Bartkus v. Illinois
Bartkus v. Illinois |
---|
|
Argued November 19, 1957 Reargued October 21–22, 1958 Decided March 30, 1959 |
---|
Full case name |
Bartkus v. Illinois |
---|
Citations |
359 U.S. 121 (more) 79 S. Ct. 676; 3 L. Ed. 2d 684; 1959 U.S. LEXIS 1824 |
---|
Holding |
---|
Coordination of federal officials with state officials did not implicate the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. It also held that a defendant may be acquitted of a federal crime and convicted of a state crime, even if those crimes share the same evidence, without violating the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. |
Court membership |
---|
|
Case opinions |
---|
Majority |
Frankfurter, joined by Clark, Harlan, Whittaker, Stewart |
---|
Dissent |
Black, joined by Warren, Douglas |
---|
Dissent |
Brennan, joined by Warren, Douglas |
---|
|
Wikisource has original text related to this article:
|
Bartkus v. Illinois, 359 U.S. 121 (1959), is a decision of the U.S. Supreme Court. The decision held that coordination of federal officials with state officials did not implicate the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. It also held that a defendant may be acquitted of a federal crime and convicted of a state crime, even if those crimes share the same evidence, without violating the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
The case established the dual sovereign exception to the Double Jeopardy Clause, enabling state and federal prosecutions for substantially similar events.
External links
|
---|
| |
---|
|
- Hurtado v. California (1884)
- Ex parte Wilson (1885)
- United States v. Petit (1885)
- Mackin v. United States (1886)
- Ex parte Bain (1887)
- Parkinson v. United States (1887)
- McNulty v. California (1893)
- Wong Wing v. United States (1896)
- Maxwell v. Dow (1900)
- Lem Woon v. Oregon (1913)
- United States v. Moreland (1922)
- Costello v. United States (1956)
- Lawn v. United States (1958)
- Green v. United States (1958)
- Stirone v. United States (1960)
- Beck v. Washington (1962)
- Midland Asphalt Corp. v. United States (1989)
- United States v. Cotton (2002)
- United States v. Miller (2007)
|
| | |
---|
| After acquittal |
- United States v. Randenbush (1834)
- Ball v. United States (1896)
- Burton v. United States (1906)
- Helvering v. Mitchell (1938)
- Green v. United States (1957)
- Fong Foo v. United States (1962)
- United States v. Tateo (1964)
- Ashe v. Swenson (1970)
- Wilson v. United States (1975)
- Serfass v. United States (1975)
- United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co. (1977)
- Burks v. United States (1978)
- Crist v. Bretz (1978)
- Sanabria v. United States (1978)
- United States v. Scott (1978)
- Bullington v. Missouri (1981)
- Tibbs v. Florida (1982)
- Arizona v. Rumsey (1984)
- Poland v. Arizona (1986)
- Witte v. United States (1995)
- Sattazahn v. Pennsylvania (2003)
- Smith v. Massachusetts (2005)
- Yeager v. United States (2009)
|
---|
| After conviction |
- United States v. Wilson (1833)
- United States v. La Franca (1931)
- United States ex rel. Marcus v. Hess (1943)
- Rex Trailer Co. v. United States (1956)
- Ludwig v. Massachusetts (1976)
- Brown v. Ohio (1977)
- Harris v. Oklahoma (1977)
- Garrett v. United States (1985)
- United States v. Halper (1989)
- Grady v. Corbin (1990)
- United States v. Felix (1992)
- United States v. Dixon (1993)
- Department of Revenue of Montana v. Kurth Ranch (1994)
|
---|
| After mistrial | |
---|
| Multiple punishment |
- Ex parte Lange (1873)
- Blockburger v. United States (1932)
- Whalen v. United States (1980)
- Missouri v. Hunter (1983)
- Rutledge v. United States (1996)
|
---|
| Dual sovereignty doctrine | |
---|
| Other | |
---|
|
| | |
|