Anti-Iranian sentiment

Anti-Iranian sentiment, Anti-Persian sentiment or Iranophobia^[1] refers to feelings and expression of hostility, hatred, discrimination, or prejudice towards Iran and its culture, and towards persons based on their association with Iran and Iranian culture. Its opposite is Persophilia.

Historically, prejudice against Iranians (Persians) was prominent in the Arab World, particularly on the part of Arabs following the Muslim conquest of Persia.

In the Arab world

"Ajam"

The word "ʻajam" is derived from the root ʻ-J-M and refers to "unclear, vague and/or incomprehensible" as opposed to ʻArabi, which means "clear, understandable, with perfect Arabic tongue".^[2][3][4][5]

ʻAjam came to mean "one who mumbles" (کند زبانان)^[6](similar to the Slavic use of words with the root нѣм- (něm-) ("mute") to refer to the Germans) and came to be "applied especially to Persians".^[7] To Persian eyes and in Persian sources,

The distinction of ʻArab and ʻAjam is already discernible in pre- and early Islamic literature Cf. the ʻAjam Temtemī.

— Encyclopædia Iranica, ^[7][8]

In general, ajam was a pejorative term, used by Arabs because of their contrived social and political superiority in early Islam.

— Encyclopædia Iranica, ^[9]

However, Arabic dictionaries state that the word ʻajami is used for all non-Arabs, a term used by Ibn Khaldun in his Muqaddimah. Although

In Arabic linguistic usage, the non-Arabs designated by the term 'ajam are primarily Persians.

— Franz Rosenthal, "The Muqaddimah: An Introduction to History By Ibn Khaldun, Abd al-Rahman", ^[10]

and it is believed that Ibn Khaldun in speaking of ʻajam had meant Persians.

Other slurs

Arabs use slurs against Persians by calling them "fire worshipers" and "majoos", "majus" (ماجوس) which means Zoroastrians, Magi.

Anti-Iranianism in early Islamic period

Patrick Clawson states that "The Iranians chafed under Umayyad rule. The Umayyads rose from traditional Arab aristocracy. They tended to marry other Arabs, creating an ethnic stratification that discriminated against Iranians. Even as Arabs adopted traditional Iranian bureaucracy, Arab tribalism disadvantaged Iranians."^[11]

Many Arab Muslims believed that Iranian converts should not clothe themselves as Arabs, among many other forms discrimination that existed.^[12][13] Mu'awiyah, in a famous letter addressed to Ziyad ibn Abih, the then governor of Iraq, wrote:

Be watchful of Iranian Muslims and never treat them as equals of Arabs. Arabs have a right to take in marriage their women, but they have no right to marry Arab women. Arabs are entitled to inherit their legacy, but they cannot inherit from an Arab. As far as possible they are to be given lesser pensions and lowly jobs. In the presence of an Arab, a non-Arab shall not lead the congregation prayer, nor they are to be allowed to stand in the first row of prayer, nor to be entrusted with the job of guarding the frontiers or the post of a qadi.

— Mu'awiyah

Mistreatment of Iranians and other non-Arabs during early period of Islam is well documented. Under the rule of Umayyads, although many of the mawlas (non-Arab Muslims) employed by a patron enjoyed favourable position as equal to an Arab Muslim, they were generally victims of cultural bias and even sometimes considered to be of an equal footing of a slave. According to sources of that time, the mistreatment of mawlas was a general rule. They were denied any positions in the government under Umayyad rule.^[14]

The Umayyid Arabs are even reported to have prevented the mawali from having kunyahs, as an Arab was only considered worthy of a kunya.^[15] They were required to pay taxes for not being an Arab:

During the early centuries of Islam when the Islamic empire was really an Arab kingdom, the Iranians, Central Asians and other non-Arab peoples who had converted to Islam in growing numbers as mawali or 'clients' of an Arab lord or clan, had in practice acquired an inferior socio-economic and racial status compared to Arab Muslims, though the mawali themselves fared better than the empire's non-Muslim subjects, the Ahl al-Dhimmah ('people of the covenant'). The ةawali, for instance, paid special taxes, often similar to the jizyaا (poll tax) and the kharaj (land tax) levied on the Zoroastrians and other non-Muslim subjects, taxes which were never paid by the Arab Muslims.

— Farhad Daftary, ^[16]

References in Persian literature

Zarrinkoub presents a lengthy discussion on the large flux and influence of the victorious Arabs on the literature, language, culture and society of Persia during the two centuries following the Islamic conquest of Persia in his book Two Centuries of Silence.^[17]

Suppression of Iranian languages

After the Islamic conquest of the Sassanid Empire, during the reign of the Ummayad dynasty, the Arab conquerors imposed Arabic as the primary language of the subject peoples throughout their empire. Not happy with the prevalence of the Iranian languages in the divan, Hajjāj ibn Yusuf ordered the official language of the conquered lands to be replaced by Arabic, sometimes by force.^[18] According to Biruni

When Qutaibah bin Muslim under the command of Al-Hajjaj bin Yousef was sent to Khwarazmia with a military expedition and conquered it for the second time, he swiftly killed whomever wrote the Khwarazmian native language that knew of the Khwarazmian history, science and culture. He then killed all their Zoroastrian priests and burned and wasted their books, until gradually the illiterate only remained, who knew nothing of writing and hence their history was mostly forgotten.

