Marriage in Japan

Marriage in Japan is a legal and social institution at the center of the household. Couples are legally married once they have made the change in status on their family registration sheets, without the need for a ceremony. Most weddings are held either according to Shinto traditions or as a Christian-style chapel weddings.

Traditionally, marriages were categorized into two types according to the method of finding a partner—omiai, meaning arranged or resulting from an arranged introduction, and ren'ai, in which the husband and wife met and decided to marry on their own—although the distinction has grown less meaningful over postwar decades as western ideas of love alter Japanese perceptions of marriage.^[1]

History

The institution of marriage in Japan has changed radically over the last millennium. Indigenous practices adapted first to Chinese Confucianism during the medieval era, and then to Western concepts of individualism, gender equality, romantic love, and the nuclear family during the modern era. Customs once exclusive to a small aristocracy gained mass popularity as the population became increasingly urbanized.

Heian period (794–1185)

Genji's son Yūgiri (夕霧, "Evening Mist") reads a letter. Genji Monogatari Emaki, 12th century handscroll, Gotoh Museum.

The Heian period of Japanese history marked the culmination of its classical era, when the vast imperial court established itself and its culture in Heian-kyō (modern Kyoto). Heian society was organized by an elaborate system of rank, and the purpose of marriage was to produce children who would inherit the highest possible rank from the best-placed lineage. It was neither ceremonial nor necessarily permanent.^[2] Aristocrats exchanged letters and poetry for a period of months or years before arranging to meet after dark. If a man saw the same woman for a period of three nights, they were considered married, and the wife's parents held a banquet for the couple. Most members of the lower-class engaged in a permanent marriage with one partner, and husbands arranged to bring their wives into their own household, in order to ensure the legitimacy of their offspring. High-ranked noblemen sometimes kept multiple wives or concubines. Aristocratic wives could remain in their fathers' house, and the husband would recognize paternity with the formal presentation of a gift.^[3]

The forms of Heian courtship, as well as the pitfalls of amorous intrigue, are well represented in the literature of the period, especially The Tale of the Bamboo Cutter, The Sarashina Diary, The Pillow Book, and The Tale of Genji.

Edo period (1600-1868)

"Wedding." From the book Japan and Japanese (1902), p. 62.

"Japanese at home." From the book Japan and Japanese (1902), p. 71.

In pre-modern Japan, marriage was inextricable from the ie (家, "family" or "household"), the basic unit of society with a collective continuity independent of any individual life. Members of the household were expected to subordinate all their own interests to that of the ie, with respect for an ideal of filial piety and social hierarchy that borrowed much from Confucianism.^[4] The choice to remain single was the greatest crime a man could commit, according to Baron Hozumi.^[5] Marriages were duly arranged by the head of the household, who represented it publicly and was legally responsible for its members, and any preference by either principal in a marital arrangement was considered improper. Property was regarded to belong to the ie rather than to individuals, and inheritance was strictly agnatic primogeniture. A woman (女) married the household (家) of her husband, hence the logograms for yome (嫁, "wife") and yomeiri (嫁入り, "marriage," lit. "wife entering").^[6] In the absence of sons, some households would adopt a male heir (養子, or yōshi) to maintain the dynasty, a practice which continues in corporate Japan.^[7] Nearly all adoptions are of adult men.^[8]

Marriage was restricted to households of equal social standing (分限), which made selection a crucial, painstaking process. Although Confucian ethics encouraged people to marry outside their own group, limiting the search to a local community remained the easiest way to ensure an honorable match. Approximately one-in-five marriages in pre-modern Japan occurred between households that were already related.^[2] Outcast communities such as the Burakumin could not marry outside of their caste, and marriage discrimination continued even after an 1871 edict abolished the caste system, well into the twentieth century.

Marriage between a Japanese and non-Japanese person was not officially permitted until 14 March 1873, a date now commemorated as White Day. Marriage with a foreigner required the Japanese national to surrender his or her social standing. Western literature of the period elaborated a stereotype of Asian femininity through sexual encounters between East Asian women and white European and American men, most famously in Madame Chrysanthème and Madame Butterfly.

Caught in the Act, hanging scroll by the Kanbun Master, late 1660s, Honolulu Museum of Art.

