T-34

This article is about the Soviet medium tank. For other uses, see T34 (disambiguation).
T-34-85

A T-34-85 tank on display at Musée des Blindés in April 2007.
Type Medium tank
Place of origin Soviet Union
Service history
In service 1940–Late 1960s (USSR)
1950s–present (other countries)
Used by Soviet Union and 39 others
Wars World War II, and many others
Production history
Designer KMDB
Designed 1937–40
Produced 1940–58
Number built 84,070[1]
35,120 T-34/76[1]
48,950 T-34-85[1]
Specifications (T-34 Model 1941[2])
Weight 26.5 tonnes (29.2 short tons; 26.1 long tons)
Length 6.68 m (21 ft 11 in)
Width 3.00 m (9 ft 10 in)
Height 2.45 m (8 ft 0 in)
Crew 4 (T-3476)
5 (T-34-85)
Armor Hull front 47 mm /60° (upper part)[3]
45 mm (1.8")/60° (lower part),
Hull side 40 mm[4]/41°(upper part),
Hull rear 45 mm,
Hull top 20 mm,
Hull bottom 15 mm;
Turret front 60 mm (2.4"),
Turret side 52 mm/30°,
Turret rear 30 mm,
Turret top 16 mm
Main
armament
 76.2 mm (3.00 in) F-34 tank gun
(T-34-85: 85 mm ZiS-S-53 gun)
Secondary
armament
 2 × 7.62 mm (0.308 in) DT machine guns
Engine Model V-2-34 38.8 L V12 Diesel engine
500 hp (370 kW)
Power/weight 17.5 hp/tonne
Suspension Christie
Ground clearance 0.4 m (16 in)
Operational
range
  • 400 km (T-34) (250 mi)
  • 240 km (T-34-85) (150 mi)
Speed 53 km/h (33 mph)

The T-34 was a Soviet medium tank that had a profound and lasting effect on the field of tank design. Although its armour and armament were surpassed later in the war, it has been often credited as the most effective, efficient and influential tank design of the Second World War.[5] At its introduction, the T-34 possessed an unprecedented combination of firepower, mobility, protection and ruggedness. Its 76.2 mm (3 in) high-velocity tank gun provided a substantial increase in firepower over any of its contemporaries;[6] its heavy sloped armour was difficult to penetrate by most contemporary anti-tank weapons. When first encountered in 1941, the German tank general von Kleist called it "the finest tank in the world"[7] and Heinz Guderian confirmed the T-34's "vast superiority" over existing German armour of the period.[8][9]

The T-34 was the mainstay of Soviet armoured forces throughout the Second World War. Its design allowed it to be continuously refined to meet the constantly evolving needs of the Eastern Front: as the war went on it became more capable, but also quicker and cheaper to produce. Soviet industry would eventually produce over 80,000 T-34s of all variants, allowing steadily greater numbers to be fielded as the war progressed despite the loss of thousands in combat against the German Wehrmacht.[10] Replacing many light and medium tanks in Red Army service, it was the most-produced tank of the war, as well as the second-most-produced tank of all time (after its successor, the T-54/55 series).[11] Its evolutionary development led directly to the T-54/55 series of tanks, and from there to the T-62, T-72, and T-90 tanks that, along with several Chinese tanks based on the T-55, form the backbone of many armies even today. Widely exported following the war, in 1996, T-34 variants were still in service in at least 27 countries.

Development and production

Origins

In 1939, the most numerous Soviet tank models were the T-26 infantry tank and the BT series of fast tanks. The T-26 was slow-moving, designed to keep pace with infantry on the ground. The BT tanks were cavalry tanks: fast-moving and light, designed for manoeuvre warfare. Both were Soviet developments of foreign designs from the early 1930s; the T-26 was based on the British Vickers 6-Ton, and the BT tanks were based on a design from American engineer J. Walter Christie.[12]

In 1937, the Red Army had assigned engineer Mikhail Koshkin to lead a new team to design a replacement for the BT tanks at the Kharkov Komintern Locomotive Plant (KhPZ). The prototype tank, designated A-20, was specified with 20 mm (0.8 in) of armour, a 45 mm (1.77 in) gun, and the new Model V-2-34 engine, using less-flammable diesel fuel in a V12 configuration designed by Konstantin Chelpan. It also had an 8×6-wheel convertible drive similar to the BT tank's 8×2, which allowed it to run on wheels without caterpillar tracks.[13] This feature had greatly saved on maintenance and repair of the unreliable tank tracks of the early 1930s, and allowed tanks to exceed 85 kilometres per hour (53 mph) on roads, but gave no advantage in combat and its complexity made it difficult to maintain. By 1937-38, track design had improved and the designers considered it a waste of space, weight, and maintenance resources, despite the road speed advantage.[14] The A-20 also incorporated previous research (BT-IS and BT-SW-2 projects) into sloped armour: its all-round sloped armour plates were more likely to deflect rounds than perpendicular armour.[15]

During the Battle of Lake Khasan in July 1938 and the Battles of Khalkhin Gol in 1939, an undeclared border war with Japan on the frontier with occupied Manchuria, the Soviets deployed numerous tanks against the Imperial Japanese Army (IJA). Although the IJA Type 95 Ha-Go light tanks had diesel engines,[16] the Red Army's T-26 and BT tanks used petrol engines which, while common in tank designs of the time, often burst into flames when hit by IJA tank-killer teams[17] using Molotov cocktails. Poor quality welds in the Soviet armour plates left small gaps between them, and flaming petrol from the Molotov cocktails easily seeped into the fighting and engine compartment; portions of the armour plating that had been assembled with rivets also proved to be vulnerable.[18] The Soviet tanks were also easily destroyed by the Japanese Type 95 tank's 37 mm gunfire, despite the low velocity of that gun,[19] or "at any other slightest provocation".[20] The use of riveted armour led to a problem called "spalling", whereby the impact of enemy shells, even if they failed to disable the tank or kill the crew on their own, would cause the rivets to break off and become projectiles inside the tank.

Medium tank A-32

After these battles, Koshkin convinced Soviet leader Joseph Stalin to let him develop a second prototype, a more heavily armed and armoured "universal tank" that reflected the lessons learned and could replace both the T-26 and the BT tanks. Koshkin named the second prototype A-32, after its 32 mm (1.3 in) of frontal armour. It had an L-10 76.2 mm (3 in) gun, and the same Model V-2-34 diesel.[4] Both were tested in field trials at Kubinka in 1939, with the heavier A-32 proving to be as mobile as the A-20. A still heavier version of the A-32, with 45 mm (1.77 in) of front armour, wider tracks, and a newer L-11 76.2 mm gun, was approved for production as the T-34. Koshkin chose the name after the year 1934, when he began to formulate his ideas about the new tank, and to commemorate that year's decree expanding the armoured force and appointing Sergo Ordzhonikidze to head tank production.[21]

Valuable lessons from Lake Khasan and Khalkhin Gol regarding armour protection, mobility, quality welding, and main guns were incorporated into the new T-34 tank, which represented a substantial improvement over the BT and T-26 tanks in all four areas.[22] Koshkin's team completed two prototype T-34s in January 1940. In April and May, they underwent a grueling 2,000-kilometre (1,200 mi) drive from Kharkov to Moscow for a demonstration for the Kremlin leaders, to the Mannerheim Line in Finland, and back to Kharkov via Minsk and Kiev.[21] Some drivetrain shortcomings were identified and corrected.[23]

Initial production

Pre-production prototype A-34 with a complex single-piece hull front.

Political pressure came from conservative elements in the army to redirect resources into building the older T-26 and BT tanks, or to cancel T-34 production pending completion of the more advanced T-34M design. This pressure was brought to bear by the developer of the KV-1 and IS-2 tanks, which were in competition with the T-34.

Resistance from the military command and concerns about high production cost were finally overcome by anxieties about the poor performance of Soviet tanks in the Winter War in Finland, and the effectiveness of German tanks during the Battle of France. The first production T-34s were completed in September 1940, completely replacing the production of the T-26, the BT series, and the multi-turreted T-28 medium tank at the KhPZ plant.[24] Koshkin died of pneumonia (exacerbated by the drive from Kharkov to Moscow) at the end of that month, and the T-34's drivetrain developer, Alexander Morozov, was appointed Chief Designer.[25]

The T-34 posed new challenges for Soviet industry. It had heavier armour than any medium tank produced to date, and there were problems with defective armour plates.[26] Only company commanders' tanks could be fitted with radios (originally the 10-RT 26E radio set), due to their expense and short supply – the rest of the tank crews in each company signalled with flags.[27] The L-11 gun did not live up to expectations, so the Grabin Design Bureau at Gorky Factory N.92 designed the superior F-34 76.2 mm gun (see Designations of Soviet artillery). No bureaucrat would approve production of the new gun, but Gorky and KhPZ started producing it anyway; official permission only came from the State Defense Committee after troops praised the weapon's performance in combat against the Germans.[25]

Production of this first T-34 series – the Model 1940 – totalled only about 400,[28] before production was switched to the Model 1941, with the F-34 gun, 9-RS radio set (also installed on the SU-100), and even thicker armour.[29]

Mass production

“ The impression that it made was to influence greatly subsequent tank development throughout the world" —John Milsom (1971) ”
T-34 tanks headed to the front.

