Vladimir Tsyganko

Vladimir Vladimirovich Tsyganko (Russian: Владимир Владимирович Цыганко; Romanian: Vladimir Vladimirovici Țîganco; also Țâganco, Tziganco, Tziganko or Țiganco; 1887 – 1937)[1] was a Bessarabian, and later Soviet, politician. The son of a distinguished architect, and himself an engineer by vocation, Tsyganko entered politics shortly before the proclamation of a Moldavian Democratic Republic, when he earned a seat in the republican legislature (Sfatul Țării). He sided with the parliamentary Peasants' Faction, which supported left-wing ideals and pushed for land reform, being generally, and radically, opposed to the more right-wing Moldavian Bloc. Tsyganko was skeptical of the Bloc's plan to unite Bessarabia with Romania, although he possibly supported a federation. His uncompromising stance divided his Faction and led the Romanian Kingdom's authorities to identify him as a major obstruction to the unionist cause.

In November 1918, as the Bloc switched its support to unconditional unification and dissolved the regional government bodies, Tsyganko rejected the new regime and moved to Odessa. Allying himself to members of the White movement, with whom he set up a Committee for the Salvation of Bessarabia, attending the Paris Peace Conference to campaign for the reversal of the union. He later settled in Soviet territory, where he helped create a Moldavian Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic; other members of his family opted to stay behind in Romania. In 1937, Tsyganko fell victim to the Great Purge.

Biography

Early career

Tsyganko was born in Kishinev (Chișinău), regional capital of the Bessarabian Governorate, Russian Empire, and was a graduate of Riga Polytechnicum.[1][2] He returned to his native city where his father Vladimir (? – 1919), an architect, designed such landmarks as the Ethnography Museum and Saint Nicholas Church; his brother Nikolai (Nicolai) Vladimirovich (born 1882) was the zemstvo engineer in Orhei, and from 1909 in Kishinev itself.[2] By 1904, their father was the Director of Monastery Estates in Bessarabia, in which capacity he testified against Russian police after the Kishinev pogrom, accusing them of passivity.[3] In 1916, the Bessarabian journalist Alexis Nour described Tsyganko Sr. as a "much esteemed [...] Bessarabian intellectual of a Moldavian nationalist hue, but not a separatist" (see Moldovenism). Also according to Nour, Nikolai, whom he met personally, could speak only Russian.[4] Romanian politician Duiliu Zamfirescu, who met and debated with Vladimir Vladimirovich in 1918, claimed that the Tsygankos were "Ruthenian". He and his adversary talked in French, as Tsyganko "could not speak a word of Romanian".[5]

Tsyganko reached political prominence after the October Revolution, which had left Bessarabia to administer itself independently, as a "Moldavian Democratic Republic". In January 1918, the local Soviet of Workers' and Soldiers' Deputies began to override the Sfatul Țării assembly (appointed the previous November) and attempted to bring about Bolshevik rule. This move was swiftly suppressed by a punitive expedition of the Romanian Army. The 3rd Peasants' Congress, assembled few days after the occupation of Chișinău, adopted an anti-secessionist position, dismissed the Moldavian prime-minister Pantelimon Erhan from the position of President of the Peasants' Soviet, and elected a new leadership from among the most vocal opponents of the Romanian intervention. According to the Rumcherod's newspaper, during the opening session, Tsyganko's message on behalf of the local Socialist Revolutionary branch was met with applause and calls to support the Russian Revolution. The following day, after demanding the withdrawal of Romanian troops within 24 hours, and negotiating on the issue with the Romanian military, the Congress' Presidium was put under arrest. General Ernest Broșteanu dismissed the immunity of those Peasants' representatives who were also members of Sfatul, and issued a strong warning against further anti-Romanian agitation. Consequently, the following days the Congress selected a new list of Sfatul representatives, headed by Tsyganko, which comprised mostly moderates.[6]