The purposes of marriage in the medieval and Edo periods was to form alliances between families, to relieve the family of its female dependents, to perpetuate the family line, and, especially for the lower classes, to add new members to the family's workforce. The seventeenth-century treatise Onna Daigaku ("Greater Learning for Women") instructed wives honor their parents-in-law before their own parents, and to be "courteous, humble, and conciliatory" towards their husbands.^[9] Husbands were also encouraged to place the needs of their parents and children before those of their wives. One British observer remarked, "If you love your wife you spoil your mother's servant."^[10] The tension between a housewife and her mother-in-law has been a keynote of Japanese drama ever since.

Romantic love (愛情, aijō) played little part in medieval marriages, as emotional attachment was considered inconsistent with filial piety. A proverb said, "Those who come together in passion stay together in tears."^[11] For men, sexual gratification was seen as separate from conjugal relations with one's wife, where the purpose was procreation. The genre called Ukiyo-e (浮世絵, lit. "floating world pictures") celebrated the luxury and hedonism of the era, typically with depictions of beautiful courtesans and geisha of the pleasure districts. Concubinage and prostitution were common, public, relatively respectable, until the social upheaval of the Meiji Restoration put an end to feudal society in Japan.^[12]

Meiji Restoration and Modernization (1868-1945)

The Shōwa Emperor (Hirohito) with his wife Empress Kōjun and their children in 1941.

During the Meiji period, upper class and samurai customs of arranged marriage steadily replaced the unions of choice and mutual attraction that rural commoners had once enjoyed. Rapid urbanization and industrialization brought more of the population into the cities, ending the isolation of rural life. Public education became almost universal between 1872 and the early 1900s, and schools stressed the traditional concept of filial piety, first toward the nation, second toward the household, and last of all toward a person's own private interests. Marriage under the Meiji Civil Code required the permission of the head of a household (Article 750) and of the parents for men under 30 and women under 25 (Article 772).^[13]

In arranged marriages, most couples met beforehand at a formal introduction called an omiai (お見合い, lit. "looking at one another"), although some would meet for the first time at the wedding ceremony. A visitor to Japan described the omiai as "a meeting at which the lovers (if persons unknown to each other may be so styled) are allowed to see, sometimes even to speak to each other, and thus estimate each others' merits."^[14] However, their objections carried little weight. The meeting was originally a samurai custom which became widespread during the early twentieth century, when commoners began to arrange marriages for their children through a go-between (仲人 , nakōdo) or matchmaker. The word omiai is still used to distinguish arranged marriages, even when no formal meeting takes place, from ren'ai (恋愛, a "love match").^[15]

Courtship remained rare in Japan at this period. Boys and girls were separated in schools, in cinemas, and at social gatherings. Colleagues who began a romantic relationship could be dismissed, and during the Second World War traveling couples could be arrested. Parents sometimes staged an arranged marriage to legitimize a "love match," but many others resulted in separation and sometimes suicide.^[16] Love was thought to be inessential to marriage. A proposal by Baron Hozumi, who had studied abroad, that the absence of love be made a grounds for divorce failed to pass during debates on the Meiji Civil Code of 1898.^[17] One writer observed in 1930, "According to the traditional moral ideas, it is deemed a sign of mental and moral weakness to 'fall in love.'"^[18]

Marriage, like other social institutions of this period, emphasized the subordinate inferiority of women to men. Women learned that as a daughter they ought to obey their father, as a wife their husband, as a widow their sons. Chastity in marriage was expected for women, and a law not repealed until 1908 allowed a husband to kill his wife and her lover if he found them in an adulterous act. The prostitution of women survived the periodic intrusion of puritanical ideals on Japan's less restrictive sexuality.^[19]

Divorce laws become more equal over time. During the Edo period, a husband could divorce his wife by writing a letter of his intent to do so, but a wife's only recourse was to flee to a convent. The laws of the early Meiji period established several grounds on which a man could divorce: sterility, adultery, disobedience to parents-in-law, loquacity, larceny, jealousy, and disease. A wife, accompanied by a close male relative, could appeal for divorce if she had been deserted or imprisoned by her husband, or if he was profligate or mentally ill. The 1898 Civil Code established the principle of mutual consent, although the consent of women was still likely to be forced until the early twentieth century, as women gradually gained access to education and financial independence.^[20] The fight for divorce rights marked the beginning of Japanese feminism.

