Ashe v. Swenson
Ashe v. Swenson |
---|
|
Argued November 13, 1969 Decided April 6, 1970 |
---|
Full case name |
Bob Fred Ashe, Petitioner v. Harold R. Swenson, Warden |
---|
Citations |
397 U.S. 436 (more) 90 S.Ct. 1189 |
---|
Holding |
---|
When an issue of ultimate fact has once been determined by a valid and final judgment, that issue cannot again be litigated between the same parties in any future lawsuit. |
Court membership |
---|
|
Case opinions |
---|
Plurality |
Stewart, joined by Douglas, White, Marshall |
---|
Concurrence |
Black |
---|
Concurrence |
Harlan |
---|
Concurrence |
Brennan, joined by Douglas, Marshall |
---|
Dissent |
Burger |
---|
|
Wikisource has original text related to this article:
|
Ashe v. Swenson, 397 U.S. 436 (1970), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court, which held that "when an issue of ultimate fact has once been determined by a valid and final judgment, that issue cannot again be litigated between the same parties in any future lawsuit." The Double Jeopardy Clause prevents a state from relitigating a question already decided in favor of a defendant at a previous trial. Here, the guarantee against double jeopardy enforceable through the Fifth Amendment provided that the government could not prosecute the criminal defendant in a second trial as it related to a different victim but the same robbery the criminal defendant was acquitted of in the first trial.
See also
Further reading
External links
- Text of Ashe v. Swenson, 397 U.S. 436 (1970) is available from: Findlaw Justia
|
---|
| |
---|
|
- Hurtado v. California (1884)
- Ex parte Wilson (1885)
- United States v. Petit (1885)
- Mackin v. United States (1886)
- Ex parte Bain (1887)
- Parkinson v. United States (1887)
- McNulty v. California (1893)
- Wong Wing v. United States (1896)
- Maxwell v. Dow (1900)
- Lem Woon v. Oregon (1913)
- United States v. Moreland (1922)
- Costello v. United States (1956)
- Lawn v. United States (1958)
- Green v. United States (1958)
- Stirone v. United States (1960)
- Beck v. Washington (1962)
- Midland Asphalt Corp. v. United States (1989)
- United States v. Cotton (2002)
- United States v. Miller (2007)
|
| | |
---|
| After acquittal |
- United States v. Randenbush (1834)
- Ball v. United States (1896)
- Burton v. United States (1906)
- Helvering v. Mitchell (1938)
- Green v. United States (1957)
- Fong Foo v. United States (1962)
- United States v. Tateo (1964)
- Ashe v. Swenson (1970)
- Wilson v. United States (1975)
- Serfass v. United States (1975)
- United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co. (1977)
- Burks v. United States (1978)
- Crist v. Bretz (1978)
- Sanabria v. United States (1978)
- United States v. Scott (1978)
- Bullington v. Missouri (1981)
- Tibbs v. Florida (1982)
- Arizona v. Rumsey (1984)
- Poland v. Arizona (1986)
- Witte v. United States (1995)
- Sattazahn v. Pennsylvania (2003)
- Smith v. Massachusetts (2005)
- Yeager v. United States (2009)
|
---|
| After conviction |
- United States v. Wilson (1833)
- United States v. La Franca (1931)
- United States ex rel. Marcus v. Hess (1943)
- Rex Trailer Co. v. United States (1956)
- Ludwig v. Massachusetts (1976)
- Brown v. Ohio (1977)
- Harris v. Oklahoma (1977)
- Garrett v. United States (1985)
- United States v. Halper (1989)
- Grady v. Corbin (1990)
- United States v. Felix (1992)
- United States v. Dixon (1993)
- Department of Revenue of Montana v. Kurth Ranch (1994)
|
---|
| After mistrial | |
---|
| Multiple punishment |
- Ex parte Lange (1873)
- Blockburger v. United States (1932)
- Whalen v. United States (1980)
- Missouri v. Hunter (1983)
- Rutledge v. United States (1996)
|
---|
| Dual sovereignty doctrine | |
---|
| Other | |
---|
|
| | |
|