Subassemblies for the T-34 originated at several plants: Kharkov Diesel Factory N.75 supplied the model V-2-34 engine, Leningrad Kirovsky Factory (formerly the Putilov works) made the original L-11 gun, and the Dinamo Factory in Moscow produced electrical components. Tanks were initially built at KhPZ N.183, in early 1941 at the Stalingrad Tractor Factory (STZ), and starting in July at Krasnoye Sormovo Factory N.112 in Gorky.[26][notes 1]

Type Production
(June 1941 –
May 1945)[30]
Light tanks 14,508
T-34 35,119
T-34-85 29,430
KV and KV-85 4,581
IS 3,854
SU-76 12,671
SU-85 2,050
SU-100 1,675
SU-122 1,148
SU-152 4,779

After Germany's surprise invasion of the Soviet Union on 22 June 1941 (Operation Barbarossa), the Wehrmacht's rapid advances forced the evacuation of Soviet tank factories eastwards of the Ural Mountains, an undertaking of immense scale and haste that presented enormous logistic difficulties and was extremely punishing to the workers involved. Alexander Morozov personally supervised the evacuation of all skilled engineers and labourers, machinery and stock from KhPZ to re-establish the factory at the site of the Dzherzhinski Ural Railcar Factory in Nizhny Tagil, renamed Stalin Ural Tank Factory N.183.[31] The Kirovsky Factory, evacuated just weeks before the Germans surrounded Leningrad, moved with the Kharkov Diesel Factory to the Stalin Tractor Factory in Chelyabinsk, soon to be nicknamed Tankograd ("Tank City"). The workers and machinery from Leningrad's Voroshilov Tank Factory N.174 were incorporated into the Ural Factory and the new Omsk Factory N.174. The Ordzhonikidze Ural Heavy Machine Tool Works (UZTM) in Sverdlovsk absorbed workers and machines from several small machine shops in the path of German forces.

While these factories were being rapidly moved, the industrial complex surrounding the Dzherzhinski Tractor Factory in Stalingrad continued to work double shifts throughout the period of withdrawal (September 1941 to September 1942) to make up for production lost, and produced 40% of all T-34s during the period.[32] As the factory became surrounded by heavy fighting in the Battle of Stalingrad in 1942, the situation there grew desperate: manufacturing innovations were necessitated by material shortages, and stories persist of unpainted T-34 tanks driven out of the factory directly to the battlefields around it.[33] Stalingrad kept up production until September 1942.

Soviet designers were aware of design deficiencies in the tank, but most of the desired remedies would have slowed tank production and so were not implemented: the only changes allowed on the production lines through to 1944 were those to make production simpler and cheaper. New methods were developed for automated welding and hardening the armour plate, including innovations by Prof. Evgeny Paton.[34] The design of the 76.2 mm F-34 gun Model 1941 was reduced from an initial 861 parts to 614.[35] The initial narrow, cramped turrets, both the cast one and the one welded of rolled armour plates bent to shape, were since 1942 gradually replaced with the somewhat less cramped hexagonal one; as it was mostly cast with only a few, simple flat armour plates welded in (roof etc.), this turret was actually faster to produce. Limited rubber supplies led to the adoption of all-steel, internally sprung road wheels, and a new clutch was added to an improved five-speed transmission and engine, improving reliability.[36]

Polish T-34 Model 1943 in Poznań, Poland. The model 1943's hexagonal turret distinguishes it from earlier models.

Over two years, the unit production cost of the T-34 was reduced from 269,500 rubles in 1941, to 193,000, and then to 135,000.[35] Production time was cut in half by the end of 1942, even though most experienced factory workers had been sent to the battlefield and were replaced by a mixed workforce that included 50% women, 15% boys, and 15% invalids and old men. Originally "beautifully crafted machines with excellent exterior finish comparable or superior to those in Western Europe or America", later T-34s were much more roughly finished; however, this did not compromise mechanical reliability.[31]

In 1943, T-34 production had reached an average of 1,300 per month; this was the equivalent of three full-strength Panzer divisions.[37] By the end of 1945, over 57,300 T-34s had been built: 34,780 T-34 tanks in multiple variants with 76.2 mm guns in 1940–44, and another 22,609 of the revised T-34-85 model in 1944–45.[38] The single largest producer was Factory N.183 (UTZ), building 28,952 T-34s and T-34-85s from 1941 to 1945. The second-largest was Krasnoye Sormovo Factory N.112 in Gorky, with 12,604 in the same period.[39]

At the start of the war, T-34s comprised about four percent of the Soviet tank arsenal, but by the end it made up at least 55% of tank production (based on figures from;[40] Zheltov 2001 lists even larger numbers).

Following the end of the war, a further 2,701 T-34s were built prior to the end of Soviet production. Under licence, production was restarted in Poland (1951–55) and Czechoslovakia (1951–58), where 1,380 and 3,185 T-34-85s were made, respectively, by 1956.[41] Altogether, as many as 84,070 T-34s are thought to have been built, plus 13,170 self-propelled guns built on T-34 chassis.[42] It was the most-produced tank of the Second World War, and the second most-produced tank of all time, after its successor, the T-54/55 series.[11]

Design

Overview

“ We had nothing comparable. —Friedrich von Mellenthin (Panzer Battles) ”

The T-34 had well-sloped armour, a relatively powerful engine and wide tracks.[27] The initial T-34 version had a powerful 76.2 mm gun, and is often called the T-34/76 (originally a World War II German designation, never used by the Red Army). In 1944, a second major version began production, the T-34-85, with a larger 85 mm gun intended to deal with newer German tanks.[27]

Comparisons can be drawn between the T-34 and the U.S. M4 Sherman tank. Both tanks were the backbone of the armoured units in their respective armies, both nations distributed these tanks to their allies, who also used them as the mainstay of their own armoured formations, and both were upgraded extensively and fitted with more powerful guns. Both were designed for mobility and ease of manufacture and maintenance, sacrificing some performance for these goals. Both chassis were used as the foundation for a variety of support vehicles, such as armour recovery vehicles, tank destroyers, and self-propelled artillery. Both were an approximately even match for the standard German medium tank, the Panzer IV, though each of these three tanks had particular advantages and weaknesses compared with the other two. Neither the T-34 nor the M4 were equals to Germany's heavy tanks, the Panther or the Tiger I; the Soviets used the IS-2 heavy tank and the U.S. the M26 Pershing as the heavy tanks of their forces instead.[43]

Soviet medium tank models of World War II[44]
Model T-34 Model 1940 T-34 Model 1941 T-34 Model 1942 T-34 Model 1943 T-43 prototype T-34-85 T-44
Weight 26 t (29 tons) 26.5 t (29.2 tons) 28.5 t (31.4 tons) 30.9 t (34.1 tons) 34 t (37 tons) 32 t (35 tons) 31.9 t (35.2 tons)
Gun 76.2 mm L-11 76.2 mm F-34 76.2 mm F-34 76.2 mm F-34 76.2 mm F-34 85 mm ZiS-S-53 85 mm ZiS-S-53
Ammunition 76 rounds 77 rounds 77 rounds 100 rounds 60 rounds 58 rounds
Fuel 460 L (100 imp gal; 120 US gal) 460 L (100 imp gal; 120 US gal) 610 L (130 imp gal; 160 US gal) 790 L (170 imp gal; 210 US gal) 810 L (180 imp gal; 210 US gal) 642 L (141 imp gal; 170 US gal)
Road range 300 km (190 mi) 400 km (250 mi) 400 km (250 mi) 465 km (289 mi) 300 km (190 mi) 240 km (150 mi) 300 km (190 mi)
Armour 15–45 mm (0.59–1.77 in) 20–52 mm (0.79–2.05 in) 20–65 mm (0.79–2.56 in) 20–70 mm (0.79–2.76 in) 16–90 mm (0.63–3.54 in) 20–90 mm (0.79–3.54 in) 15–120 mm (0.59–4.72 in)
Cost 270,000 rubles 193,000 rubles 135,000 rubles 164,000 rubles

Dimensions, road speed and engine horsepower of the various models did not vary significantly, except for the T-43, which was slower than the T-34.

Armour

T-34 Model 1942 s ekranami (Russian for "with screens"), with appliqué armour welded to the hull, near Leningrad, 1942

The T-34 was one of the best-protected tanks in the world in 1941. Good armour thickness was enhanced by the sloped armour shape, which provided protection in excess of what armour thickness alone would indicate. Some tanks also had appliqué armour of varying thickness welded onto the hull and turret. Tanks thus modified were called s ekranami (Russian: с экранами, "with screens").[27]

The USSR donated two combat-used Model 1941 T-34s to the United States for testing purposes in late 1942.[45] The examinations, performed at the Aberdeen Proving Ground, revealed problems with overall armour build quality, especially of the plate joins and welds, as well as the use of soft steel combined with shallow surface tempering. Leak issues were noted as well: "In a heavy rain lots of water flows through chinks/cracks, which leads to the disabling of the electrical equipment and even the ammunition".[46] Earlier models of the T-34, until the Model 1942, had cast turrets whose armour was softer than that of the other parts of the tank, and offered poor resistance even to 37 mm anti-aircraft shells.