— Biruni From The Remaining Signs of Past Centuries, ^[19]

It is difficult to imagine the Arabs not implementing anti-Persian policies in light of such events, writes Zarrinkoub in his famous Two Centuries of Silence,^[20] where he exclusively writes of this topic. Reports of Persian speakers being tortured are also given in al-Aghānī.^[21]

Shiʻah Islam and Iranians

Predominantly Shiʻi Iran has always exhibited a sympathetic side for ʻAli and his progeny. Even when Persia was largely Sunni, this was still evident as can be seen from the writings remaining from that era. Rumi for example praises ʻAli in a section entitled "Learn from ʻAli". It recounts ʻAli ibn Abi Talib's explanation as to why he declined to kill someone who had spit in his face as ʻAli was defeating him in battle. Persian literature in praise of ʻAli's progeny is quite ubiquitous and abundant. These all stem from numerous traditions regarding Ali's favor of Persians being as equals to Arabs.

Several early Shiʻite sources speak of a dispute arising between an Arab and an Iranian woman. Referring the case to ʻAli for arbitration, ʻAli reportedly did not allow any discrimination between the two to take place. His judgment thus invited the protest of the Arab woman. Thereupon, ʻAli replied, "In the Qurʼan, I did not find the progeny of Ishmael (the Arabs) to be any higher than the Iranians."^[22]

In another such tradition, Ali was once reciting a sermon in the city of Kufah, when Ash'as ibn Qays, a commander in the Arab army protested, "Amir-al-Momeneen! These Iranians are excelling the Arabs right in front of your eyes and you are doing nothing about it!" He then roared, "I will show them who the Arabs are!" Ali immediately retorted, "While fat Arabs rest in soft beds, the Iranians work hard on the hottest days to please God with their efforts. And what do these Arabs want from me? To ostracize the Iranians and become an oppressor! I swear by the God that splits the nucleus and creates Man, I heard the prophet once say, just as you strike the Iranians with your swords in the name of Islam, so will the Iranians one day strike you back the same way for Islam."^[23]

When the Sassanid city of Anbar fell to the forces of Mu'awiyeh, news reached Ali that the city had been sacked and plundered spilling much innocent blood. Early Shi'ite sources report that Ali gathered all the people of Kufa to the mosque and gave a fiery sermon. After describing the massacre, he said, "If somebody hearing this news now faints and dies of grief, I fully approve of it!"^[24] It is from here that Ali is said to have had more sympathy for Iranians while author S. Nureddin Abtahi claims that Umar highly resented them.^[25] However, a hadith on Ali's banning of the game of shatranj (chess), narrates that Ali said "Chess is the gambling game of the Ajam" (anti-Iranian slur meaning unclean people)^[26]

Modern times

It was in Baghdad where the first Arab nationalists, mainly of Palestinian and Syrian descent, formed the basis of their overall philosophies. Prominent among them were individuals such as Mohammad Amin al-Husayni (the Mufti of Jerusalem) and Syrian nationalists such as Shukri al-Quwatli and Jamil Mardam. Sati' al-Husri, who served as advisor to the Ministry of Education and later as Director General of Education and Dean of the College of Law, was particularly instrumental in shaping the Iraqi educational system. Other prominent Pan-Arabists were Michel Aflaq and Khairallah Talfah, as well as Sati' al-Husri, Salah al-Din al-Bitar, Zaki al-Arsuzi and Sami Shwkat (brother of Naji Shawkat). These individuals formed the nucleus and genesis of true pan-Arabism.

Sati' al-Husri's campaigns against schools suspected of being positive towards Persia are well documented.^[27] One dramatic example is found in the 1920s when the Iraqi Ministry of Education ordered Husri to appoint Muhammad Al-Jawahiri as a teacher in a Baghdad school. A short excerpt of Husri's interview with the teacher is revealing:^[28]

"Husri: First, I want to know your nationality.

Jawahiri: I am an Iranian.

Husri: In that case we cannot appoint you."