Post-war period (1945-)

Signed after the surrender and occupation of Japan by Allied forces, Article 24 of the Constitution of 1947 reestablished marriage on grounds of equality and choice: "Marriage shall be based only on the mutual consent of both sexes and it shall be maintained through mutual cooperation with the equal rights of husband and wife as a base. With regard to choice of spouse, property rights, inheritance, choice of domicile, divorce and other matters pertaining to marriage and the family, all laws shall be enacted from the standpoint of individual dignity and the essential equality of the sexes."

A family meal in the 1950s.

The Constitution abolished the foundations of the ie system and the patriarchal authority at its heart. Each nuclear family retained, and still retains, a separate family registration sheet, initiated on marriage under the surname of the husband or wife, but the head of each household no longer had any special legal prerogatives over his or her dependents. All legitimate children, male or female, gained an equal right to inheritance, putting an end to primogeniture succession and the obsession with lineage. Women received the right to vote and the right to request a divorce on the basis of infidelity. The Meiji emphasis on Confucian values and national mythology disappeared from education.^[21] The conventional model of the ie was replaced with a new convention, the kazoku (家族, family) and the kakukazoku (核家族, nuclear family), as the fundamental unit of society.^[22]

New demographic trends emerged, including a later age of marriage and a smaller difference in age between groom and bride,^[23] the birth of two children in quick succession, few children born out of wedlock, and a low divorce rate.^[24] Lifetime employment became the norm for Japanese men, especially during the post-war economic boom of the 1950s, 60s, and 70s. A middle class ideology established a gendered family pattern with separate social spheres: a salaried husband to provide the family income, a housewife to manage the home and nurture the children, and a commitment by the children to education.^[25] Better health and nutrition meant a rapid extension of life expectancy, and government policies have encouraged people to form sansedai kazoku (三世代家族, "three-generation families") to manage a rapidly aging society.^[22]

Omiai marriages, arranged by the parents or a matchmaker, remained the norm immediately after the war, although the decades which followed saw a steady rise in the number of ren'ai "love matches." The distinction between the has two blurred: parents almost always consulted young people before "arranging" a marriage, and many young people asked an employer or teacher to serve as matchmaker for their "love match."^[25] Today only one in 20 married couples describe their formation as arranged, and a courtship of several years has become the norm even for relationships that begin with an omiai. Three in five couples meet in the workplace or through friends or siblings.^[26]

Demographics

According to the 2010 census, 58.9% of Japan's adult population is married, 13.9% of women and 3.1% of men are widowed, and 5.9% of women and 3.8% of men are divorced.^[27] The annual number of marriages has dropped since the early 1970s, while divorces have shown a general upward trend.^[28]

Marriage and fertility

The decline of marriage in Japan, as fewer people marry and do so later in life, is a widely-cited explanation for the plummeting birth rate.^{[28][29][30][31]} Although the total fertility rate has dropped since the 1970s (to 1.43 in 2013^[32]), birth statistics for married women have remained fairly constant (at around 2.1) and most married couples have two or more children. Economic factors, such as the cost of raising a child, work-family conflicts, and insufficient housing, are the most common reasons for young mothers (under 34) to have fewer children than desired. The number of single-child or childless couples has increased since 2002 (to 23.3 percent in 2010) even as the desire for larger families remains the same.^[33] Only 2% of births occur outside of marriage^[34] (compared to 30-60% in Europe and North America) due to social taboos, legal pressure, and financial hurdles.^[31] Half of Japan's single mothers live below the poverty line, among the highest for OECD countries.^{[35][36][37][38]}

Fewer marriages

Almost 90% of unmarried people intend to marry,^[39] and yet the percentage of people who don't continues to rise. Between 1990 and 2010, the percentage of 50-year-old people who had never married roughly quadrupled for men to 20.1% and doubled for women to 10.6%.^[40][41] The Welfare Ministry predicts these numbers to rise to 29% of men and 19.2% of women by 2035.^[42] The government's population institute estimated in 2014 that women in their early 20s had a one-in-four chance of never marrying, and a two-in-five chance of remaining childless.^[43]

