Dzungar genocide

Dzungar genocide
Part of the Conquest of Dzungaria

Battle of Oroi-Jalatu in 1756
Location Dzungar Khanate (Dzungaria, Western Mongolia, Kazakhstan, northern Kyrgyzstan, southern Siberia)
Date 1755–1758
Target Dzungars
Attack type
 Mass murder
Deaths 480,000[1]- 600,000[1] 80% of the 600,000 Dzungar population
Perpetrators Qing dynasty (Manchu Eight Banners, Green Standard Army), Khalkha Mongols, Inner Mongols

The Dzungar genocide (Chinese: 准噶尔灭族; pinyin: Zhǔngá'ěr mièzú[2]) was the mass extermination of the Dzungar people, sometimes referred as "Zunghars", at the hands of the Manchu[3] Qing dynasty of China and the Uyghur Muslims of Xinjiang. The Qianlong Emperor ordered the extermination to punish the Dzungar leader Amursana's rebellion against Qing rule after the dynasty first conquered the Dzungar Khanate with Amursana's support before he rebelled in 1755. The genocide was carried out by Manchu Generals who commanded the Qing army sent to crush the Dzungars, supported by allies and vassals like Uyghur leader Khoja Emin.

The Dzungars were a confederation of several Tibetan Buddhist Oirat tribes that emerged suddenly in the early 17th century. The Dzungar Khanate was the last great nomadic empire in Asia. Some scholars estimate that about 80% of the Dzungar population, or around 500,000 to 800,000 people, were killed by a combination of warfare and disease during or after the Qing conquest in 1755–1757.[4][5] After wiping out the native population of Dzungaria, the Qing government then resettled Han Chinese, Hui, Uyghur, and Xibe people on state farms in Dzungaria along with Manchu Bannermen to repopulate the area.

Qing conquest of the Dzungars

Dzungar leader Amursana

Background

The Qing dynasty went to war against the Dzungars in the Dzungar–Qing War. The Dzungars who lived in an area that stretched from the west end of the Great Wall of China to present-day eastern Kazakhstan and from present-day northern Kyrgyzstan to southern Siberia (most of which is located in present-day Xinjiang), were the last nomadic empire to threaten China, which they did from the early 17th century through the middle of the 18th century.[6] After a series of inconclusive military conflicts that started in the 1680s, the Dzungars were subjugated by the Manchu-led Qing dynasty (1644–1911) in the late 1750s. Clarke argued that the Qing campaign in 1757–58 "amounted to the complete destruction of not only the Zunghar state but of the Zunghars as a people".[4] After the Qianlong Emperor led Qing forces to victory over the Dzungars in 1755, he originally planned to split the Dzungar Khanate into four tribes headed by four Khans, the Khoit tribe was to have the Dzungar leader Amursana as its Khan. Amursana rejected the Qing arrangement and rebelled since he wanted to be leader of a united Dzungar nation. The enraged Qianlong Emperor then issued his orders for the genocide and eradication of the entire Dzungar nation and name, Mongol banners and Manchus received Dzungar slave women and slave children the other Dzungars were slain on Qianlong's orders.[7]

The Outer Mongol Khalkha Prince Chingünjav conspired with Amursana to revolt against the Qing in 1755. Chingünjav then started his own rebellion in Outer Mongolia against the Qing in 1756 but it was crushed by the Qing in 1757. Chingünjav and his entire family were executed by the Qing after the rebellion was put down. He is now revered as a hero by Khalkha Mongols today.