Saddam Hussein Abd al-Majid al-Tikriti forced out tens of thousands of people of Persian origin from Iraq in the 1970s, after having been accused of being spies for Iran and Israel.^[29][30] Today, many of them live in Iran.^[31][32]

Iran–Iraq War

Early on in his career, Saddam Hussein and pan-Arab ideologues targeted the Arabs of southwest Iran in an endeavour to have them separate and join 'the Arab nation.' ^[33] Hussein made no effort to conceal Arab nationalism in his war against Iran (which he called "the second Battle of al-Qādisiyyah).^[33] An intense campaign of propaganda during his reign meant that many school children were taught that Iran provoked Iraq into invading and that the invasion was fully justified.^[34]

"Yellow revolution", "yellow wind", "yellow storm" were thrown as slurs by Saddam Hussein against Iran due to Hulagu's 1258 sack of Baghdad during the Mongol wars and the terms "Persian" and "Elamites" were also used by Saddam as insults.^[35]

On 2 April 1980, a half-year before the outbreak of the war, Saddam Hussein visited Al-Mustansiriya University in Baghdad. By drawing parallels to the 7th-Century defeat of Persia in the Battle of al-Qādisiyyah, he announced:

"In your name, brothers, and on behalf of the Iraqis and Arabs everywhere, we tell those [Persian] cowards who try to avenge Al-Qadisiyah that the spirit of Al-Qadisiyah as well as the blood and honor of the people of Al-Qadisiyah who carried the message on their spearheads are greater than their attempts."^[36]

Saddam also accused Iranians of "murdering the second (Umar), third (Uthman) and fourth (Ali) Caliphs of Islam", invading the three islands of Abu Musa and Greater and Lesser Tunbs in the Persian Gulf and attempting to destroy the Arabic language and civilization.^[37]

In the war, Iraq made extensive use of chemical weapons (such as mustard gas) against Iranian troops and civilians as well as Iraqi Kurds. Iran expected a condemnation by UN of this act and sent allegation to UN. At time (-1985) the UN Security Council issued statements that "chemical weapons had been used in the war." However, in these UN-statements Iraq was not mentioned by name, so that the situation is viewed as "in a way, the international community remained silent as Iraq used weapons of mass destruction against Iranian as well as Iraqi Kurds" and it is believed that the United States had prevented UN from condemning Iraq.^[38]

In December 2006, Hussein said he would take responsibility "with honour" for any attacks on Iran using conventional or chemical weapons during the 1980–1988 war, but he took issue with charges he ordered attacks on Iraqis.^[39][40]

On the execution day, Hussein said, "I spent my whole life fighting the infidels and the intruders, [...] I destroyed the invaders and the Persians." He also stressed that the Iraqis should fight the Americans and the Persians.^[41] Mowaffak al Rubiae, Iraq's National Security adviser, who was a witness to Hussein's execution described him as repeatedly shouting "down with Persians."^[42] Hussein built an anti-Iranian monument called Hands of Victory in Baghdad in 1989 to commemorate his declaration of victory over Iran in the Iran-Iraq war (though the war was considered by many to have ended in stalemate). After his fall, it was reported that the new Iraqi government had organized the Committee for Removing Symbols of the Saddam Era and that the Hands of Victory monument had begun to be dismantled. However, the demolition was later halted.^[43]

Other Arab states

Some Arab states show hostility to Iran. Al-Salafi magazine, quoted in The Times, states, "Iran has become more dangerous than Israel itself. The Iranian revolution has come to renew the Iranian presence in our region. This is the real clash of civilisations."^[44]

In January 2007, Saudi Arabian King Abdullah said that attempts to convert Muslim Sunnis to the Shi'a branch of Islam would not succeed and that Sunnis would always make up the majority of the world's Muslims. Although Abdullah did not mention Iran by name, his comments appeared to be aimed at easing Arab concerns over the Shi'a nation's growing influence in the Middle East.^[45] "We are following up on this matter and we are aware of the dimensions of spreading Shi'ism and where it has reached", Abdullah told the Kuwaiti Al-Siyassah daily. "However, we believe that this process will not achieve its goal because the majority of Sunni Muslims will never change their faith", he added. Ultimately, "the majority of Muslims seems immune to any attempts by other sects to penetrate it (Sunnism) or diminish its historical power." While there have been no specific examples of Iranians trying to convert Sunnis, Arabs fear such conversions would accompany Iran's growing powers.

Al-Qaeda

Al-Qaeda has been increasingly singling out Iran and Shiites, describing the "Persians" as the enemy of Arabs and complicit in the occupation of Iraq.^[46]

In the United States

A man is raising a sign that reads "deport all Iranians, get the hell out of my country". This was during a 1979 Washington, D.C. student protest of the Iran hostage crisis.

