United States House of Representatives elections, 1912
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Elections to the United States House of Representatives in 1912 were held for members of the 63rd Congress, coinciding with the election of President Woodrow Wilson.
Wilson's victory was partly due to the division of the opposition Republican Party into conservative and progressive factions. While many progressives stayed within the party framework, they maintained lukewarm relationships with Republican leadership. Others formed a third party known as the Progressives and several switched allegiance to the Democrats. A message of unity was portrayed by the Democrats, allowing this group to present themselves as above the bickering and corruption that had become associated with the Republican internal feud. Many of the new seats that were added after the prior census ended up in Democratic hands. In addition, William Kent, who had been elected to the House as a Republican in 1908, was elected to California's 1st congressional district as an Independent.
The number of representatives was increased for this election to 435, where it currently stands (aside from 1959 when Alaska and Hawaii were admitted as states).
Overall results
Parties | Seats | Popular Vote | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1910 | 1912 | +/– | Strength | Vote | % | Change | ||
Democratic Party | 230 | 291 | 61 | 66.67% | 8,446,624 | 43.14% | 3.55% | |
Republican Party | 163[Note 2] | 134 | 29 | 30.80% | 6,849,927 | 34.99% | 11.59% | |
Progressive Party | 0 | 9 | 9 | 2.30% | 2,609,578 | 13.33% | New Party | |
Socialist Party | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 1,259,273 | 6.43% | 2.22% | |
Prohibition Party | 0 | 0 | 0% | 244,919 | 1.25% | 0.17% | ||
Others | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.2% | 169,064 | 0.86% | 0.24% | |
Total | 394 | 435 | 41 | 100.0% | 19,579,385 | 100.0% | - |
Election summaries
In reapportionment following the 1910 census, 41 new seats were added, bringing the House to its modern size. This would be the last time the size of the House changed, except for a temporary addition of two seats in 1959 after the admission of Alaska and Hawaii and subsequent return to 435 in 1963. In the reapportionment, 1 state lost 1 seat, 22 states had no change in apportionment, 16 states gained 1 seat each, 5 states gained 2 seats each, 2 states gained 3 seats, 1 state gained 4 seats, and 1 state gained 6 seats. Twelve states used at-large seats in addition to districts to elect new seats.
291 | 1 | 9 | 134 |
Democratic | I | P | Republican |
State | Type | Total seats |
Democratic | Republican | Progressive | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Seats | Change | Seats | Change | Seats | Change | Seats | Change | ||
Alabama | District +at-large[Note 3] |
10 | 1 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
Arizona | At-large | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||||
Arkansas | District | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | ||||
California | District | 11[Note 4] | 3 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 0 | ||
Colorado | District +2 at-large[Note 3] |
4 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
Connecticut | District[Note 5] | 5 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | ||
Delaware | At-large | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||
Florida | District +at-large[Note 3] |
4 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
Georgia | District | 12 | 1 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
Idaho | At-large | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | ||
Illinois | District +2 at-large[Note 3] |
27 | 2 | 20 | 9 | 5 | 9 | 2 | 2 |
Indiana | District | 13 | 13 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||
Iowa | District | 11 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 2 | 0 | ||
Kansas | District | 8 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 0 | ||
Kentucky | District | 11 | 9 | 2 | 0 | ||||
Louisiana | District | 8 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
Maine[Note 6] | District | 4 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | ||
Maryland | District | 6 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||
Massachusetts | District | 16 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 9 | 1 | 0 | |