The Manchu Eight Banners were ordered by the Qing Qianlong Emperor to carry out the conquest against the Dzungars.[8]

The Qianlong Emperor's orders

Qianlong Emperor

"Show no mercy at all to these rebels. Only the old and weak should be saved. Our previous military campaigns were too lenient. If we act as before, our troops will withdraw, and further trouble will occur." - Qianlong Emperor - translated by Peter C. Perdue.[9]

"If a rebel is captured and his followers wish to surrender, he must personally come to the garrison, prostrate himself before the commander, and request surrender. If he only send someone to request submission, it is undoubtedly a trick. Tell Tsengünjav to massacre these crafty Zunghars. Do not believe what they say." - Qianlong Emperor - translated by Peter C. Perdue.[9]

Qianlong had to issue his orders to carry out the "extermination" multiple times to the military officers since some of them were reluctant to carry out the slaughter, some of them were punished for sparing Dzungars and letting them flee such as Agui and Hadada, while others who participated in the slaughter were rewarded like Tangkelu and Zhaohui (Jaohui).[9] The order to slaughter the Dzungars was distasteful to generals who were unwilling to carry out the massacres and they had to be continually ordered by Qianlong to slaughter them.[10]

Young Dzungar men were especially singled out for slaughter by the Qianlong Emperor, loyalist Khalkhas received Dzungar Khoit women as slaves from Chebudengzhabu because the young men were killed on Qianlong's orders, and orders to deprive the starving Dzungars of food were given by the Emperor, Manchu Bannermen and loyalist Mongols received Dzungars women, children, and old men as bondservants while their Dzungar identity was wiped out.[9]

The Qianlong Emperor issued his commanders with direct orders to "massacre" the Dzungars and "show no mercy". Rewards were given to those who carried out the extermination and orders were given for young men to be slaughtered while women were taken as the spoils of war. The Qing extirpated Dzungar identity from the remaining enslaved Dzungar women and children.[11] Orders were given to "completely exterminate the Dzungar tribes, and this successful genocide by the Qing left Dzungaria mostly unpopulated and vacant.[12]

The Qianlong Emperor ordered his men to- "Show no mercy at all to these rebels. Only the old and weak should be saved. Our previous campaigns were too lenient."[13] The Qianlong Emperor did not see any conflict between performing genocide on the Dzungars while upholding the peaceful principles of Confucianism, supporting his position by portraying the Dzungars as barbarian and subhuman. The Qianlong Emperor proclaimed that "To sweep away barbarians is the way to bring stability to the interior.", that the Dzungars "turned their back on civilization.", and that "Heaven supported the emperor." in the destruction of the Dzungars.[14][15]

Genocide

The Qianlong Emperor moved the remaining Dzungar people to other places in China and ordered the generals to kill all the men in Barkol or Suzhou, and divided their wives and children to Qing soldiers.[16][17] In an account of the war, Qing scholar Wei Yuan, wrote that about 40% of the Dzungar households were killed by smallpox, 20% fled to Russia or the Kazakh Khanate, and 30% were killed by the army, leaving no yurts in an area of several thousands of li except those of the surrendered.[1][18][19][20][21] Clarke wrote 80%, or between 480,000 and 600,000 people, were killed between 1755 and 1758 in what "amounted to the complete destruction of not only the Dzungar state but of the Dzungars as a people."[1][22] 80% of the Dzungars died in the genocide.[23] The Dzungar genocide was completed by a combination of a smallpox epidemic and the direct slaughter of Dzungars by Qing forces.[24]

Qing Bannermen and Mongol cavalry made up the initial expeditionary army, as the campaigns progressed tens thousands of Green Standard infantrymen were also brought in.[25] It was reported that children, men, and women of the Dzungars were all slaughtered by Manchu soldiers according to the Russians.[26] It was not until generations later that Dzungaria rebounded from the destruction and near liquidation of the Dzungars after the mass slayings of nearly a million Dzungars.[27]