According to the Public Affairs Alliance of Iranian Americans (PAAIA), nearly half of Iranian Americans surveyed in 2008 by Zogby International have themselves experienced or personally know another Iranian American who has experienced discrimination because of their ethnicity or country of origin. The most common types of discrimination reported are airport security, social discrimination, employment or business discrimination, racial profiling and discrimination at the hands of immigration officials.^[47]

The Iranian hostage crisis of the U.S. embassy in Tehran in November 1979 precipitated a wave of anti-Iranian sentiment in the United States, directed both against the new Islamic regime and Iranian nationals and immigrants. Even though such sentiments gradually declined after the release of the hostages at the start of 1981, they sometimes flare up. In response, some Iranian immigrants to the U.S. have distanced themselves from their nationality and instead identify primarily on the basis of their ethnic or religious affiliations.^[48]

Hollywood's depiction of Persians and Iranians

Since the 1980s and especially since the 1990s, Hollywood's depiction of Iranians has vilified Iranians as in ^[49] television programs such as 24,^[50] John Doe, On Wings of Eagles (1986), and^[51] Escape From Iran: The Canadian Caper (1981), which was based on a true story.^[52] Critics maintain that Hollywood's "tall walls of exclusion and discrimination have yet to crumble when it comes to the movie industry's persistent misrepresentation of Iranians and their collective identity".^[53]

Not Without My Daughter

The 1991 film Not Without My Daughter was criticized for its portrayal of Iranian society. Filmed in Israel, it was based on the Pulitzer-nominated autobiography by Betty Mahmoody. In the book and film, an American woman (Mahmoody) traveled to Tehran with her young daughter to visit her Iranian-born family of her husband. Mahmoody's husband then undergoes a strange transformation in Iran, ranging from an educated and sophisticated citizen to an abusive, backwards peasant, eventually deciding that they will not return to the United States. Betty is told that she can divorce him and leave, but their daughter must stay in Tehran under Islamic law. Ultimately, after 18 months in Iran, Betty and her daughter escape to the American embassy in Turkey.

Several Western critics, including Roger Ebert of the Chicago Sun Times and Caryn James of the New York Times, criticized the film for stereotyping Iranians as misogynistic and fanatical. According to Ebert, the film depicts Islamic society "in shrill terms", where women are "willing or unwilling captives of their men", deprived of "what in the West would be considered basic human rights". Furthermore, Ebert says, "No attempt is made—deliberately, I assume—to explain the Muslim point of view, except in rigid sets of commands and rote statements".^[54][55] Ebert then contends, "If a movie of such a vitriolic and spiteful nature were to be made in America about any other ethnic group, it would be denounced as racist and prejudiced."^[56]

According to Jane Campbell, the film "only serves to reinforce the media stereotype of Iranians as terrorists who, if not actively bombing public buildings or holding airline passengers hostage, are untrustworthy, irrational, cruel, and barbaric."^[57][58]

The film was also criticized in Iran. A 2002 Islamic Republic News Agency article claimed that the film "[made] smears...against Iran" and "stereotyped Iranians as cruel characters and wife-beaters". In a Finnish documentary, Without My Daughter,^[59] film maker Alexis Kouros tells Mahmoody's husband's side of the story, showing Iranian eyewitnesses accusing the Hollywood film of spreading lies and "treasons". Alice Sharif, an American woman living with her Iranian husband in Tehran, accuses Mahmoody and the filmmakers of deliberately attempting to foment anti-Iranian sentiment in the United States.^[60][61]

Alexander

The 2004 film Alexander by American director Oliver Stone has been accused of negative and inaccurate portrayal of Persians.^[62]

300

The 2007 film 300, an adaptation of Frank Miller's 1998 graphic novel, was criticized for its "racist"^[63] portrayal of combatants in the Persian army at the Battle of Thermopylae. Reviewers in the United States and elsewhere "noted the political overtones of the West-against-Iran story line and the way Persians are depicted as decadent, sexually flamboyant and evil in contrast to the noble Greeks".^[64] With bootleg versions of the film already available in Tehran with the film's international release and news of the film's surprising success at the U.S. box office, it prompted widespread anger in Iran. Azadeh Moaveni of Time reported, "All of Tehran was outraged. Everywhere I went yesterday, the talk vibrated with indignation over the film".^[65] Newspapers in Iran featured headlines such as "Hollywood declares war on Iranians" and "300 AGAINST 70 MILLION" (Iran's population). Ayende-No, an independent Iranian newspaper, said that "[t]he film depicts Iranians as demons, without culture, feeling or humanity, who think of nothing except attacking other nations and killing people".^[65] Four Iranian Members of Parliament have called for Muslim countries to ban the film,^[66] and a group of Iranian film makers submitted a letter of protest to UNESCO regarding the film's alleged misrepresentation of Iranian history and culture.^[67] Iran's cultural advisor to president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has called the film an "American attempt for psychological warfare against Iran".^[68]

Moaveni identified two factors which may have contributed to the intensity of Iranian indignation over the film. First, she describes the timing of the film's release, on the eve of Norouz, the Persian New Year, as "inauspicious." Second, Iranians tend to view the era depicted in the film as "a particularly noble page in their history". Moaveni also suggests that "the box office success of 300, compared with the relative flop of Alexander (another spurious period epic dealing with Persians), is cause for considerable alarm, signaling ominous U.S. intentions".^[65]