Recent media coverage has sensationalized surveys from the Japan Family Planning Association and the Cabinet Office that show a declining interest in dating and sexual relationships among young people, especially among men.^[43][44][45] However, changes in sexuality and fertility are more likely an outcome of the decline in family formation than its cause.^[46][47] Since the usual purpose of dating in Japan is marriage, the reluctance to marry often translates to a reluctance to engage in more casual relationships.^[29]

The majority of Japanese people remain committed to traditional ideas of family, with a husband who provides financial support, a wife who works in the home, and two children.^[29][48][49] Labor practices, such as long working hours, health insurance, and the national pension system, are premised on a traditional breadwinner model. As a result, Japan has largely maintained a gender-based division of labor with one of the worst gender pay gaps in the developed world, even as other countries began moving towards more equal arrangements in the 1970s.^[50]

However, economic stagnation, anemic wage growth,^[51] and job insecurity have made it more and more difficult for young Japanese couples to secure the income necessary to create a conventional family, despite their desire to do so.^[50] Japan was once well known for lifetime employment, but after the asset price bubble burst and the 1997 Asian financial crisis regular employment for unmarried men age 25-34 dropped from 78% in 1982 to 55% in 2010 as companies began employing more people on temporary or part-time contracts.^[52][53][54] Men without the security and benefits of full-time employment are more than twice as reluctant to consider marriage,^[55] and in their 30s they are about 40% less likely to be married than those with regular employment.^[56] According to the sociologist Masahiro Yamada, the failure of conventions to adapt to the economic and social realities of Japanese society has caused a "gap in family formation" between those who succeed in creating a conventional family and those who remain single and childless.^[29][57]

Later marriages

The average age at first marriage in Japan has climbed steadily from the middle of the 20th century to around 31 for men and 29 for women in 2013, among the highest in Asia.^[28] Women postpone marriage for a variety of reasons, including high personal and financial expectations,^[58] increasing independence afforded by education and employment,^[59] and the difficulty of balancing work and family.^[60] Masahiro Yamada coined the term parasite singles (パラサイトシングル parasaito shinguru) for unmarried adults in their late 20s and 30s who live with their parents, though it usually refers to women.^[61] Men who do not aggressively pursue marriage are known as herbivore men (草食男子 sōshoku danshi)^[62][63]

International marriages

Of the 660,613 marriages registered in 2013, 21,488 (or about 1 in 30) were between a Japanese and a foreign national, according to the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare. The number of international unions rose rapidly in the 1980s and 90s, peaked in 2006 at 44,701 (about 1 in 16), and has declined since then.^[64] Changes in the Immigration Control Act in 2005, which made it more difficult for Philippine nationals to work in Japan, are one cause of the decline. Filipino women saw the largest drop, from 12,150 in 2006 to 3,118 or 20.1% of foreign brides in 2013.^[65] Many Filipino women come to Japan as entertainers, and some have been victims of domestic violence.^[66][67][68]

The nationality of foreign spouses differs by gender, and Japanese women are more likely to marry partners from outside East and Southeast Asia than Japanese men. Of the 15,442 non-Japanese brides in 2013, most came from China (40.4%), followed by the Philippines (20.1%), South Korea (17.7%), and Thailand (6.3%). The 6,046 grooms came from Korea (27.9%), the United States (19.1%), China (11.8%), and Brazil (4.7%).^[64] Many of the Chinese and Korean (Zainichi) nationals included in these statistics have lived in Japan for generations without becoming naturalized citizens.

Of the 1 million children born in Japan in 2013, 2.2% had one or more non-Japanese parent.^[69] The rise in international households has sometimes led to conflicts over custody. Biracial Japanese children are often called hāfu (ハーフ), although the term has its discontents.

Domestic violence

According to a summary of surveys by Japan's Gender Equality Bureau in 2006, 33.2% of wives and 17.4% of husbands have experienced either threats, physical violence, or rape, more than 10% of women repeatedly. Violence almost always occurred after marriage. Dating abuse has also been reported by 13.5% of women and 5.2% of men.^[70]

Marriage law

A marriage is legally recognized once a couple has successfully submitted the required documents to the city hall registrar to change their status in their koseki (戸籍) family registration sheet. No ceremony is required under Japanese law.^[71][72] The family registration sheet serves as birth certificate, proof of citizenship, marriage license, and death certificate. A register is kept for each nuclear family, under the name of the head of the household (筆頭者, hittousya), with the spouse and unmarried children who are registered as dependents.^[73]