Historian Peter Perdue has shown that the decimation of the Dzungars was the result of an explicit policy of extermination launched by the Qianlong Emperor,[1] Perdue attributed the decimation of the Dzungars to a "deliberate use of massacre" and has described it as an "ethnic genocide".[28] Although this "deliberate use of massacre" has been largely ignored by modern scholars,[1] Dr. Mark Levene, a historian whose recent research interests focus on genocide,[29] has stated that the extermination of the Dzungars was "arguably the eighteenth century genocide par excellence."[30] According to the Encyclopedia of genocide and crimes against humanity, Volume 3, under Article II of the United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, the Qianlong Emperor's actions against the Dzungars constitute genocide, as he massacred the vast majority of the Dzungar population and enslaved or banished the remainder, and had "Dzungar culture" extirpated and destroyed.[31]

Khoja Emin alliance with Qing

The Dzungars had conquered and subjugated the Uyghurs during the Dzungar conquest of Altishahr after being invited by the Afaqi Khoja to invade. Heavy taxes were imposed upon the Uyghurs by the Dzungars, with women and refreshments provided by the Uyghurs to the tax collectors, and periodically Uyghur women were gang raped by the tax collecters when the amount of tax was not satisfactory.[32] Anti-Dzungar Uyghur rebels from the Turfan and Hami oases submitted to Qing rule as vassals and requested Qing help for overthrowing Dzungar rule. Uyghur leaders like Emin Khoja 額敏和卓 were granted titles within the Qing nobility, and these Uyghurs helped supply the Qing military forces during the anti-Dzungar campaign.[33][34][35] The Qing employed Khoja Emin in its campaign against the Dzungars and used him as an intermediary with Muslims from the Tarim Basin to inform them that the Qing were only aiming to kill Oirats (Dzungars) and that they would leave the Muslims alone, and also to convince them to kill the Oirats (Dzungars) themselves and side with the Qing since the Qing noted the Muslims' resentment of their former experience under Dzungar rule at the hands of Tsewang Araptan.[36]

Consequences of the Genocide

The Qing genocide of the Dzungar, made the Qing sponsored settlement of millions of Han Chinese, Hui, Turkestani Oasis people (Uyghurs) and Manchu Bannermen in Dzungaria possible, since the land was now devoid of Dzungars.[1][37] Professor Stanley W. Toops noted that today's demographic situation is similar to that of the early Qing period in Xinjiang. In northern Xinjiang, the Qing brought in Han, Hui, Uyghur, Xibe, and Kazakh colonists after they exterminated the Dzungar Oirat Mongols in the region, with one third of Xinjiang's total population consisting of Hui and Han in the northern are, while around two thirds were Uyghurs in southern Xinjiang's Tarim Basin.[38][39] In Dzungaria, the Qing established new cities like Ürümqi and Yining.[40] After the Chinese defeated Jahangir Khoja in the 1820s, 12,000 Turki (Uyghur) Taranchi families were deported by China from the Tarim Basin to Dzungaria to colonize and repopulate the area since the mass extermination of the Dzungars left it empty.[41] The Dzungarian basin, which used to be inhabited by Dzungars, is currently inhabited by Kazakhs.[42]

The Qing were the ones who unified Xinjiang and changed its demographic situation.[43] The depopulation of northern Xinjiang after the Buddhist Dzungars were slaughtered, led to the Qing settling Manchu, Sibo (Xibe), Daurs, Solons, Han Chinese, Hui Muslims, and Turkic Muslim Taranchis in the north, with Han Chinese and Hui migrants making up the greatest number of settlers. Since it was the crushing of the Buddhist Öölöd (Dzungars) by the Qing which led to promotion of Islam and the empowerment of the Muslim Begs in southern Xinjiang, and migration of Muslim Taranchis to northern Xinjiang, it was proposed by Henry Schwarz that "the Qing victory was, in a certain sense, a victory for Islam".[44] Xinjiang as a unified, defined geographic identity was created and developed by the Qing. It was the Qing who led to Turkic Muslim power in the region increasing since the Mongol power was crushed by the Qing while Turkic Muslim culture and identity was tolerated or even promoted by the Qing.[45] The Qing gave the name Xinjiang to Dzungaria after conquering it and wiping out the Dzungars, reshaping it from a steppe grassland into farmland cultivated by Han Chinese farmers, 1 million mu (17,000 acres) were turned from grassland to farmland from 1760-1820 by the new colonies.[46]