According to The Guardian, Iranian critics of 300, ranging from bloggers to government officials, have described the movie "as a calculated attempt to demonise Iran at a time of intensifying U.S. pressure over the country's nuclear programme".^[66] An Iranian government spokesman described the film as "hostile behavior which is the result of cultural and psychological warfare".^[66] Moaveni reported that the Iranians she interacted with were "adamant that the movie was secretly funded by the U.S. government to prepare Americans for going to war against Iran".^[65]

Dana Stevens of Slate states, "If 300, the new battle epic based on the graphic novel by Frank Miller and Lynn Varley, had been made in Germany in the mid-1930s, it would be studied today alongside The Eternal Jew as a textbook example of how race-baiting fantasy and nationalist myth can serve as an incitement to total war. Since it's a product of the post-ideological, post-Xbox 21st century, 300 will instead be talked about as a technical achievement, the next blip on the increasingly blurry line between movies and video games.^[69]

The Netherlands

The requests of the Ministry of Education and Foreign Affairs of the Netherlands to monitor Iranian students has led to a situation that Iranian students cannot study at the University of Twente in the city of Enschede and Eindhoven University of Technology in the city of Eindhoven. The latter university had even asked the AIVD (the Dutch intelligence service) to monitor the Iranian students. AIVD stated that it was not their duty to do this and the University has decided to stop admitting any applicants from Iran no matter what degree they are seeking. The reason provided by the Dutch government is that it fears the theft of sensitive nuclear technology that could assist the Iranian government in constructing nuclear weapons. After protests were lodged, the Dutch government announced again that the Iranian students and the Dutch citizens of Iranian heritage, are not allowed to study at many Dutch universities and some areas in the Netherlands are off-limits to them.^[70]

Additionally, several other universities stated that the government had prohibited them from admitting students from Iran, and technical colleges weren't to allow Iranian students access to knowledge of nuclear technology.^[71][72] It was noted that this was the first time after the German occupation during the Second World War that ethnic-, religion- or racial-based restrictions were imposed in this part of Europe. Harry van Bommel, a parliamentarian of the Dutch Socialist Party (SP), condemned this berufsverbot, deliberately using a German word which is associated with the Second World War.^[73][74] Although the Dutch authorities state that the UN security council's resolution 1737 (2006) authorizes them and obliges all member states of the UN to take such a measure, the Netherlands remains the only country to have done so.^[75]

On 3 February 2010, a court in the Hague ruled that the Dutch government's policy to ban Iranian-born students and scientists from certain master's degrees and from nuclear research facilities is overly broad and a violation of an international civil rights treaty.^[76]

Turkey

According to a 2013 survey 75% of Turks look at Iran unfavorably against 14% with favorable views.^[77] Political scientist Shireen Hunter writes that there are two significant groups in Turkey that are hostile towards Iran: "the military establishment and the ultra-Kemalist elite" and the "ultranationalists with pan-Turkist aspirations" (such as the Grey Wolves).^[78] Canadian author Kaveh Farrokh also suggests that pan-Turkist groups (the Grey Wolves in particular) have encouraged anti-Iranian sentiments.^[79]

Historically, the Shia Muslims were discriminated in the Ottoman Empire as they were associated with their Iranian/Persian neighbors. In Turkey, relatively large communities of Turks, Kurds and Zazas are Alevi Shia, while some areas in Eastern Anatolia, notably Kars and Ağrı, are Twelver Shia.^[80]

Azerbaijan

According to political adviser Eldar Mamedov, "Anti-Iranian policies [have been] carried out by various Azerbaijani governments since the 1990s."^[81]

Armenia

According to a July 2007 poll in Armenia, Iran is viewed largely as an important partner (23%), rather than a political and economic threat (8%).^[82] According to a 2013 poll, the overwhelming majority of respondents opposed women marrying Iranians (89% vs 10% approving).^[83] In contrast, a slight majority approved doing business with Iranians (52% vs 46%).^[84]

International polls

Results of 2014 BBC World Service poll.
Views of Iran's influence by country^[85]
Sorted by Pos-Neg

Country polled	Positive	Negative	Neutral	Pos-Neg
United States	5%	88%	7	-83
Israel	2%	84%	14	-82
Germany	4%	85%	11	-81
Canada	6%	83%	11	-77
United Kingdom	7%	83%	10	-76
France	8%	84%	8	-76
Spain	6%	78%	16	-72
Australia	11%	78%	11	-67
South Korea	12%	74%	14	-62
Japan	5%	53%	42	-48
Kenya	16%	62%	22	-46
Russia	11%	49%	40	-38
Mexico	13%	49%	38	-36
Peru	13%	46%	41	-33
Nigeria	29%	54%	17	-25
China	18%	40%	42	-22
Turkey	24%	46%	30	-22
India	22%	37%	41	-15
Ghana	37%	41%	22	-4
Indonesia	40%	35%	25	5
Pakistan	51%	21%	28	30

