themptander, and called fresh elections.[1]
Results
An intensive election campaign led to a large increase in voter turnout; since the changes to the electoral system in 1866 turnout had always been below 25%, but for this election it was 48%.[1] Only 21.9% of the male population aged over 21 was eligible to vote.[2]
| Bloc | Votes | % | Seats |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free traders | 76,025 | 58.6 | 102 |
| Protectionists | 53,692 | 41.4 | 112 |
| Invalid/blank votes | – | – | |
| Total | 129,717 | 100 | 221 |
| Registered voters/turnout | 274,733 | – | |
| Source: Mackie & Rose[3] | |||
Aftermath
Following the spring elections, some MPs attempted to delay a decision on tariffs by proposing that a commission of inquiry be set up. Although this was supported by Themptander, Parliament rejected the idea.[1]
Despite the Spring elections, the scheduled August and September elections still went ahead, resulting in another victory for the free trade bloc, albeit with a reduced majority.[1]
References
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