While a few people try to give a misportrayal of the historical Qing situation in light of the contemporary situation in Xinjiang with Han migration, and claim that the Qing settlements and state farms were an anti-Uyghur plot to replace them in their land, Professor James A. Millward pointed out that the Qing agricultural colonies in reality had nothing to do with Uyghur and their land, since the Qing banned settlement of Han in the Uyghur Tarim Basin and in fact directed the Han settlers instead to settle in the non-Uyghur Dzungaria and the new city of Ürümqi, so that the state farms which were settled with 155,000 Han Chinese from 1760-1830 were all in Dzungaria and Ürümqi, where there was only an insignificant amount of Uyghurs, instead of the Tarim Basin oases.[47]

The Dzungar genocide has been compared to the Qing extermination of the Jinchuan Tibetan people in 1776.[48]

Qing view of the Dzungar campaign

The Qianlong Emperor explicitly commemorated the Qing conquest of the Dzungars as having added new territory in Xinjiang to "China", defining China as a multi ethnic state, rejecting the idea that China only meant Han areas in "China proper", meaning that according to the Qing, both Han and non-Han peoples were part of "China", which included Xinjiang which the Qing conquered from the Dzungars.[49] After the Qing were done conquering Dzungaria in 1759, they proclaimed that the new land which formerly belonged to the Dzungars, was now absorbed into "China" (Dulimbai Gurun) in a Manchu language memorial.[50][51][52] The Qing expounded on their ideology that they were bringing together the "outer" non-Han Chinese like the Inner Mongols, Eastern Mongols, Oirat Mongols, and Tibetans together with the "inner" Han Chinese, into "one family" united in the Qing state, showing that the diverse subjects of the Qing were all part of one family, the Qing used the phrase "Zhong Wai Yi Jia" 中外一家 or "Nei Wai Yi Jia" 內外一家 ("interior and exterior as one family"), to convey this idea of "unification" of the different peoples.[53] Xinjiang people were not allowed to be called foreigners (yi) under the Qing.[54] In the Manchu official Tulisen's Manchu language account of his meeting with the Torghut leader Ayuka Khan, it was mentioned that while the Torghuts were unlike the Russians, the "people of the Central Kingdom" (dulimba-i gurun 中國, Zhongguo) were like the Torghut Mongols, and the "people of the Central Kingdom" referred to the Manchus.[55]

The Qianlong Emperor rejected earlier ideas that only Han could be subjects of China and only Han land could be considered as part of China, instead he redefined China as multiethnic, saying in 1755 that "There exists a view of China (zhongxia), according to which non-Han people cannot become China's subjects and their land cannot be integrated into the territory of China. This does not represent our dynasty's understanding of China, but is instead that of the earlier Han, Tang, Song, and Ming dynasties."[56] The Manchu Qianlong Emperor rejected the views of Han officials who said Xinjiang was not part of China and that he should not conquer it, putting forth the view that China was multiethnic and did not just refer to Han.[57] Han migration to Xinjiang was permitted by the Manchu Qianlong Emperor, who also gave Chinese names to cities to replace their Mongol names, instituting civil service exams in the area, and implementing the county and prefecture Chinese style administrative system, and promoting Han migration to Xinjiang to solidify Qing control was supported by numerous Manchu officials under Qianlong.[58] A proposal was written in The Imperial Gazetteer of the Western Regions (Xiyu tuzhi) to use state-funded schools to promote Confucianism among Muslims in Xinjiang by Fuheng and his team of Manchu officials and the Qianlong Emperor.[59] Confucian names were given to towns and cities in Xinjiang by the Qianlong Emperor, like "Dihua" for Ürümqi in 1760 and Changji, Fengqing, Fukang, Huifu, and Suilai for other cities in Xinjiang, Qianlong also implemented Chinese style prefectures, departments, and counties in a portion of the region.[60]