In addition, close examination of the T-34 at the Aberdeen Testing Ground showed that a variety of alloys were used in different portions of the armour on the T-34. "Mn-Si-Mo steels were employed for the thinner rolled armour sections, Cr-Mo steels for the thicker rolled armour sections, Mn-Si-Ni-Cr-Mo steels were employed for both rolled and cast steel components from 2" to 5" in thickness, and Ni-Cr-Mo steels were employed for some of the moderately thick cast armour sections".[47] The armour was heat-treated in order to prevent penetration by armour-piercing shells, but this also caused it to be structurally weak, resulting in spalling when struck by high explosive shells.

Despite these deficiencies, the T-34's armour proved problematic for the Germans in the initial stages of the war on the Eastern Front. In one wartime account, a single T-34 came under heavy fire upon encountering one of the most common German anti-tank guns at that stage of the war: "Remarkably enough, one determined 37 mm gun crew reported firing 23 times against a single T-34 tank, only managing to jam the tank’s turret ring."[48] Similarly, a German report of May 1942 noted the ineffectiveness of their 50 mm gun as well, noting that "Combating the T-34 with the 5 cm KwK tank gun is possible only at short ranges from the flank or rear, where it is important to achieve a hit as perpendicular to the surface as possible."[28] However, a Military Commissariat Report of the 10th Tank Division, dated 2 August 1941 reported that the frontal armour could be effectively defeated within 300–400 m by the 37 mm Pak 36's armour-piercing shot.[49][50] According to an examination of damaged T-34 tanks in several repair workshops in August to September 1942, collected by the People's Commissariat for Tank Industry in January 1943, 54.3% of all T-34 losses were caused by the German long-barreled 50 mm KwK 39 gun.[51][52]

As the war went on, the T-34 gradually lost some of its initial advantage. By the end of 1943, it had become a relatively easy target for German 75 mm-armed tanks and anti-tank guns, while hits from 88 mm-armed Tigers, anti-aircraft guns and PaK 43 anti-tank guns usually proved lethal.[53] A Wa Pruef 1 report estimated that, with the target angled 30° sideward, a Panther tank could penetrate the turret of a T-34-85 from the front at ranges up to 2000 m, the mantlet at 1200 m, and the frontal hull armour at 300 m.[54] According to the Pantherfibel, the T-34's glacis could be penetrated from 800 m and the mantlet from 1500 m at 30° sideward angle.[55] Ground trials composed by employees of NIBT Poligon in May 1943 reported that the KwK 36 88mm gun could pierce the T-34 frontal hull from 1,500 metres at 90 degrees and cause a disastrous burst effect inside the tank. The examined hull showed various cracks, spalling, and delamination due to the poor quality of the armour. It was recommended to increase and improve the quality of welds and armour.[56]

Firepower

T-34 side view, displaying the F-34 gun, with an ISU-122 and T-54 in background

The F-34 76.2 mm (3 in) gun, fitted on the vast majority of T-34s produced through to the beginning of 1944, was able to penetrate any early German tank's armour at normal combat ranges. When firing APCR shells, it could pierce 92 mm of armour at 500 m.[57] The best German tanks of 1941, the Panzer III and Panzer IV, had no more than 50 or 60 mm frontal armour.[58] The F-34 also fired an adequate high explosive round.

The gun sights and range finding for the F-34 main gun (either the TMFD-7 or the PT4-7[59]) were rather crude, especially compared to those of their German adversaries, affecting accuracy and the ability to engage at long ranges.[60] As a result of the T-34's two-man turret, weak optics and poor vision devices, the Germans noted:

T-34s operated in a disorganised fashion with little coordination, or else tended to clump together like a hen with its chicks. Individual tank commanders lacked situational awareness due to the poor provision of vision devices and preoccupation with gunnery duties. A tank platoon would seldom be capable of engaging three separate targets, but would tend to focus on a single target selected by the platoon leader. As a result T-34 platoons lost the greater firepower of three independently operating tanks.[61]

The Germans also noted that the T-34 was very slow to find and engage targets, while their own tanks could typically get off three rounds for every one fired by the T-34.[61]

When new German tanks types with thicker armour began appearing in mid-1942, the T-34's 76.2 mm cannon had to fire at their flanks to assure penetration. As a result, the T-34 was upgraded to the T-34-85 model. This model, with its 85 mm (3.35 in) ZiS gun, provided greatly increased firepower compared to the previous T-34's 76.2mm gun. The 85 mm gun could penetrate the turret front of a Tiger I tank from 500 m (550 yd) and the driver's front plate "DFP" from 300 m (330 yd) at the side angle of 30 degrees, and the larger turret enabled the addition of another crew member, allowing the roles of commander and gunner to be separated and increasing the rate of fire and overall effectiveness.[62] Against the frontal armour of the Panther at 30 degree sidewards, the T-34-85 could penetrate the non-mantlet of its turret at 500 m (550 yd),[54] meaning that even upgraded models of the T-34 usually needed tungsten rounds or had to flank a Panther to destroy it.[63]

The greater length of the 85 mm gun barrel (4.645 meters) made it necessary for crews to be careful not to plough it into the ground on bumpy roads or in combat. Tank commander A.K. Rodkin commented: "the tank could have dug the ground with it in the smallest ditch. If you fired it after that, the barrel would open up at the end like the petals of a flower." Standard practice when moving the T-34-85 cross-country in non-combat situations was to fully elevate the gun, or reverse the turret.[64]

The T-34's 12-cylinder Model V-2-34 diesel engine at the Finnish Tank Museum in Parola

Mobility

The T-34 was powered by a Model V-2-34 38.8 L V12 Diesel engine of 500 hp (370 kW),[notes 2] giving a top speed of 53 km/h (33 mph). It used the coil-spring Christie suspension of the earlier BT-series tanks, using a "slack track" tread system with a rear-mounted drive sprocket and no system of return rollers for the upper run of track, but dispensed with the heavy and ineffective convertible drive.[27]

During the winters of 1941–42 and 1942-43, the T-34 had a marked advantage over German tanks through its ability to move over deep mud or snow — especially important in Russia's twice-annual rasputitsa mud seasons — without bogging down. The Panzer IV, its closest German equivalent at that time, used an inferior leaf-spring suspension and narrow track that tended to sink in such conditions.[65]

Ergonomics

The T-34 suffered from the unsatisfactory ergonomic layout of its crew compartment. The two-man turret crew arrangement required the commander to aim and fire the gun, an arrangement common to most Soviet tanks of the day; this proved to be inferior to the three-man (commander, gunner, and loader) turret crews of German Panzer III and Panzer IV tanks.

Early in the war, the commander fought at a further disadvantage; the forward-opening hatch and the lack of a turret cupola forced him to observe the battlefield through a single vision slit and traversable periscope.[66] German commanders liked to fight "heads-up", with their seat raised and having a full field of view – in the T-34 this was impossible.[67] Soviet veterans condemned the turret hatches of the early models. Nicknamed pirozhok (stuffed bun) because of its characteristic shape, it was heavy and hard to open. The complaints of the crews urged the design group led by Alexander Morozov to switch in August 1942[68] to using two hatches in the turret.[69]

The loader also had a difficult job due to the lack of a turret basket (a rotating floor that moves as the turret turns); the same fault was present on all German tanks prior to the Panzer IV. The floor under the T-34's turret was made up of ammunition stored in small metal boxes, covered by a rubber mat. There were nine ready rounds of ammunition stowed in racks on the sides of the fighting compartment. Once these rounds had been used, the crew had to pull additional ammunition out of the floor boxes, leaving the floor littered with open bins and matting and reducing their performance.[70]

The main weakness [of the two-man turret of a T-34 Model 1941] is that it is very tight. The Americans couldn't understand how our tankers could fit inside during a winter, when they wear sheepskin jackets. The electrical mechanism for rotating the turret is very bad. The motor is weak, very overloaded and sparks horribly, as a result of which the device regulating the speed of the rotation burns out, and the teeth of the cogwheels break into pieces. They recommend replace it with a hydraulic or simply manual system.[46]

The problems created by the cramped T-34/76 turret, known before the war, were fully corrected with the addition of a three-man turret on the T-34-85 in 1944.

