John Zerzan

John Zerzan

Zerzan lecturing at the 2010 Bay Area Anarchist Book Fair
Born 1943 (age 72–73)
Salem, Oregon, United States
Alma mater Stanford University
San Francisco State University
University of Southern California
Era 20th-century philosophy
Region Western Philosophy
School Anarcho-primitivism, Post-left anarchy
Main interests
 Hunter-gatherer society, Civilization, alienation, symbolic culture, technology, mass society
Notable ideas
 Domestication of humans, rewilding

John Zerzan (/ˈzɜːrzən/, ZUR-zən; born 1943) is an American anarchist and primitivist philosopher and author. His works criticize agricultural civilization as inherently oppressive, and advocate drawing upon the ways of life of hunter-gatherers as an inspiration for what a free society should look like. Some subjects of his criticism include domestication, language, symbolic thought (such as mathematics and art) and the concept of time.

His six major books are Elements of Refusal (1988), Future Primitive and Other Essays (1994), Running on Emptiness (2002), Against Civilization: Readings and Reflections (2005), Twilight of the Machines (2008), and Why hope? The Stand Against Civilization (2015).

Early life and education

Zerzan was born in Salem, Oregon. He received his bachelor's degree from Stanford University and later received a master's degree in History from San Francisco State University. He completed his coursework towards a PhD at the University of Southern California but dropped out before completing his dissertation. He is of Czech descent.

Zerzan's anarchism

Zerzan's theories draw on Theodor Adorno's concept of negative dialectics to construct a theory of civilization as the cumulative construction of alienation. According to Zerzan, original human societies in paleolithic times, and similar societies today such as the !Kung and Mbuti, live a non-alienated and non-oppressive form of life based on primitive abundance and closeness to nature. Constructing such societies as a kind of political ideal, or at least an instructive comparison against which to denounce contemporary (especially industrial) societies, Zerzan uses anthropological studies from such societies as the basis for a wide-ranging critique of aspects of modern life. He portrays contemporary society as a world of misery built on the psychological production of a sense of scarcity and lack.[1] The history of civilization is the history of renunciation; what stands against this is not progress but rather the Utopia which arises from its negation.[2]

Zerzan is an anarchist, and is broadly associated with the philosophies of anarcho-primitivism, green anarchism, anti-civilisation, post-left anarchy, neo-luddism, and in particular the critique of technology.[3] He rejects not only the state, but all forms of hierarchical and authoritarian relations. "Most simply, anarchy means 'without rule.' This implies not only a rejection of government but of all other forms of domination and power as well."[4]

Zerzan's work relies heavily on a strong dualism between the "primitive" – viewed as non-alienated, wild, non-hierarchical, ludic, and socially egalitarian – and the "civilised" – viewed as alienated, domesticated, hierarchically organised and socially discriminatory. Hence, "life before domestication/agriculture was in fact largely one of leisure, intimacy with nature, sensual wisdom, sexual equality, and health."[5]

Zerzan's claims about the status of primitive societies are based on a certain reading of the works of anthropologists such as Marshall Sahlins and Richard B. Lee. Crucially, the category of primitives is restricted to pure hunter-gatherer societies with no domesticated plants or animals. For instance, hierarchy among Northwest Coast Native Americans whose main activities were fishing and foraging is attributed to their having domesticated dogs and tobacco.[5][6]

Zerzan calls for a "Future Primitive", a radical reconstruction of society based on a rejection of alienation and an embracing of the wild. "It may be that our only real hope is the recovery of a face-to-face social existence, a radical decentralization, a dismantling of the devouring, estranging productionist, high-tech trajectory that is so impoverishing."[4] The usual use of anthropological evidence is comparative and demonstrative – the necessity or naturality of aspects of modern western societies is challenged by pointing to counter-examples in hunter-gatherer societies. "Ever-growing documentation of human prehistory as a very long period of largely non-alienated life stands in sharp contrast to the increasingly stark failures of untenable modernity."[2] It is unclear, however, whether this implies a re-establishment of the literal forms of hunter-gatherer societies or a broader kind of learning from their ways of life in order to construct non-alienated relations.

