MÄori electorates
![]() |
This article is part of a series on the politics and government of New Zealand |
Constitution |
|
Judiciary
|
Related topics |
Politics portal |
In New Zealand politics, MÄori electorates, colloquially also called MÄori seats, are a special category of electorate that gives reserved positions to representatives of MÄori in the Parliament of New Zealand. Consequently, every area in New Zealand is covered by both a general and a MÄori electorate.
MÄori electorates were introduced in 1867 under the Maori Representation Act.[1] The first MÄori elections were held in the following year during the term of the 4th New Zealand Parliament. They were intended as a temporary measure and, despite numerous attempts to disestablish MÄori electorates, they continue to form part of the New Zealand political landscape.[2]
Organisation
MÄori electorates operate much as do general electorates, but have as electors people who are MÄori or of MÄori descent, and who choose to place their names on a separate electoral roll rather than on the "general roll".
MÄori electoral boundaries are superimposed over the electoral boundaries used for general electorates; thus every part of New Zealand simultaneously belongs both in a general seat and in a MÄori seat. Shortly after each census all registered MÄori electors have the opportunity to choose whether they are included on the MÄori or General electorate rolls.[3] Each five-yearly MÄori Electoral Option determines the number of MÄori electorates for the next one or two elections.
Establishment
The establishment of MÄori electorates came about in 1867 during the term of the 4th Parliament with the MÄori Representation Act, drafted by Napier MP Donald McLean.[2] Parliament passed the Act only after lengthy debate. Many conservative MPs, most of whom considered MÄori "unfit" to participate in government, opposed MÄori representation in Parliament, while some MPs from the other end of the spectrum (such as James FitzGerald, who had proposed allocating a third of Parliament to MÄori) regarded the concessions given to MÄori as insufficient. In the end the setting up of MÄori electorates separate from existing electorates assuaged conservative opposition to the bill – conservatives had previously feared that MÄori would gain the right to vote in general electorates, thereby forcing all MPs (rather than just four MÄori MPs) to take notice of MÄori opinion.
Before this law came into effect, no direct prohibition on MÄori voting existed, but other indirect prohibitions made it extremely difficult for MÄori to exercise their theoretical electoral rights. The most significant problem involved the property qualification – to vote, one needed to possess a certain value of land. MÄori owned a great deal of land, but they held it in common, not under individual title, and under the law, only land held under individual title could count towards the property qualification. Donald McLean explicitly intended his bill as a temporary measure, giving specific representation to MÄori until they adopted European customs of land ownership. However, the MÄori electorates lasted far longer than the intended five years, and remain in place today, despite the property qualification for voting being removed in 1879.
The first four MÄori members of parliament elected in 1868 were Tareha te Moananui (Eastern Maori), Frederick Nene Russell (Northern Maori) and John Patterson (Southern Maori), who all retired in 1870; and Mete Paetahi (Western Maori) who was defeated in 1871. The second four were Karaitiana Takamoana (Eastern Maori); Wi Katene (Northern Maori); Hori Kerei Taiaroa (Southern Maori); and Wiremu Parata (Western Maori).
The first MÄori woman MP was Iriaka Ratana, who succeeded her late husband Matiu Ratana in 1949.
Elections
Elections for MÄori electorates occur as part of New Zealand general elections but in the past such elections took place separately, occurring on different days (usually the day before the vote for general electorates) and having different rules. Historically, less organisation went into holding MÄori elections than general elections, and the process received fewer resources. At first, MÄori electorates did not even require registration for voting, although later rules changed this. New practices such as paper ballots (as opposed to casting one's vote verbally) and secret ballots also came later to elections for MÄori electorates than to general electorates.
The authorities frequently delayed or overlooked reforms of the MÄori electoral system, with Parliament considering the MÄori electorates as largely unimportant. The gradual improvement of MÄori elections owes much to long-serving MÄori MP Eruera Tirikatene, who himself experienced problems in his own election. From the election of 1951 onwards, the voting for MÄori and general electorates was held on the same day.
Calls for abolition
Periodically there have been calls for the abolition of the Maori seats. The electorates aroused controversy even at the time of their origin, and given their intended temporary nature, there were a number of attempts to abolish them. The reasoning behind these attempts has varied – some have seen the electorates as an unfair or unnecessary advantage for MÄori, while others have seen them as discriminatory and offensive.
