Eating Attitudes Test

The Eating Attitudes Test (EAT, EAT-26), created by David Garner, is a widely used self-report questionnaire 26-item standardized self-report measure of symptoms and concerns characteristic of eating disorders. The EAT has been a particularly useful screening tool to assess "eating disorder risk" in high school, college and other special risk samples such as athletes. Screening for eating disorders is based on the assumption that early identification can lead to earlier treatment, thereby reducing serious physical and psychological complications or even death. Furthermore, EAT has been extremely effective in screening for anorexia nervosa in many populations.[1]

The EAT-26 can be used in a non-clinical as well as a clinical setting not specifically focused on eating disorders. It can be administered in group or individual settings and is designed to be administered by mental health professionals, school counselors, coaches, camp counselors, and others with interest in gathering information to determine if an individual should be referred to a specialist for evaluation for an eating disorder. It is ideally suited for school settings, athletic programs, fitness centers, infertility clinics, pediatric practices, general practice settings, and outpatient psychiatric departments. It is designed for adolescents and adults.

The EAT-26 is rated on a six-point scale based on how often the individual engages in specific behaviors. The questions may be answered: Always, Usually, Often, Sometimes, Rarely, and Never. Completing the EAT-26 yields a "referral index" based on three criteria: 1) the total score based on the answers to the EAT-26 questions; 2) answers to the behavioral questions related to eating symptoms and weight loss, and 3) the individual’s body mass index (BMI) calculated from their height and weight. Generally a referral is recommended if a respondent scores "positively" or meets the "cut off" scores or threshold on one or more criteria.

Development and History

The EAT was developed in response to a National Institute of Mental Health consensus panel that recognized a need for screening large populations to increase early identification of anorexia related symptoms. Additionally, the NIMH wanted a measure that could be used to examine the social and cultural factors involved in the development and maintenance of eating disorders[2] The original version of the EAT was published in 1979, with 40 items each rated on a 6-point likert scale.[3] In 1982, Garner and colleagues modified the original version to create an abbreviated 26-item test.[4] The items were reduced after a factor analysis on the original 40-item data set revealed there to be only 26 independent items.[5] Since that time, the EAT has been translated into many different languages and has gained widespread international as a tool to screen for eating disorders.[6] Both the original paper and the subsequent 1982 publication are 3rd and 4th on the list of the 10 most cited articles in the history of the journal Psychological Medicine , a prominent peer-reviewed journal in the fields of psychology and psychiatry.

The EAT-26 should be used as the first step in a two-stage screening process. Accordingly, individuals who score higher than a 20 should be referred to a qualified professional to determine if they meet the diagnostic criteria for an eating disorder. The EAT-26 is not designed to make a diagnosis of an eating disorder and should not be used in place of a professional diagnosis or consultation. The EAT should only be used as a screener for general eating disorders, as research has not shown it to be a valid instrument in making specific diagnoses.[4]

Permission to use the EAT-40 or EAT-26 can be obtained from David Garner through the EAT-26 website or the River Centre Clinic . Instructions and scoring information can be obtained from the EAT-26 website for no charge.

Scoring and Result Interpretation

There are three parts to this 26 question test, each part assessing a different dimension of the respondent's attitude towards eating. Part A deals with age, weight, and other physical attributes of the respondent. Part B screens for the respondent's attitude towards their height, weight, and shape. Part C asks about behavioral tendencies of the respondent over the past six months. It is important to note that results from EAT-26 should not take the place of an expert medical opinion.

Scoring

A respondent's score is often used in addition to the BMI norms for their age. The responses for Part A are also taken into consideration.

The sum of questions 1-26 yield the total score.

Question 26 scored as:

The behavioral questions are scored as follows:

Interpretation

A score of 20 or more on questions 1-26 suggests a high risk for an eating disorder. It is recommended that the respondent be referred to a professional for further diagnosis. Any behavioral question that yields a "positive screen" indicates that the respondent should seek evaluation from a professional.

Limitations

The EAT suffers from the same problems as other self-report inventories, in that scores can be easily exaggerated or minimized by the person completing them. Like all questionnaires, the way the instrument is administered can have an effect on the final score. If a patient is asked to fill out the form in front of other people in a clinical environment, for instance, social expectations have been shown to elicit a different response compared to administration via a postal survey.[7]

There are some general concerns with the EAT-26. First, varied symptoms of eating disorders and self-report instruments like the EAT measure symptoms only at that particular point in time. Therefore, considerable fluctuation is possible in some aspects of the eating disorder. Additionally, as it occurs with self-report measures generally, high scores on the EAT is typically influenced by a person's attitude. For example, a person might disclose less about their problems in order to be more socially desirable.[8] The EAT has low positive predictive value because of denial and social desirability, as well as the possible confounding role of co-morbid factors.[8]

See also

Other assessments

Evidence-based treatments


General guidelines and summaries


External links

References

  1. ↑ Garner & Garfinkel, (1979) http://eat-26.com/Docs/Garner-EAT-40%201979.pdf
  2. ↑ Garner, D.M., & Garfinkel, P.E. (1980). Socio-cultural factors in the development of anorexia nervosa. Psychological Medicine, 10, 273-279.
  3. ↑ Garner, D.M., & Garfinkel, P.E. (1979).Psychological Medicine, 9, 273-279.
  4. 1 2 Garner et al. (1982). The eating attitudes test: Psychometric features and clinical correlates. Psychological Medicine, 12, 871-878.
  5. ↑ Garner, David M.; Olmsted, Marion P.; Bohr, Yvonne; Garfinkel, Paul E. (1982-11-01). "The Eating Attitudes Test: psychometric features and clinical correlates". Psychological Medicine 12 (04): 871–878. doi:10.1017/S0033291700049163. ISSN 1469-8978.
  6. ↑ Alvarez-Rayón, G.; Mancilla-Díaz, J. M.; Vázquez-Arévalo, R.; Unikel-Santoncini, C.; Caballero-Romo, A.; Mercado-Corona, D. (2013-07-26). "Validity of the Eating Attitudes Test: A study of Mexican eating disorders patients". Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity 9 (4): 243–248. doi:10.1007/BF03325077. ISSN 1124-4909.
  7. ↑ Bowling A (2005). "Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality". Journal of Public Health 27 (3): 281–91. doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdi031. PMID 15870099.
  8. 1 2 Garfinkel, P. E., & Newman, A. (2013). The Eating Attitudes Test: Twenty five years later. Eating and Weight Disorders, 6(1), 1–21.

Further reading

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Wednesday, May 04, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.