General reliability

The T-34's wide track and good suspension gave it excellent cross-country performance. Early in the tank's life, however, this advantage was greatly reduced by the numerous teething troubles the design displayed: a long road trip could be a lethal exercise for a T-34 tank at the start of the war. When in June 1941, the 8th Mechanised Corps of D.I. Ryabyshev marched towards Dubno, the corps lost half of its vehicles. A.V. Bodnar, who was in combat in 1941-42, recalled:

From the point of view of operating them, the German armoured machines were almost perfect, they broke down less often. For the Germans, covering 200 km was nothing, but with T-34s something would have been lost, something would have broken down. The technological equipment of their machines was better, the combat gear was worse.[71]

The tracks of early models were the most frequently repaired part. A.V. Maryevski later remembered:

The caterpillars used to break apart even without bullet or shell hits. When earth got stuck between the road wheels, the caterpillar, especially during a turn – strained to such an extent that the pins and tracks themselves couldn't hold out.[72]

The USSR donated two combat-used Model 1941 T-34s to the United States for testing purposes in late 1942. The examinations, performed at the Aberdeen Proving Ground, highlighted these early faults, which were in turn acknowledged in a 1942 Soviet report on the results of the testing:

The Christie's suspension was tested long time ago by the Americans, and unconditionally rejected. On our tanks, as a result of the poor steel on the springs, it very quickly [unclear word] and as a result clearance is noticeably reduced. The deficiencies in our tracks from their viewpoint results from the lightness of their construction. They can easily be damaged by small-calibre and mortar rounds. The pins are extremely poorly tempered and made of poor steel. As a result, they quickly wear and the track often breaks.[46]

Testing at Aberdeen also revealed that engines could grind to a halt from dust and sand ingestion, as the original "Pomon" air filter was almost totally ineffective and had insufficient air-inflow capacity, starving the combustion chambers of oxygen, lowering compression, and thereby restricting the engine from operating at full capacity.[46] The air filter issue was later remedied by the addition of "Cyclone" filters on the Model 1943,[28] and even more efficient "Multi-Cyclone" filters on the T-34-85.[38]

The testing at Aberdeen revealed other problems as well. The turret drive also suffered from poor reliability. The use of poorly machined, low quality steel side friction clutches and the T-34's outdated and poorly manufactured transmission meant frequent mechanical failure occurred and that they "create an inhuman harshness for the driver". A lack of properly installed and shielded radios – if they existed at all – restricted their operational range to under 16 km (9.9 mi).[46]

Judging by samples, Russians when producing tanks pay little attention to careful machining or the finishing and technology of small parts and components, which leads to the loss of the advantage what would otherwise accrue from what on the whole are well designed tanks. Despite the advantages of the use of diesel, the good contours of the tanks, thick armor, good and reliable armaments, the successful design of the tracks etc., Russian tanks are significantly inferior to American tanks in their simplicity of driving, manoeuvrability, the strength of firing (reference to muzzle velocity), speed, the reliability of mechanical construction and the ease of keeping them running.[46]

Operational history

Operation Barbarossa (1941)

German training mockup of a T-34 built over a captured Polish TK-3 tankette

Germany launched Operation Barbarossa, its invasion of the Soviet Union, on 22 June 1941. The existence of the T-34 proved a psychological shock to German soldiers, who had expected to face an inferior enemy.[73] For the most part, these expectations were accurate, but the T-34 was a notable exception, superior to any tank the Germans then had in service. Initially, the Wehrmacht had great difficulty destroying T-34s in combat, as standard German anti-tank weaponry proved ineffective against its heavy, sloped armour. The diary of Alfred Jodl seems to express surprise at the appearance of the T-34 in Riga.[74]

At the start of hostilities, the Red Army had 967 T-34 tanks and 508 KV tanks[75] concentrated in five[76] of their twenty-nine mechanized corps. In one of the first known encounters, a T-34 crushed a 37 mm PaK 36, destroyed two Panzer IIs, and left a 14 kilometres (8.7 mi)-long swathe of destruction in its wake before a howitzer destroyed it at close range.[77] The Germans' standard anti-tank gun, the 37 mm PaK 36, proved ineffective against the T-34; the Germans were forced to deploy 105 mm field guns and 88 mm anti-aircraft guns in a direct fire role to stop them.[78]

Burning T-34, Russia, 1941

Despite this, the Soviet corps equipped with these new tanks lost most of them within weeks.[79] The combat statistics for 1941 show that the Soviets lost an average of over seven tanks for every German tank lost.[80][81] The Soviets lost a total of 20,500 tanks in 1941 (approximately 2,300 of them T-34s, as well as over 900 heavy tanks, mostly KVs).[82] The destruction of the Soviet tank force was accomplished not only by the glaring disparity in the tactical and operational skills of the opponents, but also by the mechanical defects that affected the Soviet armour pool.[83] Beside the poor state of older tanks, the new T-34s and KVs suffered from teething problems, particularly with regard to clutches and transmissions. Mechanical breakdowns accounted for at least 50 percent of the tank losses in the summer fighting, and recovery or repair equipment was not to be found.[83] The shortage of repair equipment and recovery vehicles led the early T-34 crews to enter combat carrying a spare transmission on the engine deck.[84]

Other key factors diminishing the initial impact of T-34s on the battlefield were the poor state of leadership, tank tactics, and crew training; these factors were partially consequences of Stalin's purges of the Soviet officer corps in 1937, reducing the army's efficiency and morale.[85] This was aggravated as the campaign progressed by the loss of many of the properly trained personnel during the Red Army's disastrous defeats early in the invasion. Typical crews went into combat with only their basic military training plus 72 hours of classroom instruction; according to armour historian Steven J. Zaloga:

The weakness of mechanized corps lay not in the design of their equipment, but rather in its poor mechanical state, the inadequate training of their crews, and the abysmal quality of Soviet military leaderships in the first month of the war.[86]

Further action (1942–1943)

As the invasion progressed, German infantry began receiving increasing numbers of the Pak 40 75 mm, which were capable of penetrating the T-34's armour. Larger numbers of the 88 mm Flak guns also arrived, which could easily defeat a T-34 even at long range, though their size and general unwieldiness meant that they were often difficult to move into position in the rough Russian terrain.[87] The heavy German Tiger I tank appeared on the Eastern Front in late 1942, as a response to the T-34.

At the same time, the Soviets incrementally upgraded the T-34. The Model 1942 featured increased armour and many simplified components. The Model 1943 (confusingly also introduced in 1942) had yet more armour, as well as increased fuel capacity and more ammunition storage. Also added were an improved engine air filter and a new clutch mated to an improved and more reliable five-speed transmission.[44] Finally, the Model 1943 also had a new, slightly roomier (but still two-man) turret of a distinctive hexagonal shape that was easier to manufacture, derived from the abandoned T-34M project.[36]

The T-34 was essential in resisting the German summer offensive in 1942, and executing the double encirclement manoeuver that cut off the German Sixth Army at Stalingrad in December 1942. The Sixth Army was surrounded, and eventually surrendered in February 1943, a campaign widely regarded as the turning point of the war on the Eastern Front.

In 1943, the Soviets formed Polish and Czech armies-in-exile, and these started to receive the T-34 Model 1943 with a hexagonal turret. Like the Soviet forces themselves, the Polish and Czech tank crews were sent into action quickly with little training, and suffered high casualties.

In July 1943, the Germans launched Operation Citadel, in the region around Kursk, their last major offensive on the Eastern Front in the Second World War. It was the debut of the German Panther tank, although the numbers employed at Kursk were small and the brunt of the burden was carried by the Panzer III, StuG III, and Panzer IV. The campaign featured the largest tank battles in history. The high-water mark of the battle was the massive armour engagement at Prokhorovka, which began on 12 July, though the vast majority of armour losses on both sides were caused by artillery and mines, rather than tanks.[88] Over 6,000 fully tracked armoured vehicles, 4,000 combat aircraft, and 2 million men are believed to have participated in these battles.

The Soviet high command's decision to focus on one cost-effective design, cutting costs and simplifying production wherever possible while only allowing relatively minor improvements, had proven to be an astute choice for the first two years of the war. However, the battles in the summer of 1943 demonstrated that the 76.2 mm gun of the T-34 was no longer as effective as it was in 1941. Soviet tank crews were unable to penetrate the frontal armour of the new German Panther or Tiger I tanks at standard combat ranges without tungsten rounds, and had to rely on tactical skill through flanking maneuvers and combined arms.[88]

T-34-85

A T-34 Model 1943 (left), next to the T-43.

After improved German Panzer IVs with the high-velocity 75 mm (2.95 in) gun were encountered in combat in 1942, a project to design an entirely new Soviet tank was begun, with the goals of increasing armour protection while adding modern features like a torsion-bar suspension and a three-man turret. This new tank, the T-43, was intended to be a universal tank to replace both the T-34 and the KV-1 heavy tank. However, the T-43 prototype's armour, though heavier, was still not proof against German 88 mm guns, while its mobility was found to be inferior to the T-34. Finally, although the T-43 shared over 70% of its components with the T-34, manufacturing it would still have required a significant slow-down in production.[89] Consequently, the T-43 was cancelled.

Rear view of a T-34-85 from Factory 174. In the centre is a circular transmission access hatch, flanked by exhaust pipes, MDSh smoke canisters on the hull rear, and extra fuel tanks on the hull sides.
Interior of a T-34-85 viewed from the driver's hatch, showing the ammunition boxes on which the loader had to stand in the absence of a turret basket. In the foreground is the driver's seat. Levers for radiator flaps can be seen on the firewall.

Not only were the weapons of German tanks improving, so was their armour. Soviet firing tests against a captured Tiger I heavy tank in April 1943 showed that the T-34's 76 mm gun could not penetrate the front of the Tiger I at all, and the side only at very close range. A Soviet 85 mm antiaircraft gun, the 52-K, was found capable of doing the job, and so derivatives of it were developed for tanks.[90][91] The resulting tank gun could penetrate the side armour of the Tiger I from a distance of 800 meters and the turret side from a distance of 600 meters. It was still not enough to match the Tiger, as a Tiger could destroy the T-34 from a distance of 1,500 to 2,000 meters,[92] but it was a noticeable improvement.