Clashes with the unionists

Tsyganko, who was counted among the representatives of the Russian minority,[7] affiliated with the left-wing "Peasants' Faction", which stood in opposition to the "Moldavian Bloc" of Romanian nationalists. During the debates on land reform, he suggested postponing the discussion until a new government, "representative of the people's will", would be approved by a Moldavian Constituent Assembly. Presumably, he feared that pressure from the Romanian troops would affect the extent of the reform.[8] Nevertheless, he became the first chairman of Sfatul's Agrarian Commission,[9] and in parallel presided upon the Peasants' Soviet.[10] Despite being involved in left-wing politics, Tsyganko would gradually develop a working relationship with Andrei Krupenski, the Polono-Bessarabian landowner and ex-Marshal of Nobility, and Alexandr K. Schmidt, who stood for the conservative side of anti-Romanian agitation; between 1918 and 1920 the three men issued calls for the end of Romanian occupation, and began popularizing their cause in Europe.[11]

When Romanian Premier Alexandru Marghiloman traveled to Bessarabia to canvass for the unionist cause, he found the Peasant Faction divided between followers of Ion Inculeț, who endorsed the Romanian viewpoint, and deputies who sided with Tsyganko.[12] Zamfirescu, who traveled with Marghiloman, recalls that Tsyganko "thrice in one month" attempted to recall the Republic's Directorate, his moves resisted by Inculeț.[13] He also protested the selection of pro-Romanian students from Kiev and Odessa as representatives of the Transnistrian Moldavians, in which he saw efforts to shake the balance of power inside the Sfatul.[14] Zamfirescu claims to have saved Tsyganko from an undisclosed mortal danger, and then to have conversed with him, trying to gain insight into his political motivations. The latter, he concluded, were "most phantasmagorical socialist ideas", not dissuaded by the prospect of "death, suffering, military disaster, sheer destitution, or degeneracy". He adds: "It was late at night, I was experiencing chills, and so I believe I have insulted the convictions of this visionary youth, reassuring him that all opinions lead to a ministerial chair, provided one makes sure to discard them on cue."[15]

Despite proclaiming its independence in late February 1918, the Moldavian Republic was still seen in various circles as subordinate to the neighboring Ukrainian People's Republic. Its Central Rada wished to represent Bessarabia in the preliminary negotiation of the Bucharest peace treaty, imposed by the Central Powers on Romania. The Moldavian Regional assembly reacted by reaffirming its independence and rejecting the division of Bessarabia, against the decisions of Akkerman and Khotin zemstva, which had proclaimed their accession to the Ukraine. A Moldavian delegation was therefore selected to head to Kiev and obtain from the Central Rada official recognition of Moldavia's independence. The delegation, which included the interior minister Vladimir Cristi, the nationalists Nicolae Secară and Teodor Neaga, and Tsyganko as representative of the Peasants' Faction, was prevented from leaving. According to the unionist Gheorghe Andronachi, it was Daniel Ciugureanu, the Republic's pro-Romanian prime minister, who intervened with the Romanian Army to hamper the departure, fearing that an international recognition of independence would hinder nationalist plans for union with Romania.[16]

March union vote

On March 27, 1918, when Sfatul voted to support the union with Romania, Tsyganko effectively abstained.[17] Zamfirescu found it "unbelievable" that Romanian-speaking peasants had ever endorsed Tsyganko, who, he claimed, "systematically opposes Bessarabia's government and Romania's policies, endeavoring for its annexation to the Ukraine"; however, he also notes that Tsyganko himself accused the Romanians of wanting to hand in Bessarabia to the Ukrainians.[13] A radical project for land reform had received pledges of support from Sfatul secretary Ion Buzdugan, and also from the Marghiloman himself; consequently, according to historian Alberto Basciani, Tsyganko's critique of unionism became marginal within his own party and Soviet.[18]

On behalf of the Peasant Faction, Tsyganko denied the Assembly had the authority to discuss such and issue, declaring his group would refrain from voting, since they considered this a matter for a Constitutional Convention; furthermore, he stated the only admissible terms for a union between the Moldavian and Romanian peoples would be in a federation.[10] Five members of his faction decided to side with the nationalists and voted for the union, while the other 17 present abstained.[19] Researchers are divided in their assessments of Tsyganko's political stance at that early stage. Basciani describes him as one of those who "opposed with great vehemence the union of Bessarabia with Romania".[1] However, according to Svetlana Suveică, Tsyganko did not object to union with autonomy, and in fact saw it as "the only solution for avoiding the Bolshevik invasion of the region."[20]

