Test method

A test method is a method for a test in science or engineering, such as a physical test, chemical test, or statistical test. It is a definitive procedure that produces a test result.^[1]

A test can be considered a technical operation or procedure that consists of determination of one or more characteristics of a given product, process or service according to a specified procedure.^[2] Often a test is part of an experiment.

The test result can be qualitative (yes/no), categorical, or quantitative (a measured value). It can be a personal observation or the output of a precision measuring instrument.

Usually the test result is the dependent variable, the measured response based on the particular conditions of the test or the level of the independent variable. Some tests, however, may involve changing the independent variable to determine the level at which a certain response occurs: in this case, the test result is the independent variable.

Importance of test methods

In software development, engineering, science, manufacturing, and business, it is vital for all interested people to understand and agree upon methods of obtaining data and making measurements. It is common for a physical property to be strongly affected by the precise method of testing or measuring that property. It is vital to fully document experiments and measurements and to provide needed definitions to specifications and contracts.

Using a standard test method, perhaps published by a respected standards organization, is a good place to start. Sometimes it is more useful to modify an existing test method or to develop a new one. Again, documentation and full disclosure are very necessary.

A well-written test method is important. However, even more important is choosing a method of measuring the correct property or characteristic. Not all tests and measurements are equally useful: usually a test result is used to predict or imply suitability for a certain purpose. For example, if a manufactured item has several components, test methods may have several levels of connections:

test results of a raw material should connect with tests of a component made from that material
test results of a component should connect with performance testing of a complete item
results of laboratory performance testing should connect with field performance

These connections or correlations may be based on published literature, engineering studies, or formal programs such as quality function deployment. Validation of the suitability of the test method is often required.

Content of a test method

Quality management systems usually require full documentation of the procedures used in a test. The document for a test method might include:

Descriptive title
Scope over which class(es) of materials or articles may be evaluated
Date of last effective revision and revision designation
Reference to most recent test method validation
Person, office, or agency responsible for questions on the test method, updates, and deviations.
The significance or importance of the test method and its intended use.
Terminology and definitions to clarify the meanings of the test method
A listing of the types of apparatus and measuring instrument (sometimes the specific device) required to conduct the test
Safety precautions
Required calibrations and metrology systems
Environmental concerns and considerations
Sampling procedures: How samples are to be obtained, and Number of samples (sample size).
Conditioning or required environmental chamber: temperature, humidity, etc., including tolerances
Preparation of samples for the test and test fixtures
Detailed procedure for conducting the test
Calculations and analysis of data
Interpretation of data and test method output
Report: format, content, data, etc.

Test Method Validation

Test methods are often scrutinized for their validity, applicability, and accuracy. It is very important that the scope of the test method be clearly defined, and any aspect included in the scope is shown to be accurate and repeatable through validation.

Test method validations often encompass the following considerations:

Accuracy and precision: Demonstration of accuracy may require the creation of a reference value if none is yet available.
Repeatability and Reproducibility, sometimes in the form of a Gauge R&R.
Range, or a continuum scale over which the test method would be considered accurate. Example: 10 N to 100 N force test.
Measurement resolution, be it spatial, temporal, or otherwise.
Curve fitting, typically for linearity, which justifies interpolation between calibrated reference points.
Robustness, or the insensitivity to potentially subtle variables in the test environment or setup which may be difficult to control.
Usefulness to predict end-use characteristics and performance
Measurement uncertainty
Interlaboratory or round robin tests
other types of measurement systems analysis

References

↑ Form and Style Manual, ASTM, http://www.astm.org/COMMIT/Blue_Book.pdf, 2009
↑ ASTM E 1301, Standard Guide for Proficiency Testing by Interlaboratory Comparisons

General references, Books

Pyzdek, T, "Quality Engineering Handbook", 2003, ISBN 0-8247-4614-7
Godfrey, A. B., "Juran's Quality Handbook", 1999, ISBN 007034003X
Kimothi, S. K., "The Uncertainty of Measurements: Physical and Chemical Metrology: Impact and Analysis", 2002, ISBN 0-87389-535-5

Standards

ASTM D4356 Standard Practice for Establishing Consistent Test Method Tolerances
ASTM E691 Standard Practice for Conducting an Interlaboratory Study to Determine the Precision of a Test Method
ASTM E1169 Standard Guide for Conducting Ruggedness Tests
ASTM E1488 Standard Guide for Statistical Procedures to Use in Developing and Applying Test Methods
ASTM E2655 - Standard Guide for Reporting Uncertainty of Test Results and Use of the Term Measurement Uncertainty in ASTM Test Methods

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Monday, March 28, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.