With the T-43 cancelled, the Soviet command made the decision to retool the factories to produce an improved version of the T-34. Its turret ring was enlarged from 1,425 mm (56 in) to 1,600 mm (63 in), allowing a larger turret to be fitted and thus the larger 85 mm gun. The prototype T-43's turret design was hurriedly adapted by Vyacheslav Kerichev at the Krasnoye Sormovo Factory to fit the T-34.[93] This was a larger three-man turret, with radio (previously in the hull). Now the tank commander needed only to command, leaving the operation of the gun to the gunner and the loader. The resulting new tank, the T-34-85, was seen as a compromise between advocates for the T-43 and others who wanted to continue to build as many 76 mm-armed T-34s as possible without interruption.[94]

Production of the T-34-85 began in February 1944, first using the 85mm S-53 gun and then in mid-1944 the 85mm ZiS-S-53 (the ZiS-S-53 was a modified S-53 designed by the Grabin Design Bureau in order to simplify the gun and reduce its price; the ballistics of both were the same).[92][95] The improved T-34-85 became the standard Soviet medium tank, with an uninterrupted production run until the end of the war. A T-34-85 initially cost about 30 percent more to produce than a Model 1943, at 164,000 rubles; by 1945 this had been reduced to 142,000 rubles.[96] During the course of the Great Patriotic War, the cost of a T-34 tank was reduced by almost half, from 270,000 rubles in 1941,[96] while in the meantime its top speed remained about the same, and its main gun's armour penetration and turret frontal armour thickness both nearly doubled.[97]

The T-34-85 gave the Red Army a tank with better armour and mobility than the German Panzer IV tank and StuG III assault gun, though it could not match the armour or weapons of the Panther or Tiger tanks. However, its improved firepower made it much more effective against Panthers and Tigers than earlier models. In comparison with the T-34-85 program, the Germans instead chose an upgrade path based on the introduction of completely new, expensive, heavier, and more complex tanks, greatly slowing the growth of their tank production and aiding the Soviets in maintaining a substantial numerical superiority in tanks.[98] By May 1944, T-34-85 production had reached 1,200 tanks per month.[99] In the entire war, production figures for all Panther types reached no more than 6,557, and for all Tiger types 2,027.[100] Production figures for the T-34-85 alone reached 22,559.

Manchurian campaign (August 1945)

Just after midnight on 9 August 1945, under cover of a torrential downpour and through terrain believed by the Japanese to be impassable by armoured formations, the Soviet Union invaded Japanese-occupied Manchuria. Red Army combined-arms forces achieved complete surprise and used a powerful, deep-penetrating attack in a classic double encirclement pattern, spearheaded by the T-34-85. The opposing Japanese forces had been reduced as elite units had been drawn off to other fronts and the remaining forces were in the middle of redeployment to form a defence-in-depth. The Japanese tanks remaining to face them were all held in the rear and not used in combat; and the Japanese had weak support from IJAAF forces, engineering, and communications. Japanese forces were overwhelmed though some put up resistance. The Japanese emperor transmitted a surrender order on 14 August, but the Kwangtung Army was not given a formal cease fire until 17 August.[101]

Korean War (1950–1951)

U.S. Marines knocked out this North Korean T-34-85 during the Korean War in September 1950 while United Nations forces advanced on Seoul after the amphibious landings at Inchon.
A North Korean T-34-85 caught on a bridge south of Suwon by American attack aircraft during the Korean War.

Many Soviet-client and former Soviet-client states used T-34-85s after the end of World War II. A full brigade equipped with about 120 North Korean T-34-85s spearheaded the invasion of South Korea in June 1950. Additional T-34 tanks later joined the first assault force after it had penetrated into South Korea.[102] The North Korean tanks had overwhelming early successes against South Korean infantry, Task Force Smith, and U.S. M24 Chaffee light tanks. The World War II-era 2.36-inch bazookas used by the Americans were useless against the T-34s,[103] as were the 75 mm cannons of the M24 Chaffee.[104]

The North Korean T-34s lost their momentum when they encountered U.S. M26 Pershing tanks and ground-attack aircraft, and when the U.S. infantry upgraded their anti-tank weapons to 3.5-inch Super Bazookas hurriedly airlifted from the United States. The M4 Sherman (M4A3E8 model) and British tanks such as the Centurion, Churchill, and Cromwell also entered the war. The tide turned in favour of the United Nations forces in August 1950, when the North Koreans suffered major tank losses during a series of battles in which their foes brought their newer equipment to bear. The U.S. landings at Inchon on September 15 cut off the North Korean supply lines, causing their armoured forces and infantry to run out of fuel, ammunition, and other supplies. As a result, the North Koreans had to retreat, and many T-34s and heavy weapons were abandoned. By the time the North Koreans had fled from the South, 239 T-34s and 74 SU-76s had been lost.[103] After November 1950, North Korean armour was rarely encountered.[105]

A few more tank engagements occurred when China entered the conflict in February 1951 with four regiments of tanks (a mix of mostly T-34-85 tanks, a few IS-2 tanks, and other AFVs). However, because these tanks were dispersed with the infantry, tank to tank battles with UN forces were uncommon.[106] China produced T-34 tanks under the designation Type 58, though production soon stopped when the Type 59 became available.

A 1954 survey concluded that there were 119 tank vs. tank actions involving U.S. Army and Marine units during the Korean War, with 97 T-34-85 tanks knocked out and another 18 probable. The M4A3E8 was involved in 50% of the tank actions, the M26 in 32%, and the M46 in 10%.[107] The M26 and M46 proved to be an overmatch for the T-34-85 as their 90 mm HVAP round could punch all the way through the T-34 from the front glacis armour to the back,[108] whereas the T-34-85 had difficulty penetrating the armour of the M26 or the M46.[109] The M4A3E8, firing 76 mm HVAP rounds, was a closer match to the T-34-85 as both tanks could destroy each other at normal combat ranges; however, the HVAP round gave the M4A3E8 an advantage in penetration.[109][110]

Use in other countries

Egyptian Army T-34-85 in the Egyptian Military museum

The Soviet and Finnish armies used T-34s until the 1960s; the former included the 76.2 mm-armed versions until at least 1968, when they were used in filming the sequel to the movie The Alive and the Dead. The Finnish tanks were captured from the attacking Soviets or trophies purchased from Germany. Many of the Т-34-85s were enhanced with Finnish or Western equipment, such as improved optics.[111]

A Bosnian Serb Army T-34-85, with rubber matting added in an attempt to hide its thermal signature, near Doboj in early 1996.

T-34s equipped many of the Eastern European (later Warsaw Pact) armies, and armies of other Soviet client states. They served in the suppression of the East German uprising of 17 June 1953, as well as of the Hungarian revolution of 1956. Cypriot National Guard forces equipped with some 35 T-34-85 tanks helped to support a coup by the Greek junta against President Archbishop Makarios on 15 July 1974. They also saw extensive action against Turkish forces during the Turkish invasion in July and August 1974, with two major actions at Kioneli and at Kyrenia on 20 July 1974.[112] The T-34-85 was also used in the Middle East, the Vietnam War, and even as recently as the Bosnian War.

On 3 May 1995, a Bosnian Serb T-34-85 attacked an UNPROFOR outpost manned by the 21st Regiment of the Royal Engineers in Maglaj, Bosnia, injuring six British peacekeepers, with at least one of them sustaining a permanent disability.[113][114] Croatia inherited 25 or 30 from Yugoslavia, but has since withdrawn them from service. T-34s were sporadically available in Afghanistan, but it is not known if T-34s were used against coalition troops, and Saddam Hussein had T-34s in the Iraqi army in the early 1990s.

Several African states, including Angola and Somalia, have employed T-34-85s in recent years. T-34-85s were deployed by Angola and Cuba during the Angolan Civil War in order to combat UNITA and the South African Defence Force. The tank was useful against light infantry, but showed itself to be vulnerable against the South African armoured vehicles.[104]

In January 2015, video emerged of SU-100 and T-34 tanks being transferred by rail, reportedly to participate in the invasion of Ukraine. It was later confirmed that these tanks were being transported to Moscow for the 2015 May Day Parade. [115] In 2015, both T-34-85 Model 1969 tanks and SU-100 self-propelled guns were photographed being used in Yemen.[116]

As of 2015, the only countries confirmed to use the T-34 in active service are Somalia, Yemen and North Korea.