The Qing Qianlong Emperor compared his achievements with that of the Han and Tang ventures into Central Asia.[61] Qianlong's conquest of Xinjiang was driven by his mindfulness of the examples set by the Han and Tang[62] Qing scholars who wrote the official Imperial Qing gazetteer for Xinjiang made frequent references to the Han and Tang era names of the region.[63] The Qing conqueror of Xinjiang, Zhao Hui, is ranked for his achievements with the Tang dynasty General Gao Xianzhi and the Han dynasty Generals Ban Chao and Li Guangli.[64] Both aspects pf the Han and Tang models for ruling Xinjiang were adopted by the Qing and the Qing system also superficially resembled that of nomadic powers like the Qara Khitay, but in reality the Qing system was different from that of the nomads, both in terms of territory conquered geographically and their centralized administrative system, resembling a western stye (European and Russian) system of rule.[65] The Qing portrayed their conquest of Xinjiang in officials works as a continuation and restoration of the Han and Tang accomplishments in the region, mentioning the previous achievements of those dynasties.[66] The Qing justified their conquest by claiming that the Han and Tang era borders were being restored,[67] and identifying the Han and Tang's grandeur and authority with the Qing.[68] Many Manchu and Mongol Qing writers who wrote about Xinjiang did so in the Chinese language, from a culturally Chinese point of view.[69] Han and Tang era stories about Xinjiang were recounted and ancient Chinese places names were reused and circulated.[70] Han and Tang era records and accounts of Xinjiang were the only writings on the region available to Qing era Chinese in the 18th century and needed to be replaced with updated accounts by the literati.[69][71]

References

Volume 145 of Indiana University Uralic and Altaic series, Indiana University Bloomington. Contributor Indiana University, Bloomington. Research Institute for Inner Asian Studies. Psychology Press. ISBN 0700703802. Retrieved 24 April 2014.  line feed character in |volume= at position 64 (help); horizontal tab character in |others= at position 12 (help)