Michigan | District +at-large[Note 3] |
13 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 2 | |
Minnesota | District +at-large[Note 3] |
10 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 1 | 0 | ||
Mississippi | District | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | ||||
Missouri | District | 16 | 15 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | ||
Montana | At-large | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
Nebraska | District | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | ||||
Nevada | At-large | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||||
New Hampshire | District | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | ||
New Jersey | District | 12 | 2 | 11 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | |
New Mexico | At-large | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||
New York | District | 43 | 6 | 31 | 8 | 11 | 3 | 1 | 1 |
North Carolina | District | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | ||||
North Dakota | District | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | ||
Ohio | District +at-large[Note 3] |
22 | 1 | 19 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | |
Oklahoma | District +3 at-large[Note 3] |
8 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 0 | ||
Oregon | District | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | ||
Pennsylvania | District +4 at-large[Note 3] |
36 | 4 | 12 | 4 | 22 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Rhode Island | District | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | ||
South Carolina | District | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | ||||
South Dakota | District[Note 7] | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | ||
Tennessee | District | 10 | 8 | 2 | 0 | ||||
Texas | District +2 at-large[Note 3] |
18 | 2 | 18 | 2 | 0 | 0 | ||
Utah | At-large | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | ||
Vermont[Note 6] | District | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | ||||
Virginia | District | 10 | 9 | 1 | 0 | ||||
Washington | District +2 at-large[Note 3] |
5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | ||
West Virginia | District +at-large[Note 3] |
6 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 0 | |
Wisconsin | District | 11[Note 8] | 3 | 1 | 8 | 0 | |||
Wyoming | At-large | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||||
Total | 435 | 41 | 291 66.9% |
61 | 134 30.8% |
29 | 9 2.1% |
9 |
[[Image:63 us house membership.png|thumb|450px|
]] |
[[Image:63 us house changes.png|thumb|450px|
]] |
Early election dates
Two states, with 6 seats between them, held elections early in 1912:
This was the last year that Vermont held early elections.
Complete results
Party abbreviations
- D: Democratic
- I: Independent
- Prog: Progressive
- Proh: Prohibition
- S: Socialist
California
District | Incumbent | Party | First elected |
Result | Candidates |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
California 1 | William Kent Redistricted from the 2nd district |
Republican | 1910 | Re-elected as an Independent Independent gain |
William Kent (I) 37.27% I. G. Zumwalt (D) 34.37% Edward H. Hart (R) 19.40% Joseph Bredsteen (S) 8.96% |
California 2 | John E. Raker Redistricted from the 1st district |
Democratic | 1910 | Re-elected | John E. Raker (D) 62.64% Frank M. Rutherford (R) 27.17% J. C. Williams (S) 10.19% |
California 3 | None (District created) | New seat Republican gain |
Charles F. Curry (R) 58.85% Gilbert McMillan Ross (D) 28.79% William L. Wilson (S) 12.36% | ||
California 4 | Julius Kahn | Republican | 1898 | Re-elected | Julius Kahn (R) 56.09% Bert Schlesinger (D) 32.72% Norman W. Pendleton (S) 11.19% |
California 5 | None (District created) | New seat Republican gain |
John I. Nolan (R) 52.27% Stephen V. Costello (D) 34.69% E. L. Reguin (S) 13.04% | ||
California 6 | Joseph R. Knowland Redistricted from the 3rd district |
Republican | 1904 | Re-elected | Joseph R. Knowland (R) 53.70% J. Stitt Wilson (S) 40.00% Hiram A Luttrell (D) 6.31% |
California 7 | James C. Needham Redistricted from the 6th district |
Republican | 1898 | Lost re-election Democratic gain |
Denver S. Church (D) 44.05% James C. Needham (R) 42.65% J. S. Cato (S) 13.30% |
California 8 | Everis A. Hayes Redistricted from the 5th district |