Successors

In 1944, pre-war development of a more advanced T-34 tank was resumed, leading to the T-44. The new tank had a turret design based on the T-34-85's, but featured a new hull with torsion-bar suspension and transversely mounted engine; it had a lower profile than the T-34-85 and was simpler to manufacture. Between 150 and 200 of these tanks were built before the end of the war. With substantial drivetrain changes, a new turret, and 100 mm gun, it became the T-54, starting production in 1947.[117]

Operators

Some of the PRC's T-34-85 in the country's 1950 National Day parade

The following countries have used the T-34. As of 1996, it remained in service in 27 of those countries, indicated by asterisks (*).[118]

Europe and the Americas

Middle East and Asia

Africa

As of 2012, the T-34 is mostly in reserve, used in a light tank role, or treated as an infantry backup. In some Third World countries, it is also considered a secondary or even primary tank where more modern tank designs have not entered service yet.[121][122]

Current and past operators of T-34 in 2012
  Brown: current operators
  Red: former operators
  Pink: recent operators; uncertain if still using

Symbolism

One of the best-known memorials of the Battle of the Dukla Pass of 1944, near Ladomirová and Svidník, on the Slovak side of the Dukla Pass. A Soviet T-34-85 (left) together with a German Pz-IV J (right).

A T-34-85 tank monument in the East German city of Karl-Marx-Stadt (Chemnitz) became the target of a 1980 bomb-attack that inflicted minor damage on the vehicle and blew out nearby windows. The bomber, Josef Kneifel, was sentenced to life imprisonment in Bautzen, but was released after a deal with the West German government in 1987. After German unification in 1990, the tank was transferred to a museum in Ingolstadt.[123][124]

Another such tank, mounted atop the monument to Soviet tank crews in Prague, was the focus of significant controversy. The monument, also known locally as 'Saint Tank,' intended to represent Lt I.G. Goncharenko's T-34-85, the first Soviet tank to enter Prague in May 1945, actually bore an IS-2m heavy tank. To many in Prague, the tank was also a reminder of the Soviet invasion which ended the Prague Spring of 1968. The tank was painted pink by artist David Černý in 1991. Following an official protest from the Russian government, the arrest of Černý, a coat of official green paint, public demonstrations, and a further coat of pink paint applied by fifteen parliamentary deputies, the tank was finally removed to a military museum.[125][126]

Four Tankers and a Dog (Czterej pancerni i pies), a very successful war-themed Polish television series of the 1960s, adapted the novel of the same name by the Polish writer Janusz Przymanowski (1922–1998), himself a People's Army of Poland volunteer. The series made T-34 tank number 102 an icon of Polish popular culture. It was also shown in other Soviet-bloc countries where it was also well received, surprisingly even in the German Democratic Republic (East Germany). At the beginning of the 21st century reruns of the black and white series still manage to attract a large audience.[127]

In Budapest on 23 October 2006, the 2006 protests in Hungary climaxed during the 50th anniversary of the Hungarian Revolution of 1956. Protesters managed to start an unarmed T-34 tank which was part of a memorial exhibit, and used it in riots against police forces. The tank drove a few hundred metres, then stopped in front of the police, causing no personal injury.[128]

Variants

Main article: T-34 variants

There were two main production families of the T-34, each with subvariants. The identification of T-34 variants can be complicated. Turret castings, superficial details, and equipment differed between factories; new features were added in the middle of production runs, or retrofitted to older tanks; damaged tanks were rebuilt, sometimes with the addition of newer-model equipment and even new turrets.[27]

The Red Army never had a consistent policy for naming the T-34.[129] Since at least the 1980s, however, many academic sources (notably, AFV expert Steven Zaloga) have used Soviet-style nomenclature: T-34 for the models armed with 76.2 mm guns, and T-34-85 for models armed with 85 mm guns, with minor models distinguished by year, as T-34 Model 1940. Some Russian historians use different names: they refer to the first T-34 as the T-34 Model 1939 instead of 1940, all T-34s with the original turret and F-34 gun as Model 1941 instead of Models 1941 and 1942, and the hexagonal-turret T-34 as Model 1942 instead of 1943.[130]

German military intelligence in World War II referred to the two main production families as T-34/76 and T-34/85, with subvariants receiving letter designations such as T-34/76A — this nomenclature has been widely used in the West, especially in popular literature. When the German Wehrmacht used captured T-34s, it designated them Panzerkampfwagen T-34(r), where the "r" stood for russisch ("Russian").[131] The Finns referred to the T-34 as the Sotka after the common goldeneye, because the side silhouette of the tank resembled a swimming waterfowl. The T-34-85 was called pitkäputkinen Sotka ("long-barreled Sotka").[132]

Captured T-34 Model 1943 tanks pressed into service with the Wehrmacht.
T-34-85 on display at Yad La-Shiryon, Israel.

The T-34 (German designation: T-34/76) was the original tank with a 76.2 mm gun in a two-man turret.

The T-34-85 (German designation: T-34/85) was a major improvement with an 85 mm gun in a three-man turret. All T-34-85 models are externally very similar.

Other armoured fighting vehicles

A T-34-57 in 1941.

Surviving vehicles

Restored Angolan T-34-85 at the South African National Museum of Military History, Johannesburg.

An enormous number of T-34's and T-34-85's were produced; the Soviets used them aggressively in campaigns in Europe and Asia, and they were distributed to the Soviets' allies all over the world. Due to all three factors, there are hundreds of surviving T-34s. Examples of this tank are in the collections of most significant military museums, and hundreds more serve as war memorials. Many are in private ownership, and demilitarised working tanks change hands for U.S. $20,000–40,000. Some still may serve in a second-line capacity in a number of Third World militaries, while others may find use in a civilian capacity, primarily in film-making. In many World War II films, such as Saving Private Ryan,[138] The Battle of Neretva, and Kelly's Heroes,[139] T-34-85 tanks were modified to resemble Tiger I tanks, due to the rarity of the latter.[138] In Sydney Pollack's 1969 movie Castle Keep, barely modified T-34-85 tanks were used as German tanks.[140]

In 2000, a T-34 Model 1943 was recovered that had spent 56 years at the bottom of a bog in Estonia.[141] The tank had been captured and used by retreating German troops, who dumped it in the swamp when it ran out of fuel. The anaerobic environment of the bog preserved the tank and ensured there were no signs of oil leakage, rust, or other significant water damage. The engine was restored to full working order.[142][143]

Other significant surviving T-34s include a Model 1941 at the U.S. Army Ordnance Museum in Aberdeen, Maryland—one of the oldest surviving vehicles. The French Musee des Blindes at Saumur holds two T-34s, including one in full working condition that is displayed in action at its summer "Carrousel" live tank exhibition.[144] The Mandela Way T-34 Tank, a privately owned T-34-85 named after the street in which it is sited (near Bermondsey, London), is frequently repainted by artists and graffitists.[145]

