United States v. Felix
United States v. Felix |
---|
|
Argued January 14, 1992 Decided March 25, 1992 |
---|
Full case name |
United States, Petitioner v. Frank Dennis Felix |
---|
Citations |
503 U.S. 378 (more) 112 S.Ct. 1377; 118 L.Ed.2d 25 |
---|
Prior history |
Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit |
---|
Holding |
---|
The Double Jeopardy Clause does not bar Felix's prosecution on either the substantive drug offenses or the conspiracy charge. |
Court membership |
---|
|
Case opinions |
---|
Majority |
Rehnquist, joined by White, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas |
---|
Concurrence |
Stevens, joined by Blackmun |
---|
United States v. Felix, 503 U.S. 378 (1992), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court, which held that “a[n]…offense and a conspiracy to commit that offense are not the same offense for double jeopardy purposes.” The Supreme Court rejected the Tenth Circuit's reversal of Felix's conviction, finding that the Court of Appeals read the holding in Grady v. Corbin (1990) too broadly.
See also
Further reading
- Donofrio, Anthony J. (1993). "The Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment: The Supreme Court's Cursory Treatment of Underlying Conduct in Successive Prosecutions". Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (Northwestern University) 83 (4): 773–803. doi:10.2307/1143871. JSTOR 1143871.
- Shindala, C. (1992). "Where Conspiracy To Commit a Crime Is Based on Previously Prosecuted Overt Acts, No Double Jeopardy Violation Exists". Mississippi Law Journal 62 (1): 229–243. ISSN 0026-6280.
External links
|
Wikisource has original text related to this article:
|
|
---|
| |
---|
|
- Hurtado v. California (1884)
- Ex parte Wilson (1885)
- United States v. Petit (1885)
- Mackin v. United States (1886)
- Ex parte Bain (1887)
- Parkinson v. United States (1887)
- McNulty v. California (1893)
- Wong Wing v. United States (1896)
- Maxwell v. Dow (1900)
- Lem Woon v. Oregon (1913)
- United States v. Moreland (1922)
- Costello v. United States (1956)
- Lawn v. United States (1958)
- Green v. United States (1958)
- Stirone v. United States (1960)
- Beck v. Washington (1962)
- Midland Asphalt Corp. v. United States (1989)
- United States v. Cotton (2002)
- United States v. Miller (2007)
|
| | |
---|
| After acquittal |
- United States v. Randenbush (1834)
- Ball v. United States (1896)
- Burton v. United States (1906)
- Helvering v. Mitchell (1938)
- Green v. United States (1957)
- Fong Foo v. United States (1962)
- United States v. Tateo (1964)
- Ashe v. Swenson (1970)
- Wilson v. United States (1975)
- Serfass v. United States (1975)
- United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co. (1977)
- Burks v. United States (1978)
- Crist v. Bretz (1978)
- Sanabria v. United States (1978)
- United States v. Scott (1978)
- Bullington v. Missouri (1981)
- Tibbs v. Florida (1982)
- Arizona v. Rumsey (1984)
- Poland v. Arizona (1986)
- Witte v. United States (1995)
- Sattazahn v. Pennsylvania (2003)
- Smith v. Massachusetts (2005)
- Yeager v. United States (2009)
|
---|
| After conviction |
- United States v. Wilson (1833)
- United States v. La Franca (1931)
- United States ex rel. Marcus v. Hess (1943)
- Rex Trailer Co. v. United States (1956)
- Ludwig v. Massachusetts (1976)
- Brown v. Ohio (1977)
- Harris v. Oklahoma (1977)
- Garrett v. United States (1985)
- United States v. Halper (1989)
- Grady v. Corbin (1990)
- United States v. Felix (1992)
- United States v. Dixon (1993)
- Department of Revenue of Montana v. Kurth Ranch (1994)
|
---|
| After mistrial | |
---|
| Multiple punishment |
- Ex parte Lange (1873)
- Blockburger v. United States (1932)
- Whalen v. United States (1980)
- Missouri v. Hunter (1983)
- Rutledge v. United States (1996)
|
---|
| Dual sovereignty doctrine | |
---|
| Other | |
---|
|
| | |
|