A couple who marries must file a marriage registration form (婚姻届, konin todoke) to create a new registration sheet (新戸籍, shinkoseki) under a common surname. Since 1947, couples have been permitted to choose either the surname of the husband or wife, consistent with a ban on separate surnames first imposed in 1898. Married couples are estimated to choose the man's surname 95% of the time, although some women continue to use their maiden name informally. The ban has survived several legal challenges on the basis of gender inequality, most recently in 2015.^[74] When marriage is used to adopt a male heir, the husband takes his wife's family name.

International marriages are subject to separate rules within Japan. Foreigners in Japan do not have their own family registration sheet, and therefore those who marry a Japanese national are listed on his or her family's sheet.^[71] Foreign spouses in Japan are eligible for a long-term dependent visa.^[75]

Children born out of wedlock are recorded as illegitimate on their mother's family register, although they can be legitimized by a later acknowledgment of paternity. Illegitimate children were eligible for half the inheritance of legitimate ones until a court ruling in 2013.^[76]

Wedding ceremonies

A bride in watabōshi and shiromuku at Tokyo's Meiji Shrine.

A common description of Japan's religious syncretism says: "Born Shinto, married Christian, die Buddhist."^[77] In practice, however, elements of all three major traditions tend to be practiced side-by-side. Japanese weddings usually begin with a Shinto or Christian-style ceremony for family members and very close friends before a reception dinner and after-party at a restaurant or hotel banquet hall. There the couple's extended families and friends make speeches and offer goshuugi (ご祝儀, "gift money") in a special envelope.^[78] Close family pay about twice as much as friends.^[79]

Japanese Shinto ceremonies

Traditional Shinto ceremonies (神前式, 'shinzen shiki'), which account for around one in six of Japanese weddings, are held in the main building of a shrine. A priest performs a ritual purification for the couple, then announces their marriage to the kami (神, "gods" or "spirits") of the shrine and asks for their blessing. The bride and groom take three sips each from three cups of sake, a ritual called sansankudo (三三九度).

Japanese brides, sometimes painted white as a sign of purity before the gods, wear a kimono which is either shiromuku (白無垢, "pure white dress"), iro uchikake (色打掛, "colorful outer robe"), or kurobiki furisode (黒引き振袖), the black and patterned kimono once worn at weddings of the nobility during the Edo period (1603–1868), with either an open white watabōshi (綿帽子) or a tsunokakushi (角隠し). Grooms wear a black crested haori (羽織) jacket and loose, skirt-like hakama (袴) with a vertical stripe.^[79]

Christian chapel ceremonies

A Christian wedding in Kyoto.

Ceremonies modeled on the Christian chapel weddings of Europe and North America have replaced more traditional Shinto rites in recent years. An estimated 75-85% of marriage ceremonies are conducted at professional wedding halls or at hotels providing similar services.^[80] Non-Japanese from Europe and North America often play the part of minister during the ceremony, although they are often not Christian themselves and are discouraged from proselytizing during the ceremony.^[81][82]

The brief ceremony includes a rehearsal, a procession, and a service. During the rehearsal, the mother of the bride lowers the veil for her daughter, to signify a last act of kindness "giving her away". The father walks the bride down the aisle to her waiting groom. After the rehearsal, the wedding celebrant leads the procession and often wears a wedding cross (the kana, a cross with two interlocking wedding rings attached) which symbolizes a couple's commitment to sharing a life together. The wedding celebrant gives a brief welcome and an introductory speech before announcing the bride's entrance. The procession ends with the groom bowing to the bride's father. The father bows in return. The service which ensues is given either in Japanese or English, though quite often in a mix of both. It follows Protestant ceremony, relaxed and not overtly religious. Typically part of 1 Corinthians 13 is read from the Bible. After the reading, there is a prayer and a short message, explaining the sanctity of the wedding vows (seiyaku). The bride and groom share their vows and exchange rings. The chapel register is signed and the new couple is announced. This is often followed by the traditional wedding kiss. The service can conclude with another hymn and a benediction.