See also

Tanks of comparable role, performance, and era

Notes

  1. ↑ Due to a shortage of new Model V-2-34 diesel engines and a need to produce as many T-34s as possible, the initial production run from the Gorky factory were equipped with the BT tank's Mikulin M-17 gasoline aircraft engine, and inferior transmission and clutch. (Zheltov 2001:40–42)
  2. ↑ The name of the T-34's engine (V-2; B-2 in Russian) is a model name, and has nothing to do with its number of cylinders.
Citations
  1. 1 2 3 Zaloga & Kinnear 1996:18
  2. ↑ Zaloga & Grandsen 1984:184
  3. ↑ Specifications for T-34 model 41 WWIIVehicles.com. Retrieved on 18 May 2013.
  4. 1 2 Zaloga & Sarson 1994:5
  5. ↑ Achtung Panzer! - T-34 !
  6. ↑ McFadden, David Frederick (2002). Two ways to build a better mousetrap. Ohio: Ohio state university. p. 11.
  7. ↑ Stahel, David (2009). "5". Operation Barbarossa and Germany's Defeat in the East. New York: Cambridge university press. p. 169. ISBN 978-0-521-76847-4.
  8. ↑ Guderian, Heinz (2000). "6". Panzer Leader. London: Penguin classics. p. 233. ISBN 0-141-39027-1.
  9. ↑ Caidin, M. (1974). 14 The incredible T-34 tank. In The tigers are burning (2nd ed., p. 162). Los Angeles: Pinnacle Books.
  10. ↑ "The T-34 in WWII: the Legend vs. the Performance | Operation Barbarrosa". www.operationbarbarossa.net. Retrieved 2015-12-16.
  11. 1 2 Harrison 2002
  12. ↑ Sale, Richard. "The Soviet Command Economy,":5
  13. ↑ Zheltov 1999
  14. ↑ Zaloga & Grandsen 1984:66, 111
  15. ↑ Yaziv, D.; Chocron, S.; Anderson, Jr., C.E.; Grosch, D.J. "Oblique Penetration in Ceramic Targets". Proceedings of the 19th International Symposium on Ballistics IBS 2001, Interlaken, Switzerland: 1257–64
  16. ↑ Zaloga (2007)
  17. ↑ Coox 1990:311
  18. ↑ Coox 1990:309
  19. ↑ Coox 1990:437, 993
  20. ↑ Zaloga & Grandsen 1984:111
  21. 1 2 Zaloga & Sarson 1994:6
  22. ↑ Coox 1990:998
  23. ↑ Zaloga & Grandsen 1983:6
  24. ↑ Zaloga & Sarson 1994:4
  25. 1 2 Zaloga & Grandsen 1984:130
  26. 1 2 Zaloga 1983:6
  27. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Zaloga & Grandsen 1983:14
  28. 1 2 3 4 The Russian Battlefield 2000
  29. ↑ Zaloga (1983:14), Zaloga & Grandsen (1984:113, 184), Harrison (2002:181), KMDB (2006).
  30. ↑ Walter S. Dunn, Jr (2007). Stalin's keys to victory : the rebirth of the Red Army. Mechanicsburg, PA: Stackpole Books. ISBN 0-8117-3423-4.
  31. 1 2 Zaloga & Grandsen 1983:17
  32. ↑ Zaloga & Grandsen 1983:13
  33. ↑ Zaloga & Sarson 1994:23
  34. ↑ "Paton Evgeny Oscarovich", at the E.O. Paton Electric Welding Institute. Retrieved November 17, 2008.
  35. 1 2 Zaloga & Grandsen 1984:131
  36. 1 2 Zaloga & Grandsen 1983:18
  37. ↑ Zaloga 1984:225
  38. 1 2 The Russian Battlefield 2003
  39. ↑ Michulec & Zientarzewski 2006:220
  40. ↑ Zaloga 1984:125–6, 225
  41. ↑ Drachkovitch, Milorad M. (ed.) East Central Europe: Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow. Hoover Press 1982:150.
  42. ↑ Zaloga & Grandsen 1996:18
  43. ↑ Zaloga & Grandsen 1983:37
  44. 1 2 3 Zaloga & Grandsen (1984:113, 184), Harrison (2002:181), KMDB (2006).
  45. ↑ Kavalerchik, Boris (March 2015). "Once Again About the T-34". The Journal of Slavic Military Studies. doi:10.1080/13518046.2015.998132. Retrieved April 4, 2016.
  46. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Major-General of Tank Armies, Khlopov, 2nd Department, Evaluation of The T-34 and KV Tanks By Engineers of the Aberdeen Proving Grounds USA, Main Intelligence Department of the Red Army (n.d.) via The Russian Battlefield, retrieved November 23, 2011
  47. ↑ "Review of Soviet Ordnance Metallurgy by A. Hurlich" (PDF).
  48. ↑ Zaloga & Sarson 1994:12
  49. ↑ "Technical Report from the 10th Tank Division, August 1941". Mark Conrad, 1995. Retrieved 2015-02-25.
  50. ↑ "Original Report: БОЕВОЙ ДЕЯТЕЛЬНОСТИ 10-й ТАНКОВОЙ ДИВИЗИИ НА ФРОНТЕ БОРЬБЫ С ГЕРМАНСКИМ ФАШИЗМОМ ЗА ПЕРИОД С 22.6 ПО 1.8.41 г." (in Russian). Retrieved 2015-02-25.
  51. ↑ Zaloga, Steven; Ness, Leland (2003). Red Army Handbook 1939-1945. Sutton Publishing. p. 179. ISBN 0-7509-3209-0.
  52. ↑ "Original Report: Отчет ЦНИИ-48 "Изучение пробивного действия немецких трофейных снарядов по броне наших танков и разработка мер борьбы с ними"" (in Russian). Retrieved 2015-02-25.
  53. ↑ Drabkin & Sheremet 2006:43.
  54. 1 2 Jentz 1995:128
  55. ↑ Pantherfibel
  56. ↑ Baryatinsky, Mikhail (2008). The T-34 in Combat. Jauza, Moscow. pp. 29–30. ISBN 978-5-699-26709-5.
  57. ↑ Fleischer, Wolfgang. Russian Tanks and Armored Vehicles 1917-1945, 1999.
  58. ↑ Jörgensen, Christen. Rommel's Panzers: Rommel and the Panzer Forces of the Blitzkrieg 1940-42. Zenith Imprint 2003:38.
  59. ↑ amvas. "Armchairgeneral". Retrieved 15 November 2014.
  60. ↑ Zaloga & Grandsen 1984:126–27, 135
  61. 1 2 Zaloga & Sarson 1994:40
  62. ↑ Jentz and Doyle 1993:20.
  63. ↑ Healy 2008:167–172
  64. ↑ Drabkin & Sheremet 2006:33
  65. ↑ Perrett 1999
  66. ↑ Zaloga p39
  67. ↑ Zaloga & Grandsen 1984:135–7
  68. ↑ http://english.battlefield.ru/t-34.html
  69. ↑ Drabkin & Sheremet 2006:27-28
  70. ↑ Zaloga & Grandsen 1984:137
  71. ↑ Drabkin & Sheremet 2006:43
  72. ↑ Drabkin & Sheremet 2006:42
  73. ↑ Zaloga & Grandsen 1984:126
  74. ↑ Correlli Barnett, ed. (1989). Hitler's Generals. Weidenfeld and Nicolson. p. 456. ISBN 0 297 79462 0.
  75. ↑ Erickson 1962/2001:567.
  76. ↑ Zaloga 1995:9.
  77. ↑ Orgill, Douglas. T-34: Russian Armour. Ballantine Books, 1971.
  78. ↑ Bailey, Jonathan B.A. Field Artillery and Firepower (Naval Institute Press, London 2003), p.337. ISBN 978-1591140290
  79. ↑ Solonin:145, 261–262, 321.
  80. ↑ Fowler & Bean 2002:170
  81. ↑ Zaloga & Ness 1998:181, table 6.3.
  82. ↑ Krivosheev & Erickson 1997:252, table 95.
  83. 1 2 Zaloga & Grandsen 1984:127
  84. ↑ Zaloga & Sarson 1994:24.
  85. ↑ Bullock, Alan. Hitler and Stalin: Parallel Lives. New York: Vintage Books 1993:489.
  86. ↑ Zaloga & Sarson 1994:126
  87. ↑ Gander and Chamberlain, 1979:119
  88. 1 2 Zamulin, Valeriy. "Prokhorovka Interview". World of Tanks. Retrieved 10 October 2014.
  89. ↑ Zaloga et al. 1997:5
  90. ↑ Eugene Boldyrev (2005-09-20). "Средний танк Т-34-85 - The Russian Battlefield". Battlefield.ru. Retrieved 2010-08-11.
  91. ↑ Healy 2008:167–171
  92. 1 2 Pyatakhin, Dmitry. "The New Generation of Soviet Armor vs. Tigers". Achtung Panzer. Retrieved 2014-12-22.
  93. ↑ Zaloga & Grandsen 1984:166
  94. ↑ "T-34/85 - Medium Tank - History, Specs and Pictures - Military Tanks, Vehicles and Artillery". Retrieved 15 November 2014.
  95. ↑ "Soviet Guns 85mm calibre". Retrieved 2014-12-22.
  96. 1 2 Harrison 2002:181
  97. ↑ Zaloga 1984:113, 184, 225
  98. ↑ Zaloga & Grandsen 1983:37
  99. ↑ Zaloga et al. 1997:6
  100. ↑ Tom Philo, "Selected Equipment Production Figures World War II". at Tom Philo Photography website, retrieved on July 4, 2013
  101. ↑ Marine Corps University Command and Staff College (1986) "The Soviet Army Offensive: Manchuria, 1945." Global Security website.
  102. ↑ Perrett 1987:134-35
  103. 1 2 Perrett 1987:135
  104. 1 2 Zaloga & Kinnear 1996:36
  105. ↑ Zaloga & Kinnear 1996:33-4
  106. ↑ Zaloga 2010:71-73
  107. ↑ Zaloga 2010:74-75
  108. ↑ Zaloga 2010:59
  109. 1 2 Zaloga 2010:74
  110. ↑ "United States' 76 mm Gun Penetration tables". wwiivehicles.com.
  111. ↑ Michulec, Robert (2007). T-34: Mythical Weapon. Mississauga, Ontario, Canada: Air Connection.
  112. ↑ Drousiotis, 2006.
  113. ↑ "Regina v. Ministry of Defence Ex Parte Walker" (judgment), 6 April 2000. Retrieved November 17, 2008.
  114. ↑ "Sergeant Trevor Walker". Retrieved 25 June 2014.
  115. ↑ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tHhBQc-n0vo "В России готовят Танки Т34 к отправки в Украину/Russian T-34 tanks are preparing to send to Ukraine"
  116. ↑ http://www.uskowioniran.com/2015/04/wwii-era-soviet-armor-engaged-in-yemen.html "WWII era Soviet armor engaged in Yemen conflict"
  117. ↑ Zaloga & Johnson 2004:6
  118. ↑ Zaloga & Kinnear 1996:34
  119. ↑ "Italian army". Retrieved 15 November 2014.
  120. ↑ "ARMOUR OF THE 1st DIVISION OF ROA". Retrieved 15 November 2014.
  121. ↑ Anonymous (2011). Libyan Rebels Make Gains Toward Tripoli. Reuters. Report of a Libyan T-34 captured by rebels, August 2011.
  122. ↑ The Military Balance 2012. International Institute for Strategic Studies.
  123. ↑ Honnigfort, Bernhard. "Der Panzersprenger." Frankfurter Rundschau, April 15, 2005.
  124. ↑ Honnigfort, Bernhard. "Der sich nicht fügen wollte." Kölner Stadt-Anzeiger, April 17, 2005.
  125. ↑ Wright 2001:379
  126. ↑ Zaloga & Kinnear 1996:42–43
  127. ↑ http://www.wsowp.poznan.pl/muzeum/pages/eksponat12.htm
  128. ↑ Scotsman.com, "Hungarian protesters seize tank", October 23, 2006; Népszabadság Online, "Elfogták az elkötött T-34-es vezetőjét", October 23, 2006 (Hungarian language).
  129. ↑ Zaloga & Sarson 1994:19
  130. ↑ Zheltov 2001, passim
  131. ↑ Carruthers, Bob. Panzers At War, 1943-1945. Henley-in-Arden, UK: Coda Books Ltd., 2011.
  132. ↑ "Tank Museum Tour." Southeast Finland Border Guard Guild, 1999.
  133. ↑ Zaloga & Sarson 1994:42
  134. ↑ Zaloga & Johnson 2004:18-19; the KMT designation was adopted in the 1950s
  135. 1 2 Zaloga & Sarson 1994:45
  136. ↑ Zaloga 1996:14
  137. ↑ Wachowski 2004
  138. 1 2 "SdKfz 181 PzKpfw VI Tiger I Tank", Saving Private Ryan Online Encyclopedia
  139. ↑ "Kelly's Heroes Tiger Tank page", Internet Movie Cars Database
  140. ↑ "Castle Keep Trailer", YouTube
  141. ↑ Tanki T34-76 väljatõmbamine Kurtna järvest (WWII Trophy tank). Militaarne Hiiumaa web site, text republished from Komatsu Times vol 3 no 1. English and Estonian language, retrieved on February 3, 2007.
  142. ↑ Подъем танка (pulling tank) T-34. Otsing Club web site. Russian language, retrieved on February 3, 2007.
  143. ↑ "Russian Tank Recovered from the Lake After 50 Years Been There - English Russia". Retrieved 15 November 2014.
  144. ↑ http://www.museedesblindes.fr/spip.php?article23
  145. ↑ "Mandela Way T-34 Tank". bermondsey.org. Retrieved 2016-03-13.