In November, after the generalization of Romanian military rule in Bessarabia, Tsyganko, as putative "president" of the Bessarabian Peasants' Party,[21] with Nicolae Alexandri, Ion Păscăluță, and 37 other Sfatul members, sent a letter of protest to the Romanian government of Constantin Coandă. This coalition of Romanian Bessarabians and White Russians demanded the immediate recognition and restoration of autonomy, as well as the lifting of the martial law; however, its imperatives were rejected as illegitimate by the central authorities.[22] According to Clark: "We cannot but applaud the admirable aims of the 40 Deputies, in most of their requests; but at the same time we must wonder at their ingenuousness; they did not foresee the constant turbulence on the Eastern frontier, which even at that time impressed the Roumanians".[23]

November union vote

The protest arose controversy in political circles. Tsyganko reported a private interview with the Romanian envoy Artur Văitoianu. He quoted the latter as offering a deal: "You must renounce [autonomy] if only for this sole reason—that you no good Roumanian officials in Bessarabia—that is to say, none who are good nationalists. If you give up autonomy, you will not have a Commissioner-General, but you will have a Bessarabian Chargé d'Affaires, a man of your own character, who will be nominated by the Central Power. The new [Bessarabian] Directorate will remain in office until the meeting of the Pan-Roumanian Constitutional Assembly. Does this appeal to you as attractive?"[24] Also according to Tsyganko, Văitoianu informed the group that they needed to coalesce with Romanian nationalists in front of Great Russian revivalism, and that "the national idea takes precedence over everything", implicitly threatening Sfatul dignitaries.[25]

As Suveică writes, it was only at this stage that Tsyganko became an adversary of the unionist camp, placing his hopes in a reestablishment of the Russian Republic, and her re-annexation of Bessarabia.[20] At the last Sfatul session, on November 25, 1918, unconditional union was proposed for ratification, as one of several measures being voted on, alongside the allocation of offices and a land-reform-law. According to the Peasants' Faction account, also supported by many of the Moldavian nationalists who had signed the earlier protest, the Moldavian Bloc kept the opposition uniformed about there being a Sfatul session: "only Mr. V. Tziganko was aware of the fact, and he was informed privately, two hours before the opening of the sitting."[26] The Tsyganko group confronted the assembly's president, Halippa, arguing that his election was illegal. They announced another walk-out, to which voices of the Moldavian Bloc responded with rhetorical questions ("Is this how you intend to solve the agrarian issue?") and taunts of "Good riddance!"[27]

The opposition maintained that the walk-out resulted in a lack of quorum: only 48 of 160 deputies were reportedly present, which made the voting results questionable.[28] Tsyganko and his colleagues accused the Bloc of putting up unconditional union for the vote as a rider, at 2.30 AM on the morning of November 26, and of counting votes during considerable and purposeful commotion. Some of the Fraction deputies in the opposition, including Tsyganko and Gavril Buciușcan, actually returned in time to cast their Nay votes.[29] Clark claims that one of the Moldavian Bloc representatives testified that there were enough deputies present.[30] According to Moldavian Bloc's Pan Halippa, Tsyganko's walk-out from the Assembly Hall proved to be a miscalculation, as the Peasant Faction's other members returned to vote on land reform, and, subsequently, on the unconditional union.[31] Marghiloman nevertheless gave a contrasting account. He complained that "not even 30 deputies" had been present for the vote abrogating the conditions, in spite of "all the money spent".[32]

Salvation Committee

In early 1919, Tsyganko emigrated from what was then being recognized as Romanian territory. He settled in Odessa, a Ukrainian port city, where he established the Peasants' Faction in exile, alongside a dozen other former Sfatul deputies.[11] He joined efforts with Krupenski and Schmidt, affiliating with their Committee for the Salvation of Bessarabia,[33] whose activities were closely monitored by Romania's secret police, the Siguranța.[11] According to the Moldavian Bloc's Petru Cazacu, they answered indirectly to Anton Denikin, commander of the Volunteer Army.[34]

The various groups of Bessarabian autonomists and White loyalists agreed to send a common delegation to the Peace Conference in Paris, where the Allies were debating on recognizing the union. On February 10, the Committee issued a common platform for these organizations, sharing two goals: "the liberation of Bessarabia from the Romanian annexation and the realization of the aspirations of the people of Bessarabia." The latter referred to the region's reintegration into Russia.[35] In April, together with Krupenski and Schmidt, later followed by Mark Slonim and Mihail Savenco,[36] Tsyganko had arrived in Paris. In its addresses to the international media, the group insisted that the union was a putsch by urban intellectuals against the other social classes.[37] It also circulated a protest against the Romanian land reform project, which the Salvation Committee saw as a chauvinistic attack against the landed gentry and the Russian patriots.[38]