Notes

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Perdue 2009, p. 285.
  2. ↑ 呂 2010, p. 353.
  3. ↑ Ondřej Klimeš (8 January 2015). Struggle by the Pen: The Uyghur Discourse of Nation and National Interest, c.1900-1949. BRILL. pp. 27–. ISBN 978-90-04-28809-6.
  4. 1 2 3 4 Clarke 2004, p. 37.
  5. ↑ [4]Archived 11 February 2011 at WebCite
  6. ↑ Chapters 3–7 of Perdue 2005 describe the rise and fall of the Dzungar Khanate and its relations with other Mongol tribes, the Qing dynasty, and the Russian empire.
  7. ↑ Millward 2007, p. 95.
  8. ↑ L. J. Newby (2005). The Empire And the Khanate: A Political History of Qing Relations With Khoqand C1760-1860. BRILL. pp. 15–. ISBN 90-04-14550-8.
  9. 1 2 3 4 Peter C Perdue (30 June 2009). China Marches West: The Qing Conquest of Central Eurasia. Harvard University Press. pp. 283–. ISBN 978-0-674-04202-5.
  10. ↑ James A. Millward (2007). Eurasian Crossroads: A History of Xinjiang. Columbia University Press. pp. 95–. ISBN 978-0-231-13924-3.
  11. ↑ Crowe 2014, p. 31.
  12. ↑ Crowe 2014, p. 32.
  13. ↑ Roberts 2011, p. 152.
  14. ↑ Nan & Mampilly & Bartoli 2011, p. 219.
  15. ↑ Nan & Mampilly & Bartoli 2011, p. 219.
  16. ↑ 大清高宗純皇帝實錄, 乾隆二十四年
  17. ↑ 平定準噶爾方略
  18. ↑ Perdue 2005, p. 285.
  19. ↑ ed. Starr 2004, p. 54.
  20. ↑ Wei Yuan, 聖武記 Military history of the Qing dynasty, vol.4. “計數十萬戶中，先痘死者十之四，繼竄入俄羅斯哈薩克者十之二，卒殲於大兵者十之三。除婦孺充賞外，至今惟來降受屯之厄鲁特若干戶，編設佐領昂吉，此外數千里間，無瓦剌一氊帳。”
  21. ↑ Lattimore 1950, p. 126.
  22. ↑ [4]
  23. ↑ Powers & Templeman 2012, p. 537.
  24. ↑ Lorge 2006, p. 165.
  25. ↑ Peter Lorge (29 March 2006). War, Politics and Society in Early Modern China, 900–1795. Routledge. pp. 165–. ISBN 978-1-134-37286-7.
  26. ↑ Peter C Perdue (30 June 2009). China Marches West: The Qing Conquest of Central Eurasia. Harvard University Press. pp. 284–. ISBN 978-0-674-04202-5.
  27. ↑ Tyler 2004, p. 55.
  28. ↑ Perdue 2005, pp. 283-285.
  29. ↑ Dr. Mark Levene, Southampton University, see "Areas where I can offer Postgraduate Supervision". Retrieved 2009-02-09.
  30. ↑ Moses 2008, p. 188
  31. ↑ Shelton 2005, p. 1183.
  32. ↑ Ahmad Hasan Dani; Vadim Mikhaĭlovich Masson; Unesco (1 January 2003). History of Civilizations of Central Asia: Development in contrast : from the sixteenth to the mid-nineteenth century. UNESCO. pp. 197–. ISBN 978-92-3-103876-1.
  33. ↑ Kim 2008, p. 308
  34. ↑ Kim 2008, p. 134
  35. ↑ Kim 2008, p. 49
  36. ↑ Kim 2008, p. 139.
  37. ↑ Tamm 2013,
  38. ↑ ed. Starr 2004, p. 243.
  39. ↑ Toops, Stanley (May 2004). "Demographics and Development in Xinjiang after 1949" (PDF). East-West Center Washington Working Papers (East–West Center) (1): 1.
  40. ↑ Millward 1998, p. 102.
  41. ↑ Tyler 2004, p. 67.
  42. ↑ Tyler 2004, p. 4.
  43. ↑ Liu & Faure 1996, p. 71.
  44. ↑ Liu & Faure 1996, p. 72.
  45. ↑ Liu & Faure 1996, p. 76.
  46. ↑ Marks 2011, p. 192.
  47. ↑ Millward 2007, p. 104.
  48. ↑ Theobald 2013, p. 21.
  49. ↑ Zhao 2006, pp. 11,12.
  50. ↑ Dunnell 2004, p. 77.
  51. ↑ Dunnell 2004, p. 83.
  52. ↑ Elliott 2001, p. 503.
  53. ↑ Dunnell 2004, pp. 76-77.
  54. ↑ Millward 1998, p. 4.
  55. ↑ Perdue 2009, p. 218.
  56. ↑ Zhao 2006, p. 4.
  57. ↑ Zhao 2006, pp. 11-12.
  58. ↑ Zhao 2006, p. 18.
  59. ↑ Zhao 2006, p. 19.
  60. ↑ Zhao 2006, p. 25.
  61. ↑ Millward 1998, p. 25.
  62. ↑ Millward 1998, p. 245.
  63. ↑ Millward 1998, pp. 20-1.
  64. ↑ Millward 2007, p. 356.
  65. ↑ Millward 2007, pp. 97-8.
  66. ↑ Liu & Faure 1996, p. 68.
  67. ↑ Newby 2005, p. 254.
  68. ↑ Newby 2005, p. 13.
  69. 1 2 Newby 2005, p. 111.
  70. ↑ Newby 2005, p. 112.
  71. ↑ Newby 2005, p. 2.
This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Sunday, May 01, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.