References

  • Buckley, John (2004). British Armour in the Normandy Campaign. London: Frank Cass. ISBN 978-0415407731.
  • Chamberlain, Peter, Hilary Doyle, and Tom Jentz (1978). Encyclopedia of German Tanks of World War II. London: Arms and Armour Press. ISBN 978-0853682028.
  • Chant, Christopher (1994 [1996]). World Encyclopedia of the Tank: An International History of the Armoured Fighting Machine, Somerset: Patrick Stephens (Haynes). ISBN 1-85260-114-0.
  • Cole, Hugh M. The Ardennes: Battle of the Bulge. Washington, DC: Office of the Chief of Military History, Department of the Army, 1965.
  • Coox, Alvin D. (1990 softcover edition, two volumes in one). Nomonhan, Japan Against Russia 1939. Berkeley, CA: Stanford University Press. ISBN 0-8047-1835-0.
  • Drabkin, Artem & Oleg Sheremet (2006). T-34 in action. Barnsley (S-Y): Pen & Sword Military. ISBN 1-84415-243-X.
  • Drousiotis, Makarios (2006). Cyprus 1974: The Greek coup and the Turkish invasion. Bibliopolis. ISBN 3-933925-76-2.
  • Erickson, John (1962). The Soviet high command: a military-political history, 1918–1941 (3rd ed.). London: Frank Cass. ISBN 0-7146-5178-8.
  • Fowler, Will, and Tim Bean (2002). Russian Tanks of World War II — Stalin’s Armoured Might. London: Ian Allan Publishing. ISBN 978-0760313022.
  • Gander, Terry, and Peter Chamberlain. Weapons of the Third Reich: An Encyclopedic Survey of All Small Arms, Artillery and Special Weapons of the German Land Forces 1939-1945. New York: Doubleday, 1979 ISBN 0-385-15090-3.
  • Harrison, Mark (2002). Accounting for War: Soviet Production, Employment, and the Defence Burden, 1940–1945. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-89424-7.
  • Kharkov Morozov Machine Building Design Bureau (2006). "T-43 Medium Tank", at morozov.com.ua. URL accessed on October 5, 2006.
  • Krivosheev, Col.-Gen. G.F., and John Erickson (1997). Soviet Casualties and Combat Losses in the Twentieth Century. London: Greenhill Books. ISBN 978-1853672804.
  • Liddell Hart, Basil (1951 [1999]). The other side of the hill: Germany's generals, their rise and fall, with their own account of military events, 1939–1945. London: Cassell. ISBN 0-330-37324-2.
  • Michulec, Robert; Mirosław Zientarzewski (2006). T-34: mythical weapon. Mississauga, ON: Armagedon & Airconnection. ISBN 0-9781091-0-4. 
  • Milsom, John (1971). Russian Tanks, 1900–1970: The Complete Illustrated History of Soviet Armoured Theory and Design. Harrisburg, PA: Stackpole Books. ISBN 0-8117-1493-4.
  • Para, Carl (April 2002). "Military Heritage feature on the T-34" in Military Heritage vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 18–20, 22–23.
  • Perrett, Bryan (1987). Soviet Armour Since 1945. London: Blandford. ISBN 0-7137-1735-1.
  • Perrett, Bryan, and Jim Laurier (1999). Panzerkampfwagen IV Medium Tank, 1936–45 (New Vanguard 28). Oxford: Osprey Publishing. ISBN 1-85532-843-7.
  • Russian Battlefield (2000). "T-34 Medium Tank" The Russian Battlefield, URL accessed on July 6, 2013.
  • Russian Battlefield (2003). "T-34-85 Medium Tank" The Russian Battlefield, URL accessed on July 6, 2013.
  • Solonin, Mark (2007). 22 czerwca 1941 czyli Jak zaczęła się Wielka Wojna ojczyźniana (in Polish). Translated by Tomasz Lisiecki (1 ed.). Poznań, Poland: Dom Wydawniczy Rebis. ISBN 978-83-7510-130-0.  (the only English translations of Solonin's works seem to be, as of June 2011, these online chapters)
  • Sewell, Stephen 'Cookie' (1998). "Why Three Tanks?" in Armor vol. 108, no. 4, p. 21. Fort Knox, KY: US Army Armor Center. ISSN 0004-2420.
  • Von Mellenthin, Major General F. W. (1956). Panzer Battles: A Study of the Employment of Armor in the Second World War, First Ballantine Books Edition, 1971. New York: Ballantine Books. ISBN 0-345-24440-0.
  • Wachowski, Tomasz (2004). "Nieznany T-34" (The Unknown T-34) in Nowa Technika Wojskowa (New Military Equipment) 11/2004, p. 53. Warsaw: Magnum-X. ISSN 1230-1655.
  • Wright, Patrick (2001). Tank: The Progress of a Monstrous War Machine. Viking Adult. ISBN 0-670-03070-8.
  • Zaloga, Steven J., James Grandsen (1983). T-34 in Action, Carrollton, Texas: Squadron/Signal. ISBN 0-89747-112-1.
  • Zaloga, Steven J., James Grandsen (1984). Soviet Tanks and Combat Vehicles of World War Two, London: Arms and Armour Press. ISBN 0-85368-606-8.
  • Zaloga, Steven J., Peter Sarson (1994). T-34 Medium Tank 1941–45 (New Vanguard 9), Oxford: Osprey Publishing. ISBN 1-85532-382-6.
  • Zaloga, Steven J., Jim Kinnear (1996). T-34-85 Medium Tank 1944–94 (New Vanguard 20), Oxford: Osprey Publishing. ISBN 1-85532-535-7.
  • Zaloga, Steven J., Jim Kinnear, Andrey Aksenov & Aleksandr Koshchavtsev (1997). Soviet Tanks in Combat 1941–45: The T-28, T-34, T-34-85, and T-44 Medium Tanks, Hong Kong: Concord Publication. ISBN 962-361-615-5
  • Zaloga, Steven J., Leland S. Ness (1998). Red Army Handbook 1939-1945. Stroud, UK: Sutton Publishing. ISBN 978-0750917407.
  • Zaloga, Steven J., Hugh Johnson (2004). T-54 and T-55 Main Battle Tanks 1944–2004. Oxford: Osprey Publishing. ISBN 1-84176-792-1.
  • Zaloga, Steven J. (2007). Japanese Tanks 1939–45. Oxford: Osprey Publishing. ISBN 978-1-84603-091-8.
  • Zaloga, Steven J. (2010). T-34-85 vs. M26 Pershing, Korea 1950. Oxford: Osprey Publishing, ISBN 978-1-84603-990-4.
  • Zheltov, I., M. Pavlov, I. Pavlov (1999). "Tanki BT. chast 3. Kolyosno-gusenychny tank BT-7" ("BT Tanks, part 3: BT-7 wheeled/tracked tank"), in Armada no. 17, p.13. Moscow.
  • Zheltov, I., M. Pavlov, I. Pavlov (2001). Neizvestnyy T-34 (The Unknown T-34). Moscow: Eksprint. ISBN 5-94038-013-1

External links

Wikimedia Commons has media related to T-34.

This article is issued from Wikipedia - version of the Friday, May 06, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.