WA Inc

A John Curtin Foundation gathering Left to right, rear: Denis Cullity, John Horgan, Alan Bond, Laurie Connell, Ric Stowe, James McCusker, Rod Evans; Front: Kevin Parry, prime minister Bob Hawke, state premier Brian Burke, John Roberts and former Perth lord mayor Ernest Lee-Steere

WA Inc was a political scandal in Western Australia. In the 1980s, the state government, which was led for much of the period by premier Brian Burke, engaged in business dealings with several prominent businessmen, including Alan Bond, Laurie Connell, Dallas Dempster, John Roberts, and Warren Anderson. These dealings resulted in a loss of public money, estimated at a minimum of $600 million and the insolvency of several large corporations.

Bond and Connell were major contributors to the party in government, the Australian Labor Party and its remarkable fundraising structure, the John Curtin Foundation.[1] A royal commission (the Royal Commission into Commercial Activities of Government and Other Matters) was established in 1990 by Labor premier Carmen Lawrence to examine the dealings.

Connell alleged [in evidence to the Commission] that Hawke dropped a proposed gold tax after Connell and various Perth high-flyers donated $250,000 each to Labor during an infamous lunch in Brian Burke's office in 1987—a claim the former PM vigorously denied. Burke's loyalty to those who had donated their efforts (and money) to Labor was no less fervent. Taking the John Curtin Foundation axiom to the next level, Burke created the West Australian Development Corporation and installed fellow Catholic John Horgan (pictured second from left, top) on $800,000 a year, an extraordinary figure for a public servant not only then but now.—Journalist Tony Barrass, 2009.[1]

In 1991, political scientist Paddy O'Brien identified the members of the government most associated with WA Inc deals as premier Burke and his successor Peter Dowding, deputy premier David Parker, industrial development minister Julian Grill and attorney-general Joe Berinson.[2]:p132

Corporate failures

As an outcome of questionable business practices, precipitated by the 1987 stock market crash, several major businesses based in Perth found themselves in difficulties and ultimately went into bankruptcy. These included:

A proposed petrochemical plant was to be built as a joint venture between Laurie Connell and Dallas Dempster, both being businessmen with close government connections. $100,000 was outlaid as a deposit on a block of land at Kwinana but otherwise the proposal did not proceed beyond designs and stood as a basis for fund-raising, loans, collateral transactions, development of proposed plant, management fees to Bond Corporation and, eventually, was sold for $400 million —$175 million being provided by a government agency, WA Government Holdings.

Losses incurred by the government

The government had lent large sums of money, offered financial guarantees and acquired assets at inflated prices. Because of the connections between many of the deals and cross-ownership of businesses involved, it is difficult to say precisely where the government's fault started and ended. A minimum loss to the state of $600M has been reported.[3]

In 1991, barrister Bevan Lawrence published what he regarded as a conservative itemisation of the government's actual losses. The figures are summarised as follows:

Rothwells and Petrochemicals Plant $408 million
Purchase of Bell Group shares from Robert Holmes à Court $155 million
Unlisted bonds purchased from Holmes à Court, later assessed as having no value $140 million
Westralia Square (Old Perth Technical School site redevelopment) $74 million
Central Park property redevelopment $100 million
Grand total[4]:p389 $877 million

The WA Inc Royal Commission

On 19 November 1990, Carmen Lawrence, the then Labor premier, announced her government's intention to hold a royal commission to "inquire into certain matters". This decision followed more than a year of strong public advocacy by the activist group, People for Fair and Open Government[5] headed by the premier's brother, barrister Bevan Lawrence, Professor Emeritus Martyn Webb and prominent political scientist Paddy O'Brien. O'Brien edited The Burke Ambush, subtitled Corporatism and Society in Western Australia, which was the first substantial exposé of Burke's pro-corporate government—a collection of articles by himself and other Western Australian writers, including Hal Colebatch, Robert Bennett, Joseph Poprzeczny, John Hyde, Paul Nichols, Michael McKinley, Anthony Dale and Tom Herzfeld.[6]

The commission of three was headed by Geoffrey Kennedy and joined by Sir Ronald Wilson and Peter Brinsden, with a brief "To inquire into and report" whether there had been "corruption, illegal conduct, improper conduct, or bribery" on the part of any person or corporation in the "affairs, investment decisions and business dealings of the Government of Western Australia or its agencies".[3]

Absence of important witnesses

In the introductory part of its report, the commission noted that it had

"heard from 543 witnesses encompassing 847 appearances. [...] There were, however, some who may have been able to give valuable information to the Commission, who died before the Commission hearings commenced or after they had begun. There were others who were unwilling to assist and were beyond the reach of compulsory process".[7]:p.41

The following had died or been incapable on health grounds: Peter Beckwith (Bond Corporation), Bill Burgess (Rothwells), Robert Holmes a Court, Thomas Hugall (Rothwells), Bruce Kirkwood (SECWA), Andrew Mensaros (former Liberal state minister), Terence McDonnell (solicitor), and Jack Walsh (Rothwells). The following declined to give evidence: Yosse Goldberg (entrepreneur), Peter Mitchell (Bond Corporation), Tony Oates (Bond Corporation), and Ms Kim Rooney (wife of David Parker). Dr Shrian Oskar was serving a 6-year prison term in the UK.[7]:p.44 The witnesses whose testimony was received by the commission are listed in an appendix to the report.[8]:p.54

Main findings

After approximately 21 months of enquiries and hearings, the commission's final report began:

1.1.1 The Commission has found conduct and practices on the part of certain persons involved in government in the period from 1983 to 1989 which were such as to place our governmental system at risk. Unfortunately, some of that conduct and some of those practices were peculiar to Western Australia; but there is no reason to believe that many of the fundamental questions raised by our inquiry were unique to this period or to this State. On the contrary, as detailed studies in other States and overseas clearly demonstrate, they have been raised elsewhere as a consequence of events similar to those which we have experienced.