As noted by Suveică, Tsyganko was the only delegation member to belong to a non-aristocratic elite, and nominally an appointee of the "Central Committee of the Peasants of Bessarabia". He therefore took some distance from the conservative demands of the Salvation Committee, and in various contexts presented himself as an independent emissary, united with the others mainly in their common support for a plebiscite clause in Bessarabia.[39] However, his autonomism and Krupenski's loyalism were mostly endorsed by the White émigré lobby in Paris, including the likes of Georgy Lvov, Vasily Maklakov, Sergey Sazonov, and Nikolai Tchaikovsky.[40] In his papers, Halippa commented that Tsyganko, the self-proclaimed "socialist and revolutionary", had arrived in Paris as a propagandist of Russian nationalism, "with no connection to the people [of Bessarabia]".[31] Cazacu also notes that the "bizarre association" comprising Tsyganko, Maklakov and Schmidt propagated the contradictory claim that Sfatul was a "Bolshevik" assembly.[41]

In June 1919, the French communist organ, L'Humanité, gave exposure to Slonim and Tsyganko's allegations regarding political repression and "atrocities" in Bessarabia, as a common protest of the "democrats and socialists".[42] Such allegations were responded to by the Peasant Party's Ion Pelivan, who wrote the newspaper to argue that Romania's intervention had first of all restored "liberty and democracy" in Bessarabia, and that the union expressed "the free will of the Bessarabian populace, with no outside intervention."[43] Countering Tsyganko's claim to speak for the peasants, the pro-Romanian delegation grew to include peasant members such as Ion Codreanu, Gheorghe Năstase, and Sergiu Victor Cujbă.[44]

Later life

Making his split from the White Russian community a definitive one,[45] Tsyganko eventually settled in the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic. In September 1921, he wrote a memorandum on Bessarabia and Romania–Russia relations, which he sent to Leon Trotsky, the Commissar for Military Affairs. His text informed the Russian viewpoint at the negotiations in Warsaw between the Soviets and the Romanians, but also presented personal observations on the social makeup of Bessarabia. Tsyganko argued that the Moldavian Republic's creation and union were attributable to left-wing "agitators" such as Inculeț and Pantelimon Erhan. He claimed that multi-ethnic Bessarabia was naturally "internationalist", but also rural and "well-off", concluding that an anti-Romanian revolt could happen if sustained from across the border.[46] Cazacu noted in 1924 that the dossier compiled by the Bolsheviks and the earlier Salvation Committee drafts used as sources the same documents, including statements by private individuals.[47]

In 1924, Tsyganko became a founding figure of the Moldavian Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic, created on Soviet territory as a Bessarabian rump state.[48] In September 1926, he was at Odessa, where, together with Ivan Krivorukov, he issued a formal protest against Italy's recognition of the Bessarabian union with Romania, and therefore against her "passage into the anti-Soviet camp".[49] Nikolai Vladimirovich, meanwhile, remained behind in Romania, working as a conservator for the Historical Monuments Commission,[50] then as Department head for Chișinău City Hall.[2] In early 1929, Nikolai supported the Bessarabian regionalist platform for administrative reform (an initiative by Erhan and Alexandru Mîță).[51] He died some five years later, at age 52, while reading a book.[2] At some point during the 1930s, Vladimir Tsyganko was singled out as a political suspect by the Stalinist regime, and was murdered in 1937, at the height of the Great Purge.[48]