The adoption of Christian-style weddings dates back to two events in the 1980s. The first was the wedding of Lady Diana Spencer to Prince Charles, and the second—among the Japanese—was the televised wedding of the Japanese idol Momoe Yamaguchi. Between 1 and 2.1% of Japan's population is Christian, but "white wedding" ceremonies account for 75% of all Japanese weddings, in what some take as a sign of the country's increasing agnosticism.^[82]

Non-religious or civil ceremonies

Non-religious or civil ceremonies often take place in a banquet hall, before or during the reception party, with a Master of Ceremonies officiating and guests seated around tables. Although these ceremonies often adopt Western elements, especially a wedding dress for the bride and a tuxedo for the groom, they forego any religious connotations.^[81]

Some younger couples choose to abandon formality entirely for a "no host party" wedding, which emphasizes celebration rather than ceremony. The guests consist primarily of the couple's friends, who pay an attendance fee.^[83]

See also

• Aging of Japan
• Confucian view of marriage
• Family law in Japan
• Same-sex marriage in Japan
• Sexuality in Japan
• Shinto wedding
• Women in Japan

Works Cited

• Edwards, Walter. Modern Japan Through Its Weddings: Gender, Person, and Society in Ritual Portrayal. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1989.
• Fukutake, Tadashi. Japanese Rural Society. Trans. by R. P. Dore. Tokyo: Oxford University Press, 1967.
• Hendry, Joy. Marriage in Changing Japan: Community & Society. Rutland, Vt, and Tokyo, 1979.
• Kawashima, Takeyoshi. Kekkon (Marriage). Tokyo: Iwanami Shinso, 1954.
• National Institute of Population and Social Security Research (IPSS). "Attitudes toward Marriage and Family among Japanese Singles." 2011.
• National Institute of Population and Social Security Research (IPSS). "Marriage Process and Fertility of Japanese Married Couples." 2011.
• Tamura, Naoomi. The Japanese Bride. New York: Harper & Brother Publishers, 1893.