Zerzan's political project calls for the destruction of technology. He draws the same distinction as Ivan Illich, between tools that stay under the control of the user, and technological systems that draw the user into their control. One difference is the division of labour, which Zerzan opposes. In Zerzan's philosophy, technology is possessed by an elite which automatically has power over other users; this power is one of the sources of alienation, along with domestication and symbolic thought.

Zerzan's typical method is to take a particular construct of civilisation (a technology, belief, practice or institution) and construct an account of its historical origins, what he calls its destructive and alienating effects and its contrasts with hunter-gatherer experiences. In his essay on number, for example, Zerzan starts by contrasting the "civilized" emphasis on counting and measuring with a "primitive" emphasis on sharing, citing Dorothy Lee's work on the Trobriand Islanders in support, before constructing a narrative of the rise of number through cumulative stages of state domination, starting with the desire of Egyptian kings to measure what they ruled.[7] This approach is repeated in relation to time,[8] gender inequality,[9] work,[10] technology,[11] art and ritual,[6] agriculture[12] and globalization.[13] Zerzan also writes more general texts on anarchist,[4] primitivist theory,[2][5] and critiques of "postmodernism".[14]

Zerzan was one of the editors of Green Anarchy, a controversial journal of anarcho-primitivist and insurrectionary anarchist thought. Link label He is also the host of Anarchy Radio in Eugene on the University of Oregon's radio station KWVA. He has also served as a contributing editor at Anarchy Magazine and has been published in magazines such as AdBusters. He does extensive speaking tours around the world, and is married to an independent consultant to museums and other nonprofit organizations.

Political development

In 1966, Zerzan was arrested while performing civil disobedience at a Berkeley anti-Vietnam War march and spent two weeks in the Contra Costa County Jail. He vowed after his release never again to be willingly arrested. He attended events organized by Ken Kesey and the Merry Pranksters and was involved with the psychedelic drug and music scene in San Francisco's Haight-Ashbury neighborhood.[15][16]

In the late 1960s he worked as a social worker for the city of San Francisco welfare department. He helped organize a social worker's union, the SSEU, and was elected vice president in 1968, and president in 1969.[16][17] The local Situationist group Contradiction denounced him as a "leftist bureaucrat".[18] He became progressively more radical as he dealt further with his and other unions. He was also a voracious reader of the Situationists, being particularly influenced by Guy Debord.[16]

In 1974, Black and Red Press published Unions Against Revolution by Spanish ultra-left theorist Grandizo Munis that included an essay by Zerzan which previously appeared in the journal Telos. Over the next 20 years, Zerzan became intimately involved with the Fifth Estate, Anarchy: A Journal of Desire Armed, Demolition Derby and other anarchist periodicals. He began to question civilization in the early 80's, after having sought to confront issues around the neutrality of technology and division of labour, at the time when Fredy Perlman was making similar conclusions.[19] He saw civilization itself as the root of the problems of the world and that a hunter-gatherer form of society presented the most egalitarian model for human relations with themselves and the natural world.

Zerzan and the "Unabomber"

In the mid-1990s, Zerzan became a confidant to Theodore Kaczynski, the "Unabomber", after he read Industrial Society and Its Future, the so-called Unabomber Manifesto. Zerzan sat through the Unabomber trial and often conversed with Kaczynski during the proceedings. After Zerzan became known as a friend of the Unabomber, the mainstream media became interested in Zerzan and his ideas.