Results of 2015 Pew Research Center poll.^[86]
World Views of Iran
Sorted by Favorable - Unfavorable

Country polled	Favorable	Unfavorable	Neutral	Fav - Unfav
Israel	5%	92%	3	-87
Jordan	8%	89%	11	-81
Spain	7%	87%	6	-80
Italy	9%	87%	4	-78
Brazil	11%	79%	10	-68
Germany	15%	78%	7	-63
France	19%	81%	0	-62
United States	14%	76%	10	-62
Japan	15%	73%	12	-58
Poland	14%	67%	19	-53
Chile	16%	68%	16	-52
Australia	17%	67%	16	-50
Canada	16%	66%	18	-50
Argentina	10%	59%	31	-49
Mexico	13%	62%	25	-49
Turkey	17%	64%	19	-47
United Kingdom	17%	62%	21	-45
South Africa	18%	57%	35	-39
China	23%	61%	16	-38
Venezuela	22%	58%	20	-36
Peru	19%	48%	33	-29
South Korea	30%	56%	14	-26
Palestine	34%	57%	9	-23
Philippines	33%	56%	11	-23
Lebanon	41%	58%	1	-19
Kenya	32%	50%	18	-18
Ukraine	26%	42%	32	-16
Malaysia	34%	47%	19	-13
Uganda	32 %	43%	25	-11
Nigeria	33%	43%	24	-10
Russia	34%	44%	22	-10
Burkina Faso	25%	34%	41	-9
Senegal	32%	39%	39	-7
Indonesia	36%	41%	23	-5
Tanzania	29%	34%	37	-5
India	28%	28%	44	0
Vietnam	42%	35%	23	7
Ghana	44%	36%	20	8
Ethiopia	27%	18%	55	9
Pakistan	57%	16%	27	41