References

1. Edwards, Modern Japan Through its Weddings.
2. "Society: Marriage in Japan". Japan Reference. 4 March 2013. Retrieved 21 January 2016.
3. Kurihara, Hiromu (1999). Heian-jidai no Rikon no Kenkyu. Tokyo: Kobundo.
4. Hendry, Marriage in Changing Japan, pp. 15-6.
5. Hozumi, Nobushige. Ancestor-Worship and Japanese Law. University Press of the Pacific, 2003. ISBN 1-4102-0838-9.
6. Hendry, Marriage in Changing Japan, pp. 15-6.
7. Kapur, Roshni (17 January 2016). "Welcome to the family: Adult adoptions in corporate Japan". Rappler. Retrieved 19 January 2016.
8. Hartson, William (11 February 2016). "Top 10 facts about Japan". Express. Retrieved 17 February 2016.
9. Hendry, Marriage in Changing Japan, pp. 18, 22.
10. Sladen, Douglas; Lorimer, Norma (1904). More Queer Things About Japan. London: Anthony Treherne. p. 384.
11. Tamura, The Japanese Bride, p. 3.
12. Hendry, Marriage in Changing Japan, pp. 19-21. Fukutake, Japanese Rural Society, p. 44.
13. Hendry, Marriage in Changing Japan, pp. 14, 16-7, 22-3.
14. Chamberlain, Basil Hall (1902). Things Japanese (4th ed.). London: John Murray. p. 309.
15. Hendry, Marriage in Changing Japan, pp. 18, 22-3.
16. Hendry, Marriage in Changing Japan, pp. 24-5.
17. West, Mark D. (2011). Lovesick Japan: Sex, Marriage, Romance, Law. Cornell University Press. p. 183.
18. Kawashima, Kekkon, pp. 143f.
19. Hendry, Marriage in Changing Japan, p. 21
20. Hendry, Marriage in Changing Japan, pp. 21-2
21. Hendry, Marriage in Changing Japan, pp. 26-8
22. Kelly, William. "Finding a Place in Metropolitan Japan: Transpositions of Everyday Life." Ed. Andrew Gordon. Postwar Japan as History. University of California Press, 1993. P. 208-10.
23. E-Stat (3 September 2015). "Trends in mean age of bride and groom at marriage and difference in mean age between bride and groom". Vital Statistics of Japan. Table 9-12. Retrieved 21 January 2016.
24. Coleman, Samuel. "The Tempo of Family Formation." Ed. David W. Plath. Work and Lifecourse in Japan. Albany: SUNY Press, 1983. P. 183-214.
25. Schirokauer, Conrad, Miranda Brown, David Lurie, and Suzanne Gay. A Brief History of Chinese and Japanese Civilizations. 4th ed. Boston: Cengage Learning, 2013. P. 609-10.
26. IPSS, "Marriage Process and Fertility of Japanese Married Couples" (2011), table 1.1, 1.3.
27. "Chapter 3: Marital Status". Populations and Households of Japan 2010 (PDF). Table 3.1. p. 33. Retrieved 18 January 2016.
28. Statistics Bureau, Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, Japan. "Statistical Handbook of Japan 2014". Chapter 5. Retrieved 18 January 2016.
29. Yamada, Masahiro (3 August 2012). "Japan’s Deepening Social Divides: Last Days for the “Parasite Singles”". Nippon.com. Retrieved 14 January 2016.
30. Sudo, Yoko (18 July 2014). "Japan's Low Marriage Rate Concerns Minister". Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 12 April 2016.
31. "Why the Japanese are having so few babies". The Economist. 23 July 2014. Retrieved 14 January 2016.
32. Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communication, Statistics Bureau. "Japan Statistical Yearbook, Chapter 2: Population and Households". Table 2-25. Retrieved 13 January 2016.
33. IPSS, "Marriage Process and Fertility of Japanese Married Couples" (2011), pp. 9-14.
34. "人口動態調査（平成26年）". Retrieved 13 January 2016.
35. WuDunn, Sheryl (13 March 1996). "Stigma Curtails Single Motherhood in Japan". The New York Times. Retrieved 13 January 2016.
36. Imamura, Yuri; Imamura, Hisanori; Okabayashi, Sawa; Yamada, Kana (9 September 2014). "Half of single-mother households in Japan below poverty line, among worst in OECD rankings". The Asahi Shimbun. Retrieved 13 January 2016.
37. Akaishi, Chieko (24 August 2015). "The Plight of Japan's Single Mothers". Nippon.com. Retrieved 13 January 2016.
38. Brasor, Philip; Tsubuku, Masako (7 November 2015). "No relief in sight for Japan's poor single-parent families". The Japan Times. Retrieved 13 January 2016.
39. IPSS, "Attitudes toward Marriage and Family among Japanese Singles" (2011), p. 2.
40. Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communication, Statistics Bureau. "Japan Statistical Yearbook, Chapter 2: Population and Households". Table 2-12. Retrieved 13 January 2016.
41. "White paper shows Japanese people delaying marriage, having children". Asahi Shimbun. 26 June 2013. Retrieved 15 January 2016.
42. Yoshida, Reiji (31 December 2015). "Japan’s population dilemma, in a single-occupancy nutshell". The Japan Times. Retrieved 14 January 2016.
43. Haworth, Abigail (20 October 2013). "Why have young people in Japan stopped having sex?". The Guardian. Retrieved 14 January 2016.
44. Waldman, Katy (22 October 2013). "Young People in Japan Have Given Up on Sex". Slate. Retrieved 15 January 2016.