On May 7, 1995, a full-page interview with Zerzan was featured in The New York Times.[20] In Zerzan's essay "Whose Unabomber?" (1995), he signaled his support for the Kaczynski doctrine, but criticised the bombings:

[T]he mailing of explosive devices intended for the agents who are engineering the present catastrophe is too random. Children, mail carriers, and others could easily be killed. Even if one granted the legitimacy of striking at the high-tech horror show by terrorizing its indispensable architects, collateral harm is not justifiable ...[21]

However, Zerzan in the same essay offered a qualified defense of the Unabomber's actions:

The concept of justice should not be overlooked in considering the Unabomber phenomenon. In fact, except for his targets, when have the many little Eichmanns who are preparing the Brave New World ever been called to account?... Is it unethical to try to stop those whose contributions are bringing an unprecedented assault on life?[21]

Two years later, in the 1997 essay "He Means It — Do You?," Zerzan wrote:

Enter the Unabomber and a new line is being drawn. This time the bohemian schiz-fluxers, Green yuppies, hobbyist anarcho-journalists, condescending organizers of the poor, hip nihilo-aesthetes and all the other "anarchists" who thought their pretentious pastimes would go on unchallenged indefinitely — well, it's time to pick which side you're on. It may be that here also is a Rubicon from which there will be no turning back.

In a 2001 interview with The Guardian, he said:

Will there be other Kaczynskis? I hope not. I think that activity came out of isolation and desperation, and I hope that isn't going to be something that people feel they have to take up because they have no other way to express their opposition to the brave new world.[15]

In a 2014 interview Zerzan stated that he and Kaczynski were "not on terms anymore." He criticized his former friend's 2008 essay "The Truth About Primitive Life: A Critique of Anarchoprimitivism" and expressed disapproval of Individuals Tending Towards the Savage, a Mexican group inspired by the Unabomber's bombing campaign.[22]

Zerzan and the Seattle Riots

Another significant event that shot Zerzan to celebrity philosopher status was his association with members of the Eugene, Oregon anarchist scene.[23]

This was seen—incorrectly, it turned out—as the driving force behind the use of black bloc tactics at the 1999 anti-World Trade Organization protests in Seattle, Washington. Anarchists using black bloc tactics were thought to be chiefly responsible for the property destruction committed at numerous corporate storefronts and banks.

Although the majority of black block participants were, in fact, class struggle anarchists and not primitivists, the mainstream media chose Zerzan as one of those to explain the actions.

Again boosted by public notoriety, Zerzan began accepting speaking engagements and giving interviews around the world explaining anarcho-primitivism and so-called post-left anarchist trend. This argues that anarchists should break with the political left.

Criticism: history, catastrophe and anarchism

In his essay "Social Anarchism or Lifestyle Anarchism: An Unbridgeable Chasm", Murray Bookchin directed criticism from an anarchist point of view at Zerzan's anti-civilizational and anti-technological perspective. He argued that Zerzan's representation of hunter-gatherers was flawed, selective and often patronisingly racist, that his analysis was superficial, and that his practical proposals were nonsensical.

Aside from Murray Bookchin, several other anarchist critiques of Zerzan's primitivist philosophies exist. The pamphlet, "Anarchism vs. Primitivism" by Brian Oliver Sheppard criticizes many aspects of the primitivist philosophy.[24] It specifically rejects the claim that primitivism is a form of anarchism.

Some authors, such as Andrew Flood, have argued that destroying civilization would lead to the death of a significant majority of the population, mainly in poor countries.[25] John Zerzan responded to such claims by suggesting a gradual decrease in population size, with the possibility of people having the need to seek means of sustainability more close to nature.[26]

Flood suggests this contradicts Zerzan's claims elsewhere, and adds that, since it is certain that most people will strongly reject Zerzan's supposed utopia, it can only be implemented by authoritarian means, against the will of billions.[25]

In his essay "Listen Anarchist!", Chaz Bufe criticized the primitivist position from an anarchist perspective, pointing out that primitivists are extremely vague about exactly which technologies they advocate keeping and which they seek to abolish, noting that smallpox had been eradicated thanks to medical technology.[27]

Theodore J. Kaczynski, better known as the Unabomber, is a surprisingly harsh critic of the current Anarcho-Primitivist mainstream and Zerzan in particular for what he sees as a foolish and invalid projection of leftist values such as gender equality, pacifism and leisure time onto the primitive way of life. Kaczynski holds that the values of gender equality, pacifism, leisure time, etc., while still admirable, are exactly the values of techno-industrial civilization and its promised techno-utopia. Second, he holds that having such an interpretation is counter-productive to the ultimate anti-civilization/anti-tech goal as it attracts "leftist types" who are by nature uncommitted and act to dilute the movement. Kaczynski insists that the core values of freedom, autonomy, dignity, and human fulfillment must be emphasized above all others.[28]