See also

• 1987 Mecca Massacre
• Greater Iran
• Iranian citizens abroad

References

1. Ram, H. (2009): Iranophobia: The Logic of an Israeli Obsession, Stanford University Press, ISBN 9780804760676
2. Al-Fairouzabadi; The Surrounding Ocean (al-Qamus al-Muhit) in Arabic
3. Ibn Manzur; The Tongue of the Arabs (Lisan al-ʻArab) in Arabic
4. Al-Bustani, P.; Surrounding the Surrounding (Muhit al-Muhit) in Arabic
5. Abu al-ʻAzm, ʻAbd al-Ghani; The Rich (al-Ghani) in Arabic
6. Ignaz Goldziher, 'Arab und 'Agam. Muhammedanische Studien I. Halle. 1889-1890. I p. 101. tr. London 1967-1971, I, p. 98[C. E. Bosworth.
7. Encyclopædia Iranica], p. 700.
8. Goldziher. Muhammedanische Studien I, p. 103. tr I, p. 99
9. Encyclopædia Iranica, p. 700
10. Franz Rosenthal, "The Muqaddimah: An Introduction to History By Ibn Khaldun, 'Abd al-Rahman b. Muhammad Ibn Haldun", Princeton University Press, 1967, ISBN 0-691-09797-6, page 311(footnote 1206)
11. Patrick Clawson. Eternal Iran. Palgrave Macmillan. 2005. ISBN 1-4039-6276-6, p. 17.
12. "Ignaz Goldziher. Mohammedanische Studien". Vol 2. p. 138–9
13. • "Ansab al Ashraf" or "Futuh al-Buldan" by Baladhuri, p. 417.
    • "Tarikh-i Sistan". p82.
    • "Tarikh e Qum". p254-6.
14. Gianluca Palo Parolin (2009). Citizenship in the Arab World: Kin, Religion and Nation-state. Amsterdam University Press. pp. 63, 64. ISBN 9789089640451.
15. Jurji Zaydan, p. 228 (زیدان، جرجی، تاریخ تمدن اسلام ، ترجمه علی جواهرکلام، تهران: امیرکبیر ، چاپ نهم ، 137)
16. "The Institute of Ismaili Studies - Sectarian and National Movements in Iran, Khurasan and Transoxania During Umayyad and Early 'Abbasid Times". iis.ac.uk.
17. ʻAbd al-Ḥusayn Zarrīnʹkūb (1379 (2000)). Dū qarn-i sukūt : sarguz̲asht-i ḥavādis̲ va awz̤āʻ-i tārīkhī dar dū qarn-i avval-i Islām (Two Centuries of Silence). Tihrān: Sukhan. OCLC 46632917. ISBN 964-5983-33-6. Check date values in: |date= (help)
18. Cambridge History of Iran, by Richard Nelson Frye, Abdolhosein Zarrinkoub, et al. Section on The Arab Conquest of Iran and its aftermath. Vol 4, 1975, London, p. 46
19. وقتی قتبیه بن مسلم سردار حجاج، بار دوم بخوارزم رفت و آن را باز گشود هرکس را که خط خوارزمی می نوشت و از تاریخ و علوم و اخبار گذشته آگاهی داشت از دم تیغ بی دریغ درگذاشت و موبدان و هیربدان قوم را یکسر هلاک نمود و کتابهاشان همه بسوزانید و تباه کرد تا آنکه رفته رفته مردم امی ماندند و از خط و کتابت بی بهره گشتند و اخبار آنها اکثر فراموش شد و از میان رفت Biruni From The Remaining Signs of Past Centuries (الآثار الباقية عن القرون الخالية), pp. 35, 36, 48
20. Zarrinkoub, Abdolhossein, Dū qarn-i sukūt : sarguz̲asht-i ḥavādis̲ va awz̤āʻ-i tārīkhī dar dū qarn-i avval-i Islām (Two Centuries of Silence), Tihrān: Sukhan, 1379 (2000), OCLC 46632917
21. al-Aghānī (الاغانی). Abū al-Faraj al-Isfahāni. Vol 4, p. 423
22. • "Algharat" Vol 1 p70.
    • "Tarikh-i Yaghubi" Vol 2 p183.
    • Bihar-ol-Anwar Vol 41 p137.
23. • Safinat-ol Bihar by Shaykh 'Abbas al-Qummi. Vol 2. p693.
    • Sharh Nahj-ul Balaghih Ebn Abi-alhadid Vol 19, p124.
24. Nahj ol Balagheh. Sobhi Saleh. Sermon 27
25. Abtahi, S. Nureddin. Iranian dar Quran va rivayat. p75.
26. http://www.quran.mu/gambling-qimar.html
27. See for example: Republic of Fear: The Politics of Modern Iraq, By Kanan Makiya, 1998 ISBN 0-520-21439-0, p. 152–154
28. Samir El-Khalil, Republic of Fear, New York: Pantheon Books, 1989, p. 153–154
29. Saddam: His Rise and Fall, by Con Coughlin, 2005, ISBN 0-06-050543-5, p. 148
30. Saddam Hussein: An American Obsession By Andrew Cockburn, Patrick Cockburn, ISBN 1-85984-422-7, p. 80
31. The Iraq War: Hidden Agendas and Babylonian Intrigue, by Raphael Israeli, ISBN 1-903900-90-5, 2004, p.49
32. A History of Iraq, by Charles Tripp, ISBN 0-521-52900-X, 2002, p. 230
33. Saddam Hussein: A Political Biography by Efraim Karsh, Inari Rautsi, Dr Joseph M Stowell- P145
34. Con Coughlin. Saddam: His Rise and Fall, page 19. ISBN 978-0-06-050543-1: Quoted from Samir al-Khalil. Republic of Fear, 1989. University of California press. pg 17
35. Jerry M. Long (17 August 2009). Saddam's War of Words: Politics, Religion, and the Iraqi Invasion of Kuwait. University of Texas Press. pp. 69–. ISBN 978-0-292-77816-0.
36. Saddām, 'Address given'. Baghdād, Voice of the Masses in Arabic, 1200 GMT 02 April 1980. FBIS-MEA-80-066. 03 April 1980, E2-3.
37. Tallal Etrisi طلال عتریسی in: Arab-Iranian Relations, edited by: Khair El-Din Haseeb. 1998. ISBN 1-86064-156-3
38. S. M. Gieling, Iran-Iraq War, in Encyclopædia Iranica, 2006.
39. Saddam admits Iran gas attacks
40. "Business & Financial News, Breaking US & International News - Reuters.com". Retrieved 8 February 2015.
41. "BBC NEWS - Middle East - Witness to Saddam's death". Retrieved 8 February 2015.
42. "'A Historic Day For Iraq'". Sky News. 2006-12-30. Archived from the original on 22 January 2007. Retrieved 2006-12-30.