In 1902, a consolidation of electoral law prompted considerable discussion of the MÄori electorates, and some MPs proposed their abolition. Many of the proposals came from members of the opposition, and possibly had political motivations – in general, the MÄori MPs had supported the governing Liberal Party, which had held power since 1891. Many MPs alleged frequent cases of corruption in elections for the MÄori electorates. Other MPs, however, supported the abolition of MÄori electorates for different reasons – Frederick Pirani, a member of the Liberal Party, said that the absence of MÄori voters from general electorates prevented "pÄkehÄ members of the House from taking that interest in MÄori matters that they ought to take". The MÄori MPs, however, mounted a strong defence of the electorates, with Wi Pere depicting guaranteed representation in Parliament as one of the few rights MÄori possessed not "filched from them by the Europeans". The electorates continued in existence.
Just a short time later, in 1905, another re-arrangement of electoral law caused the debate to flare up again. The Minister of MÄori Affairs, James Carroll, supported proposals for the abolition of MÄori electorates, pointing to the fact that he himself had won the general electorate of Waiapu. Other MÄori MPs, such as Hone Heke Ngapua, remained opposed, however. In the end, the proposals for the abolition or reform of MÄori electorates did not proceed.
Considerably later, in 1953, the first ever major re-alignment of MÄori electoral boundaries occurred, addressing inequalities in voter numbers. Again, the focus on MÄori electorates prompted further debate about their existence. The government of the day, the National Party, had at the time a commitment to the assimilation of MÄori, and had no MÄori MPs, and so many believed that they would abolish the electorates. However, the government had other matters to attend to, and the issue of the MÄori electorates gradually faded from view without any changes occurring. Regardless, the possible abolition of the MÄori electorates appeared indicated when they did not appear among the electoral provisions "entrenched" against future modification.
In the 1950s the practice of reserving electorates for MÄori was described by some politicians "as a form of 'apartheid', like in South Africa".[4]
In 1976, MÄori gained the right for the first time to decide on which electoral roll they preferred to enrol. Surprisingly, only 40% of the potential population registered on the MÄori roll. This reduced the number of calls for the abolition of MÄori electorates, as many presumed that MÄori would eventually abandon the MÄori electorates of their own accord.
When a Royal Commission proposed the adoption of the MMP electoral system in 1986, it also proposed that if the country adopted the new system, it should abolish the MÄori electorates. The Commission argued that under MMP, all parties would have to pay attention to MÄori voters, and that the existence of separate MÄori electorates marginalised MÄori concerns. Following a referendum, Parliament drafted an Electoral Reform Bill, incorporating the abolition of the MÄori electorates. Both the National Party and Geoffrey Palmer, Labour's leading reformist, supported abolition; but most MÄori strongly opposed it. Eventually, the provision did not become law. The MÄori electorates came closer than ever to abolition, but survived.
The ACT Party and the National Party have each advocated abolition of the separate electorates. New Zealand First also advocates abolition of the separate electorates but says that the MÄori voters should make the decision. The National Party announced in 2008 it would abolish the electorates when all historic Treaty settlements have been resolved, which it aims to complete by 2014.[5] While it remains National Party policy to abolish the electorates, Prime Minister John Key ruled it out as recently as August 2014, saying he would not do it even if he had the numbers to do so as there would be "hikois from hell".[6]
Number of electorates
From 1868 to 1996, four MÄori electorates existed (out of a total that slowly changed from 76 to 99).[7] They comprised:[8]
With the introduction of the MMP electoral system after 1993, the rules regarding the MÄori electorates changed. Today, the number of electorates floats, meaning that the electoral population of a MÄori seat can remain roughly equivalent to that of a general seat. In the first MMP vote (the 1996 election), the Electoral Commission defined five MÄori electorates:
- Te Puku O Te Whenua (="The belly of the land")
- Te Tai Hauauru (="The western district")
- Te Tai Rawhiti (="The eastern district")
- Te Tai Tokerau (="The northern district")
- Te Tai Tonga (="The southern district")
For the second MMP election (the 1999 election), six MÄori electorates existed:
The 2002 and 2005 elections had seven:
- Ikaroa-RÄwhiti
- Tainui
- TÄmaki Makaurau (roughly equivalent to greater Auckland)
- Te Tai HauÄuru
- Te Tai Tokerau
- Te Tai Tonga
- Waiariki
The 2008, 2011 and 2014 elections also had seven:
- Hauraki-Waikato – (North Western North Island, includes Hamilton and Papakura)
- Ikaroa-RÄwhiti – (East and South North Island, includes Gisborne and Masterton)
- TÄmaki Makaurau – (Roughly equivalent to greater Auckland)
- Te Tai HauÄuru – (Western North Island, includes Taranaki and Manawatu-Wanganui regions)
- Te Tai Tokerau – (Northernmost seat, includes Whangarei and North and West Auckland)
- Te Tai Tonga – (All of South Island and nearby islands. Largest electorate by area)
- Waiariki – (Includes Tauranga, Whakatane, Rotorua, Taupo)
While seven out of 70 (10%) does not nearly reflect the proportion of New Zealanders who identify as being of MÄori descent (about 18%), many MÄori choose to enroll in general electorates, so the proportion reflects the proportion of voters on the MÄori roll.