Zerzan's views have been criticized for being anti-anarchist. His solution - a return to a hunter-gatherer lifestyle - has been criticized as likely to lead to a loss of life.[25] His critics largely reject his claim to be an anarchist.[24]

Selected works

Books and pamphlets

Articles

See also

References

  1. ↑ John Zerzan – The Mass Psychology of Misery Archived March 23, 2010 at the Wayback Machine
  2. 1 2 3 John Zerzan – Why Primitivism? Archived December 14, 2009 at the Wayback Machine
  3. ↑ John Zerzan The Guardian
  4. 1 2 3 John Zerzan – What is Anarchism? Archived June 18, 2010 at the Wayback Machine
  5. 1 2 3 "John Zerzan – Future Primitive". Primitivism.com. Retrieved November 13, 2011.
  6. 1 2 "John Zerzan – Running on Emptiness: The Failure of Symbolic Thought". Primitivism.com. Retrieved November 13, 2011.
  7. ↑ John Zerzan – Number: Its Origin and Evolution Archived June 18, 2010 at the Wayback Machine
  8. ↑ John Zerzan – Time and its Discontents Archived June 18, 2010 at the Wayback Machine
  9. ↑ John Zerzan – Patriarchy, Civilization, and the Origins of Gender Archived February 6, 2010 at the Wayback Machine
  10. ↑ John Zerzan – Organized Labor versus "The Revolt Against Work" Archived June 18, 2010 at the Wayback Machine
  11. ↑ John Zerzan – Technology Archived June 18, 2010 at the Wayback Machine
  12. ↑ John Zerzan – Agriculture Archived August 31, 2010 at the Wayback Machine
  13. ↑ John Zerzan – Globalization and its Apologists: An Abolitionist Perspective Archived February 6, 2010 at the Wayback Machine
  14. ↑ John Zerzan – "Hakim Bey," Postmodern Anarchist Archived March 19, 2013 at the Wayback Machine
  15. 1 2 "Profile of American anarchist John Zerzan | World news". The Guardian (UK). April 20, 2001. Retrieved November 13, 2011.
  16. 1 2 3 John Zerzan – So...how did you become an anarchist?
  17. ↑ History of the union Archived August 28, 2008 at the Wayback Machine
  18. ↑ Contradiction. "Open Letter to John Zerzan, anti-bureaucrat of the San Francisco Social Services Employees Union". Bopsecrets.org. Retrieved November 13, 2011.
  19. ↑ "Interview: Anarcho-Primitivist Thinker and Activist John Zerzan | CORRUPT.org: Conservation & Conservatism". CORRUPT.org. December 7, 2008. Retrieved November 13, 2011.
  20. ↑ Prominent Anarchist Finds Unsought Ally in Serial Bomber (New York Times article)
  21. 1 2 John Zerzan – Whose Unabomber? Archived June 18, 2010 at the Wayback Machine
  22. ↑ "The Anarcho-Primitivist Who Wants Us All To Give Up Technology". Vice Media Inc (USA). June 25, 2014. Retrieved June 26, 2014.
  23. ↑ "Part. III: Eco-Anarchy Imploding". Eugene Weekly. November 22, 2006. Retrieved September 1, 2010.
  24. 1 2 "Anarchism vs. Primitivism by Brian Oliver Sheppard". Libcom.org. Retrieved November 13, 2011.
  25. 1 2 3 "Civilization, Primitivism, Anarchism by Andrew Flood". Anarkismo.net. Retrieved November 13, 2011.
  26. ↑ Archived September 10, 2010 at the Wayback Machine
  27. ↑ Chaz Bufe (1987). "Listen Anarchist!". See Sharp Press.
  28. ↑ Technological Slavery: The collected writings of Theodore J. Kaczynski, pp. 128–189.

External links

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Thursday, February 04, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.