1.1.2 Some ministers elevated personal or party advantage over their constitutional obligation to act in the public interest. The decision to lend Government support to the rescue of Rothwells in October 1987 was principally that of Mr Burke as Premier. Mr Burke's motives in supporting the rescue were not related solely to proper governmental concerns. They derived in part from his well-established relationship with Mr Connell, the chairman and major shareholder of Rothwells, and from his desire to preserve the standing of the Australian Labor Party in the eyes of those sections of the business community from which it had secured much financial support.

1.1.3 Subsequently, Mr Dowding, as Premier, presided over a disastrous series of decisions designed to support Rothwells when it was or should have been clear to him and to those ministers closely involved that Rothwells was no longer a viable financial institution. This culminated in the decision to involve the Government, through WAGH, in the Kwinana petrochemical project as a means of removing the Government's contingent liability for certain of the debts of Rothwells. Electoral advantage was preferred to the public interest.

1.1.4 Personal associations and the manner in which electoral contributions were obtained could only create the public perception that favour could be bought, that favour would be done.[9]:p.22

In an earlier finding, the commission had summarised:

[The Government was not entitled] to risk the public resources of the State without its actions being subjected to critical scrutiny and review. Effective accountability was a casualty of its entrepreneurial zeal. Influence in the conduct of this State's public affairs was captured by a small group of self-interested businessmen.[10]:p.10

The commission's report included a confidential appendix (not published) containing an "outline of matters to be referred to the Director of Public Prosecutions",[8]:p.1 and a list of recommendations impinging on open government,[9]:p.6 accountability,[9]:p.8 integrity in government,[9]:p.11 the Parliament,[9]:p.12 the administrative system,[9]:p.15 and a proposed Commission on Government[9]:p.16

Summary of main issues

Report Volume I
Report Volume II
Report Volume III
Report Volume IV
Report Volume V
Report Volume VI

Costs and outcomes

The royal commission cost $30 million, including $12.5 million in witness costs. Of the latter, $3.6 million funded Burke's own legal fees ($1.71 million) and those of David Parker ($1.92 million).

Burke and his predecessor, the Liberal premier Ray O'Connor ultimately served prison sentences as a result of convictions which arose from findings of the commission. The premier immediately after Burke, Peter Dowding, and public servant Len Brush were both found to have acted improperly.

See also

References

Notes

(Page numbers cited in PDF documents are PDF pages, not necessarily corresponding to folio numbers printed on original pages.)

  1. 1 2 Barrass, Tony (8 August 2009). "Business and Labor at the birth of WA Inc". The Australian. Retrieved 2010-11-20.
  2. ↑ O'Brien P. The Origins and Development of WA's Executive State, in The Executive State —WA Inc & The Constitution, (Perth 1991).
  3. 1 2 Alan Ramsey (July 20, 2005). "A role in the fall of a Labor mate conveniently omitted from the eulogies". Sydney Morning Herald.
  4. ↑ O'Brien P. and Webb M. The Executive State--WA Inc & The Constitution, Constitutional Press (Perth) 1991. ISBN 0-646-04875-9;
  5. ↑ Bevan Lawrence. "W.A. Inc.: Why Didn't We Hear The Alarm Bells?". Samuel Griffith Society. Retrieved 30 November 2005.
  6. ↑ O'Brien, P (ed.) The Burke Ambush: Corporatism and Society in WA Apollo Press, Nedlands 1986)
  7. 1 2 WA Inc Royal Commission Report, Contents and Introduction 19 October 1992, at State Law Publisher, Government of WA
  8. 1 2 WA Inc Royal Commission Report, Appendices 19 October 1992, at State Law Publisher, Government of WA
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 WA Inc Royal Commission Report Part II (final) 12 November 1992, at State Law Publisher, Government of WA
  10. 1 2 3 4 5 6 WA Inc Royal Commission Report, Vol.VI 19 October 1992, at State Law Publisher, Government of WA
  11. 1 2 3 4 WA Inc Royal Commission Report, Vol.I 19 October 1992, at State Law Publisher, Government of WA
  12. 1 2 3 4 WA Inc Royal Commission Report, Vol.II 19 October 1992, at State Law Publisher, Government of WA
  13. 1 2 3 WA Inc Royal Commission Report, Vol.III 19 October 1992, at State Law Publisher, Government of WA
  14. 1 2 3 4 WA Inc Royal Commission Report, Vol.IV 19 October 1992, at State Law Publisher, Government of WA
  15. 1 2 WA Inc Royal Commission Report, Vol.V 19 October 1992, at State Law Publisher, Government of WA

Further reading

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Friday, March 18, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.