For maps showing broad electoral boundaries, see selected links to individual elections at New Zealand elections.
MÄori Party co-leader Pita Sharples has proposed the creation of an additional electorate, for MÄori living in Australia, where there are between 115,000 and 125,000 MÄori, the majority living in Queensland.[9]
Party politics
As MÄori electorates originated before the development of political parties in New Zealand, all early MÄori MPs functioned as independents. When the Liberal Party formed, however, MÄori MPs began to align themselves with the new organisation, with either Liberal candidates or Liberal sympathisers as representatives. MÄori MPs in the Liberal Party included James Carroll, Apirana Ngata and Te Rangi HÄ«roa. There were also MÄori MPs in the more conservative and rural Reform Party; Maui Pomare, Taurekareka Henare and Taite Te Tomo.
Since the Labour Party first came to power in 1935, however, it has dominated the MÄori electorates. For a long period this dominance owed much to Labour's alliance with the Ratana Church, although the Ratana influence has diminished in recent times. In the 1993 election, however, the new New Zealand First Party, led by the part-MÄori Winston Peters – who himself held the general seat of Tauranga from 1984 to 2005 – gained the Northern MÄori seat (electing Tau Henare to Parliament), and in the 1996 election New Zealand First captured all the MÄori electorates for one electoral term. Labour regained the electorates in the following election in the 1999 election.
A development of particular interest to MÄori came in 2004 with the resignation of Tariana Turia from her ministerial position in the Labour-dominated coalition and from her Te Tai HauÄuru parliamentary seat. In the resulting by-election on 10 July 2004, standing under the banner of the newly formed MÄori Party, she received over 90% of the 7,000-plus votes cast. The parties then represented in Parliament had not put up official candidates in the by-election. The new party's support in relation to Labour therefore remained untested at the polling booth.
The MÄori Party aimed to win all seven MÄori electorates in 2005. A Marae-Digipoll survey of MÄori-rollvoters in November 2004 gave it hope: 35.7% said they would vote for a MÄori Party candidate, 26.3% opted for Labour, and five of the seven electorates appeared ready to fall to the new party. In the election, the new party won four of the MÄori electorates. It seemed possible that MÄori Party MPs could play a role in the choice and formation of a governing coalition, and they (surprisingly) conducted talks with the National Party. In the end they remained in Opposition.
Similarly in 2008, the MÄori Party aimed to win all seven MÄori electorates. However, in the election, they managed to increase their four electorates only to five. Although the National government had enough MPs to govern without the MÄori Party, it invited the MÄori Party to support their minority government on confidence and supply in return for policy concessions and two ministerial posts outside of Cabinet. The MÄori Party signed a confidence and supply agreement with National on the condition that the MÄori electorates were not abolished unless the MÄori voters agreed to abolish them.
See also
References
- ↑ "Maori Representation Act 1867". Retrieved 27 December 2011.
- 1 2 Wilson, John (May 2009) [November 2003]. "The Origins of the MÄori Seats". Wellington: New Zealand Parliament. Retrieved 28 July 2010.
- ↑ "MÄori Electoral Option 2013 | Electoral Commission". Retrieved 9 March 2014.
- ↑ "In the 1950s and 1960s the National government occasionally talked of abolishing the MÄori seats. Some politicians described special representation as a form of 'apartheid', like in South Africa." "History of the Vote: MÄori and the Vote", Elections New Zealand website, 9 April 2005. Retrieved 3 November 2006.
- ↑ Tahana, Yvonne (29 September 2008). "National to dump Maori seats in 2014". The New Zealand Herald. Retrieved 28 December 2009.
- ↑ "John Key: Dropping Maori seats would mean 'hikois from hell'". New Zealand Herald. 22 August 2014. Retrieved 6 September 2014.
- ↑ "General elections 1853–2005 – dates & turnout". Elections New Zealand. Retrieved 6 June 2010.
- ↑ Scholefield, Guy (1950) [First ed. published 1913]. New Zealand Parliamentary Record, 1840–1949 (3rd ed.). Wellington: Govt. Printer. pp. 157, 161, 163, 167.
- ↑ "Maori Party suggests seat in Aust". Television New Zealand. Newstalk ZB. 1 October 2007. Retrieved 19 October 2011.
|
|