Republican | 1904 | Re-elected | Everis A. Hayes (R) 50.95% James B. Holohan (D) 35.18% Robert Whitaker (S) 13.86% |
California 9 | None (District created) | New seat Progressive gain |
Charles W. Bell (Prog) 47.25% Thomas H. Kirk (D) 23.87% Ralph L. Criswell (S) 18.22% George S. Yarnall (Proh) 10.66% | ||
California 10 | William Stephens Redistricted from the 7th district |
Republican | 1910 | Re-elected as Progressive |
William Stephens (Prog) 53.45% George Ringo (D) 21.91% Fred C. Wheeler (S) 20.98% Emory D. Martindale (Proh) 3.67% |
California 11 | Sylvester C. Smith Redistricted from the 8th district |
Republican | 1904 | Retired and died before the Congress ended Democratic gain |
William Kettner (D) 42.69% Samuel C. Evans (R) 36.85% Noble A. Richardson (S) 12.14% Helen M. Stoddard (Proh) 8.33% |
Florida
District | Incumbent | Party | First elected |
Result | Candidates |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Florida 1 | Stephen M. Sparkman | Democratic | 1894 | Re-elected | Stephen M. Sparkman (D) 78.5% C. C. Allen (S) 12.0% George W. Beall (R) 4.9% J. D. Hazzard (Prog) 3.0% George C. Kelley (Proh) 1.6% |
Florida 2 | Frank Clark | Democratic | 1904 | Re-elected | Frank Clark (D) 81.1% J. J. Collins (S) 7.3% John W. Howell (R) 6.7% C. E. Speir (Prog) 4.9% |
Florida 3 | Dannite H. Mays | Democratic | 1908 | Lost primary Democratic hold |
Emmett Wilson (D) 86.4% W. M. Lamberry (S) 6.3% Thomas F. McGourin (R) 4.7% John T. Poder (Prog) 2.7% |
Florida at-large | None (District created) | Democratic win | Claude L'Engle (D) 77.4% A. N. Jackson (S) 8.2% George W. Allen (R) 6.6% E. R. Gunby (Prog) 6.0% Frances P. Coffin (Proh) 1.8% |
New Mexico
District | Incumbent | Party | First elected |
Result | Candidates |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
New Mexico at-large | George Curry | Republican | 1911 | Retired Democratic gain |
Harvey B. Fergusson (D) 45.6% Nathan Jaffa (R) 36.9% Andrew J. Eggum (S) 12.1% Marcos DeBaca (Prog) 5.5% |
Harvey B. Fergusson | Democratic | 1911 | Re-elected |
South Carolina
District | Incumbent | Party | First elected |
Result | Candidates |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
South Carolina 1 | George Swinton Legaré | Democratic | 1902 | Re-elected | George Swinton Legaré (D) 97.2% Aaron P. Prioleau (R) 1.8% William Eberhard (S) 1.0% |
South Carolina 2 | James F. Byrnes | Democratic | 1910 | Re-elected | James F. Byrnes (D) 100% |
South Carolina 3 | Wyatt Aiken | Democratic | 1902 | Re-elected | Wyatt Aiken (D) 100% |
South Carolina 4 | Joseph T. Johnson | Democratic | 1900 | Re-elected | Joseph T. Johnson (D) 100% |
South Carolina 5 | David E. Finley | Democratic | 1898 | Re-elected | David E. Finley (D) 100% |
South Carolina 6 | J. Edwin Ellerbe | Democratic | 1904 | Lost primary Democratic hold |
J. Willard Ragsdale (D) 100% |
South Carolina 7 | Asbury F. Lever | Democratic | 1901 (special) | Re-elected | Asbury F. Lever (D) 98.4% A. D. Dantzler (R) 1.6% |
See also
- United States presidential election, 1912
- United States Senate elections, 1912
- 63rd United States Congress
Notes
- ↑ Maine and Vermont held elections early, in September 1912.
- 1 2 Included one Progressive Republican.
- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Additional seat or seats elected at-large due to State not redistricting.
- ↑ One Independent, William Kent, was elected to CA-01.
- ↑ At-large seat eliminated in redistricting.
- 1 2 Elections held early.
- ↑ Changed from at-large.
- ↑ Previous election had 1 Socialist.
References
Bibliography
- Dubin, Michael J. (March 1, 1998). United States Congressional Elections, 1788-1997: The Official Results of the Elections of the 1st Through 105th Congresses. McFarland and Company. ISBN 978-0786402830.
- Martis, Kenneth C. (January 1, 1989). The Historical Atlas of Political Parties in the United States Congress, 1789-1989. Macmillan Publishing Company. ISBN 978-0029201701.
- Moore, John L., ed. (1994). Congressional Quarterly's Guide to U.S. Elections (Third ed.). Congressional Quarterly Inc. ISBN 978-0871879967.
- "Party Divisions of the House of Representatives* 1789–Present". Office of the Historian, House of United States House of Representatives. Retrieved January 21, 2015.
External links
- Office of the Historian (Office of Art & Archives, Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives)
|