Notes

  1. 1 2 3 Basciani, p. 128
  2. 1 2 3 4 (Romanian) "Fără clădirile arhitectului Țiganco Chișinăul ar arăta mult mai sărac", in Construcții și Dezvoltare Regională, Nr. 1/2010, pp. 36–37
  3. ↑ Isidore Singer, Russia at the Bar of the American People: a Memorial of Kishinef, p. 263. New York City & London: Funk & Wagnalls, 1904
  4. ↑ Alexis Nour, "Ce este Basarabia?", in Viața Romînească, Nr. 1–3/1916, p. 251
  5. ↑ Zamfirescu & Adam, pp. 39, 57
  6. ↑ Levit, pp. 257–263
  7. ↑ Cazacu, pp. 242, 296, 320
  8. ↑ Levit, pp. 282–283
  9. ↑ Basciani, p. 128; Suveică (2010), p. 140
  10. 1 2 Clark, p. 200
  11. 1 2 3 Basciani, pp. 128–129
  12. ↑ Alexandru Marghiloman, Note politice, 3. 1917–1918, p. 456. Bucharest: Editura Institutului de Arte Grafice Eminescu, 1927
  13. 1 2 Zamfirescu & Adam, pp. 57–58
  14. ↑ Levit, pp. 340–341
  15. ↑ Zamfirescu & Adam, pp. 46–47, 58
  16. ↑ Levit, pp. 355–361
  17. ↑ Basciani, p. 128; Clark, pp. 156, 200; Suveică, "Between the Empire...", p. 42
  18. ↑ Basciani, pp. 100–101
  19. ↑ Levit, pp. 368–370
  20. 1 2 Suveică, "Between the Empire...", p. 42
  21. ↑ The Roumanian Occupation..., p. 110; Clark, p. 212
  22. ↑ Mitrașcă, pp. 143–144. See also The Roumanian Occupation..., pp. 5, 107–111; Basciani, pp. 117–118; Clark, pp. 208–215; Suveică, "Between the Empire...", p. 42
  23. ↑ Clark, p. 215
  24. ↑ The Roumanian Occupation..., pp. 100–101. See also translation from the French in Suveică, "Between the Empire...", p. 42
  25. ↑ The Roumanian Occupation..., pp. 101–102
  26. ↑ The Roumanian Occupation..., p. 94
  27. ↑ Constantin & Negrei (2009), pp. 134–135; Levit, pp. 443–445
  28. ↑ The Roumanian Occupation..., p. 5; Basciani, p. 118
  29. ↑ The Roumanian Occupation..., pp. 5, 95–106
  30. ↑ Clark, p. 225
  31. 1 2 Constantin & Negrei (2009), p. 96
  32. ↑ Alexandru Marghiloman, Note politice, 4. 1918–1919, p. 313. Bucharest: Editura Institutului de Arte Grafice Eminescu, 1927
  33. ↑ Cazacu, p. 334; Constantin et al. (2011), p. 147; Suveică, "Between the Empire...", pp. 36–43
  34. ↑ Cazacu, p. 334
  35. ↑ Suveică, "Between the Empire...", p. 36; "For the 'Bessarabian Cause'...", p. 145
  36. ↑ Constantin et al. (2011), p. 147; Zamfirescu & Adam, p. 82
  37. ↑ Constantin et al. (2011), pp. 147–148
  38. ↑ Suveică (2010), p. 154
  39. ↑ Suveică, "Between the Empire...", pp. 37, 43; "For the 'Bessarabian Cause'...", pp. 144–145
  40. ↑ Cazacu, pp. 334–339; Mitrașcă, pp. 144–145. See also Suveică, "Between the Empire...", p. 37
  41. ↑ Cazacu, pp. 337–338
  42. ↑ A. P., "Atrocités roumaines en Bessarabie. Le Récit de Marco Slonim, ex-député de la Constituante", in L'Humanité, June 22, 1919, p. 3
  43. ↑ Constantin et al. (2011), pp. 148–149
  44. ↑ Suveică, "For the 'Bessarabian Cause'...", p. 147
  45. ↑ Suveică, "For the 'Bessarabian Cause'...", p. 146
  46. ↑ Flavius Solomon, "Relațiile româno-sovietice la începutul anilor 1920: noi surse documentare și direcții de cercetare", in Vasile Ciobanu, Sorin Radu (eds.), Partide politice și minorități naționale din România în secolul XX, Vol. V, pp. 67–68. Sibiu: TechnoMedia, 2010. ISBN 978-973-739-261-9
  47. ↑ Cazacu, pp. 329, 338
  48. 1 2 Basciani, p. 129
  49. ↑ Bulletin Périodique de la Presse Russe, No. 162, 1927, pp. 7–8
  50. ↑ C. D. Fortunescu, "Recenzii. Reviste: Anuarul Comisiunei Monumentelor Istorice, Secția Basarabia", in Arhivele Olteniei, Nr. 37–38/1928, p. 369
  51. ↑ "Basarabenii și reforma administrativă", in Adevărul, April 26, 1929, p. 5

References

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Tuesday, March 15, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.