45. Osaki, Tomohiro (5 January 2016). "For many young Japanese, marriage — and sex — are low priorities". The Japan Times. Retrieved 19 February 2016.
46. Matthews, Dylan (23 October 2013). "Don’t worry. The Japanese are having plenty of sex". The Washington Post (Know More blog). Retrieved 15 January 2016.
47. Keating, Joshua (23 October 2013). "No, Japanese People Haven't Given Up on Sex". Slate. Retrieved 15 January 2016.
48. IPSS, "Marriage Process and Fertility of Japanese Married Couples" (2011), p. 9.
49. "51% want wives to stay home: poll". The Japan Times. Kyodo. 17 December 2012. Retrieved 14 January 2016.
50. Yamada, Masahiro (17 March 2016). "The Future of the Japanese Family: Diversification or Virtualization?". Nippon.com. Retrieved 27 March 2016.
51. Khan, Mehreen (28 March 2016). "Can anything rescue Japan from the abyss?". The Telegraph. Retrieved 29 March 2016.
52. IPSS, "Attitudes toward Marriage and Family among Japanese Singles" (2011), pp. 20-21.
53. Obe, Mitsuru (12 March 2015). "Japan Has Plenty of Jobs, but Workers Still Struggle". Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 12 April 2016.
54. Murakami, Naohisa (29 February 2016). "Regular Full-Time Positions Increasingly Elusive for Japanese Workers". Nippon.com. Retrieved 7 March 2016.
55. IPSS, "Attitudes toward Marriage and Family among Japanese Singles" (2011), p. 4.
56. Hoenig, Henry; Obe, Mitsuru (8 April 2016). "Why Japan’s Economy Is Laboring". Wall Street Journal.
57. Lewis, Leo (13 January 2016). "Japan: Deflated generation". Financial Times. Retrieved 26 February 2016.
58. Efron, Sonni (26 June 2001). "Me, Find a Husband? Later, Maybe". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 18 January 2016.
59. "Asian demography: The flight from marriage". The Economist. 20 August 2011. Retrieved 18 January 2016.
60. Kawaguchi, Akira (20 August 2015). "Japanese Women Face Tough Reality in Work and Marriage". Nippon.com. Retrieved 18 January 2016.
61. Wiseman, Paul (2 June 2004). "No sex please we're Japanese". USA Today. Retrieved May 10, 2012.
62. Yang, Jeff (2011-03-23). "After the end of the world". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved 2012-01-15.
63. "Young Japanese 'decline to fall in love'". BBC News. 2012-01-11.
64. Vital Statistics in Japan: The Latest Trends (PDF). Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. 2013. p. 32. Retrieved 19 January 2016.
65. "A Look at International Marriage in Japan". Nippon.com. 19 February 2015. Retrieved 19 January 2016.
66. Cartelle, Karryn (8 June 2008). "Foreign victims of domestic violence band together". Japan Today. Retrieved 19 January 2016.
67. "Center offers help to abused Filipinos". The Japan Times. Kyodo. 9 October 2013. Retrieved 19 January 2016.
68. Sugiyama, Haru (12 June 2015). "Kawasaki Youth’s Murder Exposes Japan’s Social and Policy Failings in Coping with Immigration". Nippon.com. Retrieved 19 January 2016.
69. "Trends in live births by nationality of father and mother, 1995, 2000 and 2005-2013". e-Stat. Table 9. 29 January 2015. Retrieved 19 January 2016.
70. Gender Equality Bureau, Cabinet Office, Survey on Domestic Violence (Tokyo: Gender Equality Bureau, 2006) page 3, 9. (Published in Japanese only, English information available at: or at: )
71. Embassy of the United States: Japan, Marriage in Japan. Accessed 29 August 2008.
72. Western Style Weddings in Japan: Are they real weddings? Seiyaku.com. Accessed 29 August 2008.
73. "Japan's Family Registry System". Embassy of the United States: Tokyo, Japan. Retrieved 22 January 2016.
74. Soble, Jonathan (16 December 2015). "Japan’s Top Court Upholds Law Requiring Spouses to Share Surname". The New York Times. Retrieved 19 January 2016.
75. "General visa: Dependent (family stays)". Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan. 22 July 2015. Retrieved 19 January 2016.
76. Tamura, Tsuyoshi (4 September 2013). "Top court rules illegitimate children entitled to equal inheritance". The Asahi Shimbun. Retrieved 22 January 2016.
77. Kisala, R (2006). "Japanese Religions". In Swanson, P; Chilson, C. Nanzan Guide to Japanese Religions (3-13 ed.). University of Hawaii Press. p. 3.
78. "Wedding Ceremonies in Japan". Hiragana Times (June 2010 Issue). 9 January 2013. Retrieved 18 January 2016.
79. "Weddings in Japan". Nippon.com. 20 July 2015. Retrieved 27 March 2016.
80. Edwards, Modern Japan Through Its Weddings, pp. 50-1.
81. "Faking it as a priest in Japan". BBC. 2 November 2006. Retrieved 29 March 2016.
82. Brooke, James (8 July 2005). "Here Comes the Japanese Bride, Looking Very Western". The New York Times. Retrieved 18 January 2016.
83. Lebra, T, Sugiyama (1984). Japanese women: constraint and fulfillment. Honolulu University of Hawaii Press, Retrieved 10 January 2009, from NetLibrary