43. Iraq Dismantles Saddam’s Big Monument - Newsweek: World News - MSNBC.com
44. The Times: An unholy alliance threatening catastrophe. Anatole Kaletsky. Jan 4, 2007.
45. "Nation & World - Sunnis won't convert, Saudi king says - Seattle Times Newspaper". Retrieved 8 February 2015.
46. Al-Qaida new tape blasts Iran for working with US Copyright © 2008 Yahoo! Inc
47. "Survey of Iranian Americans: 84% Support Establishing U.S. Interest Section in Iran". Retrieved 8 February 2015.
48. Bozorgmehr, Mehdi (2001-05-02). "No solidarity: Iranians in the U.S.". The Iranian. Archived from the original on 10 February 2007. Retrieved 2007-02-02.
49. The U.S. Media and the Middle East: Image and Perception. Praeger, 1997; Greenwood, 1995.
50. Los Angeles Times: Iranians moving past negative depictions in pop culture June 27, 2010.
51. Tv View; 'On Wings Of Eagles' Plods To Superficial Heights, New York Times.
52. "Escape from Iran: The Canadian Caper", (1981) (TV), IMDB.
53. "'Axis of Evil' Seeps into Hollywood". Asia Times. March 15, 2007.
54. Ebert, Roger (1991-01-11). "Not Without My Daughter". Chicago Sun Times. Retrieved 2007-03-20.
55. James, Caryn (1991-01-27). "Embrace the Stereotype; Kiss the Movie Goodbye". New York Times. Retrieved 2007-03-20.
56. Ebert, Roger. "Not Without My Daughter", Chicago Sun Times, January 11, 1991.
57. Campbell, J. (1997). Portrayals of Iranians in U.S. Motion Pictures. p. 180.
58. "THE IRANIAN: Features, Iranins in U.S. media, Yahya Kamalipour". iranian.com.
59. "Finnish documentary counters anti-Iran propaganda in US film". netnative.com.
60. "Finnish documentary counters anti-Iran propaganda in US film" (reprint). Islamic Republic News Agency. 2002-11-22. Archived from the original on 20 February 2007. Retrieved 2007-03-20.
61. Nesselson, Lisa (2003-04-10). "Without My Daughter". Variety. Retrieved 2007-03-20.
62. "World: Oliver Stone's Alexander Stirs Up Controversy", RadioFreeEurope.
63. Golsorkhi, Masoud (2007-03-19). "A racist gorefest". London: The Guardian. Archived from the original on 21 March 2007. Retrieved 2007-03-21.
64. Karimi, Nasser (2007-03-13). "Iranians Outraged by `300' Movie" (reprint). London: Associated Press. Archived from the original on 17 March 2007. Retrieved 2007-03-14.
65. Moaveni, Azadeh (2007-03-13). "300 Versus 70 Million Iranians". Time (magazine). Archived from the original on 16 March 2007. Retrieved 2007-03-14.
66. Tait, Robert (2007-03-14). "Iran accuses Hollywood of 'psychological warfare'". London: The Guardian. Archived from the original on 17 March 2007. Retrieved 2007-03-14.
67. See Baztab newspaper, accessed March 15, 2007
68. "واكنش مشاور رئیس جمهور به فیلم 300". Sharif News. Archived from the original on 16 March 2007. Retrieved 2007-03-21.
69. Stevens, Dana (March 8, 2007). "A Movie Only a Spartan Could Love". Slate.com. Archived from the original on 17 June 2008. Retrieved 2008-06-22.
70. "IraanseStudenten: Stop verdachtmaking van Iraniers". Retrieved 8 February 2015.
71. http://www.nisnews.nl/public/030108_2.htm
72. "IraanseStudenten: Stop verdachtmaking van Iraniers". iraansestudenten.nl.
73. "1930-1945". seniorplaza.nl.
74. "Weblog Harry van Bommel » Berufsverbot voor Iraanse studenten". sp.nl.
75. http://iraansestudenten.nl/docs/briefiraansestudenten.pdf
76. Enserink, Martin (2015-12-31). "Court Rebukes Dutch Policy on Iranian Scientists". News. Retrieved 2016-01-02.
77. Poushter, Jacob (31 October 2014). "The Turkish people don’t look favorably upon the U.S., or any other country, really". Pew Research Center.
78. Hunter, Shireen T. (2010). Iran's Foreign Policy in the Post-Soviet Era: Resisting the New International Order. Santa Barbara, California: ABC-CLIO. p. 158. ISBN 9780313381942.
79. Farrokh, Kaveh. "Pan-Turanianism Takes Atim At Azerbaijan: A Geopolitical Agenda". Rozaneh Magazine. Pan-Turanian activists have attempted to turn these celebrations into anti-Persian events. There are reports that Grey Wolves activists from Turkey and the Republic of Azerbaijan join the celebrations, chant anti-Iranian slogans and distribute anti-Iran literature.
80. Karin Vorhoff. 1995. Zwischen Glaube, Nation und neuer Gemeinschaft: Alevitische Identitat in der Türkei der Gegenwart, pp. 107-108.
81. Mamedov, Eldar (31 October 2014). "Azerbaijan: Time to Address the Potential Salafi Danger". eurasianet.org (Open Society Institute).
82. "Armenia National Voter Study July 2007" (PDF). IRI, USAID, Baltic Surveys Ltd./The Gallup Organization, ASA. p. 29.
83. "Approval of women marrying Iranians (%)". caucasusbarometer.org. Caucasus Barometer.
84. "Approval of doing business with Iranians (%)". caucasusbarometer.org. Caucasus Barometer.
85. "BBC World Service poll" (PDF). BBC. 3 June 2014.
86. "Iran's Global Image Mostly Negative". Pew Research Center. June 18, 2015.